A Comprehensive History Of The OAHSPE

The Librarian says –
librarian6
Hi there! You are currently
In the Reading Library—>
World Government section—>
P for Propaganda

 A big topic – indeed.

thelibrary-571786

 

A Comprehensive History Of The OAHSPE

And Its Surrounds – The Oahspe’s Role in British Propaganda

By Virginia McClaughry

 

Introduction

transparent back flashing starHow The Oahspe Was Writtentransparent back flashing star

PDF of the 1882 version of the Oahspe

The Oahspe is a late 1800’s book that has been portrayed as channelings of knowledge from “ancient masters” written by John Ballou Newbrough, the son of an Englishman who had emigrated to the U.S.

John_Ballou_Newbrough_from_thaumat-Oaahspe_1912

The original meaning of the word channeling was primarily limited to referring to a person that would “channel” communications to the living from the spirits of the dead. The person doing such a channeling would pretend to be possessed, or taken over, by the spirit of the dead, who would then “talk” using the living person’s body as a “medium”. This is why the term “medium” often appears together with the term channeling.

channeling ancient masters.
Later, the element of one’s body being taken over by the alleged spirit of the dead, became an either/or affair. This is most easily seen concurrent with the beginnings of a new type of propaganda hoax in the 1800’s – the channeling of “ancient masters”.

The most famous (simply defined as well-known) were, without fail, either directly a result of the efforts of intelligence agents of the British Empire-builders or were brought into public prominence by one.

In the last case – this was undertaken in order to either mislead the public into wasting time in such an endeavor or to shoot down publicly certain ideas that are unsettling to those with something to hide.

Telepathy and mind-reading, as they termed them. Those who can converse together without going through the bodily senses or hearing or voice, and those who can see into another’s mind. The first was labeled telepathy by an SPR member, the second seems to not really have a definitive term assigned to it even now, other than the colloquial term ‘mind-reading’.

Telepathy, as most people understand it, should be better portrayed. Along that line, I created this image for a friend of mine.

telepathy - just talkin really - diagram

The author of Oahspe, falls under the modified meaning of channeling, meaning he claimed that he acted as a medium only in the sense that “angels” told him what to write. It’s a variation of the “ancient masters” idea, obviously. But, he also claimed to have been influenced by ‘automatic writing” . That falls under the first meaning of channeling, only in this case the ‘ancient master’ takes control of the writing (or typing in Newbrough’s case). Apparently, when a “beam of light” fell over his fingers, off he went on a 50-week typing binge.

I’ll let this New York Times article from November 21, 1884 fill in the picture for you.

new_york_times_article_-_oahspe_and_newborough_1884

.

sword divider2

Section 1

transparent back flashing starThe Publishing of OAHSPEtransparent back flashing star

The same New York Times article mentions an interesting tidbit concerning who published this new Bible.

…an association of seven members, whose names, however, Dr. Newbrough would not give.

This is an obvious reference to the “Oahspe Publishing Association”.

The agreement between the seven members of the association, whose names he had refused to give, called, he said, for $100,000. The association or Oahspe Lodge of Faithists…

A name shows up in association with this small print shop, or “Association”. There were at least two “temperance” publications printed by the same shop, in the same year. They both utilize the name of Mrs. Elizabeth Thompson.

The first example I found is called Figures of Hell, and it can be found in the Internet Archive.

The second example was troubling to me. It is titled Kindergarten Homes for Orphans and other destitute children; A New Way to Ultimately Dispense with Prisons and Poor-Houses.

kindergarten_Homes_as_a_way_to_empty_prisons_by_oashpe_pub_thompson_1882

I have to admit, a title like that combined with the content and supposed delivery of the OAHSPE? Made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up.

Going after the children this early? And from an obvious propaganda campaign using angelic messengers channeling their new “scientific” word of god? That has got to be part of an intelligence operation of the British – guaranteed.

The name “Your Reporter” was obviously a pseudonym for Newbrough and his “friends”. A fact which becomes painfully obvious when you read the introduction to Kindergarten Homes. It is rife with appealingly colorfulYour Reporter” = John Newbrough reasons galore as to why no-one has ever seen this “Mrs. T.” In fact, Newbrough et al. employ two pseudonyms in this book, that of “your reporter” and Mrs. Thompson. Conversations are carried on that are reminiscent of two sock-puppets talking to each other – both controlled by the unnamed actual author.

yourreporter and mrs thompson

That can be a quite entertaining method of writing, but in light of the subject matter and what was being presented or offered? I think in this case educational is a better description, because you get to watch an intelligence con-artist operation live and first hand. Skim over a few pages, you’ll see what I mean.

I think my particular favorite excerpt from the opening pages, is this:

People do not know how to live.

I can’t think of a more perfect example of an arrogantly superior “Enlightened Us” versus “lazy them” imperialistic attitude.

And if that doesn’t tear your eyebrows off the top of your head – look at “Mrs. Thompson” solution.

Mrs T. said, “That is it, exactly. We should gather up in infancy those who are likely to become inmates of poor-houses, asylums and prisons.”

That is a truly scary statement.

terrible ideas - baby sorting

For one thing, one wonders immediately how and by whom, is this “likely” criteria established?

For another, the bulk of the greatest (and most formidable) opponents of the British nobles and their overseers – as Thomas Jefferson referred to them – were not born rich, nor were they part of any ‘nobility’.

American Presidents Jefferson and Jackson are prime examples.Those two alone may have more than a little bearing on why a ‘baby sorter’ would be something that would be even desired at all.

The fact that there is sock-puppetry being employed in this Kindergarten Homes book, brings into question the other book published by this Oahspe publishing company – Figures of Hell.

I am not surprised to have found out (and I believe I may be the first to do so) that Newbrough and buddies were using pen names to front essentially British Eugenics propaganda ideas.

sword divider2

Section 1-1

– The Publishing of the OAHSPE –

transparent back flashing starBritish Society of Psychical Researchtransparent back flashing star

The end of Kindergarten Homes contains quite a large section promoting The OAHSPE book, with various reviews by “orientalists” and scholars singing its praises – all highly entertaining of course, but transparently obvious as being purely a Cecil-Bloc tactic of promotion.

But, there was something very important included there as well – an address for the London Publisher.

J. Burns 15 Southhampton Row, High, Holborn, London, England

Oahspe_London_publisher_goes_to_SPR

.

The Medium and Daybreak was a British weekly journal on Spiritualism, and it also listed the same J. Burns as publisher – but the first page of the PDF I linked to gives a more complete description of this publishing concern.

medium_and_daybreak_index_1885.

It says J. Burns, Progressive Library and Spiritual Institution with the same address of 15 Southampton Row, High Holborn, W.C.

Open Library lists items that show that this publishing concern began its output at the same time that the earliest beginning of the SPR – 1872.

J_Burns_SPR_1872.

You’ll notice that the first item is from 1876 by Mary F. Davis; the second is by Charles Bradlaugh in 1872. Another pamphlet called Work or Revolution by M.M was also made available by J. Burns (amongst others) in 1885 – and I think this pamphlet had something to do with the rise of Communism.

So, since this is obviously a forming SPR publishing concern, it’s not much of a surprise to see that William Crookes first researches were published by this very same J. Burns.

.

Screenshot of Esalen website page –

screenshot_esalen_website.

William Crookes was one of the first SPR members. J. Burns is James Burns. This book provides some of the details (starting on p. 33) concerning this Progressive Library business. Burns had started his library in 1862, but it wasn’t until the forming SPR days that certain books found their way to him to be published – meaning they were chosen to be propagated by the SPR. This book (starting on p. 286) provides a highly colorful description of what Spiritualists were “spreading” from London throughout the world. Not only is it sometimes clearly counter-Christianity, it also serves as an excellent example of that this was a BRITISH PLAN.

A couple of examples.

…a psychological star has risen

…ministering spirits are working with us for the world’s redemption.

…sowing the seeds of heavenly harvests

…In the kingdom of Great Britain, the realm of thought

…The army of Spiritualists is constituted of millions of devoted followers. It is throwing from the press, constantly, books, pamphlets, monthlies and weeklies…

…Our friend Burns is sending books, not only to the Continent, not only to Australia and New Zealand, but to the farthest isle of the Ocean

…I can not let the moment pass without speaking of the Progressive Library, under the supervision of our friend James Burns. This is ‘the Banner-of-Light’ Institution of Great Britain. It is a center, a grand rallying-place, for Spiritualists from every point of the compass.

…[Burns] devising other means for the propagation of a broad, free, unsectarian Spiritualism.

Its banner floats to-day beneath all skies…immortality for all the races of men.

The introduction of “spiritualism” started with British subject, (Scotsman) William Gregory, who in 1813 had published a book titled Animal Magentism: or Mesmerism and its phenomena.  It was dedicated to George Douglas-Campbell Duke of Argyll .

Who is that?

Well, George Douglas Campbell was a close associate of Prince Albert, and in 1866 served under the Lord Henry Temple Palmerston administration, in which position he was notable as a strong advocate of the Northern cause in the American Civil War. In 1871, while actually serving in the Cabinet, his son and heir, Lord Lorne, married one of Queen Victoria’s daughters, Princess Louise, putting him directly in the Royal Family.

President Lincoln apparently saw threw such panderings of the British (they were not against slavery, they were against a freed and independent America) and had allegedly said: The British aristocracy believed “a slaveocracy’s better than no ‘ocracy at all.

Palmerston tried to get that back to being “not known as true” by extending diplomatic recognition and military protection to the Confederate States in 1862.

So, there that book Magnetism book sat for nigh onto almost 40 years, until suddenly the Brits decide to resurrect it just prior to the American Civil War, interestingly enough. Nothing like a little distraction of the people, eh?

Gregory’s book had contained records of “supernormal occurrences” and accounts were published from time to time in the mesmerist journal Zoist.

An American “medium” was brought to Britain to be paraded around and publicly made “known” to the world. Maria B. Hayden, who arrived in 1852, stayed for almost a year, and returned in 1853.

In 1854, at the age of 83, and despite his previous antipathy to religion, Robert Owen (see later section about him and secularism) was converted to spiritualism after a series of alleged “sittings” with Maria B. Hayden. Owen then “seeded the farm” with a public profession of his new faith in his publication The Rational quarterly review and later wrote a pamphlet entitled: The future of the Human race; or great glorious and future revolution to be effected through the agency of departed spirits of good and superior men and women.

Just from that title alone, you can see that he is simply helping update the #1 Slavemaster Propaganda of Tabula Rasa – writing on the Blank slate of man. (more on that later)

Owen claimed to have had mediumistic contact with the spirits of Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and others, who, of course, conveniently told him that the purpose of their communications was “to change the present, false, disunited and miserable state of human existence, for a true, united and happy state … to prepare the world for universal peace, and to infuse into all the spirit of charity, forbearance and love.”

Next, we get the “great medium” D.D. Home, who was received by all the very best people enthusiastically. Some of them (including novelist William Thackeray, Anthony Trollope, Robert Bell, Rosicrucian Bulwer Lytton, and Lord Brougham) were said to have been deeply impressed but “kept quiet for fear of public ridicule”.

Sure that’s why.

So, that’s a little background on what’s going on around all this Progressive Library business, that Burns had started in 1862.

Note: Burns was also later be one of the means of helping Helena Blavatsky become more well-known to the public, so that she could “do her thing” as a humanist agent as well. (See: The Medium and Daybreak (London), March 15, 1889, p. 165)

.

James Burns

James Burns.

The Society for Psychical Research (SPR)was formally established in 1882 by the Arthur Balfour family and their in-laws, Lord Rayleigh and Professor Sidgwick, although work had already begun privately in 1871.

They had been deliberately planting and staging seriously fake “spiritual” encounters.

Here’s a couple of examples:

.

.

I mean look at this stuff – it’s so bad it literally can’t be natural. The woman in what looks to be a bunch of sheets trying to look possessed is…I can’t even think of the word.

These British slavemaster agents did all this in order to then have an excuse to “call for an investigation” and then they could engage in researching what they were really interested in (and worried about) – telepathy and mind-reading.

In fact, the whole rise of “spiritualism” was actually sponsored and brought to light by these people.

All the way into the twentieth century the SPR continued to be dominated by later members of the Cecil Bloc who were also members of the Round Table.7

The primary Cecil Bloc intelligence tactic at the time, was sometimes loosely referred to as “the Toynbee method”.

This basically consisted of privately coming together and studying an area to be controlled (or destroyed), then coming up with a plan, then beginning the public launch usually with a “need for investigation” of fraud or some such, accompanied by various forms of press and books being “reviewed” to bring public attention to the area now under the auspices of a black intelligence operation of the British Slavemasters.

Such was the case with the later publicly well-known Society for Psychical Research. The slavemaster handlers and agents were working covertly, seeding the area with fraud and so on (which attracted others who were not agents to try their hand), once it became a “phenomenon” – they first loosely associated and investigated (while further seeding the field and gaining intel), then moved onto outright public assault on the areas of spiritual abilities.

It is of note that some of the SPR presidents included Henri Bergson and Arthur J. Balfour.

.

Arthur Balfour – member of the Cecil family

Founding person of Society of Psychical Research, as Prime Minister he formed Committee of Imperial Defense 1902, which is the committee that recommends formation of MI5 and MI6..

Balfour’s mother was the sister of Lord Salisbury, the full name and titles of Lord Salisbury are – Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil, Viscount Cranborne and third Marquess of Salisbury. Arthur was who later called for the formation of MI6, and also served as Prime Minister of England.

Balfour is obvious as to why he was “in charge” visibly at the time, but Bergson may not be so obvious to those of you new to this area of history. For one thing, Bergson’s sister Mina was one of the founding members of the Golden Dawn Society, yet another intelligence front group that Aleister Crowley, MI6 agent, was also involved with. It was an “occult” society, an intelligence cover.

The same type of cover that has been used by the Cecil Bloc slavemasters all the way since the time of Queen Elizabeth – the “occult” activities of Walsingham spy Dr. Dee are just one example.

The Golden Dawn itself was an outcropping of another occult front group that later became founded officially in 1884 as The Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor, but had informally begun in 1873.

In that time period, some of the people that were acting as agents for the Slavemasters for their “spiritualism” occult operation, were Peter Davidson, Frank Olcott, Helena Blavatsky, Carl Kellner, Thomas Dalton ‘Burgoyne’, Albert Faucheux, Pascal Beverly Randolph and Max Theon.

Max Theon (1850-1927) was a Polish immigrant working in London as a psychic healer. Theon was also an occult teacher specializing in teaching his students the means of contacting various ‘beings’. Under Theon, Thomas Dalton began to pretend to channel material from these beings, known as the Interior Circle.

Albert Faucheux (pseudonym of F. Charles Barlet) was also a member, while at the same time being billed as the “Great Master of the Kabalística Order of the Rose-Croix” at the time, making him a Rosicrucian in the grand tradition of spymaster agent and Cecil family member Francis Bacon, Imperator of the Rosicrucians in the time of Queen Elizabeth.

Pascal Randolph was used by Aleister Crowley later on in his O.T.O as “inspirational”. What, specifically that meant, was that Pascal’s work Eulis! The History of Love in 1874. This book detailed how to make a “magick child” (something L. Ron Hubbard would attempt as well years later) but more importantly, Crowley particularly liked promoting Pascal’s ritual of using what he called the “nuptive moment” (orgasm) as the time to make a “prayer” for events to occur.”

There are certainly some very colorful characters running around in this time period, to put it mildly.

Meanwhile –

Our front man James Burns was acting as “the” center for arranging seances and so on as well as a promoter of the “Vegetarian Society”.

Anna Kingsford (later Theosophy head in Britain) hooks up with Burns and begins helping to promote a Darwinist view of the spirit as being some form of matter, that can be enlightened by what it eats. In a letter to Edward Maitland she wrote: “I know that in proportion as man abandons the diet of flesh and blood, and observes that of fruit and grain, his spirit becomes purer, higher, and diviner.

This little gem of an idea sarcasm would evolve into the whole personality-equals-chemicals propaganda that is modern Biological Psychiatry.

What is that?

They arbitrarily decided that mental disorder stems from the biological malfunctioning of the brain and nervous system. Hence, some of the so-called treatments that stem from this are insulin shock, psychiatric drugs, transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy.

There is even a Society just for this. In 1945, a small band of psychiatrists formed the Society of Biological Psychiatry allegedly in response to the “U.S. infatuation with psychoanalysis”, advocating the development of neuroscience in consideration of psychiatric conditions.

It was these men, that also fronted the psychiatric drug industry, including Lithium, imipramine, clorpromazine, and so on – some VERY nasty drugs. They also linked together with the British intelligence front here in the U.S., the OSS, later named the CIA, to continue to research ways to control the minds of men.

The first President of the society, was J.M. Nielsen, in 1947.

For those of you familiar with the concepts inherent in Scientology and Dianetics –

Guess what was the name of a book that Nielsen wrote…

enid_markey - hmmm

The Engrammes of Psychiatry

 

L Ron Hubbard used that term!

vincent - excuse me

In point of fact, he did, but not at first. At first he called these “recordings” norns. It wasn’t until the release of Dianetics in 1950 that he called them “engrams”. This article by Nielsen and Thompson was first published in 1947, just three years before Hubbard’s supposed “discoveries”. Isn’t it funny, that while Hubbard would later bitch and moan about the “evil” psychiatrists? Meanwhile, he was literally in total lockstep with the whole plan, the whole time.

As you can see, this “biological” view of the mind and spirit, this Anna Kingsford propaganda promoting a Darwinian physical view of the spirit as being some form of matter, that can be enlightened by what it eats, is an excellent example of the earliest moves towards the torturing procedures that would become “biological psychiatry”.

If you look at even the meaning of the word psychiatry – through the spirit – added together with “biological”, perhaps you may not take such a soft view of what might appear to be “enlightening” philosophies.

There is a much darker intent behind all that.

They couch it in “ancient masters” and Fairy Tales –

in the hopes that you won’t see that freight train of horror coming behind the mists of their lies.

dark train comin

They aim to present in this book the anatomy and physiology of human behavior…

– JAMA, Biological Psychiatry Society – 1947.

 

As part of the overall push along that same “scientific” line begun in the 1800’s, in 1873 Dr. Alfred Russel Wallace comes out publicly with his conclusion that “after painstakingly investigating Spiritualism” for a number of years, he found that “its phenomena were proved quite as well as the facts of any other science.” Dr. Wallace was the co-founder and writer of “Theory of Evolution” with Charles Darwin!

I told you they were trying to reinvent spirit as being a form of matter – is that something or what? Yet again, this conjunction of Darwinism with Spiritualism reveals the utter solidarity of all these supposedly independent subjects as being controlled by the same group of men – British Slavemasters.

This is also why Frederic Myers (SPR) tried so hard to present as “fact” that spirit and spiritual abilities (as they are classified) had some kind of scientific laws just like matter. For a full discussion of Frederic Myers seminal work on this titled: The Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death, please see my husband’s Scientology Roots chapter on the subject.

The particular passages I am referring to, bear some further discussion at this time because they offer such a clear view into this one major part of the overall plan begun in the late 1800’s by the Slavemasters.That being the re-characterizing a person, life, as subject to the laws of matter and physics – a Darwinian Spiritualism, as I call it.

Myers book is contained in two volumes, links are provided with the passages quoted. The first passage is where he first presents his basic premise on which he lays all subsequent ideas upon.

The needed clue, as I believe, can be afforded only by the discovery of laws affecting primarily that unseen or spiritual plane of being where I imagine the origin of life to lie.

If we can suppose telepathy to be a first indication of a law of this type, and to occupy in the spiritual world some such place as gravitation occupies in the material world, we might imagine something analogous to the force of cohesion as operating in the psychical contexture of a human personality. Such a personality… involves the aggregation of countless minor psychical entities…

– The Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death by Frederic Myers, Volume I, Chapter 2 Disintegrations of Personality

Did you catch the logical error there?

Let me break it down.

If we can suppose…

There is his introduction to his SUPPOSITION.

…telepathy to be a first indication of a law of this type…

There is his positioning of telepathy corresponding to a LAW.

Why is that a problem?

Well, what’s the word LAW mean here.

One source has it as:

A law in science is a generalized rule to explain a body of observations in the form of a verbal or mathematical statement. Scientific laws imply a cause and effect between the observed elements and must always apply under the same conditions.

Scientific laws do not try to explain the ‘why’ the observed event happens, but only that the event actually occurs the same way over and over.

Let’s go with that – paying particular intention to this: “must always apply under the same conditions“.

That is where Myers (and Darwin, for that matter) are going off the proverbial cliff.

Since they can not actually SEE or MEASURE telepathy, in every case, all the time, purely using the bodily senses (which is what Slavemaster science is limited to) – you can see that what you would get would be purely based on machine readings and so on.

All a machine might do, is A: send a message that can be received by a body, and B: record possible reception of such a message in brainwaves.

By such a message, I mean it would have to be either sent or reconverted into energy for them to even have anything to “see”.

If it is NOT done that way? They are blind.Flawed reason.

You see, they are pre-supposing that the body must receive and react to such messages before they can be “heard” or realized, and that is their flawed reason.

From that flawed foundation, they then try to have what are called “spiritual” abilities conform to the laws of Matter. It is arrogant to an extreme, to assume that even if there were laws, that they would follow (emulate) the laws of matter!

And that’s exactly where Myers goes next.

…and to occupy in the spiritual world some such place as gravitation occupies in the material world.

The fact that he uses the term “gravitation” also clearly shows that he wants to liken Spirituality to ENERGY – which is what gravity is really all about.

He then tries to explain that love is “like” gravity – and we’re off to the races.

Love is a kind of exalted, but unspecialised telepathy;—the simplest and most universal expression of that mutual gravitation or kinship of spirits which is the foundation of the telepathic law.

– The Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death by Frederic Myers
Volume I, Chapter 5 Hypnosis

Gravity is ENERGY caused (magnetic). It can be broken and changed – and that’s the key here.They want to believe…

That is why these people want to characterize the spiritual world to be “having laws”.

.

SO IT CAN BE MANIPULATED.

.

They want to believe in their own Fairy Tales – that they can manipulate spiritual things the same way that they can manipulate physical things.

To this day, they still cannot come even close to proving there are such laws, in the sense of how they define scientific law – an outside force that always responds in the same way under their contrived conditions.

They can certainly manipulate what the brain receives, that is a fact. But their real concerns, telepathy and especially mind-reading? They have no way of knowing or proving physically 100 percent of the time, when and if it is happening to them; they have no way of knowing if they are successfully “reading” the complete mind of someone else.

The problem here is not that these things don’t exist. It is that they do NOT follow their “laws” which are always founded in what matter does, or doesn’t do.

Case in point – Myers then tries to take atomic and molecular laws and apply them to any individual person!

Meaning, if the “whole” is water, what are it’s parts? type of thing.

…it is the soul in man which links him with other souls… We are every one members one of another. Like atoms, like suns, like galaxies, our spirits are systems of forces which vibrate continually to each other’s attractive power.

– The Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death by Frederic Myers
Volume I, Chapter 5 Hypnosis

There is also the element added of “attractive power” – with its implications that one is “forced” (like gravity) to attract to someone else. Yet another example of something they would dearly love to control – what and who someone likes or doesn’t like.

See the arrogance there? How dare they assume that anyone could have such control over someone else on the order of “drop an apple and it will fall.” How dare they even have that as a goal!

It is with much pleasure, that I have repeatedly proven the idiocy and falseness of such ideas – such alice-in-wonderland lies are eternally open season, in my opinion, and deserve to be shot with impunity as the clay pigeons that they are.

Coming back to our first Darwin crosses Spiritualism man – Wallace, these “previous investigations” Wallace refers to happen to also coincide with the founding of the concept of Scientology by Stephen Pearl Andrews. Andrews was another mouthpiece that went along with this Darwinian Spiritualism baloney, and in his book he said that Scientology will re-assert and vindicate Spiritualistic Realities. He also said that Scientology would be developed in the spirit of the Exact Sciences.

Note: I don’t have any disagreement with spiritual abilities being FACT, because they are. I have complete disagreement with any idea that pre-supposes that a spirit can be controlled like an apple with gravity – by “laws”. If Earth’s definition of Science (as it seems to) only includes “scientific” as meaning can be observed by the body – then no wonder it is so backward in so many things.

Scientology is therefore Universology developed in the spirit of the Exact Sciences, and is wholly new in kind. It is the Core or Centre and the most distinctive Department of Universology… (page 37)

Scientology will re-assert and vindicate… Spiritualistic Realities and Tendencies…
(page 146)

It will be the supreme triumph of Scientology, the Exact Branch of this new Universal Science, to exhibit in Diagram, and by illustrative object-teaching, all the Root-thoughts of which the Human Mind is capable… (page 165)

– Stephen Pearl Andrews, The Primary Synopsis of Universology and Alwato, The New Scientific Universal Language – available at the Internet Archive.

Clearly yet another outcropping of propaganda, I’d be willing to bet that this book may have even been published in some form by our friend Mr. Burns in London, in order to help with that “devising other means for the propagation of a broad, free, unsectarian Spiritualism.” he was tasked to accomplish.

Meanwhile –

That same year, (1873) our Oahspe publisher James Burns, together with Charles Williams had arranged a seance that Frederic Myers (later SPR founder) attended. Frederic, helping to forward the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor and channeling ideas of Blavatsky, recounts this experience as having “felt the hand of Williams’ spirit guide, John King, melt away to nothing while he was still holding it.” John King is the same spirit-guide that Blavatsky promoted she was in communion with.

Immediately following this, Frederick Myers, Henry Sidgwick and Edmund Gurney were tasked by their handler Arthur Balfour to form a publicly visible association (as opposed to their previous private one) of those who were interested in investigating the paranormal – called informally The Sidgwick Group in 1874. Of course, immediately thereafter, Arthur Balfour, his sister Eleanor, his sister Evelyn (married to Lord Rayleigh) Walter Leaf, Stanton Moses and Lord Rayleigh himself (AKA John William Strutt) all joined up. They were all wealthy Cecil Bloc personages with plenty of time to perform their “investigations”. This is the earliest beginnings of what would become the SPR in 1882.

Note: The pictures below all get larger if you click on them.

The outer cover story* is that the Sidgwick Group was formed for “the purpose of investigating mediums and Spiritualistic seances.” That’s obviously where our Oashpe publisher James Burns comes in – remember, he was the “center” for arranging such Seances and happenings.

*Cover (sometimes called “legend”) – The identity you give an agent in the field.

Later on – 1882 – Sir William Fletcher Barrett provided the “idea” (with back-channel prompting) to form the Society for Psychical Research while he was in Dublin. The shore story goes, that he decided to “leave that up to” Henry Sidgwick, Frederic WH Myers, and Edmund Gurney – which if you notice, provides the distance needed from the real handlers – the Cecil men.

Edmund_Gurney,_Henry_Sidgwick_and_Frederick_Myers_-_Society_for_Psychical_Research

The real concern of the SPR, in its quest for turning spirit into matter with all the rules of matter – was that they were concerned with the idea of thought transference actually being real. So, in the spirit of Darwinian Spiritualism, the very first published investigation was headed by Myers into this arena – whereby he invented the term telepathy and compatriot agent William Crookes then characterized it as being “like” radiation waves. A form of matter, of course.

There is much more that could be said about the SPR men and their beginnings, but for the purposes of this article I am mainly including it so that you can see just how massive this intelligence operation actually was – and how the Oahspe fit into it.

Now, in the run-up during the 1870’s (to the 1882 publishing of the Oahspe) there were several other simultaneously occurring events that well illustrate how connected these agents all were. Particularly 1873 was practically a whirlwind of coinciding moves and operations – the Slavemasters were really, really, in a hurry that year.

Briefly, here are some of the other moves going on at the same time as the Cecil Bloc SPR men started to go more public.

1873 is when Charles Watts senior, the founding secretary of the National Secular Society, took charge of a well-established secularist printing and publishing business in Johnson’s Court, in order to help spread the propaganda even more. Just a few years later, he turned it over to his son Charles Watts Jr., who is our George Holyoake —> Elizabeth Thompson connection.

Charles Watts Sr.
Charles Watts (senior)

Both Felix Adler and Helena Blavatsky were tasked to bring the two different “versions” of this same agenda of making over man – to America. They arrived within a month of each other in New York, in 1873. Felix had just graduated from Heidelberg University with a doctorate in Philosophy. He was tasked to do the more reformed-Judaism humanist version, soon to become the Ethical Culture Society (humanism); she was tasked with the more occult/spiritualist version, soon to become the Theosophical Society.

                                Adler and Blavatsky

Felix_Adler_1920 Helena Blavatsky - trying to do her gypsy crone imitation

Sergei Stepniak (real name Sergius Michaelovitch Kravchinski) was a fellow agent of Blavatsky’s. He was tasked with promoting a propagandic version of democracy (some call it Communism) in Russia in 1873.

sergei stepniak

His efforts were part of the British desire to bring down all other King/Queen rulers but themselves and the Netherlands.

As part of a plan to help spread this by bringing it to the Russian public’s attention – Sergei gets arrested in 1874 for “secretly sowing the sentiments of democracy among the peasants.” Of course, (sarcastically speaking) he successfully “escaped” to London where his campaign became even more vigorous against the ruling family of Russia, making him an instrumental element leading up to the overthrow of the Russian monarchy, culminating in the Bolshevik revolution.

So –

When that description I quoted revealed that: “In the kingdom of Great Britain, the realm of thought..the army of Spiritualists is throwing from the press, constantly, books, pamphlets, monthlies and weeklies” ?

You can now very clearly see just what that really was – an intelligence operation led by British Spymasters and agents.

Such as – James Burns, the London publisher of the Oashpe.

sword divider2

Section 1-2

– The Publishing of the OAHSPE –

transparent back flashing starWho Was Elizabeth Thompson?transparent back flashing star

What I do know is that in the Kindergarten Homes book, (obviously written by John Newbrough) her name is being used as some sort of attention-getter to help spread a specific agenda – a British one.

a specific agendaBut, who was she? What was her role in all this? To answer this question, I conducted some research into Elizabeth’s background, her agendas, and her connections.

There are a number of descriptions of her available historically but most of them struck me as over-the-top – as in disinformation somehow.

Appletons’ Cyclopaedia of American Biography, Volume 6 does have a relatively straightforward biography of her.

She gave $1,000 to the American association for the advancement of science in 1883, and was made its first patron. In 1885 she placed in the hands of a board of trustees, chosen for that purpose, $25,000, to be devoted to the advancement and prosecution of scientific research in its broadest sense. This trust, known as the “Elizabeth Thompson science fund,” is to be controlled by the International scientific congress.

Just what are those named items?

The AAAS

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) was founded September 20, 1848, in Pennsylvania.

Elizabeth was a “patron” of this association*, where a patron was simply defined as having donated $1000.

*Citation: Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1883) p. XXXL

.

The Elizabeth Thompson Science Fund

The book Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900-1945 by Robert E. Kohler, shows a history of her relationship with the AAAS and also discusses the creation of the Elizabeth Thompson Science Fund.

The Chemical News and Journal of Physical Science, Volume 59 of June 18 1889, p 314. shows an announcement of the fund and that it has a Board of Trustees.

The Board members are named in an 1885 issue of The American Naturalist, in the “Scientific News” section, p 1250.

They are: Henry P. Bowditch, Francis A. Walker, William Minot, Jr., and Charles S. Minot.

The 25K was presented in trust to these men to be used in a particular manner.

…the means of ennobling and promoting investigation and the study of science for the sake of science and the benefit of mankind.

They stated an overview of what direction they wanted these studies to take.

…the advancement of human knowledge or the benefit of mankind in general.

The first grant was slated to be made early in January, 1886.

Elizabeth was also part of trying to put Britain and America together by forming the International Scientific Congress that would be jointly run by the British and America associations for the advancement of science, but that never materialized and instead she put the money into the private science fund.Part of a much larger plan.

Now that last, that British dual control of American research, was part of a much larger plan that Thompson was helping forward there (or trying to).

If we look at another quote from the biography about her, we start to see the ugly head of the Empire-builders begin to show even more.

Mrs. Thompson has agitated the question of the possibility of an international republic, or a world governed by laws emanating from an intelligent community. The value of this idea has been recognized by statesmen at home and abroad. The publication of a journal in England advocating her views has been announced by George J. Holyoake.
Appletons’ Cyclopaedia of American Biography, Volume 6

Now we are getting somewhere. See that name, George J. Holyoake?

.

That’s a really bad connection.

One that leads straight into the heart of the British propaganda machine.

sword divider2

Section 1-3

– The Publishing of the OAHSPE –

transparent back flashing starNewbrough—>Thompson—>Holyoaketransparent back flashing star

Meet George Holyoake.
200px-Holyoake2

You might wonder why Elizabeth Thompson’s views would be given a PR positioning of “recognized by statesmen at home and abroad” and then doing a little name-dropping of George Holyoake. That’s because of who and what Holyoake was with – the first rumblings of the latest evolution of the British master plan to restructure the world.

Why Elizabeth Thompson was given such star treatment regarding her views is directly part of that plan. But, you see, back then in the 1880’s, they weren’t calling it the New World Order yet – or the League of Nations (another interim title for the same plan).

They were calling it –

An ‘International Republic’.

.

“Where the world is governed by laws from anthese words don’t mean what you think they do… intelligent community.”

That sounds like it might be good, but these words don’t mean what you think they do when they are used as part of a Slavemaster Plan.The key here is the idiom “intelligent community”.

Can you think why? I’ll give you a hint, the word intelligent is key. Quite literally, if you substituted the “t” for a “c” – making the word intelligence (spies and such) – you’d pretty much have the accurate picture.

Also important, is the word REPUBLIC.

.

Do you think you know what that means?

You don’t.

Let me qualify that – I’ll bet you only know what it has been changed to mean.

You might like to see how Thomas Jefferson explains the terms republic and democracy. Considering he was one of the main founders of the Republic of The United States, with tongue firmly in cheek I say to you, it might just be possible that he knows what he’s talking about.

Note: In the below quote the “They” is referring to the “tinsel aristocracy” as Jefferson elsewhere refers to them. He is always quite clear about what he thinks about the false superiority of the British nobility and other such forms. Jefferson writes:

They knew no medium between a democracy (the only pure republic, but impracticable beyond the limits of a town) and an abandonment of themselves to an aristocracy, or a tyranny independent of the people. It seems not to have occurred that where the citizens can not meet to transact their business in person, they alone have the right to choose the agents who shall transact it: and that in this way a republican, or popular government, of (the second grade of purity) may be exercised over any extent of country. The full experiment of a government, democratical, but representative, was and is still reserved for us.

…The introduction of this new principle of representative democracy has rendered useless almost everything written before on the structure of government: and, in a great measure, relieves our regret, if the political writings of Aristotle, or of any other ancient, have been lost, or are unfaithfully rendered or explained to us.

Jefferson Cyclopedia p.51 (nbr 486)

Really take some time to think about every word of that – it is absolutely brilliant. It is very, very important to note that Jefferson makes extremely clear that this is a new principle.

.

New.

– as in – never existed like that before.

The next time you see some ill-informed or downright argumentative person try to tell you that our system was founded on some ancient Greek or Jewish/Christian one? Show them this.

It also clearly shows the absolutely ridiculous nature of the supposedly American political parties of Republican and Democrat. You do note they are opposed to each other, right? That justRepublican and Democrat in opposition now! about says it all, where that idea came from.

The declamatio version of what a Republic is what had been heavily propagated by the British as being “ancient Greek” or Roman – starting in the 1700’s or so. This most often took the form of the writings or ideas of “Aristotle” – but was by no means limited to just that name. And it is just a name. There is no real proof whatsoever that there ever was anyone named Aristotle, or that he said half the things it is alleged that he said.

Declamatio – adopting the persona of an allegedly ancient figure to express a particular viewpoint or perspective.

.

One of the ways you can tell these views were declamatio (even if you didn’t know anything else) is that the espoused views of a Republic were highly imperialistic oriented, and the views of Democracy are predominantly negative and consist of the horrors of the idea of the “mob” ruling. This is a dead give away as to who really wrote all that, and when.

Jefferson knew this. Look at the last line again, of what he said about Republic and Democracy, particularly the part I have colored.

The introduction of this new principle of representative democracy has rendered useless almost everything written before on the structure of government: and, in a great measure, relieves our regret, if the political writings of Aristotle, or of any other ancient, have been lost, or are unfaithfully rendered or explained to us.

The last three phrases are particularly well-chosen by Jefferson. These supposed writings of Aristotle, Jefferson had studied and knew there was nothing like what he described in them.

He attacks the true source of the propaganda definitions and descriptions of Republic and Democracy – the British, without naming them specifically – where he says “have been lost” and “unfaithfully rendered”.

He’s saying (without saying it) that he thinks these British presentations of “ancient” writings are bogus, plus he also attacks the teachers and “scholars” for doing such a thing when he says “or explained to us”.

“Us” being the students or readers of this drivel called “the political writings of Aristotle“.

Aristotle, portrayed as an “ancient Greek philosopher” was one of the first slavemaster-talking-to-himself sockpuppets to be used.

.

slave chains

.

Aristotle thought that slavery was a natural thing and that human beings came in two types – slaves and non-slaves. “Slavery is a natural thing?”

Some people, he said, were born natural slaves and ought to be slaves under any circumstances. Other people were born to rule these slaves, could use these slaves as they pleased and could treat them as property.

Aristotle_on_slavery

Natural slaves were slaves because their souls weren’t complete – they lacked certain qualities, such as the ability to think properly, and so they needed to have masters to tell them what to do.“They needed Masters.”

It’s clear that Aristotle thinks that slavery was good for those who were born natural slaves, as without masters they wouldn’t have known how to run their lives. You can see the early beginnings of the “tabula rasa” idea here too.

In fact Aristotle seems to have thought that slaves were ‘living tools’ rather like domestic animals, fit only for physical labour.

Aristotle_on_slavery_2

Slaves were not totally incapable of thought, but they only needed minimal amount of rational ability; just enough to understand and carry out their duties. Similarly, slaves were not devoid of ‘virtue’, but once again, they only needed just enough to carry out their duties. But that ‘virtue’ was enough for them to be treated as human beings.

Aristotle didn’t provide any sensible practical method of recognizing these ‘natural slaves’, and without that it’s inevitable that some people will be made slaves who should not be.

However, since the late 1800′s when this declamatio was first mass-media’d – Tavistock Brit John Rawlings Rees did discuss a so-called “practical” method of assessing men. That’s what the personality and intelligence testing research (especially during World War II) was about.

Some people, per Rees, just weren’t fit for anything other than manual labor. Sound familiar?

There are few aspects of social medicine more important than this. Aldous Huxley in his book Brave New World was planning to produce a section of subnormal men who would do the dull jobs of the community: we don’t really need to produce them for there are too many already. If we can employ them, and if we care for their morale, i.e. their mental health, there will be fewer of them and as a group they will be contributors to the life of the community and not consumers or problem makers. 6

– John Rawlings Rees, The Shaping of Psychiatry by War 1945

Aristotle also had a category of ‘legal slaves’; they weren’t natural slaves but through bad luck – perhaps being taken prisoner in war – they just happened to be slaves at a particular time.

Aristotle argued that:

If the world was just, the legal slaves would be freed, and if any natural slaves were by chance free, they should be made slaves. 5

When Thomas Jefferson said what he did, now you can get an even clearer picture of just how well he said it and what he meant.

The introduction of this new principle of representative democracy has rendered useless almost everything written before on the structure of government: and, in a great measure, relieves our regret, if the political writings of Aristotle, or of any other ancient, have been lost, or are unfaithfully rendered or explained to us.— Thomas Jefferson

The fact that Jefferson IS attacking these declamatio Aristotle writings as such (put together with many examples of his views regarding the British aristocracy and merchants) shows that he knows that the supposedly Aristotle based glowing descriptions of Republic and nasty views of Democracy are exactly what the British wanted people to think about these ideas.

So, with all that in mind – look again at what fabulous “views” our Oahspe publisher Mrs. Thompson had, that were so glowingly described as “accepted” and that propagandist George Holyoake was going to publish in a pamphlet.

Mrs. Thompson has agitated the question of the possibility of an international republic, or a world governed by laws emanating from an intelligent community. The value of this idea has been recognized by statesmen at home and abroad. The publication of a journal in England advocating her views has been announced by George J. Holyoake.

Appletons’ Cyclopaedia of American Biography, Volume 6

 

Do you think then, that these anglophiles (Thompson and Holyoake) meant the Aristotle meaning of “republic” – or the Jefferson one?

Exactly. They meant the Aristotle meaning complete with nobles and all. That is what is couched in the term “intelligent community”. It was a carefully chosen description, I’m sure, trying to leverage the people’s understanding of the word “community’ to think they meant the American Republic ideas of Thomas Jefferson.

That is some nasty business there.

So what does George Holyoake have to do with forwarded both the Oahspe and Mrs. Thompson’s rather convenient views – who is he?

I’d like to open that subject with a passage from a compatriot of Holyoake – Frederick James Gould.

“One of my activities in the decade ending 1899 was interviewing, for purposes of print, people of the Rationalist persuasion. Such, for example, were G. W. Foote, who in his library appeared rather the cultured book-lover than the iconoclast; G. J. Holyoake, the witty old Owenite and Co-operator…

F. J. Gould’s The Life-Story of a Humanist, published by Watts & Co, London 1923, reproduced by the Leicester Secular Society.

 

By 1888, Fred Gould, George Holyoake and Charles Watts Jr. were all writing cheap pamphlets specifically created for the little people, as the British nobles viewed them. Charles Watts Jr., if you recall, had a printing press concern turned over to him by his father just for that purpose.

Frederick Gould
Frederick James Gould

Charles Albert Watts
(aka Charles Watts Jr.)Charles_Albert_Watts_(charles watts junior).

The three men (along with others) aimed to “set things on fire” with cheap books” They heavily promoted the theories of Charles Darwin, the writings of H.G. Wells (British Foreign Intelligence) and other Cecil Bloc approved ideas.

*Cecil Bloc – See ScientologyPropagandist Press Committee Roots – Chapter 21-2 for full description of this British Slavemaster Dynasty.

They especially targeted the Christian establishment, as the author of this New Humanist article put it – meaning the Catholic Church.

“Before long it settled into the pattern it would follow for six decades: several brief signed articles in which the Christian establishment was criticised on every imaginable front, from science and metaphysics to history and poetry, interspersed with anonymous paragraphs (mostly written by Watts) retailing miscellaneous facts about worthy progressives from Leslie Stephen to Annie Besant, or Walt Whitman to HG Wells, not to mention the homonymous Charles Watts.”

Cite: New Humanist Volume 120 Issue 6 November/December 2005 found in the Internet Archive.

They expanded from pamphlets into books – cheap reprints really, of other Slavemaster propaganda agents sputterings and mutterings.

Towards the end of the 19th century, Watts & Co started to expand from producing the Guide and a range of propagandistic pamphlets, to publishing books, including a celebrated series of Cheap Reprints which made the works of sceptical Victorians like Darwin, Huxley, Arnold and Mill available to working people at only sixpence a volume.
Cite: New Humanist Volume 120 Issue 6 November/December 2005 found in the Internet Archive.

For the next ten years or so, they informally called themselves the Propagandist Press Committee.

Note: Johnson’s Court is where the Watts printing company was.

At that period Frederick Millar, Dr. R. Bithell, Charles A. Watts, and I used occasionally to sit close together in a poky room at Johnson’s Court, calling ourselves the Propagandist Press Committee, and plotting to set the Thames on fire with tracts and cheap volumes. I supplied the conspirators with a motto: “The lecturer wins his thousands, but the writer his tens of thousands”; for, indeed, the lessened cost and larger output of Freethought literature made the common citizen much less dependent upon public debates and expositions than in 1860 or 1870.

Then it was renamed the Rationalist Press Committee in 1893.

A word on H.G. Wells –

You might wonder why H. G. Wells writings would be being promoted by this bunch. Well, that’s because around 1870 (the same period as James Burn and the “spiritualists” and the time of John Ruskin’s “rebuild the Empire” speech) the British began to grow afraid after the loss of the American Colonies, and the resulting advances of man, they recognized that they were unable to suppress the advances of man everywhere. More to the point, because of those advances, man was becoming capable of invading THEIR island – no longer were they insulated by distance and their supremacy over the Seas.

This gives a window into their thought process, and perhaps another element as to why they created the American Civil War. It was to slow down America!

Death does certainly have a way of doing that.

how_dare_you_question_me_-_vincent

This also gives us further insight into the reason for John Ruskin’s “fire up the youth” speech about founding colonies as far and as fast as they can.

Many things were set in motion once the assessment as to their risk in the “world theatre” had been brought to a conclusion – they needed aggressive action, but most of all they needed CHAOS, they needed WAR to hide their movements.h

There is a saying by magicians, that “the big move hides the little one” – which is even quoted in their current cyber magician black operations that they run on their target persons using the internet. A very interesting subject, that, thanks to Edward Snowden we all have documentation of what some of us observed all along. You might want to check it out.

calling_all_magicians

JTRIG_british_intelligence_cyber_magicians_p_8

mickey

As usual, they started with attempting to control people’s attention and this was when they began using what I call “Fairy Tales” – fictional stories that are not so fictional after all. Such stories are, in a sense, the vanguard of the British Slavemasters attack on humanity for daring to rise equal to or <gasp> higher than them.

 

The Big Move covers the little one.

 

They chose the “invasion of England” – their worst fear – as the fear they would like everyone else to have as well.

Authors began immediately playing on this fear to bring it to the publics attention. Utilizing the propaganda mediums of short stories, novels, fairy tales and stage plays – The Germans invading England being the main topic. Propaganda was planted in other countries against England, or rather having England invade Germany.

They planted it everywhere. The Battle of Dorking by Sir George Tomkyns Chesney was published in Blackwoods magazine 1871; A Conning Tower by Hugh Arnold Fraser, in Murray’s magazine in 1888; The Great War in England in 1897 by William Lequeus, a serial in the periodical answers during the “war scare” of 1893; The Riddle of the Sands by Erskne Chider in 1903; Danger! by SPR-man Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in Stran magazine July 1914.

In Wehrlos Zur Zee 1910 and La Fin De la Prusse et le Demembrement De L’allemagne 1913, the French invade Germany. In Der Weltkrieg 1904, Germany conquers most of western Europe. In La Guerra 1905, the French are thwarted in an attempt to invade Italy.

They planted it everywhere that they wanted the war conditions to develop.

 

These books “predict” that large armies will be involved, several nations will be drawn into the conflict, and that “new” weapons will be used, including gas, machine guns, aircraft and dirigibles, very large warships, tanks, submarines, torpedoes, and H.G. Wells (around the time of Annie Besant and nuclear energy) “predicted” the use of atomic bombs. (The World Set Free written in 1913 and published 1914) and death rays (War of the Worlds 1898) – they predicted the increased role of emotional nationalism as a cause of modern war and a factor affecting the morale of troops and the general population.)

The interesting thing is what they didn’t predict, The fall of the idea that war was “chivalric” (that was killed deader than a doornail), the actual extent of the death and destruction and what that really meant to the people.

You know, minor things like that.

how_dare_you_question_me_-_vincent

They never talked about propaganda – not because they didn’t know about it, they were the ones doing it after all, but because they didn’t want anyone ELSE to figure out that was going to be their main weapon.

Now, H.G. Wells is a very interesting choice for the newly renamed Rationalist Press Committee (RPC) to be “dumbing down” the works of in booklets for all those little people.

Because, he had recently been tasked to use science in the form of a novel, or “fiction”, as a VEHICLE for social commentary – obvious in his first book The Time Machine in 1895.

It was right after that, when the RPC became even more specific in their “progressive ideas” on religion, which the completely controlled-opposition target – the Catholic Church – garnered even more attention. See how it brings it TO the people’s attention? That serves both sides, which as we know, are not in opposition at all really.

It’s more sleight of hand. The BIG move of lobbing lots of distracting ideas at a person covers the little one.

The “don’t look here” – look at all THESE maneuver.

magic_show_-_lob_lots_of_distracting_things_at_you_-_the_big_move

It’s not a surprise that the Slavemasters have even polluted the fun idea of magic, into being just a con. Considering they have been employing it as a vehicle for propaganda since the days of Dr. Dee and the Rise of the Slavemasters, we shouldn’t be surprised to see them crossing over their idea of “magic” (deception) into reading materials as a method to control a population en masse.

I love how Gould tries to “whiten” what they were really doing as “the spread of progressive ideas“.

Well – that IS propaganda, is it not?

 

They knew exactly what they were doing.

sleight_of_hand_magic_showYe old “shell game

 

They just had now chosen a different delivery method, a different stage.

A little volume of mine on The New Testament (1914) had this dedication: “To Charles Albert Watts, chief founder of the Rationalist Press Association, with whom I have been companion in the spread of progressive ideas on religion since the year 1882.”

ibid; Gould

Gould brought in a recently divested Catholic priest to the R. P. C. early in 1896, whom he referred to as “an unassuming, spectacled young man, with a very firm mouth.” with an interest in astronomy. His name was Joseph McCabe (ex-Father Anthony) and Gould proposed that he should write a pamphlet on From Rome to Rationalism which was accepted by the Committee.

The R.P.C. became the Rationalist Press Association (R.P.A.) in 1899.
they had to change…
Here in the late 1800’s, you can see that overall the strategy of propaganda had obviously begun to change from being primarily lectures and debates to cheap books and pamphlets. Obviously in order to get the “masses” on-board with the program of war and social change – as they called it euphemistically.

The target had changed – they were now after the general public versus the in-between and junior noble classes. They had to change, or else see their Empire-building way of life go right down the drain.

But also, there was a coordinated attack upon Christianity – the Catholic Church. One wonders about the real purpose of this, because it certainly wasn’t really about dogma (which is just propaganda put another way). Being all propagandists themselves in one way or another, the timing and method of these attacks strike me as ingenious. Although, I’m not inclined to say that the ingenuity lay with the slavemasters. No, I think some other force was involved.

The attacks struck at the biggest and most indefensible weakness of Catholicism. That the whole thing was an invention – neither a natural law nor even founded in truth.

The thing is, it’s almost like some kind of weird strawman. Those who had the knowledge of its construction held the matches and were now passing them out to others! But what is really burning down here…

.

Strawman argument - meaning

.

It could be, that this is all about trying to have certain truths be “burned” and denied, and I don’t mean about some all-powerful “God”.

Judging from purely their actions over the course of the 1800’s alone, it’s pretty obvious that there are certain things that are being denied by both Catholicism and “Modern Scientific Thinking”. Among those are that a man, a person, is capable of abilities beyond and independent of the body senses. Telepathy, remote-healing, mind-reading, those are just a few of the terms. They don’t even really well describe what is being looked at there, but I’m sure you get the general idea anyway.

In those abilities being independent of anything like evolution, genetics, or GOD, these two supposedly opposite sides are united against them.

More specifically: they are united against their use and their independent existence being known as fact.

I find that –

spock fascinating

and

very revealing.

.

One step behind that, I find it even more interesting that those involved are obviously being played from an outside perspective to even go that route – which in the end? Is going to lead straight to their demise.

While that may be something that you think “can’t be proved” (it can) – it doesn’t really matter United in their attacks…right now. It won’t stop you from seeing what it is easily provable – the fact that they are united in their attacks on those particular points, and that they are united in their zeal to bring them “down to earth” and classified in the same way that matter is (Darwinian Spiritualism).

Thanks to the slavemaster we now have the word reality and the word viewpoint quite literally being sock-puppets – “this” is my reality – hold up sock puppet. Look it talks and everything, you see it so it must be real right? Yea, but now, apparently real and true are completely divorced from each other.

Our man Frederick here (Frederick Gould) the buddy of George Holyoake, was on the anti-Christianity side of things, although not in so obvious a manner as to be easily pegged “no religion”. He was Anglican.

Anglican was the preferred “religion” of most of the British slavemasters, mostly because it wasn’t really a religion anyways.

Note: Its American front group counterpart was the Episcopal Church. The Episcopal Church had rather conveniently been brought into prominence just after the American Patriots had attained Independence from British slavemaster rule.

The word Anglican originates in ecclesia anglicana, a medieval Latin phrase dating to at least 1246 that means: the English Church. So, basically Anglican is not really a religious term tied to one religion – it’s a generic term meaning the official “church” of England and whatever “religion” they want it to be that week – humorously speaking.

Historically, that had predominantly been invested with Catholicism, but when these people (such as Gould) say they were Anglican in the 1800’s? This was a statement that they had divorced themselves from Catholicism (considered Christianity at the time). The marriage of Pope and King was “over” and had been for some time.

This “divorce” between warring Nesilim factions of Priests and Kings (see Scientology Roots Chapter Six) became official during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I.

This just happened to be the same time as the rise of the British Slavemasters. The formation of the first world-wide spy network; the formation of the City of London as the center of financial aims; and the formation of the East India Trading Company that would wreak some of the most horrible genocide on the races of man – ALL of these things began together and by basically the same individuals. They were fully coordinated activities – the Master Plan.

To use the term Anglican to infer that it is one’s religion, as you can see, is not quite as simple as it might seem. I think it bears some closer inspection to see what this term is actually throwing back to, and why.

You see, immediately upon her ascension to the throne of England in 1858, Queen Elizabeth began enacting Acts of Parliament concerning the Church of England – one in 1858 and one in 1859. These are called the Elizabethan Religious Settlement.

Many of the “new” aspects of the Anglican official religion of England (put in place by Elizabeth) happened to correspond closely to Reformed Protestantism – termed the “middle way” between the two Protestant factions; Lutheranism and Calvinism. The Anglican “religion” does mark to something called Apostolic succession, but this is not so much meaning a descendancy from some imaginary Apostles of Jesus. It was more of a “missionary” spiritual leader who would spread whatever the word happened to be decided to be at the time, usually in opposition to the Catholic Church.

The Pope (Pius V) was not pleased at all, with Elizabeth’s call-to-arms. He subsequently issued Regnans in Excelsis. This Papal bull, written in Latin, is named from its incipit, the first three words of its text, which mean “ruling from on high” (a reference to God). The Pope was channeling GOD, in other words, in the classic Nesilim tradition. Hmm, I think I just gained a better understanding of the origin of the word bullshit.

Speaking on behalf of GOD, the Pope declared Elizabeth to be “a heretic”, the “servant of crime”, and only the “pretended” Queen of England (presumably because GOD didn’t approve of nor choose her by channeling his wishes through the Pope). The Pope, continuing to speak on behalf of GOD, “released” all of Elizabeth’s subjects from any allegiance to her, and excommunicated any who obeyed her orders. An interesting point, is that among the queen’s alleged offences, the Pope lists that “she has removed the royal Council, composed of the nobility of England, and has filled it with obscure men, being heretics.”

There’s our new slavemasters!

Being called “obscure men” by a jealous Pope who just got dethroned, no less! In-Fighting amongst slavemasters is always highly entertaining – isn’t it?

You can also see from this offence list, that the prior “nobility” it mentions, is an obvious reference to that these men were from a particular Nesilim faction – one that was now at war with the new Slavemasters seeking dominance.

Elizabeth’s predecessor, Queen Mary, had re-established Catholicism as the state religion, so you can imagine that was most certainly part of the reason for this frothing at the mouth “decree” coming from Pope Pius V.

Queen Elizabeth’s actions to revert that move were controlled directly by two of her main advisors, Sir William Cecil, as her Secretary of State, and Sir Nicholas Bacon, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, who happened to be the beginning of the Cecil Bloc dynasty. Rulers that were not easily visible as such.

These early Slavemasters formed a tight-knit group – cemented by bonds of marriage and blood, secrets, and money. A practice which continues to this day.

Here’s some examples of how closely these early British slavemasters were inter-related.

Sir Nicholas Bacon was the father of Francis Bacon, the son of his second wife Anne Cooke. Anne’s great-great-grandfather was Sir Thomas Cooke, who had been Lord Mayor of London in 1462. Anne’s brother Edward had a son (her nephew) Francis Cooke, who was a Mayflower passenger and one of the first settlers of the British Plymouth colony in America.

Look! A Cecil Bloc man planted right there. Not many people know of Francis’s connection there, by the way. This Francis, was also then a first cousin of Francis Bacon.

Anne’s father (referred to as a “Humanist”) was Sir Anthony Cooke, who happened to have been the tutor of Edward the VI.

Note: “Humanist” here, meant Renaissance humanism which was when the Declamatios of supposed “intellectual Greek teachings”, began being scribed and propagated by scholars, writers, and others. It allegedly started in Italy, then spread into Europe during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. It was a challenge to the Catholic church’s control over education, which at the time, wouldn’t allow the teaching of many subjects that it deemed a threat to its role as “god channeler” and ruler of humans.

Anne Cooke’s (Francis Bacon mother) – sister was married to William Cecil, so Cecil was Francis’s uncle, and Cecil’s son Robert (the 1st Earl of Salisbury) was his first cousin.

As one of the second-tier Slavemasters, Francis Bacon was assigned to not only re-write the bible, he was also the Imperator of the Rosicrucians – among other things.

His dad, Nicholas Bacon, had a sister who married Sir Thomas Gresham, the founder of the Royal Exchange (stocks and trading) and the Mayor of the City of London at the key time of its changeover to being the center of finance and planning for the British Slavemasters. (This also means that Sir Thomas Gresham was Francis Bacon’s uncle.)

To further illustrate this intermarrying business just a bit more, another son of Nicholas Bacon from his first wife, married the illegitimate daughter of Sir Thomas Gresham. The Cecils later intermarry with another Lord Mayor descendant of Sir Crispin Gascoigne, and this is when the Cecil family name became Gascoigne-Cecil. Mary and City of London“, the center of finance and planning.James Gascoigne-Cecil then had three sons, one of which was Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoigne-Cecil.

This Gresham guy was a key instrument of the Slavemasters. He took his marching orders from Lord William Cecil and his replacement, son Sir Robert Cecil. For example, although Gresham was used as the “suggestion” point to form a company of Merchants (bankers) – it was only with William and Robert’s approval that The East India Company was formed on New Year’s Eve of the year 1600 (under Queen Elizabeth).

Gresham was put into play initially many years before this. It was in the late 1500’s that the City of London suddenly shows up on the map, so to speak.

Starting with Sir Thomas Gresham as Lord Mayor (backed by William Cecil) under King Edward VI, the City of London increasingly became a major centre for banking, international trade and commerce.

One of the first moves to start this directed motility, was the founding of The Royal Exchange in 1565 by Sir Thomas Gresham. It was founded specifically to act as a centre of commerce for London’s merchants (the bankers) and after Gresham proved this new venture to King Edward VI, official Royal patronage of the Exchange began six years later in 1571.

Remember – Nicholas Bacon’s wife (Francis Bacon’s mother) her father had been the tutor of King Edward the VI – influencing him to the “humanist” educational agenda – which at that time also included the tenets of Martin Luther’s Protestant “reformation” of Catholicism.

Underneath the cloak of all such touchy-feely ideals of the period, was the black beating heart of a plan that wanted the entire world under the rule of England and its Slavemaster “advisors”. And right here, was one of their very first agents.World Domination

Thomas Gresham

Sir Thomas Gresham

He made one of the first publicly visible moves for the British Slavemasters towards world domination.

.

The Royal Exchange

.

.

However, it was only when Queen Elizabeth later came to the throne, that even more key (and terrible to mankind) moves could now be advices” as covert marching ordersexecuted one after the other under the guise of “royal advices”.

.

Coming back to where we last were –

I had written: “Frederick Gould was anti-Christianity, although that not in so obvious a manner as to be easily pegged “no religion”. He was Anglican.”

And now you know what that means – just about anything except Catholic.

So now, Holyoake’s good buddy (and fellow agent) Fred Gould has himself a nice clear connection to one of the other agents set loose upon the world – Felix Adler. Whom if you remember, had been sent back to America to begin his works at the same time as Helena Blavatsky.

* * *

The Brief Version – Gould to Coit —> Coit to Adler.

Gould met Stanton Coit at a lecture in 1889. Stanton was Felix Adler’s right-hand man for the Society for Ethical Culture, which came out of the “reformed Judaism” Temple Emanu-El of New York City. Coit helped Gould set up yet another front group, the East London Ethical Society.

Together with Charles A. Watts’ publishing company, Gould published a number of items for the new society to use in its instruction. Coit and Gould also worked together in 1896 to help establish the Union of Ethical Societies, which became the forerunner of the later British Humanist Association.

After Adler had essentially redefined and presented the term “Humanist”, Gould was one of the first to use it in its more modern sense. In a nutshell, the term humanism had previously simply referred to a study of particular subjects that a “human man” should learn. When Adler came back to the U.S. (tasked to begin the British propaganda campaign here) the word “humanism” came to America for the first time.

Dr. Adler preaches what is known in Germany as ‘Humanism’…

-The New York DAILY GRAPHIC January 22, 1877.

I have excerpted some of the Aims of the New York Society for Ethical Culture so that you can see how similar this all was to what was happening in Britain first.

“To teach the supremacy of the moral ends above all human ends and interests;

“To teach that the moral law has an immediate authority not contingent on the truth of religious beliefs or of philosophical theories;

The real kicker was:

.

To advance the science and art of right living.

.

Right living – as determined by whom, one might ask.

Be that as it may, as I said, you can easily see how right in line this was with the concurrent campaigns being run elsewhere and through other front groups.

For example, our OAHSPE publisher Elizabeth Thompson. Remember what she said in one of her and Newbrough’s sock-puppet publications?

yourreporter and mrs thompson

 

People do not know how to live.

Kindergarten Homes for Orphans and other destitute children; A New Way to Ultimately Dispense with Prisons and Poor-Houses, a pseudonymic pamphlet by John Newbrough and Elizabeth Thompso.

Considering that this is pretty much exactly the same time period as Felix Adler’s Aims of the New York Society for Ethical Culture advancing the “science and art of right living” – you have to admit that between the two of them alone, they form perfect examples of the ever-present arrogantly superior “Enlightened Us” versus “lazy them” imperialistic attitude.

Put their statements together and you get –

You people don’t know the science and art of right living.

I am the master, you must do what I say.

I am the MASTER

Mixed with an appropriate dose of intellectual snobbery and the obscured Union Jack influence, of course.

anglophile - british shillsnob with pipe - british

You see my point.

Now from the religious angle, Temple Emanu-El shows its strong connections to the British Slavemaster “reworking of man” operation that was going on.

At around the same time as Felix Adler’s Society for Ethical Culture was being backed by Temple Emanu-El member and British in-crowd banker Joseph Seligman, the listed goals of ‘reform’ Judaism were formed. One in particular stands out.

(Point 4)….The mission of Israel will not have been fulfilled until righteousness and peace prevail everywhere for everyone. Until that great Messianic fulfillment, the Jewish people must survive as a “Kingdom of Priests” dedicated to the service of God and humanity.

Do you notice that “righteousness and peacepart? That is a reworking of the same idea expressed in Adler’s Ethical Culture society – “supremacy of the moral ends“.

Note: Felix’s father was a rabbi for Temple Emanu-El.

Also around this time, a story was being circulated concerning a “history” or foretelling of John Hyrcanus – a Jewish rebel – clearly yet another Declamatio story – a fairy tale.

Hyrcanus is portrayed as a high-priest in this telling, and the advent of the Messianic kingdom is supposed to be ruled over by a Messiah sprung from Judah. The important part of the story is the oddly familiar propaganda line running right at the heart of it. This so-called Messianic kingdom would be ‘gradually realized’ on earth, and that a transformation of man would occur if an ethical transformation was a part of it.

…the transformation of physical nature would go hand in hand with the ethical transformation of man until there was a new heaven and a new earth.

Appropriately chosen for the Slavemasters goal at the time, wouldn’t you say?

This is also just an excellent example serving to illustrate the solidarity of the massive propaganda campaign begun in the 1870’s by the Slavemasters. Once you find the commonality, accounting for word changes for different ‘audiences’, it becomes very easy to track this thing.

Take that “transformation of physical nature” part of this fairy tale specifically designed for the Jewish people.

That exact same idea also shows up (and around the same time) in the British occult society called The Hermetic Order of The Golden Dawn, or “Golden Dawn” for short.

…. From thence the members would be brought into the light of a new dawn. In other words, these men and women sought personal alchemical transmutation of their base matter into spiritual “gold.”

The Golden Dawn is an updated version of the original British cult begun by the first Spymasters, the Cecils, and their relations (Francis Bacon, etc.) at the time of Queen Elizabeth I. That cult was the Rosicrucians, which in turn was concurrent with their previously fostered “schism” of the Catholic Church – Martin Luther and the Reformation.

Some people go all ga-ga about symbols, which ordinarily I think are entirely just another form of misdirection but sometimes a particular misdirection – a symbol – is held up like a shield marker by the oddest assortment of supposedly dis-related items.

The Golden Dawn’s symbol was the “rosy” cross, which is actually a crossed-out Christian cross, if you notice. Quite similar to the Scientology cross, the original Rosicrucian cross, and Temple Emanu-el “rose” in fact.

“Rose” window

Temple Eman-El, NYC.

The_Rose_Window_-_Temple_Emanu-el

Rosicrucian_Cross_-_Golden_Dawn_Cross_-_Scientology_CrossNote the “crossed out” aspect of #2 and #3.

 

At first blush it would seem to be quite the strange bunch of bedfellows, but when you understand what is uniting them? All becomes clear.

You can also now easily understand why intelligence agents such as later MI6 man Alistair Crowley used “cult leader” as their cover – in his case he was head of the OTO which actually came straight out of Golden Dawn, and he was one of the Golden Dawn’s earliest members.

Next point –

Take the “all sin and pain would disappear and men would live past the age of 1,000 yearspart of Temple Emanu-el goals of ‘reform’ Judaism.

Yet another declamatio story became circulated, by Maimonides, the “second” Moses.

The second “Moses” – Oh sure. As if there ever was a first Moses.

Kermit the frog excited

.

Are you seeing the pattern here of the British Slavemasters?

.

This Maimonides character is made to say strangely similar  sarcasm  ideas as all the other agents and front groups of this time period. In one case, exactly along the same lines as Temple Emanu-El!

One who has attained a correct knowledge of God has reached a condition of existence, which renders him immune from all the accidents of fortune, from all the allurements of sin, and even from death itself.

And of course, this “correct knowledge of Godis as dictated within other front groups such as the Ethical Culture Society, the Rationalist Press, the World Union of Freethinkers, and so on. Of course, who is really dictating this are our dearly beloved (ahem) usual suspects – the British Slavemasters and their Igors.

Freethinker – one who rejects unverifiable authority in matters of religious opinion, accepts reason as the ultimate test and regards it as the right and duty of every individual to think things out for himself.

Now see though, none of this sounds like a bad idea, does it? No, it does not. However, these ideas are not what you think when they are in the hands of those who would hide behind them in order to set up their own rulership of the world – a dark one filled with death and destruction for those who do not “think things out for themselves” in the way they are dictated to.

That – is what shows the true agenda here. There is no “free thought” really allowed by these people, your thoughts must conform to what they think they should be!

 

MUST CONFORM.

 

If not? Well, look at Africa, India, the Middle East, and so on and you’ll have a good idea of just how ‘free’ thought really is under their ‘tutelage’.

warning heavy sarcasm

.

With all that in mind, have a look again now at the significance of Frederick Gould getting together with Stanton Coit in 1889, and then together setting up the “East London Ethical Society” and the later Union of Ethical Societies in 1896, which became the British Humanist Association.

Which then became the Aldous Huxley business. What’s that, you say? Well…

The long version of what happened there, and all its other connections coming back into Gould, Holyoake, Thompson, and the publication of the Oahspe will be coming up here shortly – after we go back a bit more into the background of George Holyoake.

But to understand George, you need to understand something called Secularism.

* * *

Secularism

You see many of these propagandist writers using the terms “secular”, “secularist” and “secularism”.

Geroge Holyoake is who first used the term “secularism” – in 1851. He used it as a catchall term for the previously generated propaganda heralding all the way back to Martin Luther – at the time of the rise of the British Slavemasters.

Note: the use of the term “humanist” and “humanism” as it means today, constantly gets backdated by writers and historians to refer to things that were NOT called that, but were, its true, the same agenda.

Secularism was also used as an umbrella term for the later named “Freethought” societies and front groups.

The really interesting part of this, is that Holyoake invented the term “secularism” to describe his views of promoting a social order separate from religion.

Considering what we just learned about Anglican, and Darwinian Spiritualism, it’s obvious that this is yet another way to hit the Catholic Church and its false dictatorship over the “spirits” of man.

The National Secular Society was founded in 1866 with Charles Bradlaugh as President and Charles Watts Senior as secretary.

Ok, why do we know those names? Because in the section covering the publishing of the Oahspe, Society for Psychical Research, we found out that the same publishing company (James Burns) that published the Oahspe also published as one of its first items? A book by Charles Bradlaugh. We know the name Charles Watts senior as being the man that bought a press concern in Johnson’s court, and then turned it over to his son Charles Watts Jr., who hobknobs with Fred Gould and George Hoyoake making propaganda pamphlets for the “little people”.

So, now we can add yet another front group into the maze – The National Secular Society.

It combined previously existing societies into one group. Bradlaugh had been President of the London Secular Society from 1858, and had begun propaganda work of his own in 1860 when he became editor of the secularist newspaper, the National Reformer. This is around the same time that James Burns initially set up the “seance” spiritualism center, if you recall, which was part of the less public maneuverings of what would become the Society for Psychical Research.

The National Secular Society is a British campaigning organisation that promotes Holyoake’s secularism – this organization was explicitly created for those who reject the supernatural. Supernatural usually means “beyond human”, where human means the bodies capabilities or senses.

See how it ties directly into all the other “let’s make spirits equal to matter” front groups?

Here is another clear example of what I told you before. Both the Catholic Church and these supposedly rational thinkers are united in their attacks against those abilities and the people who use them.

Something else that I find…

spock fascinating

The Holyoake based society also promoted that ‘this is the only life we have, and that we should work for its improvement’.

And that is another clear example – this time against the concept of the immortality of a person in successive lives – loosely termed reincarnation. This is exactly one of those “sinful” ideas Catholicism had labeled derogatorily, so there they are united again with the “rational thinkers”.

Holyoake did not believe in God (of course) and was always on the lookout for new terms to describe himself and the other “rationalists”.

Particularly terms that obfuscated the truth of what they were up to to the public.

For example, after the term “atheism” came to be regarded by the public as a negative word – he invented the term “secularism” and that is why he invented it. Later on, Holyoake switched to the word “agnostic” when that showed up, and after “secularism” began getting a bad name as well.

Note: Bradlaugh died in 1891 and was replaced by G.W. Foot as President of the National Secular Society. Foote was one of the men that Gould mentioned that he interviewed for their use in making propaganda pamphlets about “freethought” and “rationalism”.

It was through the National Secular Society that Bradlaugh met Annie Besant who became his close associate. Annie Besant was a rather busy little bee – she kept turning up in front group after front group to “help things along” – but we’ll get to that.

As part of this continuing shifting around and inventing of new terms and front groups, in 1877 George Holyoake, John Watts and Harriet Law founded the British Secular Union, which remained active until 1884.

Together with Annie Besant and others, Charles Bradlaugh founded the World Union of Freethinkers in 1880, just two years before the publication of the Oahspe, which was published by their good buddy James Burns, and the supposedly piously brilliant Mrs. Thompson.

This new Union, by the way, was an amalgamation of the National Secular Society and Watts’s Rationalist Press Committee (later renamed Rationalist Press Association) whose members if you recall, were Frederick Millar, Dr. R. Bithell, Charles A. Watts, and Frederick Gould.

So, the World Union of Freethinkers was probably yet another way to try and distance from the bad names (in the public perception) of their previous front group.

I think we have just surmised the real reason for constantly reinventing things by British agents – trying to disallow any continuity of was bad=STILL BAD that should actually be there, but that they are hoping won’t be because of a “new” name. That, and their silly 50 year rule are the only things they have to hide behind – they hope.

And of course…these “Freethinkers” explicitly rejected all religion, and a Freethinker was defined as “one who rejects unverifiable authority in matters of religious opinion, accepts reason as the ultimate test and regards it as the right and duty of every individual to think things out for himself.” 2, 3,4

Just a year before the publishing of the Oashpe (and the official formation of the SPR), on 6 March 1881 George Holyoake was one of the speakers at the opening of Leicester Secular Society’s new Secular Hall in Humberstone Gate, Leicester. The other speakers were Harriet Law, Annie Besant and Charles Bradlaugh.

Note: Frederic Gould, who was running the Ethical Culture Society headquarters, would shortly become head of the Leicester Secular society.

Annie Besant, who would soon play key roles in several other societies, was smack dab right in the thick of all things propaganda for the Cecil Bloc “new order”.

That marks where we need to go into the long version, the more complete version of events in the 1800’s.

But first let’s finish up on Holyoake.

Gould’s description of George Holyaoke was rather interesting in that it carried a few labels for him that I doubt many of you are familiar with – “Owenite” and “Co-operator”.

…the witty old Owenite and Co-operator…

cite: F. J. Gould’s The Life-Story of a Humanist, published by Watts & Co, London 1923, reproduced by the Leicester Secular Society.

What do these mean?

Well, they actually go together somewhat, in what they are referring to. But, especially easy to pass over and just think it means what it means normally, is the term “Co-operator”. You probably passed right over the term, thinking it just means the normal use of the word. It doesn’t. This was actually a name for a political movement of the 1800’s.

To understand why Gould referred to Holyaoke (our connection to Elizabeth Thompson and the Oahspe) in such particular ways – we need to back up here.

George Holyoake wrote The History of Co-operation, wherein he describes the discovery of a record showing that the first Co-operative Congress, at which Robert Owen had been present, had been held in Manchester on 26 May 1827. These “Owenite” Congresses stopped in 1835.

Understand where we are in time here, in relationship to the long-running Cecil Bloc agenda of how the world should be run (and by whom).

Andrew Jackson was President of America, and due to his clear adherence to the principles and founding sentiments concerning the British (Thomas Jefferson) he had been prevented from becoming President in 1824 under a cloud of spurious activities on the part of Anglophiles. Jackson won by a landslide in 1828, and again in 1832.

The whole time that he was President, he was systematically and inexorably engaged in taking down the Cecil Bloc choke-holds. Holds that had been ever so carefully (and stealthily) placed around the throat of the young nation. Starting, with tearing down the Merchants bank (British Cecil-Bloc bankers) called the Bank of the United States and finishing up with making America debt-free for the only time in its history.

Understand that from the very beginning, with the formation of the East India Company in 1600, the Cecil Bloc slavemasters used such “trading” companies to provide cover for their intelligence operatives. They would go into a country and gather intelligence, then formulate a plan to take over first economically, then politically – ending up with them running someone else’s country and its people become slaves to the whims of the British Empire.

With America, they had already well-engaged the first plan, and were hard at work on the second when President Jackson delivered a killing blow to these plans – setting them back DECADES.

The example that free America was setting, word of it was spreading like wildfire to the other peoples of the world in such far-flung areas as China, India, and Africa – ALL considered British Empire holdings in one way or another.

Thomas Jefferson described this phenomena well.

Before the establishment of the American States, nothing was known to history but the man of the old world…steeped in the vices which that situation generates….(p. 818)

The flames kindled on the Fourth of July, 1776, have spread over too much of the globe to be extinguished by the feeble engines of despotism ; on the contrary, they will consume these engines and all who work them. — To John Adams, vii, 218. (M., Sep. 1821.)

The light which has been shed on the mind of man through the civilized world, has given it a new direction from which no human power can divert it. The sovereigns of Europe who are wise, or have wise counsellors, see this, and bend to the breeze which blows; the unwise alone stiffen and meet its inevitable crush. — To Marquis Lafayette, vii, 193. Ford ed., x, 179- (1820.)

The light from our West seems to have spread and illuminated the very engines employed to extinguish it. It has given them a glimmering of their rights and their power. The idea of representative government has taken root and growth among them. Their masters feel it…Opinion is power, and that opinion will come. — To John Adams, vi, 525. (M., 1816.)

We have the same object, the success of representative government. Nor are we acting for ourselves alone, but for the whole human race. The event of our experiment is to show whether man can be trusted with self-government. The eyes of suffering humanity are fixed on us with anxiety as their only hope, and on such a theatre, for such a cause, we must suppress all smaller passions and local considerations. — To Governor Hall. Ford ed., viii, 156. (W., July 1802.)

– Jefferson Cyclopedia pages 818, 352 and 353, and pages 775 and 819, respectively.

The eyes of the world were upon us and it was catching on. The British stood to lose their other holdings asThe British had a lot to lose… well, if they didn’t “change” their tactics and start trying to trick people into thinking they were free (when in reality, they were not).

This is also part of why they “suddenly” chose to come out against slavery – it was a PR positioning. It was also an economical hit against the South, where both Jackson and Jefferson hailed from. The Cecil Bloc people didn’t care about the “atrocities” of slavery – look at the states of existence in India (under their helm) all the way to today!

No.

What they cared about was losing control of the people in the rest of their holdings and they wanted America back in that position, be it covertly or overtly.

So, that is what is going on at this time.

It becomes very easy to see why the Brits suddenly went into such a furious propaganda production mode during the 1800’s – covering the opposite bases of both “new ideas” and “ancient teachings”.

So, here in the 1827-1835 range, those Congresses that were referred to as both “Owenite” and “Co-operation”?

They were the baby of front man propagandist Robert Owen exactly when Jackson was tearing down the Cecil Bloc bank!

Now we’ll look at what were the ideas being presented as these Congresses, although I think you can tell that the Brits were trying to get people to “co-operate” with them in their world plan of domination – that they don’t tell them IS the plan. They usually attempt to cover the stench of their plan by misappropriating words that have no business being anywhere them and their crazy goals. Words like “freedom” and “scientific”, “rational” and “logical” – not exactly their strong points, sarcastically speaking.

.

Robert Owen (1771-1858)

Robert_Owen.

Robert Owen was a Brit who tried to re-present the “blank slate” (tabula rasa in latin) idea around the turn of the 19th century. He pretended that it was a “new” idea, when in fact it was a fairly old one.

He presented that man had no personality, no character at all, and that on this “blank slate” so to speak, his character was been formed by circumstances over which he had no control – therefore no-one is to blame for their behavior as “he” (man) is not a proper subject either of praise or blame.

A real humdinger of wishful thinking.

 

These “principles” then led up to the practical conclusion that “the great secret in the right formation of man’s character” is to place him under the proper influences–physical, moral and social–from his earliest years.

This and more are in his first work, A New View of Society, or Essays on the Principle of the Formation of the Human Character, which is the first of four essays that began appearing in 1813.

I’ll give you a few example excerpts.

Any character, from the best to the worst, from the most ignorant to the most enlightened, may be given to any community, even to the world at large, by applying certain means; which are to a great extent at the command and under the control, or easily made so, of those who possess the government of nations.
– Title page

And in preparing the way for the introduction of these principles, it cannot now be necessary to enter into the detail of facts to prove that children can be trained to acquire “any language, sentiments, and belief, or any bodily habits and manners, not contrary to human nature, even to make them, to a great extent, either imbecile or energetic characters.”
– page 10

That principle is the happiness of self …CAN ONLY BE ATTAINED BY CONDUCT WHICH MUST PROMOTE THE HAPPINESS OF THE COMMUNITY.
– page 13

They direct that the governing powers of all countries should establish rational plans for the education and general formation of the characters of their subjects. These plans will be devised to train children from their earliest infancy to think and act aright…
– page 19

So, to be an “Owenite”, as George Holyoake was characterized, means that he was part of one of the next-gen plans of “socializing” man, in this case Robert Owen’s writings.

Owenites formed “Co-Operative” this, that, and the other thing based on Owen’s writings. Most of these were more than 50 years after he published his essays.

Another well-known “Co-Operator” was yet another Cecil Bloc man – John Ruskin.

We previously discussed The Toynbee strategy as part of British tactics of war – thought war.

“He would gather his friends around him; they would form an organization; they would work on quietly for a time, some at Oxford, some in London; they would prepare themselves in different parts of the subject until they were ready to strike in public.”

.

John Ruskin was right in the middle of all that.

.

John Ruskin

John_Ruskin_1870_approx

Ruskin was a paedophile. Together gether with Lewis Carroll, they “valued” the innocence and lack of sexual being of young girls. Ruskin was seriously twisted in his views, and was very much into this whole “British rule the world” idea.

Ruskin had been unanimously appointed the first Slade Professor of Fine Art at Oxford University in August 1869, largely through the offices of his friend, Henry Acland. He delivered his inaugural lecture on his 51st birthday February 8, 1870, at the Sheldonian Theatre.

Imperial Duty was the subject of Ruskin’s inaugural lecture at Oxford, delivered to a packed audience  and its effects would be felt far beyond the shores of the British Isles. The lecture was published in his Lectures on Art (1894).

Cecil Rhodes cherished a long-hand copy of the lecture, believing that it supported his own view of the British Empire.

There is a destiny now possible to usOne kingdom; but who is to be its king?…will you, youths of England, make your country again a royal throne of kings; a sceptred isle, for all the world a source of light

And this is what she [England] must either do, or perish: she must found colonies as fast and as far as she is abletheir chief virtue is to be fidelity to their country…their first aim is to be to advance the power of England by land and sea…The England who is to be mistress of half the earth…

– John Ruskin inaugural speech

Well, that pretty much makes it crystal-clear where Ruskin’s head was at – and where it was wanted that other young British “heads” should be as well.

And, it should be a bit more clear why George Holyaoke, having been referred to as an Owenite, would be tasked to play a role in the publishing of Mrs. Elizabeth Thompson’s (our Oashpe publisher in the U.S.)  rather convenient views on a new world order.

Look at them again now.

Mrs. Thompson has agitated the question of the possibility of an international republic, or a world governed by laws emanating from an intelligent community. The value of this idea has been recognized by statesmen at home and abroad. The publication of a journal in England advocating her views has been announced by George J. Holyoake.

Appletons’ Cyclopaedia of American Biography, Volume 6

Even more interesting is another connection that Holyoake has, covered in depth in my article Evolution Not Revolution.

Prior to all this activity, Holyoake had hooked up with Elizabeth Thompson, a wealthy American widow, who was fond of New World Order government ideas – a match made in British Intelligence heaven.

Elizabeth_Thompson

The British Slavemasters, using Ruskin’s ideas of empire-building and “back to agriculture” for all the little people (modern Feudealism) were even trying to colonize the U.S. again – with Holyoake-based “co-operative” colonies.

Elizabeth Thompson, had been a supporter of George Holyoake’s secularism since at least 1871, when she had underwritten the Chicago-Colorado Colony near Burlington, Colorado.

Holyoake fully endorsed Thompson’s efforts to establish cooperative colonies, and this was how Thompson’s Colony near Salina, Kansas, began.

Called the Workingmen’s Co-operative Colony, it was unique as part of British colonization efforts in the U.S. in Kansas. It was the first of the British re-colonization effort in America and the only attempt by members of the British “working classes” to build a settlement in Kansas (which only lasted five years).

*Reference – Llewellyn Castle: A Worker’s Cooperative on the Great Plains by Gary R. Entz

It should be clear to you why, just after that in 1876, he founded the Workingmen’s Labor Party in in Newark, New Jersey, through his British counterpart the Socialistic Labor Party.

socialist labor party

Note: Both Blavatsky and Adler had come back from England (from abroad) the same year that Holyoake’s Workingmen’s Labor Party was formed in Newark.

It was almost immediately renamed the following year to the Socialistic Labor Party of America – especially strong in New York City, where there was a very large community of german-jewish immigrants.

socialist labor party

 

 

Just two years later, Elizabeth Thompson had “sponsored” George Holyoake to come to the U.S. in 1879, which seemed to mainly consist of what is called an obs mission – short for Observation mission – where he traveled all over the place and reported his observations of the people, the work, the ideas, and so on using the British embassy in Washington as his relay point. It was an intelligence action that he was doing, in other words.

During that time, Holyoake spoke about his baby, this Socialist-Labor Party, he predicted that it would become much larger than it then was in the United States.

In the New York Times November 2, 1879, he said:

The laborer would lack common sense, he thought, if he stood idly by while machinery showers gold upon capitalists.

 

– which was an obvious undermining attempt of the American economy.

As per the same New York Times article, this speech that Holyoake gave was done together with Felix Adler and others (Mr. E.V. Smalley, Mr. Ryland, and Mr. Peter Cooper).

Felix Adler in 1875Felix Adler – 1875

 

If you remember who Felix Adler was (Temple Emanu-El Ethical Culture Society) it makes perfect sense why he would be appearing publicly with and in support of Brit-propaganda man George Holyoake. As a reminder – Felix would later send his right-hand man – Stanton Coit – to England to meet up with Holyoake’s buddy, Frederick Gould, to start what would later become the world-wide humanism movement of “right living”.

Adler had just formed the Ethical Culture Society in New York in 1876, which was in perfect parallel with the entire British Slavemaster “colonize the world” plan – revealed by Ruskin in 1870.

This is part of why you see Holyoake confidently predicting that: “the time was coming when American working men would consider social questions of far more importance than the discussion of political topics.

Of course, since men like he and Adler were going to make sure of that.

Why did they want the focus of “the people” shifted to social questions?

They wouldn’t be paying attention (hopefully) to things like the intended planned undermining of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, the creation of a federal bank again, the creation of personal income tax, and other such unimportant  sarcasm  “political topics” – seeings as how they were going to be so consumed with those “social questions”, you see.

Adler, together with his local handler and Temple Emanu-El man Joseph Seligman, were very much involved right together with Holyoake and other British propaganda agents.

Holyoake speaks on this in 1880 and reveals the real point here, that I just mentioned above. The Brits were afraid of the Americans revolting – another revolution – against their nasty little plans they had in mind for us, utilizing their long-placed infiltrators into our society and government.

revolution socialism

So, this “Co-operation” business was designed to try and channel that correct instinct over into something that would not interfere with their Empire-building plans.

Note: understand that this is British immigrants that are being talked about here with this “colony” business.

Note: Seligman, besides being a wealthy merchant, was also associated with Temple Emanu-El and it’s parent masonic body – the B’nai B’rith.

In New York I found there had lately been formed a “Co-operative Colony Aid Association” (represented by the Worker, published by Mrs. Elizabeth Thompson, and edited by the Rev. R. Heber Newton), of which Mr. E. E. Barnum, Dr. Felix Adler, Mr. E. V. Smalley, the Rev. Dr. Rylance, the Rev. Dr. Charles F. Deems, Mr. Courtland Palmer, Joseph Seligman, the Hon. John Wheeler, and others were promoters.

From inquiries in the city (which I, a stranger, thought it right to make) I found that these were persons whose names gave the society prestige.  Mrs. Thompson was regarded in the States, as the Baroness Burdett-Coutts is in England, for her many discerning acts of munificence.

[My Note: she sponsored his trip there in the first place – and he’s pretending he doesn’t know who she is until now? – See how he’s hiding their real connections going back almost 10 years at this point?]

To them I was indebted for the opportunity of addressing a remarkable audience in the Cooper Institute, New York—an audience which included journalists, authors, and thinkers on social questions, State Socialists, and Communists—an audience which only could be assembled in New York.

… I never saw the human mind at large before acting on its own account—unhampered by prelate or king.

[My Note: See? he’s studying us.]

Every error and every virtue strive there for mastery, but humanity has the best of the conflict, and progress is uppermost.

[My Note: I think there was an insult in there somewhere..lol]

…Co-operation, which substitutes evolution for revolution in securing competence to labour, may have a great career in the New World.

LITTELL’S LIVING AGE, No. 1886—August 17, 1880, A Stranger in America. (From The Nineteenth Century) By G. J. Holyoake.


Substituting
evolution for revolution? That pretty much says it all.

 

Tabula Rasa strikes again.

 

Note: This “worry about the workers revolting” is part of the fall-out of the time period called The Industrial Revolution which began in Great Britain (1760 to 1870).

Just three years after this “happy time” speech with Adler in 1879, Holyoake, through his SPR connections (Society of Psychical Research) helped Thompson and John Newbrough publish the Oahspe in 1882, which would become the foundation for much of Scientology’s Advanced Levels.

*See The Fairy Tales of Scientology: Advanced Science Fiction and the section comparing OAHSPE/scientology materials at the end of this compendium.

So, this Owenism, “Co-Operators”, the “Labor Party” business, plus alternative “religions” and ideas such as Holyoake and Thompson are involved in, are all part of the British Slavemasters Grand Plan to rule the world.

Next, I’ll explain the meaning and the importance of Tabula Rasa.

sword divider2

Section 2

transparent back flashing starTabula Rosa – The “Blank Slate”transparent back flashing star

This idea of man being a “blank slate” or more properly, the Latin Tabula Rosa, is important to understand just how long these Slavemasters have been engaged in this particular project of theirs – the remaking of Man. Tabula Rasa brings all their apparently disrelated subjects into view as being under one overriding concern.

Tabula Rosa – a blank wax slate.

blank slate tabula rasa

.

I think the first thing I’d like to here is have a brief look at the kind of people that were still bringing this concept forward as being “workable” even well into the 20th century, and then we’ll go into the back history of the idea.

The first (and probably one of the best) example is the Huxley Family – long part of the in-crowd of the Cecil Bloc.

If you recall, in section 1-1 (where we covered the British Society of Psychical Research or SPR) we talked about how James Burns, the OAHSPE publisher in London, was sort of a clearing house for all the “spiritualism” type propaganda being put out at the time.

Some of the people who were involved in propagandizing what I called Darwinian Spiritualism, which was really just a different way of promoting Darwinism, were:

  • Anna Kingsford (later Theosophy head in Britain) who hooked up with Burns and begins helping to promote the Darwinist view of the spirit as being some form of matter, that can be enlightened by what it eats.
  • Fredric Myers – presented as “fact” that spirit and spiritual abilities (as they are classified) had some kind of scientific laws just like matter.   (culminating in his books The Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death, see  Scientology Roots chapter on the subject.)
  • James Burns was acting as “the” center for arranging seances and so on as well as a promoter of the “Vegetarian Society”, and publishing books that the British slavemaster wanted him to – such as the OAHSPE.
  • Dr. Alfred Russel Wallace comes out publicly in 1873 with his conclusion that “after painstakingly investigating Spiritualism” for a number of years, he found that “its phenomena were proved quite as well as the facts of any other science.”

Dr. Wallace was the co-founder and writer of “Theory of Evolution” with Charles Darwin.

This is where the Huxley Family comes into play. Starting with Thomas Henry Huxley (aka T.H. Huxley) who was nicknamed ‘Darwin’s Bulldog’, he was instrumental in boosting recluse Charles Darwin’s theories into public prominence.

So that’s TWO men, now, that were directly either writing or bringing forward the supposed Darwin’s work – which I am beginning to wonder just whether it really was all his work, at this point.

T.H. Huxley sounds a bit like a carnival barker – a PR man – Victorian style.

thomas henry huxley

He kind of looks like one too.

Step right up and get your Darwinism

– the latest in propaganda, ladies and gentleman –

Right here!

victorian carnival barker

T.H. was also a biologist and an advocate of agnosticism (which he ‘invented’ – he coined the word). But, he was also an Oxford Balliol man – Oxford’s Balliol college was the recruiting ground of the Cecils.

Of course, back in the day, Darwin was rumored to be a ‘billionaire’, had ‘royal blood’ flowing through his veins, and had the secrets of the universe at his fingertips –

Sounds like a PR campaign to me!

Ooh. Ah. Darwin. He has secrets

Darwin Wallpaper by jeevanusCharles Darwin and Evolution – by Jeevanus

 

And ‘Darwin’ was paraded about endlessly by the Cecil Bloc to forward the next part of their plan – the Ruskin ’empire building’ stage.

 

Our next Huxley was T.H.’s son, Leonard Huxley.

Leonard Huxley with son, Julian(pictured with son Julian)

He was also an Oxford Balliol man, his later grand-daughter married a descendant of Charles Darwin, further cementing the ‘ties’ between upper level British slavemasters – intermarriages like this were common practice amongst that echelon.

Leonard, crosses into our Humanism kids – you know, the Adler-Coit duo.

In Section 1-3 (Newbrough to Thompson to Holyoake) we discussed a brief version of one of Holyoake’s compatriots, Frederic Gould, and his connection to Coit and Adler.

To review:

Just a year before the publishing of the Oashpe (and the official formation of the SPR), on 6 March 1881 George Holyoake was one of the speakers at the opening of Leicester Secular Society’s new Secular Hall in Humberstone Gate, Leicester. The other speakers were Harriet Law, Annie Besant and Charles Bradlaugh.

Note: Frederic Gould, who was running the Ethical Culture Society headquarters, would shortly become head of the Leicester Secular society.

Annie Besant, who would soon play key roles in several other societies, was smack dab right in the thick of all things propaganda for the Cecil Bloc “new order”.

And then I pointed out the significance of Frederic Gould getting together with Stanton Coit in 1889, and then together setting up the “East London Ethical Society” and the later Union of Ethical Societies in 1896, which became the British Humanist Association.

Finishing up by saying:

Which then became the Aldous Huxley business. What’s that, you say? Well…I’m about to get into that in the next section.

Before we get to Aldous, (Leonard’s son), have a look at this. The Leonard generation, included Stanton Coit, who even in his last years? He tried to undermine America’s system of government as envisioned by our forefathers – sort of performing a last step-and-fetch it for the British Slavemasters for yet another war – WWII. That makes TWO that he helped propagandize towards.

On the 26th of May of 1937, Stanton delivered a speech at Conway Hall, the home of the British Ethical Culture Society which he had started. It was called: The One Sure Foundation for Democracy, and it was published by ye ole Watts family printers. (The Rationalist Press guys)

In it he said:

The one sure foundation for democracy is the nurturing, in all members of society, of their innate capacity to perceive good and evil …

To get an even clearer view into this, check out J.A. Hobson’s “review” (classic Toynbe strategy here) of Coit’s lecture, found here.

one sure foundation for democracy - ja hobson introSome extra-choice quotes for you –

Though his ultimate solution for the achievement of Democracy rests upon the right feelings and desires of the peoples as a whole, he does not believe that a people possesses yet a sufficiently trained intellectual and moral insight for this task.

There is an evil principle in the animal man which works against the application of that insight of true values which Democracy enjoins.

The “right” feelings and desires?

And here we are with the whole Felix Adler/Elizabeth Thompson/Temple Emanu-El “right” living thing – again!

What is this “evil principle” in…wait for it…ANIMAL man…

 

Please don’t tell me it’s ENGRAMS and DRUJAS.

come on!

Scapegoat much?

That’s kind of a Scientology/Oahspe joke there.

See Fairy Tales of Scientology – The Engram and last section here where we go into what “drujas” are.

For those of you already familiar with these ideas, see how clearly L. Ron Hubbard was following in lockstep with these people? Wow.

This “good and evil” business, was another one of the chosen sub-propaganda lines of the British Slavemasters Tabula Rasa business – you’ll see it also being espoused by George Brock Chisholm, founder of the WFMH, in his lectures in the U.S. in 1946. Both he and Dr. Ewen Cameron spent quite some time pushing their ideas of what this perception should be (of good and evil). Cameron, in particular, was saying that there wasn’t any evil, and that “they” were above good and evil. If you understand what Cameron did to people in the name of “mental health” – you’ll surely see just how gross that is for him to say what he did.

Reference – George Stanton Coit article in the Specific Persons (Encyclopedia of the “Bad Guys”) section of our Reading Library.

You do understand, that these people are after tearing to shreds, the American Constitution, and the brave words of Thomas Jefferson, right?

Look at these again:

  • He does not believe that a people possesses yet a sufficiently trained intellectual and moral insight for this task.
  • There is an evil principle in the animal man which works against the application of that insight of true values which Democracy enjoins.

You are inherently EVIL and can not rule your own self!

You need MASTERS – (them, of course)

That is what he is saying.

Now, considering who Stanton Coit had long been working on behalf of (British Intelligence and the Cecil Bloc), his next statements, while true, are in extremely poor taste considering his loyalties.

Members of a democracy need education in the knowledge of good and evil in order to avoid being dominated and exploited by the cunning and the guileful.

He then tries to sell the audience on that British Society is the best model to accomplish this “education” – while at the same time he acts like Britain is the only place this exists!

Finally, the possibility of this education already exists, in British society at least. We have the requisite minimum of leisure, formal schooling, affluence and security of life.

I found a copy of one of Coit’s pamphlets (although not the one quoted above) in the Internet Archive, and uploaded it here for your perusal.

PDF – 1937_STANTON_COIT_Part 1

Now in this “Democracy” pamphlet by Coit, you see the following pamphlet advertised for sale:

1926. PROGRESS AND THE UNFIT. By LEONARD HUXLEY, LL.D.
(In cloth or paper cover.)

Progress and the ‘unfit‘?

Unfit?

Are you frickin’ kidding me?

414px-Kermit_exasperated

How Correa Moylan Walsh war-mongering of him.

Strife is thus the weeder-out of the weak and unfit.

The Climax of Civilisation by Correa Moylan Walsh, 1917; See my article Inside the Mind of a Slavemaster.

What that really means – unfit – is people won’t accept their rule, and who view them as TINY TYRANTS.

“You think we’re the actual enemy?”

“You’re UNFIT.”

 

Yea, some of us do think you are the actual enemy.

I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny imposed upon the mind of man.

– Inscription inside the dome of the Jefferson Memorial, in Washington DC, by Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson also made his view on ALL monarchies quite plain.

I certainly never made a secret of my being anti-monarchical, and anti-aristocratical…

 Ref – letter to President Washington, iii, 257. Ford ed., v, 329. (Pa., 1791)

Now let’s compare the MONARCH supporter Stanton Coit’s views on Democracy and the “fitness” of the people (views which Leonard Huxley shares) with Thomas Jefferson.

Coit –

  • He does not believe that a people possesses yet a sufficiently trained intellectual and moral insight for this task.
  • There is an evil principle in the animal man which works against the application of that insight of true values which Democracy enjoins.

Jefferson –

#3

There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents.

…There is, also, an artificial aristocracy, founded on wealth and birth, without either virtue or talents.

#4

Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself.

Can he then be trusted with the government of others?

Or have we found angels, in the form of kings, to govern him…

#5

It is a happy truth that man is capable of self-government and only rendered otherwise by the moral degradation designedly superinduced on him by the wicked acts of his tyrant.

#6

…men may be trusted to govern themselves without a master. Could the contrary of this be proved, I should conclude, either that there is no God or that he is a malevolent being.

#7

Under governments of force; as is the case in all other monarchies… It is a government of wolves over sheep.

#2

Nor are we acting for ourselves alone, but for the whole human race. The event of our experiment is to show whether man can be trusted with self-government.

Jefferson Cyclopedia, #1 To John Adams, vi, 525. (M., 1816.); #2 To Governor Hall. Ford ed., viii, 156. (W., July 1802.); #3 To John Adams, vi, 223. Ford ed., ix, 425. (M., 1813.); #4 First Inaugural Address, viii, 3. Ford ed., viii, 3. (1801; #5 To M. de Mar- bois. vii, 77. (M., 1817.) page 820; #6 To David Hartley, ii, 165. (P., 1787.) page 820: #7 To James Madison. ii, 105. Ford ed., iv, .362.

And the best one – that shows he knows what the British were up to even back then

If ever the morals of a people could be made the basis of their own government, it is our case; and he who could propose to govern such a people by the corruption of their legislature, before he could have one night of quiet sleep, must convince himself that the human soul as well as body is mortal.

…I am sure, from the honesty of your heart, you join me in detestation of the corruption of the English government…I have been among those who have feared the design to introduce it here, and it has been a strong reason for me wishing there was an ocean of fire between that island and us.

– To John Adams. Ford ed., vii, 56. (M., 1796.)

And what did Coit say, trying to sell us on exactly that (introducing THEIR methods into America)?

Members of a democracy need education in the knowledge of good and evil …the possibility of this education already exists, in British society at least.

In that same letter to John Adams, Jefferson also said something that just kills their “but the people are unfit!” stupendously arrogant argument.

The mass of man kind under that, [democracy] enjoys a precious degree of liberty and happiness. It has its evils, too; the principle of which is the turbulence to which it is subject.

But weigh this against the oppressions of monarchy, and it becomes nothing.


Malo periculosam libertalem quam quietem servitutetn
– Even this evil is productive of good.

It prevents the degeneracy of government…

 

And what did Coit say about this capability of man?

  • There is an evil principle in the animal man which works against the application of that insight of true values which Democracy enjoins.

Ah, shifting the blame off of them, you see?

Jefferson said the cause of this “evil” of which Coit tries to blame on the rest of us, that it is caused by:

the moral degradation designedly superinduced on him by the wicked acts of his tyrant.

Yep, that’s them alright.

Vincent-Price - it doesn't look like a soul

Now –

 

Considering all that covert corruption and undermining of America that these people are actually up to, and there has been over 150 years of trying to turn us back into one of their dominions, I have to say that I find Leonard Huxley trying to talk about anybody else but them being “unfit”?

Quite beyond-the-pale.

 

But, it does tell me all I need to know about ole Leonard Huxley here, and it explains a lot about the actions of his two sons. Leonard fathered Julian Huxley (born 1887) and Aldous Huxley (born 1894).

Julian Huxley carried on in the Cecil Bloc Darwin tradition and was a prominent member of the British Eugenics Society – indeed its president from 1959–1962. Considering that Mr. Eugenics of Vineland Training School – Goddard – also tried to black propaganda to us Americans what democracy “really is” –

Thus Democracy is a method for arriving at a truly benevolent aristocracy.

Goddard, Psychology of the Normal and Subnormal, page 237

Can you say undermine America back into the British Empire?

Also see British Security Coordination Compendium Section 3 – Your Mind, My Mind, for more about Goddard.

 

Julian is just carrying that same dang propaganda torch right on down the line – see how they do it?

Julian Huxley (left)

Julian_Huxley

Julian was also secretly an MI6 asset. He worked closely with H.G. Wells concerning propaganda starting under C.F.G. Masterman in 1916 (and later under Lord Northcliffe) during WWI.

Just prior to WWI, he developed and headed the biology department at the newly formed Rice University in Houston, Texas, before serving in the British Army Intelligence Corps between 1916 and the end of World War I.

After WWI, Julian had become a teacher at Oxford’s Balliol College, but resigned his position to work with Wells on the book.

This was not the only role of pushing people into war, that Julian would play. He was also part of the MI6 covert operation to try and trick America into joining WWII – a key part of the next phase of the British world-domination plan.

See British Security Coordination Compendium

Section I – The Book and The Lords
Section II – The Party Boys
Section III –  Your Mind – My Mind
Section IV – The British Way
Section V – Back to the Beginning
Section VI –

In November 1941 Huxley was invited to the United States on a lecturing tour. He publicly stated that he thought the United States should join World War II, and serprise, serprise, serprise? A few weeks later came the attack on Pearl Harbor – which was a BRITISH plan to push the U.S. into war for the British, yet again.

I call him the Gomer Pyle of the bunch.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Julian also worked on a book collaboration with Northcliffe in 1927 – “The Science of Life” – an awfully familiar title choice to any of you former Scientologists out there. This book is one of those fed to Hitler to help push for the Nazi Eugenics occult movement to come into being!

Another book of his  Evolution: the modern synthesis also sounds eerily familiar with L Ron Hubbard’s later books.

He got involved in the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and became the organization’s first Director-General in 1946. His term of office, six years in the Charter, was cut down to two years at the behest of the USA delegation – let’s just say mainstream America didn’t like his ideas so much.

Julian, taking right after his father, had a very close association with the British rationalist and secular humanist movements. For example, he was an Honorary Associate of the Rationalist Press Association from 1927 until his death, and on the formation of the British Humanist Association in 1963 became its first President, to be succeeded by AJ Ayer in 1965. He also presided over the founding Congress of the International Humanist and Ethical Union.

Home of the “Happy Human” symbol

200px-Happy_Human_black.svg

Felix Adler would be so pleased.

Last but not least, there’s Julian’s younger brother –

Aldous Huxley

97n/34/huty/7167/33.

You think that, if you call imprisonment true freedom, people will be attracted to the prison. And the worst of it is you’re quite right.

– ALDOUS HUXLEY, Eyeless in Gaza

Now he was a propagandist – a novelist, no less. Starting with a “foolproof system of eugenics” in his Brave New World first published in 1932. In the book, humans are, mainly, cloned in the laboratory in the right numbers of various kinds to preserve the perceived optimum social class ratios.

Take a look what John Reese said again now – lauding Huxley’s book about those “subnormal men” and what to do with them.

There are few aspects of social medicine more important than this. Aldous Huxley in his book Brave New World was planning to produce a section of subnormal men who would do the dull jobs of the community: we don’t really need to produce them for there are too many already. If we can employ them, and if we care for their morale, i.e. their mental health, there will be fewer of them and as a group they will be contributors to the life of the community and not consumers or problem makers. 6

– John Rawlings Rees, The Shaping of Psychiatry by War 1945

wiley-double yikes

As you can see, the Huxley family played many key roles in British operations against “the minds of man” – part of the Slavemasters many attempts to win these “minds” over into what I call enlightened slavery. While, it must be said, also looking for those “naturally free” people at the same time so that they could hopefully recruit them into their one-rule of the world agenda.

Even the founding of the International Humanist and Ethical Union in August of 1952, was a direct outcropping of this earlier operation carried down into the 1800’s and 1900’s.

This Union was formed as the sole world umbrella organization for humanism organizations.

Their goal is “A Humanist World, and the American Ethical Union (a later evolvement of Felix Adler’s Society for Ethical Culture) is one of the founding member organizations. In fact, that Happy Human symbol was taken from Stanton Coit and Frederick Gould’s British Rationalist Association!

Concurrently, both the slightly earlier founding of the “mental health” main organization and UNESCO was done by a few key British agents, of which Sir Julian Huxley was a main handler. (he himself was subordinate to the higher-level Cecil Bloc handlers).

British agent George Brock Chisholm was elected head of the World Health Organization “on behalf of” John Rawlings Rees, his superior as far as agents go. Rees then “asks” Chisholm to form the World Federation for Mental Health.

With the founding of UNESCO in 1946, Chisholm submitted his paper entitled: Psychiatry of Enduring Peace and Social Progress – Chisholm and Sullivan 1946

As we know, UNESCO’s first director general was Julian Huxley, and he (after backing it in the first place) adopted Chisholm’s paper as the backbone document of the Constitution of UNESCO.

This is just classic Cecil Bloc tactics here, folks. Setting up the front groups, approving the literary documents, and then PRing it all over the place as “the thing to do”. They are ALL agents, but it is meant to look like “it’s just a group of like-minded men dedicated to serving humanity”.

NOTHING could be further from the truth.

 

I don’t feel very served.

slavemaster experiments - this is not a good look for me

Neither do I.

Julian Huxley, personally described UNESCO in this document. Please take note of these excellent examples of false and misleading “happy cherry-sounding words”.

Its main concern is with peace and security and with human welfare, in so far as they can be subserved by the educational and scientific and cultural relations of the peoples of the world. Accordingly its outlook must, it seems, be based on some form of humanism.

And there you have it – HUMANISM. Their intelligence operation from the 1800’s is being carried over into the 20th century, more than a hundred years later.

That provides us with an excellent example of a conspiracy against humanity, or if you prefer, you could call it a planning continuity. It clearly shows just how LONG a period of time the Slavemasters will consecutively pass on and carry out these planned operations.

After ratification, the Constitution of UNESCO that Julian is essentially describing (linked to above) officially came into effect on November 4, 1946. The first official General Conference of UNESCO was then held in Paris from November 19-December 10, 1946 with representatives from 30 countries.

Later on in 1959 – the British agents tried hard to shield the fact that a very few men – British agents – were behind all of this.

John Rawlings Rees, a Tavistock man, tried to re-characterize the whole conglomeration of new front groups and agencies as not being the work of a relatively few front men – which it was.

Unesco and the World Health Organization were the two Specialized Agencies which pressed originally for the formation of the WFMH…” – John Rees in 1959

How very droll of him. The two “agencies” did it – yea, that’s what happened.

vincent - well...puhlease

Coming back around now –

As you can see, this the British-based subject of humanism  and ethical culture is really just a subset of idea of man being a “blank slate” or more properly, the Latin Tabula Rosa, and that he has to be “taught” how to live.

Tabula Rasa brings all their apparently disrelated subjects into view as being under one overriding concern.

Tabula Rosa – a blank wax slate.

blank slate tabula rasa

I said originally we were going to have a look at the kind of people that were still bringing this concept forward as being “workable” even well into the 20th century, and then we’ll go into the back history of the Tabula Rasa idea itself.

So, we have done the Huxleys now, the second example is a man named Geoffrey Gorer.

Gorer in 1955

Geoffrey_Gorer_in_March_1955

British Intelligence man Geoffrey Gorer was also a a blank slater. It’s positioning as part of a heavy propaganda campaign was renewed yet again through a co-operative effort between MI6 and the forming OSS (the predecessor to the CIA) in America.

In 1942 the OSS Research and Analysis Branch had issued a report concerning a project on how to influence other countries people by what they called culture-specific propaganda.8 The project itself had been started December 20th, 1941, when four Anthropologists had been brought in (through Tavistock, MI6, and General Donovan) to begin assessing the social psychological characteristics of “a people”.

1941_December_20

The reason they were doing this is obvious, to assess the strengths and weaknesses, likes and dislikes, beliefs etc. etc of people around the world in order to design propaganda and control operations to “lead” them where they want them to go.

By Autumn of 1941, Donavan had created the Psychology Division for the OSS – for psychological warfare purposes.

The head of the division was Robert C. Tryon, a psychologist at the University of California. It’s him that wrote the report I just mentioned.

20 years earlier, the Army’s Military Intelligence Division (in liaison with the early Tavistock members) had attempted a systematic social-psychological study of “belligerent nations”, that’s essentially the same idea that Tryon was proposing in January of 1942.

Tryon, for his project, suggested as a “consultant” – which is such a euphemism for an intelligence agent that it’s a joke – Geoffrey Gorer of Yale’s Institute of Human Relations, a specialist in national character studies (which was later approved).

Geoffrey Gorer – young

geoffrey gorer.

This is not as innocent as it looks. Gorer was British Intelligence through Tavistock, and had specifically just been sent to America in 1941 by British Intelligence to work at the Yale Institute of Human Relations. Just in time to also be part of Robert Tryon’s classified COI/OSS project as well.

Time magazine in 1944 actually documented that he was doing secret research in Washington for the British Government. 9

One of the first things that Gorer (who was a closet-homosexual) did upon his arrival to the U.S. was to propagandize against American women. You can get an idea of his mind-set, just from the title of a book mentioned in a book review of his writings, as being comparable to a book called Modern Woman: A Generation of Vipers, by Philip Wylie published in 1942.

But, the very first thing that Gorer did was to do a reconnaisance mission for British Intelligence. He traveled around the U.S.  checking out the impact of radio and television of the Americans. He produced no public documentation of this little journey. Then, he went to work for Yale, where he supposedly was engaged in studying a schizophrenic, again, no documentation. He was engaged in intelligence work and these were obviously “covers” for what he was really doing.

Apparently, while Mr. Gorer is supposedly conducting all these studies that he does NO documentation of to speak of, he was also completely over-obsessed with criticizing the loving relationships American sons had with their mothers.

American_People_book_review_1
American People book review
by HORTENSE POWDERMAKER

Far more disgusting, is his portrayal of any men who are sensitive, moral, and have a conscience are “feminine” and that the real reason American males are loyal to their women (mothers or otherwise) is because they are afraid they are homosexual!!!

american_people_book_review_3
American People book review
by HORTENSE POWDERMAKER

.

Note: In 1961, Gorer wrote “Man to Man” (1961), reprinted as Chapter 18 in: The Danger of Equality and other essays, London: Cresset Press, 1966, pp. 184-192. He discusses homosexuality, saying it is “unfortunate” that homosexuality is illegal in some countries, and taking offense at the word homosexual, preferring it to be homophile as if that is “better”.

As to The Yale Institute of Human Relations itself – where Gorer was supposedly researching schizophrenics – it had been founded on February 25, 1929 with a seven million dollar grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.10

This institute will seek to correlate the branches of learning, to produce a graduate super-informed, trained and inspired to analyze and minister to individuals, to social groups.

The new Institute intends no reorganization of the University’s present departments. Instead, each department will contribute to the Institute’s study of all factors of human behavior and relations.

– Time magazine10

But that was mostly the building part of it, it had actually begun being formed back in 1923 by a Mr. Winternitz, by Yale President James F. Angell, a psychologist [and relative of Brit Sir Norman Angell] and by Robert Hutchinson, Dean of the Law School – they  were the primary advocates for establishing the Institute for Human Relations (IHR). Sir Angell being the British intelligence face-man.

It was said to be an experiment in cooperative research for “the betterment of society.”

Ah, but when Igor Rockefeller entered the mix though –

come igor rockefeller - slavemaster

The British slavemasters, as they quite often do, took control of the relatively mild-mannered front and turned it into something quite different – in this case “biological” psychiatric studies and experimentation. Biological Psychiatry being just another fancy word for quite nasty Eugenics studies.

This, all while still pretending to the public that it is still just as mild-mannered and scholarly, as you can see in the Time magazine article.

Please also see British Security Coordination Compendium – Part V for much more information on the Yale Institute.

The Yale Institute was also the American version of what the Tavistock Institute was up to in England was doing.The later formed U.S. based Tavistock Institute (1946) was planned to be patterned after Yale’s Institute for Human Relations. This is really all just a shell-game of front groups, in an attempt to make it not look like it was 100 percent British Intelligence sourced in the first place – which it was.

Out of this Yale “Project” (proposed by Tryon above) came several works.

One of which was The People of Great Russia by Geoffrey Gorer and John Rickman in 1949. John Rickman* is one of the founding psychiatrists of the original Tavistock group that started their Army Psychiatry work in 1941.

*See British Security Coordination compendium IV – The British Way.

The group on Russia was directed by British agent and “anthropologist” Geoffrey Gorer. Margaret Mead also worked under him, and later in 1951 she published her own paper Soviet Attitudes towards Authority: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Problems of Soviet Character.

…I consider that Russia, or rather the Russian government, is an expanding proselytising force with a system of values and methods of imposing them which shock and revolt me, and which stand in opposition to the values and methods which we honour in theory, however much we may betray them in practice. As such, Russia and its government are a potential danger to our values and our security…(Gorer in Gorer and Rickman 1949: 20)

If you have read my Casimir Pilenas Palmer and The “Reds” articles, you’ll know that this still continuing British propaganda about Russia isn’t at all what it appears to be.

However, it’s fascinating to know that history and see that the next-gen propagandists are still doing the same damn thing as the Brits were during WWI!

BAD Russia. Bad, Bad!

:spank: remake by arrioch

It’s a lot more of a controlled show – a sleight of hand, than anything else.

A distraction.

Gorer had also written a book in early 1948 – titled The American People, where he psycho-analyzes us Americans.

american_people_gorer_book_cover

Gorer also wrote an essay in 1956, which illustrates quite clearly the goals of Tavistock and Yales’ Institute of Human Relations, The title alone, again, gives you your first clue – The Remaking of Man.

One of the most urgent problems – perhaps the most urgent problem – facing the world today is how to change the character and behavior of adult human beings within a single generation.  This problem of rapid transformation has underlaid every revolution (as opposed to coups d’etat) at least from the time of the English Revolution in the seventeenth century….

The Remaking of Man – just another bringing forward of the #1 British Slavemaster propaganda, Man as a Blank Slate.

And now we’re ready to find out more about what that is about.

.

Tabula Rasa – Blank Slate

What is it, and where did it come from, really?

blank slate tabula rasa

Declamatio works like “Aristotle” – written by covert Catholicism agents only half a millennia ago – not thousands and thousands of years, as some would have you believe, write of the unscribed tablet in what is probably the first textbook of psychology in the Western canon, his treatise “Περί Ψυχῆς” (De Anima or On the Soul, Book III, chapter 4).

This had more to do with the Catholic Church’s idea that if you gave them a child under seven, they would give you back a confirmed Catholic.

The Book of Healing also called The Cure it is intended to “cure” or “heal” ignorance of the soul.

The first three books of the Latin Canon were printed in 1472, and a complete edition appeared in 1473.

Avicenna (left) was the Latin name of the great medieval Muslim scholar Ibn Sina (980-1037), who wrote the Canon medicinae, a compendium of medical knowledge. The 1491 edition exhibited at the Countway is the first printing of a medical treatise in Hebrew.

The illustration (right) from ‘The Works of Tobias’ compares the organs of the body to the rooms of a house. (Both purchased for the Solomon M. Hyams Collection of the Boston Medical Library, 1931)

AvicennaIllustration comparing body organs to rooms of a house

The 1491 edition of Avicenna’s Canon is the first appearance of the work in print. (Purchased for the Solomon M. Hyams Collection of the Boston Medical Library, 1934)

1491 edition of Avicenna's 'Canon' with pointing hands to highlight text
– image from  Harvard

A Latin copy of The Canon of Medicine, dated 1484, located at the P.I. Nixon Medical Historical Library of The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA. – But I think this is backdated, there is no way it’s 500 years old.

File:Canons of medicine.JPG

An Arabic copy of The Canon of Medicine, dated 1593 – source is who knows who? Probably one of Lord Cecil’s propagandists*.

*See Balance of Power article for more about the Cecil propagandists first works.

File:Canon ibnsina arabic.jpg

English: A photo of Avicenna’s Canon from a private collection.

Note that this one is hosted by UNESCO.

File:IbnSinaCanon1.jpg

English: The oldest copies of the second volume of “Canon Of Medicine” (1030) by Abu Ali Ibn Sina, known in the West as Avicenna (980-1037). The Institute of Manuscripts of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences – alleged Date 1030, source UNESCO.

Of the Latin version there were about thirty editions, founded on the original translation by Gerard de Sabloneta.

His translations from works of Avicenna are said to have been made by order of the emperor Frederick II. This is a classic example of Declamatio – see that? Supposedly Ibn Sina, translated by Sabloneta, with the propaganda of that Avicenna accepted Galen’s evidence on anatomical matters he preferred Aristotle’s…It’s what I call a quote-fest, which is meaningless as to any real proof.

Note: Canon means “law”.

And now we have another Declamatio referring attempting to cement the earlier declamatios of Ibn whatever and Aristotle.And here also, this Ibn Sina fairy tale, is where we get this “tabula rasa”.

This declamatio character Ibn Sina (known as “Avicenna” in the Western world) is presented as a Persian philosopher. “He” argued that the:

…human intellect at birth is like a tabula rasa, a pure potentiality that is actualized through education and comes to know,” and that knowledge is attained through “…empirical familiarity with objects in this world from which one abstracts universal concepts,” which develops through a “…syllogistic method of reasoning; observations lead to prepositional statements, which when compounded lead to further abstract concepts.

He further argued that the intellect itself:

“…possesses levels of development from the material intellect (al-‘aql al-hayulani), that potentiality can acquire knowledge to the active intellect (al-‘aql al-fa‘il), the state of the human intellect at conjunction with the perfect source of knowledge.”

The declamatio history of this fictional character, usually continues with that:

…in the 12th century, the Andalusian-Islamic philosopher and novelist Ibn Tufail (known as “Abubacer” or “Ebn Tophail” in the West) demonstrated the theory of tabula rasa as a thought experiment through his Arabic philosophical novel, Hayy ibn Yaqzan, in which he depicted the development of the mind of a feral child “from a tabula rasa to that of an adult, in complete isolation from society” on a desert island, through experience alone.

A little more history that you might not know – on the spiritual Eugenics idea, as well as backdating and forging Declamatio works.

Another somewhat fictional figure is used to try and backdate things a bit more than where they were – St. Thomas Aquinas. He is used to say that the Aristotelian and Avicennian (the Tabula Rasa arabic version) notions were brought to the forefront of Christian thought in the 1200’s. He is used to show an “argument” between two declamatio sock-puppets ideas – Plato and Aristotle.

SummaTheologiae.jpg
Summa theologica
, Pars secunda, prima pars. (copy by Peter Schöffer, allegedly from 1471)

Many of Aquinas‘ so-called “proofs” are actually coming from sock-puppet Aristotle’s writings.

Here’s an example of a forged and backdated book, something the British Slavemasters are very fond of doing.

The ad reads –

Featuring Manuscript Endleaves from ca. 1100, the
Oldest We’ve Ever Seen in an Incunabular Binding

THOMAS AQUINAS.

SUMMA THEOLOGICA, PARS SECUNDA: PRIMA PARS (THE FIRST PART OF THE SECOND BOOK).

aquinas_-_summa_theologica_outer

aquinas_-_summa_theologicaVenice: Theodorus de Ragazonibus, 1490). 324 x 222 mm (12 3/4 x 8 3/4″). 200 unnumbered leaves (complete), with first, last, and leaf 194 blank. Double column, 60 lines, gothic type.

Excellent contemporary blindstamped Northern Italian calf (perhaps from Venice or Milan), outer border of blind fillets with mitered corners, inner frame formed by a chain roll within triple fillets, this frame enclosing a large central panel dominated by a cross formed by repeated impressions of a diamond tool and with four small crosses composed of the same tool in the quadrants formed by the large cross, the background punctuated with small rosettes; raised bands, spine compartments with saltire of blind fillets, the same diamond and rosette tools decorating the quadrants, old paper label with ink year of publication, four original brass catches on lower cover (two along fore edge, one each at top and bottom), top clasp and rawhide thong intact (remnants of the other thongs present), FOUR PARTICULARLY FINE 12TH CENTURY VELLUM MANUSCRIPT FLYLEAVES (two at front and two at back), from a liturgical manuscript with early neumes in a fine Carolingian hand (see below).

..Written beginning in 1265 or 1266 and left unfinished at the author’s death, the work first appeared in print in 1463, and became one of the most widely printed works of the incunabular era.

See? There they go…sure, the book just shows up two hundred years later…I believe it.

sarcasm little guy

And here again – how do we know of any of these stories? From one of the first Cecil Bloc propagandists – Sir Francis Bacon.

Bacon first characterized the idea of tabula rasa in a bit more cloaked terms, to have it be more relevant to Science. He strongly established the reliance on the experience of the senses in the pursuit of knowledge. Bacon was a nephew of the first Cecil, William Cecil – the rise of the Slavemasters in the time of Queen Elizabeth.  As one of the second-tier Slavemasters, Francis Bacon was assigned to not only re-write the bible, he was also the Imperator of the Rosicrucians! – among other things.

Even more interesting, is that this time period – the rise of the Slavemasters – is when we get the whole “Greek Intellectual” teachings showing up in English Society, the “Humanists”,  amongst the nobility. Bacon’s mother Anne, her father Sir Anthony Cooke was referred to as a humanist. He was the tutor of King Edward the VI.  Some of which, said teachings are of course, the Aristotle and Plato sockpuppets and the whole “man as a desert island” precursor to the later format of “tabula rasa” characterization.

Note: “Humanist” here, meant Renaissance humanism which was when the Declamatios of supposed “intellectual Greek teachings”, began being scribed and propagated by scholars, writers, and others. It allegedly started in Italy, then spread into Europe during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. It was a challenge to the Catholic church’s control over education, which at the time, wouldn’t allow the teaching of many subjects that it deemed a threat to its role as “god channeler” and ruler of humans.

Note: Francis’s dad, Nicholas Bacon, had a sister who married Sir Thomas Gresham, the founder of the Royal Exchange (stocks and trading) and the Mayor of the City of London at the key time of its changeover to being the center of finance and planning for the British Slavemasters. (This also means that Sir Thomas Gresham was Francis Bacon’s uncle.)

See Scientology Roots chapter 21-2 First Scientologists and their Masters, and Center of the British Empire, City of London.

So, after the Bacon and Humanism “greek” business versions and the “arabic” novels and so on, then we get the next generation of this propaganda in 1671.

The Latin translation – of Ibn Tufail (known as “Abubacer” or “Ebn Tophail” in the West) Arabic philosophical novel, Hayy ibn Yaqzan  – was entitled Philosophus Autodidactus, published by Edward Pococke the Younger in 1671.

This, in turn was used as the basis of John Locke’s formulation of tabula rasa in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.

It was then used as the “inspiration” for John Locke’s essay concerning Human Understanding (which was picked up and spread some more by Robert Boyle, who wrote The Aspiring Naturalist.)

Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper void of all characters, without any ideas. How comes it to be furnished? Whence comes it by that vast store which the busy and boundless fancy of man has painted on it with an almost endless variety? Whence has it all the materials of reason and knowledge? To this I answer, in one word, from EXPERIENCE.

– Essay Concerning Human Understanding : Hernnstein & Murray, 1994, p.311

You can see the influence of Francis Bacon in there, easily.

So, all of this sassa-frassaing around with Ibn this and that plus Aristotle and Plato sockpuppets – is purely designed to give the idea credibility, and not make it so easy to see that it originated in England.

I just wanted you to understand just how far the British Slavemasters will take this propaganda business.

The first English translation was published by George Ashwell in 1686, which now adds a new element of rhetoric to the mix, if you consider adding into the Declamatio timeline, the alleged “Baruch Spinoza” (sort of the Jewish form of Declamatio) Dutch translation, which was actually published by someone else – Johannes Bouwmeester.

But, wait, there’s more!

Then we add in the rhetorical propaganda of the first English translation of the Arabic original, [already a Declamatio, you understand] entitled The Improvement of Human Reason: Exhibited in the Life of Hai Ebn Yokdhan, published by Simon Ockley in 1708.

This is part of how the British Slavemasters colonise an area, they start telling it what their history, their famous figures, and even their “ancient” religion are, and at this time, they were after getting hold of regions of the Far East.

This includes their own people, as well.

 

From then on, in each succeeding generation, an author will be heralded (above all others) who then resurrects the previous Declamatio works. For example, in 1719, Daniel Defoe wrote Robinson Crusoe, which was also set on a deserted island and was regarded as the first novel in English.

It was a major propaganda vehicle for the so-called “Enlightenment.” period.

Now in John Locke’s version of the late 1600’s, tabula rasa was the theory that the (human) mind is at birth a “blank slate” without rules for processing data, and that data is added and rules for processing are formed solely by one’s sensory experiences. The notion is central to Lockean empiricism.

As understood by Locke, tabula rasa meant that the mind of the individual was born blank, and it also emphasized the freedom of individuals to author their own soul.

You can see where Robert Owen just followed right along propagating this in a “next generation” of it, in 1813.

And in preparing the way for the introduction of these principles, it cannot now be necessary to enter into the detail of facts to prove that children can be trained to acquire “any language, sentiments, and belief, or any bodily habits and manners, not contrary to human nature, even to make them, to a great extent, either imbecile or energetic characters.”
– page 10

Owen was obviously the early 1800’s vehicle chosen to forward this particularly lovely little piece of British Slavemaster propaganda – begun in the time of Queen Elizabeth really, don’t forget.

As was Geoffrey Gorer and the Huxley’s in their times. See what I mean though?

They just keep bringing it forward.

 

It’s basically Eugenics, before there was such a named subject, but in the real of mind or spiritual matters. It is yet another example of the joining of supposedly opposed forces in dictating propaganda as to who and what you really are.

On the one hand, you have the Catholic Church (and other religions) appearing to believe that you are a spirit IN a body, which then makes no sense as to how tabula rasa would even be promoted by them. But, yet it was.

Why?

Ah.

Therein lies the crux of the matter. Because, their explanation is that you are a NEW soul, a blank soul, sent to earth to “learn”.

See? Not so different after all, than the so-called “scientific view”, that says you aren’t a spirit, you are a thing, and as such “have no memory and no experience” or what experience you do have is purely “conditioned”.

They are aligned on this.

 

Which, yet again, shows their real fear – the truth about you – which isn’t no tabula rasa.

This is their #1 propaganda item.

The most consistently brought forward throughout the last 400 years.
The most core principle of the hold they would like to have over you.

They want to condition YOU, into believing that you can be conditioned.

It is important to notice the only real possibility of any kind of actual date for the beginning of this just lovely tabula rasa propaganda, is the English version, published by George Ashwell in 1686.

That is the first time anyone, you or I, could possibly even know of it – as English-speaking people, I mean.

Anything before this, is highly suspect to me, for a number of reasons.

Another thing comes clear out of analysing this tabula rasa business, is that now we know why their “philosophies” are useless. They are propaganda, they are not philosophy, and even “Science” is revolving around this same #1 propaganda of theirs.

You are a blank slate – to be conditioned how the Slavemasters want you to be.

 

Coming back around a bit here – the tabula rasa concept became part and parcel of where Geoffrey Gorer and the new regurgitated form of this began showing up, in places like Harvard, and Yale Institute of Human Relations, and so on.

But, next, guess where the torch is passed?

To British intelligence assets like Stanford Research Institute and the highly controlled subjects of “Social Science” and “Biological Psychiatry”.

Again – these subjects:

Are NOT opposed.

They are in LINE with each other.

 

As usual, and as consistent as it is – it again reveals the true agenda and that it is run by ONE source.

The book, Changing Images of Man, is a result of a British intelligence -Tavistock – Stanford Research Institute (SRI) early 1970′s “mind” restructuring project supervised by Willis W. Harman.

However, the institute itself was tasked along these lines in 1968, by OSS man William Gardner – the same year that Hubbard changed direction and created “advanced” levels in Scientology.

Stanford Research Institute was controlled by the same hierarchy of men who were pushing Eugenics, as well as behavior modification and “testing” techniques – run by the British Slavemasters through their highly controlled MI6 asset, the OSS.

Some of these very men, started and ran Stanford Research Institute as a cut-out to continue their nasty experiments (including the later LSD, and Scientology “remote viewing” ridiculousness) with having a nice, large, Young-and-Dumb (to their ways) population of actually highly intelligent college students.

In fact, the official that “asked” for this “Changing Images of Man” study, was an outcropping of the British Tavistock psychological assessment operation, John William Gardiner.

*For much more information about that – see British Security Coordination Compendium articles in the World Government Section of our Reading Library, especially #3 and #5.

 

The book contains a very revealing section concerning propagating the #1 British Slavemaster propaganda – Tabula Rasa.

Changing Images of Man OCRd  –

page 29 and 30 –

The Human as Mechanism-the View of Modern Behaviorism

Objective psychology became behaviorism in 1913 when John B. Watson led a break with the older tradition of introspection, a tradition that had brought about little agreement about the nature of consciousness.

More important, from the utilitarian point of view that has typified American thought, the introspectionist approach could not lead to prediction and control of data as could nineteenth-century physics. [ their real goal there in orange]

Thus, for scientific reasons, consciousness came to be thought of as a “construct” whose study leads to no fruitful results – a “black box” whose unknown mechanisms (which would become known by physiology, biochemistry, etc.) should produce behaviors that would be regular and predictable if we but study them the right way.

[See? They don’t understand how YOU work – they still don’t]

Instinctivist thought (endless lists of instincts being proposed to explain man’s behavior) came into scientific disrepute at about this same time; hence it was convenient for the behaviorist school to incorporate Locke’s image of the new born human as a tabula rasa on which is written the results of various processes of conditioning.

The branch of this school of thought which has proved most successful emphasizes the technique of operant conditioning, a term originated by B. F. Skinner to denote a systematic procedure whereby the actions of an organism are brought under control by giving it a reward if and only if it behaves in a specified manner.

This technique has been successfully used – in education, psychotherapy, and in prisons to alter whole behavior patterns of individuals.

A rather different approach to understanding (and controlling) behavior, also of proven effectiveness, is through the implementation of remotely activated electrodes in the brain.

The “psycho-civilization of society” has been advocated by means of various techniques of behavior modification such as operant conditioning (Skinner, 1971), electrocranial stimulation (Delgado, 1969), and psycho-chemical drugs (Clark, 1971).

Only if such mentalistic and prescientific concepts as will, freedom, consciousness, and so forth are cast off, Skinner asserts, “does man have a chance to attain a truly peaceful, rational, and humane society in the future.”

Certainly, the techniques that have been developed within the view of “man as mechanism” are powerful and efficient. They work.

Hence if integrated and reconciled with other views of man-views which have more adequate ethics and metaphysics (both terms that the behavioristic scientist insists are not part of his concern) on which to guide their application-this view and its products could conceivably be of great benefit to mankind.

Did you catch that?

They want you to get rid of the idea that you have will, freedom, and consciousness!

 

Of course, minor little detail, why then, is there such need to get rid of something that, if we are truly tabula rasa, things like will, freedom, and consciousness were never there in the first place.

If it isn’t there, why are they always trying to override it then?

Hmmm...

sarcasm little guy

Methinks they doth protest too much.

 

sword divider2

 

Section 2.1

transparent back flashing starTabula Rasa – The “Blank Slate” – The Writing Is On The Walltransparent back flashing star

image by Virginia

Now we will come all the way back around to George Holyoake look again at what fabulous “views” our Oahspe publisher Mrs. Thompson had, that were so glowingly described as “accepted” and that propagandist George Holyoake was going to publish in a pamphlet. Bearing in mind, this is the predecessor the next generation Britain-rules-the-world idea – The League of Nations.

Mrs. Thompson has agitated the question of the possibility of an international republic, or a world governed by laws emanating from an intelligent community. The value of this idea has been recognized by statesmen at home and abroad. The publication of a journal in England advocating her views has been announced by George J. Holyoake.

Appletons’ Cyclopaedia of American Biography, Volume 6

Then we talked about Holyoake’s good buddy Frederick Gould, and who he was, and that he had described Holyoake with some labels – “Owenite” and “Co-operator”, so we learned about what all that meant.

We then learned something very important – the #1 Slavemaster Propaganda propagated for generation after generation.

Tabula Rasa – Man is a Blank Slate.

 

Now we’ll pick this up again, and you’ll understand what all this “secularism” bit is about now, it’s just the latest outcropping of trying to “write” on man’s slate – so to speak.

Ah, but what they write on that “slate” – such poison!

mind poisoners - mind control

If you consider that the first generation of their poison-pen was the Bible as we now know it, the invention of Lurian Kabbalah and the “raising of the sparks”, and the Torah, all begun during the rise of the Slavemasters (Queen Elizabeth) – has caused more suffering, more war, more HORROR than any single other cause?

Well, you’d expect to see them utilize that same type of “rewrite” again. And so it was, and you’re looking at the….shall we say…covert part of fomenting unrest (so as to need a “solution”) part of the cycle right here at this point in history. This is the beginning of the second phase of building their Empire to rule the world  – England as the “King” chosen by God to rule over ALL OF CHRISTENDOM. (See Balance of Power article).

So here we are in 1866, and the poison pens are on the move…

Power of Words

 

Marching in lockstep across the “slates” of men.

marching_fountain_pens

George Holyoake took Robert Owen’s regurgitation of the same ol’-same ol’ slavemaster views, updated it for the next generation and renamed the whole idea secularism.

He also threw in that word nationalism we discussed, when the The National Secular Society was founded in 1866 with Charles Bradlaugh as President and Charles Watts Senior as secretary.

As part of this continuing shifting around and inventing of new terms and front groups, in 1877 George Holyoake, John Watts and Harriet Law then founded the British Secular Union, which remained active until 1884.

It was through the National Secular Society that Charles Bradlaugh met Annie Besant who became his close associate. Annie Besant was a rather busy little bee – she kept turning up in front group after front group to “help things along” – but we’ll get to that in just a minute.

Together with Annie Besant and others, Charles Bradlaugh then founded the World Union of Freethinkers in 1880, just two years before the publication of the Oahspe, which was published by their good buddy James Burns, and the supposedly piously brilliant Mrs. Thompson.

Remember, in the Society for Psychical Research connections section of this article, we found out that the same publishing company (James Burns) that published the Oahspe also published as one of its first items? A book by Charles Bradlaugh.

This new World Union was an amalgamation of the National Secular Society and Watts’s Rationalist Press Committee (later renamed Rationalist Press Association) whose members if you recall, were Frederick Millar, Dr. R. Bithell, Charles A. Watts, and Frederick Gould.

So now you have them all linked up together, and easy to see and understand that they are writing on the blank slate of man – these wonderful  sarcasm  ideas.

Annie Besant was another propagandist agent of this same core group of Brits. She was not only mixed up with Helena Blavatsky and Theosophy, but with several other front groups as well. Helena Blavatsky was mixed up in combined Okhrana (Russian Secret Service) and British Secret Service (Sir William Melville) black operations against “International Anarchists”, amongst other things.

See Casimir Pilenas and The Protocols of Zion hoax for much more info on just how involved these kind of Black operations by the British were – including the Protocols of Zion.

Note: Blavatsky, if you recall, was also helped by our OASHPE publisher Burns, to become more well-known to the public, so that she could “do her thing” as a humanist (tabula rasa) agent as well. (See: The Medium and Daybreak (London), March 15, 1889, p. 165)

Frederick Gould had mentioned Annie as being one of the people he had interviewed for the Rationalist publications. She apparently couldn’t stop talking about Theosophy at the time, as that remained Gould’s dominant recollection of his interview with her.

Mrs. Annie Besant, profusely discoursing on Theosophy and reprimanding me if I forgot a Buddhist phrase. These and many another agreeably confronted me and the fluttering leaves of my Pitman shorthand note-book.”

cite: F. J. Gould’s The Life-Story of a Humanist, published by Watts & Co, London 1923, reproduced by the Leicester Secular Society.

Remember – the whole “spiritualism” movement goes back to the time of our other OAHSPE publisher – James Burns, the Society of Psychical Research “study group” – and that Robert Owen had “converted” to spiritualism at this time to further lend it credibility.

Annie Besant

Annie Besant

Annie Besant was a rather colorful character, to put it mildly. She was one of many Cecil Bloc agents assigned various tasks concerning “changing the world”. Not only was she acceptable to the hoity-toity Aethaeneum Club, but she was also one of the seven members of the board of the Fabian Society – yet another front group for this campaign then running rampant.

It is said that she and George Bernard Shaw were lovers, despite his refusal to move in with her. Nevertheless, they did have a close relationship; after attending a Fabian Society soiree’ (17 April, 1884) Shaw sponsored her to become a member.

This gathering, held in Gower Street, was memorable because it was attended by Mrs. Annie Besant, then notorious as an advocate of Atheism and Malthusianism, the heroine of several famous law cases, and a friend and colleague of Charles Bradlaugh.

The History of the Fabian Society by Edward R. Pease

Some time in May that same year, she officially became one of the Society’s seven propaganda writers in house. Her tract on Sidney Webb was one of the most popular; used later by Zubatoc concerning “revolutionary cells” and infiltration of society.

Note: Sidney Webb was a life-long close friend of the later Under-Secretary of the Home Office (MI5) Charles Masterman, whose superior was Winston Churchill. Masterman would run the first ever propaganda department (changing the meaning of the word forever) to get American into WWI. Masterman was sponsored by several Cecil Bloc men in both his political career and his propaganda activities. See Charles Frederick Gurnee Masterman and Casimir Pilenas Palmer and The Protocols of Zion Hoax articles in the Specific Persons section of our Reading Library.

Besant was also involved with Fred Gould, George Holyoake et al. (1888/89) in the publishing of cheap tracts for the masses, as well as having previous involvement with the National Secular Society – which was Holyoake’s baby. She jumped from fad subject to fad subject, all done as part of the basic master propaganda plan to inundate the public with “new ideas” – an outright attack on the Catholic Church and centuries of dogma. She called herself an atheist, a Marxist, a theosophist, a socialist, a humanist, and as you saw in the Fabian Society history above – a Malthusian.

Malthusianism

  • noun:   Malthus’ theory that population increase would outpace increases in the means of subsistence

Three years after the publishing of the OAHSPE, the year 1885 was a busy year for the British-run propagandists. Anne Besant – as part of yet another soon-to-be front group called the Rationalist Associaton – somehow found time to help Charles Watts Jr. starts a magazine called “the Literary Guide” (now called New Humanist). This is one of the oldest running magazines in the world.

Right out of the starting gate, this poison-pen magazine was heavily pushing the Stanton Coit/Felix Adler (Temple Emanu-EL, New York) Ethical Culture Society doctrines.

See George Stanton Coit article.

Note: Charles Watts Jr. was the son of Charles Watts, who was the secretary of the National Secular Society that George Hoyaoke had formed together with Bradlaugh and Besant.

Meanwhile, Besant compatriots Anna Kingsford and Edward Maitland had started the Hermetic Society just previously, and were busy bashing out painfully hard to read “ancient texts” in 1885.

One particularly inventive rewrite of a declamatio was The Virgin of the World, Of Hermes Mercurious Trismegistus published in London by George Redway. Apparently this had been preceded by publishing a Hargrave Jennings version of the Divine Pomander, which, said tongue firmly held in cheek, revealed ancient philosophical truths!

Ahem.

Ancient “truths” brought to you by live and in person by British declamatio writers – that is.

In presenting the “Virgin of the World” – which with my “Hargrave Jennings” Edition of the “Divine Pymander,” now so much in repute and demand, are the text books of Hermetic thought – it is no act of supererogation to gratefully acknowledge my appreciation of the valued services associated with me in the privileged task of once again reviving those priceless writings of that “Master Initiate,” “Hermes Mercurius Trismegistus;” (to be shortly supplemented by the Third Volume, or “Golden Treatise concerning the Physical Secret of the Philosopher’s Stone, in seven sections,” esteemed one of the best and oldest pieces of Alchemical Philosophy extant; comprising, in epitome, the whole Art and secret method of its confection, with corroborative annotations from Fludd, Behmem, Vaughan, &c.

Bath. May, 1885.

Maitland and Kingsford: The Virgin of the World, Of Hermes Mercurious Trismegistus

Hermes Trismagistus?

Oh god – not that again.

come on!

wiley-double yikes

Maitland had just hooked up even more closely with Besant, (1884) when he would later help run the British Theosophical Society of which he became vice-president – Besant was President. Charles Carleton Massey had previously been President when it first formed in 1878, he was a prominent member of the British Society of Psychical Research and a member of the Athenaeum Club. He resigned when the Society for Psychical Research “attacked” Helena Blavatsky and gave allegedly damaging evidence against her.

That isn’t what it looks like, because Blavatsky was then a newly recruited deep cover Russian and British intelligence agent.

See Casimir Pilenas and The Protocols of Zion Hoax for documentation.

Sometimes, as part of building their agents cover and “distancing” them – they would use an attack to both bring them to people’s attention and distance them.

The other thing with Blavatsky, is that she was running a kind of False Flag operation, where Blavatsky is deliberately spear-heading dubious ideas which can then be attacked, making other Brits look “intelligent and rational” by so doing – get it?

It’s part of Controlled Opposition.

 

Annie Besant, in all her propagandist be-bopping around, would land in yet another front group a little later on (1889) – the marxist-based Social Democratic Foundation.

George Bernard Shaw decided not to partake of that society with Besant, stating later that their differences (between the Fabian Society just beginning) and other Socialists were “latent and instinctive.”

… among ourselves, talked revolution, anarchism, labour notes versus pass-books, and all the rest of it, on the tacit assumption that the object of our campaign, with its watchwords, ‘EDUCATE, AGITATE, ORGANIZE,’ was to bring about a tremendous smash-up of existing society, to be succeeded by complete Socialism.

George Bernard Shaw as quoted in The History of the Fabian Society by Edward R. Pease

Besides the fact that it just became obvious where the ideas for the “revolution” of 1960’s American came from, to describe these “differences” using the ubiquitous terms of ‘latent’ and ‘instinctive’?

seriously

About the best thing you could say about that is that perhaps Shaw was just having a lark using a thesauraus – to figure how to basically say nothing. I say that, because there really wasn’t any actual conflict between the groups – they were all run by the same masters. So, any – insert air quotes here – “conflicts” were purely of the draw-attention-to-ourselves variety.

Meanwhile – our cast of characters here seems to be growing rather exponentially.

Over in America, the former “Freethought” group, the American Socialistic Labor Party (sister to a group formed by Holyaoke and others) had somewhat imploded. Out of the ashes, at a Congress in 1884 they voted to change the name to the American Secular Union, which was done shortly thereafter in 1885.

**see Important Note – Courtland Palmer section just after this, for just what and from whom, this Congress idea was about.

They elected Robert G. Ingersoll president, Mr. Samuel Putnam secretary, Charles Watts first vice-president, and Courtlandt Palmer as treasurer.

pansy-yellow-purple

They adopted the flower “pansy” for their symbol of freethought. It was supposedly chosen because of it’s derivation from the French word pensée, which means “thought”; the pansy was so named because the flower resembles a human face, and in the month of August it nods forward as if deep in thought.

freethought pansy

Reminder: Charles Watts had been a leading member of the Freethought movement, formed the World Union of Freethinkers – five years earlier in 1880 – together with Charles Bradlaugh, Annie Besant, and others. More importantly, remember the George Holyoake/Elizabeth Thompson Workingmen’s Co-operative Colony?  It was unique as part of British colonization efforts in the U.S. in Kansas, and then Holyoake founded the Workingmen’s Labor Party in Newark, New Jersey, through his British counterpart the Socialistic Labor Party and the Workingmen’s Labor party was renamed the American Socialistic Labor Party in 1877.

socialist labor party

In regards the new, NEW conglomeration called the American Secular Union –

Understand now, we are still in an era of time

that is only 3 years after

the publication of the OAHSPE, which as you can see, fits right in.

 

.

This organization, by the way – American Secular Union – had one hell of a lot of interesting connections directly tying it to a number of other front groups.

The first President was Robert G. Ingersoll.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN: While I have never sought any place in any organization, and while I never intended to accept any place in any organization, yet as you have done me the honor to elect me president of the American Secular Union, I not only accept the place, but tender to you each and all my sincere thanks.

CONVENTION OF THE AMERICAN SECULAR UNION Albany, N.Y., September 13, 1885, Works of Robert G. Ingersoll.

 

Remember Courtlandt Palmer (spelled Courtland also) that Holyoake mentioned in 1880?

Reminder: understand that this is primarily British immigrants that are being talked about below with this 1880 “colony” business.

In New York I found there had lately been formed a “Co-operative Colony Aid Association” (represented by the Worker, published by Mrs. Elizabeth Thompson, and edited by the Rev. R. Heber Newton), of which Mr. E. E. Barnum, Dr. Felix Adler, Mr. E. V. Smalley, the Rev. Dr. Rylance, the Rev. Dr. Charles F. Deems, Mr. Courtland Palmer, Joseph Seligman, the Hon. John Wheeler, and others were promoters.

LITTELL’S LIVING AGE, No. 1886—August 17, 1880, A Stranger in America. (From The Nineteenth Century) By G. J. Holyoake.

This “Co-operation” business was designed to try and channel the correct instinct to revolt over into something that would not interfere with their Empire-building plans.

So, now Palmer shows up again at this American Secular Union Congress.

Ingersoll referred to Palmer’s speech at the congress as the “aristocracy” of freethought – there’s that hierarchy thing coming into play again. This is also a direct undermining of Thomas Jefferson’s principles regarding “aristocracies.”

I now have the pleasure of introducing Mr. Courtlandt Palmer, who will speak to you on the “Aristocracy of Freethought,” in my judgment the aristocracy not only of the present, but the aristocracy of the future.

– CONVENTION OF THE AMERICAN SECULAR UNION, Albany, N.Y., September 13, 1885.

I think a comparison to Thomas Jefferson’s views on this is in order, especially considering these nasty little anglophilic propagandists are trying to pretend like they are following his ideas – which they aren’t.

These people are trying to make America back into a British Dominion.

Never forget that.

 

There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents.

…There is, also, an artificial aristocracy, founded on wealth and birth, without either virtue or talents: for with these it would belong to the first class. The natural aristocracy I consider as the most precious gift of nature for the instruction, the trusts, and government of society.

…May we not even say, that that form of government is the best, which provides the most effectually for a pure selection of these natural aristoi into the offices of government?

The artificial aristocracy is a mischievous ingredient in government, and provision should be made to prevent its ascendency.

 — To John Adams, vi, 223. Ford ed., ix, 425. (M., 1813.), From The Jefferson Cyclopedia – available to view online at the Internet Archive and Hathi Trust.

If he knew what these weasels were trying to do – hiding behind his ideas for this country, he’d have probably booted them back to England where they belong!

I mean really, Courtlandt, together with Felix Adler and Elizabeth Thompson – they were all part of Holyoake’s British Colony-making in America – all nicely tied in with Henry George and others with this whole WORKINGMEN’S labor Party and the first entrance of a Roosevelt into Politics..

See Evolution Not Revolution article.

And now here they all are again, trying to shift public perception by inventing another new front group!

wiley oh wow

Important note – Courtland Palmer

 

Courtlandt (born 1843 – died 1888)  had formed something called the Nineteenth Century Club of New York in 1880, after a meeting with George Holyoake.

The Club was patterned on the Toynbee method – which often used “book reviews” and “discussions on literature and art” as sort of their cover for why they were meeting, but it also served as a command post for deciding which books to “push” and which ones to “kill”.

The general Toynbee method, again, was:

“He would gather his friends around him; they would form an organization; they would work on quietly for a time, some at Oxford, some in London; they would prepare themselves in different parts of the subject until they were ready to strike in public.”

So Courtlandts Nineteenth Century club, (of which he was the President) would meet periodically during the winter months. Leaders of art, literature, and social science were invited to speak and their remarks were followed by open discussion. Members of the masonic organization – the B’nai B’rith – were also involved.

It was at a congress of that club in 1884, that it was proposed to combine the Workingmen’s Party and the Nineteenth Century Club into this NEW front group – the American Secular Union.

Remember, this is the same time period of the changeover of front groups concerning “theosophy” over in England, where Edward Maitland had just hooked up even more closely with Besant, (1884) which he would later help run the British Theosophical Society of which he became vice-president – Besant was President.

Felix Adler and others, at this American Secular Union Congress, proposed a New Church of HumanityAnimatedStar.

Which is the same thing that John Newbrough had proposed in his Oahspe book just 2 years earlier.

Which is the same thing as SPR – Society for Psychical Research – board member Frederick Myers in his two-volume book The Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death Volume I and Volume II .

AnimatedStarThe Church of Humanity New York’s Worshipping Positivists, Courtlandt Palmer: Tributes Offered by Members of the Nineteenth Century Club to its Founder and First President (New York, 1889), p. 155.

 

Excerpt, Scientology Rootschapter 21-5Myers promotion of a new world religion.

The last chapter in the two-volume book states the covert evil purpose of the Society for Psychical Research (and the much later outcropping, Scientology). They want a World Religion to go along with their World Government, World Army, World Bank, and World Court.

Volume II– Chapter X Epilogue Provisional Sketch Of A Religious Synthesis

…a durable religious synthesis should do more than satisfy man’s immediate aspiration.

It should be in itself progressive and evolutionary; it should bear a promise of ever deeper holiness, to answer to the long ages of heightening wisdom during which our race may be destined to inhabit the earth. This condition has never yet been met.

The Function of a Society for Psychical Research

…For just as a kind of spiritual fusion of Europe under Roman sway prepared the way for Christianity to become the European religion –

so now also it seems to me that a growing conception of the unity, the solidarity, of the human race is preparing the way for a world-religion which expresses and rests upon that solidarity; — which conceives it in a fuller, more vital fashion than either Positivist or Catholic had ever dreamed.

So, see that’s the point of all this “Socialist” “Communist” crap, ad infinitum – it’s all part of the British Slavemaster plan.

… Now here, I take it, lies the special, the characteristic duty of the Society for Psychical Research. …the expansion of Science herself until she can satisfy those questions which the human heart will rightly ask, but to which Religion alone has thus far attempted an answer. Or rather, this is the duty, the mission, of the coming century’s leaders of spiritual thought.

Our own more special duty is to offer through an age of transition more momentous than mankind has ever known, that help in steadying and stimulating psychical research all over the world which our collective experience should enable us richly to bestow.

—–

So, that puts Adler, Newbrough, Myers, Palmer, Watts Jr. and Holyoake all working together for a SOCIALISTIC New World Order scientific religion – God, major shades of Scientology here – while not too much later than this, we get British/Russian intelligence accusing every one else and their brother of being “communists” and “socialists” as a slur! Those that wouldn’t go in lockstep with their New World Order plan, that is…

Methinks they misdirect too much.

 

 

So – it was this “congress”, of the Nineteenth Century Club, that proposed to change the name of the organization to the AMERICAN SECULAR UNION. Charles Watts – Mr. propaganda press in Britain – being the obligatory British agent on the board.

An interesting side note

An little known factoid about the President of the American Secular Union, Robert “G” (Green) Ingersoll, is that he descended from the original John Ingersoll who emigrated from England to the Salem colony in the 1600’s – you know, the Salem Witch Trials people.

salem 1692

Hannah Collins Ingersoll married Deacon Nathaniel Ingersoll on March 25, 1657. Nathaniel – or future witch prosecutor – was the son of Richard Ingersoll and Ann Langley.

Note: Richard was the son of John Ingersoll, and our Robert G. Ingersoll of the American Secular Union, also descends directly from him as well.

Nathaniel, grandson of John Ingersoll, was born in Salem about 1632 and was about 11 years old when his father died. His mother married John Knights, of Newbury and he was sent to live with Governor John Endicott (Endecott) on his plantation called Orchard in Salem Village. He was sent to learn how to farm the land his father had left him.

Nathaniel later became a tavern keeper. In 1673 he was allowed to sell –

beer and syder by the quart for the tyme whyle the farmers are building of their meeting house and on Lord’s days afterwards.”

On the 22d of March, 1689, and on November 24th, that same year, the church records declare –

that Brother Nathaniel Ingersoll was chosen by a general vote of the Brethren to officiate in the place of a Deacon for a time.

Church meetings were held at the Ingersoll home.

The first hearings in the Salem witch trials were held at the Ingersoll tavern on March 1, 1692. Nathaniel was an accuser in at least seven cases!

SALEM WITCH TRIAL HANGINGS

These people had a hatred of women, particularly powerful women, like you cannot believe. They are slavemasters through-and-through that way.

Most people don’t know though, they also went after men! Particularly men that stood up for women.

Giles Corey – on trial for witchcraft, his expression is priceless.

giles corey accused of witchcraft - was crushed to death.

He was put to death particularly horribly – slowly crushed to death.

John Ingersoll had several wives and LOTS of children.  Through this male progenitor, (through different wives though) Robert is actually related to the later Ralph McAllister Ingersoll, who would act as a British intelligence asset for William Stephenson and the BSC (formed to get America into WWII). Ralph would funnel propaganda for Stephenson through his magazine – PM.

I guess those psychotic British intel-lines run pretty true in some families, eh?

Courtlandt Palmer was also heavily connected to Gerald Massey.

“For instance, Courtlandt Palmer, the President of the Nineteenth Century Club, testifies that he heard Mr. Massey’s lecture in New York with the most profound interest; and although a Positivist himself, he says Mr. Massey’s facts and deductions are of the utmost value according to any theory of the world.”

The Banner of Light – Boston, Saturday, April 19, 1884.

Now we have another word being thrown around, just to confuse things even more. Did you notice it?

Positivist.

This was from another British propagandist, Richard Congreve, who was a disciple of Auguste Comte and founder of the Church of Humanity in London.

So there we go again – it starts in ENGLAND first, not America, as some might want you to believe.

Massey later wrote of something he called Natural Genesis, which was a freethought version of religion – right in line with the New Church of Humanity idea. In 1891, he writes an attack which in itself, inadvertently points to that the real reason for the explosion of all these “isms” and new age religions (the first new age, that is).

The point of poison-penning all of those was an intentional creation of a paradox. The point, more clearly stated, for creating these off-the-wall views such as the OAHSPE was to then attack them as irrational, and offer up the solution of the “new world” scientific religion of the British slavemasters. Humanity was being agitated, as a set-up, get it?

Here’s Massey –

“I cannot join in the new masquerade and simulation of ancient mysteries manufactured in our time by Theosophists, Hermeneutists, pseudo-Esoterics, and Occultists of various orders, howsoever profound their pretensions. The very essence of all such mysteries as are got up from the refuse leavings of the past is pretence, imposition, and imposture. The only interest I take in the ancient mysteries is in ascertaining how they originated, in verifying their alleged phenomena, in knowing what they meant, on purpose to publish the knowledge as soon and as widely as possible.” (Massey’s response to the Blavatsky letter, Agnostic Journal, 1891).

 

To understand why this odd assortment of people are rabble-rousing in this way, where they are headed, we need to take a brief look at something.

 

Prussia, The Hapsburg Empire, and Zionism

photo by V

House_of_Hapsburg_-_double_headed_eagleThe symbol of the Nesilim.

The symbol for War.

fall of an empire - fantazy

The Dark Empire

Where all War begins.

The Dark Empire - empire City - London

London

 

It was while he was working as the Foreign Editor for the London Times, and as an asset for Charles Masterman and Wellington House, that Henry Wickham Steed put out a book called The Hapsburg Empire in the spring of 1915.

The book was meant to forward a particular propaganda line that British intelligence wanted at that time – after all, they were at War.

Trying to win Belgium to the side of the Allies was a special desire of Masterman, one which he ultimately failed in, but not for lack of trying. Steed’s book was exactly along these lines.

His book was somewhat of a study in contradictions, particularly on the subject of Zionism, but it did inadvertently reveal part of the British Slavemasters original plan for it.

“They seem to fear that, by coming out into the open, the Zionists may be playing into the enemy’s hands.”

 H. Wickham Steed.

 

As indeed they should have been afraid, as history has now proven.

Steed also revealed though, the real reason for their desire to use the Jewish religionists.

After saying the above, Steed notes that:

Zionism in its territorial aspects is now an integral, if not indeed the most significant part of the Near Eastern Question, at least as regards the future of the Ottoman Empire.

An “empire” which, the British wanted back apparently, but the whole fairy tale about why that is (about Romans and granaries) is rather highly suspect. So never mind that, the bottom line is – they wanted the OIL.

Reaching back to their earliest days of coming to power, I believe that the next-gen Slavemasters of Charles Masterman’s time, decided to re-implement one of their long ago “successful” propaganda ideas. Ideas that they had created at the beginning of their biggest Empire building stage.

That was the time of the re-writing of the Christian Bible by Francis Bacon (who also wrote New Atlantis: about colonising America) – he was the nephew of William Cecil, the Spymaster.

At that time, the Slavemasters used those new writings by Bacon, plus the invented “Lurian Kabbala”, plus a particular England-resident Rabbi (Ben-Israel)  – ALL combined to then USE particularly the Jewish religionists to go out and “colonise” for the British slavemasters.

The Jewish rabbi told the Jews that a “new Jewish Messianic Age” would come if they would go out and colonise areas and “blend in with the local population” and so on. They called it the diaspora – their “dispersion” around the world that this began.

See Scientology Roots – Chapter Eleven: Inception of International Banking  and also see other examples of early Slavemaster Propaganda from this time period in Balance of Power.

Zionism, marks the second time they would try to use the Jewish religionists, both as pawns on a chess board and as cannon fodder for the war still to come – WWII, for any recalcitrants who had either a: refused to be “resettled’ to either America, South America, or Palestine, or b: decided to stay with their German loyalties.

An unpardonable sin, from a Slavemaster perspective, but not unexpected, and certainly able to be used.

That is why, in my opinion, Prussian Jews were chosen to both initiate and to be the bulwark of Zionism. Besides Theodore Herzl himself, we also had our American versions banging the British drum of “Zionism” to the American Jewish religionists, and the ex-patriate recent arrivals from Eastern Europe.

For example, a Prussian Jew named Rabbi Gottheil of Temple Emanu-El.

Before I get into him – to illustrate the other part of the early Slavemaster religious propaganda plan that I mentioned – we have the anti-religionist, particularly anti-Catholic.

Robert Ingersoll – who was now President of the heavily British intelligence influenced American Secular Union, had some interesting things to say at that Conference in September of 1885.

I do not want to support the Catholic Church. It is not worth supporting. It is an unadulterated evil. Neither do I want to reform the Catholic Church. The only reformation of which that church or any orthodox church is capable, is destruction.

CONVENTION OF THE AMERICAN SECULAR UNION Albany, N.Y., September 13, 1885, Works of Robert G. Ingersoll.

Pretty strong words, eh? VERY similar to what went on with Queen Elizabeth as soon as she took the throne – she got rid of Catholicism as the English official religion.

Meanwhile, the same year as this conference, 1885, an interesting event was planned by Courtlandt Palmer at the Nineteenth Century Club.

Rabbi Gustav Gottheil of Temple Emanu-El was vice-President of it at the time.

Gustav_Gottheil

He was originally from Hungary I believe, and then was in Manchester England, where he had a reform congregation for a number of years. Plenty of time to get “educated” by British intelligence. He was then “chosen” to go to America to take over as Rabbi from Felix Adler’s dad Samuel, to be the new Rabbi of Temple Emanu-El and it’s masonic society, the B’nai B’rith – which originally was constituted under the Grand Orient, Scottish Rite of Freemasonry (the one that used the double-headed eagle Nesilim symbol).

Gottheil was also to later be Vice President of the Federation of American Zionists! In 1897, he attended the first Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland.

References – Rabbi Gottheil – NY Times obituary, April 16, 1903, and The Jewish Encyclopedia: A Descriptive Record of the History Volume 6

In late 1885, the year that General Grant had died, there was a kerfluffle over the Nineteenth Century club inviting a Rabbi “Alphabet” Brown, who was too “unknown”, and that got cancelled because Gottheil didn’t want him there.

Note: Rabbi Browne was nicknamed “Alphabet” Browne by his contemporaries because of his flagrant brandishing of his many academic degrees (i.e., Rabbi E.B.M. Browne, LLD, AM, BM, DD, MD).

Soon after Grant’s death, the prestigious Nineteenth Century Club organized clergymen for a public discussion of Sabbath observance, and invited Browne to present the Jewish point of view. This did not sit well with some of the club’s Jewish members, however.

According to The New York Mail and Express, “It has given offence to some of the Fifth Avenue Israelites to see Rabbi Browne, an outsider, selected for the Jewish side over Rabbi Gottheil, one of the Vice-Presidents of the club and a Fifth Avenue preacher.” Pressure from Temple Emanu-El subsequently caused Browne’s invitation to be rescinded and transferred to Gottheil.

– Main reference is Voices for Justice: Rabbi Jacob M. Rothschild in Atlanta (1946-1972) and Edward B.M. Browne in New York (1881-1889), by Janice Rothschild Blumberg, Southern Jewish Historical Society.
– References given for this particular excerpt are: The Daily Telegraph, January 7, 1896, copy in Portion of Book, Series C, Browne, AJA, 24-25; and for the last line above: Col. Elliot F. Sheppard to Isaac Frisch, January 15, 1889, text copied in Portion of Book, Series C, Browne, AJA, 140 n.

 

You can tell Rabbi Browne was pissed off about it, because he was still talking about it in 1888, The Evening World (August 11, 1888) commented on his sermon that apparently was trashing Palmer and the Nineteenth Century Club with “severe allusions”.

The_Evening_World_Sat__Aug_11__1888_

 

Rabbi “Alphabet” Browne wearing his medals.

Rabbi_E.B.M._Browne_wearing_his_medals

Meanwhile, moving up in time here –

Gottheil’s son, Professor Richard H. Gottheil, held the Chair of Semitic and Rabbinical Literature at Columbia. During WWI, starting some time around 1915/16, he worked as a deep-cover agent for British Intelligence – for William Wiseman on Bolshevik/White Russian matters (amongst other things).

See Casimir Pilenas and The Protocols of Zion Hoax

Coming back now to Propaganda Boy Henry Wickham Steed again – what’s the deal with the Hapsburg Empire anyways, why should we care?

Because  – it’s what “started” WWI.

The Austrian Habsburgs ruled over various lands such as Belgium, Milan, Naples, Hungary, Croatia.

In 1866 Austria was defeated by Bismarck’s Prussia and forced to relinquish its last domains in Germany and in 1867 Austria permanently agreed to share power with Hungary as the Austro-Hungarian Empire, its full title actually being ‘The Kingdoms and Lands Represented in the Imperial Council and the Lands of the Crown of St Stephen’.

This Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary was a veritable family of 11 officially recognised nationalities kept in union by the Habsburg Monarch who functioned as Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary simultaneously.

The 19th Century was a time of ethnic “awakening” (helped by the British Slavemasters, you understand) throughout Europe and tensions within the Austro-Hungarian Empire were intense.

Man, they had everybody after everybody that way.

Poles yearned for a separate and united homeland, Croats demanded autonomy, Serbs conspired to join the Kingdom of Serbia and ethnic Germans were concerned they were losing influence to liberal and non-German forces. As well as the recognised national groups the empire was also home to large populations of Jews, Muslim Bosniaks, Gypsies and numerous other groups including Albanians, Turks, Circassians and Aromanians.

Stirring the pot as they do – trouble was assured.

war-witches

The Habsburg monarch held great influence within the Catholic Church, even using its power to veto the election of the Papal Father in the conclave of 1903. The Monarch also held rights to protect Catholics in the non-Catholic states of Serbia, Montenegro and Albania.

These particular ancient Nesilim blood-line Monarchs tended to be a bit too full of themselves – kind of like this.

I am a Slavemaster

Too much power! sayeth the British Slavemasters, and the Pope concurred. So..the first moves begin.

global 3 dimension chess

In 1914 the Catholic Church signed a Concordat (agreement) with Serbia which ended the Hapsburgs rights over Catholics in Serbia. This provoked deep concerns within Austria-Hungary about their empire’s declining power and the intentions of Serbia.

Meanwhile, down in the “sewers”, deep-cover agents such as Sidney Reilly and others had err….encouraged some pretty nasty activities.

Captain Dragutin Dimitrijevic, was known as “The Bull” or “Apis” He slaughtered the Serbian king and queen, and then he formed The Black Hand (with the aim of uniting all Serbs).

He recruited young men infected with tuberculosis and promised these men with terminal disease a way to “make a mark” for Serbia through assassinations of enemies.

Literally, the Walking Dead!

The_Walking_Dead_-_Black_Hand_death_squad

A few days later, one of his liaisons, a Black Hand dying teenager named Gavrilo Princip, assassinated Austria-Hungary’s heir apparent, Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, while they were touring the Bosnian capital, Sarajevo. Setting off the perfect flurry of moves that would allow Britain to appear to “have” to declare War (when that’s what they wanted).

Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia, which, of course, they couldn’t possibly rationally agree to and exactly one month later on 28th July 1914 -war erupted. Charles Masterman had his propagandists do their thing, Sir Edward Grey gave his Churchill-coached speech to Parliament, Britain Declared War, and the nightmare of World War I began.

Note: it was only when, in October 1918, Austria-Hungary surrendered and the empire broke up, that WWI was over.

This is the climate that Masterman’s step-n-fetch-it, Wickham Steed just happens to release his book on The Hapsburg Empire (pushing Zionism) straight in the middle of.

Do you buy it as a coincidence?

Woman-Pointing-Her-Finger-now now

I didn’t think so.

His book spends some time on trying to convince the reader of the “benefits” of Zionism, but strangely, he is vaguely confrontational at the same time.

You see, the Jewish religionists correctly smelled a rat with all this push by the Brits (and others) to get them on board with the Zionist program.

Part of why we call the British slavemasters Rat Bastardswe smell it too!

rat_bastard_comics_image_2

As to the push I mentioned – as soon as Steed’s book was even out, almost immediately over on the American side of things, (utilizing Masterman’s “mentions network”) we see Louis Brandeis proselytyzing over what to do with the “eastern Jews”, in the Jewish magazine The Maccabean, June 1915.

The_Maccabaean_June_1915_Louis_brandeis_Steed_article

Trying to rally the American Jews to this nasty little covert operation, he quotes Steed:

“…To minds like these Zionism came with the force of an evangel. To be a Jew and to be proud of it; to glory in the power and pertinacity of the race, its traditions, its triumphs, its sufferings; its resistance to persecution; to look the world frankly in the face and to enjoy the luxury of moral and intellectual honesty; to feel pride in belonging to the people that gave Christendom its divinities, that taught half the world monotheism, whose ideas have permeated civilization as never the ideas of a race before it, whose genius fashioned the whole mechanism of modern commerce, and whose artists, actors, singers and writers have filled a larger place in the cultured universe than those of any other people: this, or something like this was the train of thought fired in youthful Jewish students by the Zionist spark. It’s effect upon the Jewish students of Austrian Universities was immediate and striking.”

      – Henry Wickham Steed, The Hapsburg Monarchy, London, Constable and Company, 191, p. 175

 

“…to glory in the power and pertinacity of the race…”

 

Wow! Just makes you want to march off in lockstep to War, don’t it?

LOCKSTEP

Not.

wry-face

Their targets were Jewish Students in the Hapsburg Monarchy – did you notice that?

Not all of them just fell over on the cannons for the British, in fact, as I said earlier, Steed commented on this.

“They seem to fear that, by coming out into the open, the Zionists may be playing into the enemy’s hands.

 

Ya think? Nazi gas camps mean anything to anyone?

They were right to question this – for one thing, this Zionism crap portrays them as a RACE for the first time, they were not a race.

Talk about a set-up for persecuton and WWII.

slap-forehead

 

In fact, the Neue Freie Press, March 31, 1913, quotes the Central Society of German Citizens of Jewish Faith, who did catch this “what the hell” aspect and said:

In so far as the Zionist endeavors to provide an assured home for the Jews of the East who are deprived of their rights, or to increase the pride of Jews in their history and religion, he is welcome to us as a member; but we must sever ourselves from the Zionist who denies German National (racial) sentiments, feels himself to be a guest among a strange people, and only feels nationally (racially) as a Jew.

– quoted in  The Hapsburg Monarchy, London, Constable and Company, 191, p. 177

Lordy, could Steed be any more obvious what he’s trying to set these poor people up for, there in Germany? They are setting them up to be viewed “enemies” in their own home countries!

The last quote I want to share with you, comes before he does his rah-rah routine about “the glory of..” and this really stood out to me.

‘The Jewish “danger,” if danger it be, does not lie in the proclamation and defence of a specifically Jewish standpoint but in the dissimulation of Jewish ideas and interests under a non-Jewish cloak. The Jews qua Jews are as entitled as any other people in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy or in the world, to full consideration of their rights and interests, but they cannot enjoy esteem as along as they attempt to out-German the Germans in Pan-Germanism or to out-Magyar the Magyars in oppression of the non-Magyar races of Hungary. There is something peculiarly repugnant in Jewish chauvinism on behalf of a dominant race.

[Wait, because they support the people of the country they live in they are Chauvinists! – Good God! – Propaganda overload]

…Contact with the outer world had deprived many of them of the faith of their fathers, and had divested their minds of the grosser Talmudic wrappings without providing any other substitute than a scepticism which tended constantly to become more cynical. Many cultured Jewish youths sought to discard their very nature and to identify themselves completely with Germanism, accepting German political and ethical ideals and trying honestly to “feel like” Germans.

– Henry Wickham Steed, The Hapsburg Monarchy, London, Constable and Company, 191, p. 174

 

You can see the real complaint here:

they attempt to out-German the Germans…and they are “too sceptical”yeah, probably of the British slavemasters!

But, in other words, they are too much of an ally to their own home, the Germans! Whom the British Slavemasters were worried were getting “too strong” and too much of a “commercial rival” – per Winston Churchill.

The Brits get a Yellow Rat Bastard for this pile of nastiness coming out of Wellington House.

.

yellow_rat_bastard

.

In Summary – this is just a lovely bunch of people that are trying to “enlighten” the world here, with their secular/socialist/what-the-fuck-ever societies, their “New Church of Humanity”, and their disgusting racial epithets of JEW.

So now, we have pretty much covered the Surrounds of the publishing of the OAHSPE, and what a poisonous landscape and motley crew it was. Wow.

sword divider2

Section 3

transparent back flashing starEugenics and The OAHSPEtransparent back flashing star

 

At the end of section one – we left off talking about British eugenics propaganda ideas being forwarded by Newbrough and -buddies.

Many people are under the erroneous impression that eugenics “started” in America. It did not.

From my British Security Coordination Compendium – Section III

Note: I am only excerpting a few things here, if you’re interested in this subject, please see the well-documented BSC article inked to above.

 – excerpts

The Psychological Research Laboratory at the Vineland Training School in New Jersey (where Morgan, Goddard, and Doll worked) was founded in 1906, and was the first research facility devoted to studying mental deficiencies in the US.

H.H. Goddard was a principle figure in the Eugenics movement, and was the director of research at Vineland. He popularized the use of the Binet scale in America, agreeing with Binet that the tests were most effective in identifying people just below the normal range.

These were christened “morons” by Goddard.

 

Goddard decided (he had no proof) that he saw a direct link between intelligence and immorality – a popular (but bogus) theme at the time, that led to identify criminals, most alcoholics, prostitutes and others “living on the fringes of society” to be lumped together as morons.

Robert M. Yerkes

Goddard’s junior Robert M. Yerkes (above) was just as bad. It is through him that we find one of those difficult-to-find connections that show that Britain was not just involved, they were leading all of this insanity.

Yerkes worked together with Sir Cyril Burt (1883-1971) supporting the concept of a racial superiority.

As noted previously, a common method of deflecting off of the British as the real source of this kind of horrific idealogy (Eugenics) is to try and point to either America or Germany as the “source” purely because it went on in those countries.

This is disingenuous to an extreme, if even for no other reason than it was Darwin and Galton – both Brits and both foisted off onto the world by deliberate actions behind-the-scenes of the Slavemasters – who started it all.

 

Racial superiority of the white man, particularly the British white man.

 

The Binet scales were introduced to America by the combined efforts of Lewis Terman and by Cyril Burt in England. Together they translated and expanded Binet’s findings. It probably should be brought to your attention that it was Francis Galton who first tried to measure “individual differences” in intelligence, but it was Binet that succeeded.

Reference – IQ and Human Intelligence by Nicholas Mackintosh, Nicholas John Mackintosh

Lewis M. Terman

Lewis Terman

Goddard headed the Vineland school, his junior Robert M. Yerkes worked together with Sir Cyril Burt (1883-1971) supporting the concept of a racial superiority. Lewis Terman (Stanford) also worked with Sir Burt on the Binet intelligence – also supporting the concept of a racial superiority by intelligence levels.

Who is this man?

Sir Cyril Burt

220px-Cyril_Burt_1930s

Yet another Oxford man – Burt is known for his studies on the heritability of IQ, Twins-apart studies to try and prove the heritability theory (before the Nazis) and his British Eugenics Society racist views.

To this day, there are those ignorant people around who still fall for the sensation created in the press in 1978 (after Burt’s death) accusing him of having falsified research data in his twins studies.

This has been proven repeatedly to not be true, and that is not what that feeding-frenzy was about.

It was about trying to distance from a very nasty connection that the British slavemasters and their Igors had deliberately fostered the ideals and actions of Nazi-Germany.

To understand Burt a little better, we should go back into his childhood briefly. His father was a doctor, and one of his more famous patients was Darwin Galton, brother of Francis Galton. The visits the Burts made to the Galton estate not only allowed the young Burt to learn about the work of Francis Galton, but also allowed Burt to meet him on multiple occasions and to be strongly drawn to his ideas; especially his studies in statistics and individual differences, two defining characters of the London School of Psychology whose membership includes both Galton and Burt.

 

Francis Galton

Francis Galton – the father of Eugenics

 

I mean, wow. LOOK at that guy. He’s like a walking advertisement for what not to “propagate”. And no, I don’t think there should be only “beautiful people” in the world, but really – this guy talks about the threats of the rest of us messing up the genes of the human race? Between him and Darwin, I wonder if they looked in the mirror and blamed what they saw on their own bodies “bad breeding” and then projected that insanity onto the entire human race. Might just be what happened.

Anyway –

Not only were the British a source for the work dominating the mind of psychopath Dr. Mengele – twins studies – but they also were first in psychometric testing. A fact which is repeatedly laid at “the Americans” doorstep, Captain Morgan’s book being but one example.

…they [the British] developed systems which combined the best features of German psychology, and in particular the techniques of Simoneit, with the scientific psychometric approach of American psychology. This system has come to be known as “assessment.”

O.S.S. and I by William J. Morgan; available to read for free at Hathitrust.

 

As far back as 1902, Oxford Professor William McDougall (yes, that McDougall of Society of Psychical Research and Duke University/J.B. Rhine infamy) suggested  – ha ha, more like directed – the young Cyril Burt that he focus his senior project on psychometrics, thus educating him in the development and structure of mental tests.

 William McDougallWilliam McDougall

This is an excellent example of that the Cecil Bloc of slavemasters, at one of their “homes”, are using universities and impressionable young students to forward research that they wanted done as part of their overall plan. You can see that guiding hand easily with Burt here.

*Cecil Bloc – a connected group of political and social power formed originally by the Cecil/Cavendish families under Queen Elizabeth I.

In 1904 the first chairs in Eugenics were instituted at University College, London, followed by the establishment of the Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics in 1907.

In 1907 the British Eugenics Education Society was also founded, with the aim of promoting the research and understanding of eugenics. It changed names to the Eugenics Society in 1926 (often referred to as the British Eugenics Society to distinguish it from others). From 1909-1968 it published The Eugenics Review.

It was three years later in 1910 that the sister organization of the Eugenic Record Office was founded in the United States, both institutes used the research results of the Galton Laboratory of National Eugenics to propose practical applications.

That same year of 1907, McDougall invited Burt to help with a nation-wide survey of physical and mental characteristics of the British people, proposed by Francis Galton (who originated Eugenics) in which he was to work on the standardization of psychological tests. This was his senior project mentioned earlier, and was the field which he stayed interested in for the rest of his life.

Burt also became involved with Frederic Myers and “psychical” testing and investigations with the SPR. In 1968, he published a book memorializing Myers entitled: Psychology and Psychical Research.

Note: The close connections between psychologists and the Society for Psychical Research (SPR) at the end of the 19th century are well known. What is less well known is that senior British academic psychologists were engaged in psychical research as late as the 1930s.

The same year that the Vineland school formed it’s “psychological” research department – 1908 – that summer, Cyril Burt was directed by McDougall to go study with the German eugenicist psychiatrists for a couple of years, which he did.

There is another clear example of a British Cecil Bloc man supporting and forwarding the work of the kooky German Alienists – as psychiatrists were called at one time.

Burt dutifully did as he was told – these are marching orders, make no mistake.

He visited the University of Würzburg, Liepzig Germany, where he first met the psychologist Oswald Külpe at the experimental psychology lab of Willhelm Wundt, whom Oswald was the assistant.

wundt kraepelin kulpe etc.Wilhelm Wundt on his 70th birthday, surrounded by his family and staff
(from left to right)
top row: Eleonore Wundt, Erich Mosch, Oswald Külpe, Gustav Störring, August Kirschenmann;?
middle row: Emil Kraepelin, Wilhelm Wundt, Sophie Wundt, Reinecke;
bottom row: Max Wundt, Wilhelm Wirth)

 

That, is absolutely horrifying. Why?

Because, in 1879 William Wundt established the world’s first psychological laboratory in Liepzig – he concluded that human beings were only biological organisms to which there were no spiritual realities attached.

Man is an animal.

the_librarian___discworld__by_the_primitive_muse-d4f6ll5

Based on experiments, Wundt revealed that one could produce different emotions by applying electric stimulation to different parts of the brain.

One shudders to think just how he might have carried out such experiments back in those days. Holes drilled into hapless mental patients skulls comes to mind…

Wilhelm Wundt

McDougall’s despatching of Cyril Burt to these madmen to study their methods clearly shows a united effort between Britain and Germany to perform heinous experiments on people – do you see why they wanted the two World Wars?

It was unacceptably exposed for British slavemasters to perform such ungodly experiments on such a massive scale in their own back yards but they still very much wanted to do these experiments.

So, they needed first of all, a scapegoat to point to – the “Nazis” – and second of all isolated “camps” filled with helpless victims to perform these experimentations. Creating a War provided the perfect cover – these were now “war prisoners”.

The point is that experimenting on Jews and other “inferior races” was NOT really ‘the Nazis’ idea.

end excerpts

This puts the quoted parts of Wickham Steed’s book in the previous section here, in an even worse light, not to mention the whole British intelligence invention of “zionism”.

Just to show you just what is really behind things like what Newbrough and Thompson are doing just before all this, I’d like to include information for you of how the Tavistock clinic was also eugenicists and British slavemaster dominated.

excerpts from British Security Coordination Compendium – Section III

So, after this joyful tour of psychopaths-come-doctors, Cyril Burt returned to Oxford where he was the John Locke scholar in mental philosophy, and proceeded as best he could with similar studies in Britain – necessarily with children to provide a “humanly acceptable” face over his real leanings.

Mr. Cyril Burt, psychologist to the London County Council, measuring the speed of the thought of a child with a chronoscope to two-hundredths of a second.

Mr. Cyril Burt, psychologist to the London County Council, measuring the speed of the thought of a child with a chronoscope to two-hundredths of a second.

 

Cyril became a member of the London School of Differential Psychology, and of the British Eugenics Society, and was one of the founding members of the London Psycho-analytical Society.

By 1913, Cyril was assigned the responsibility of picking out the ‘feeble-minded’ children for the London County Council (LCC), in accordance with the Mental Deficiency Act of 1913 that had just been successfully passed.

 

This is just before WWI.

 

A little known fact is that after spending 7 years with the LCC, Cyril helped set up the first child guidance clinic in England – better known as the Tavistock Clinic and its first patient was a child.

Cyril Burt was on the “Council” of Tavistock.

Reference: John Bowlby – From Psychoanalysis to Ethology… by Frank C. P. van der Horst

Cyril BurtCyril

That same year, 1920, coincidentally is when the term “mental health hospital” first came into use.

Two years later, Cyril was involved in the founding of the National Council for Mental Hygiene (later renamed NAMH, then MIND) – as part of its subgroup, the Child Guidance Council. Considering all the activities of the Huxley’s in the same arenas, it’s quite the interesting “thrust” going on there with the whole mental health propaganda.

In 1926, Cyril, together with Amy Strachey, made an appeal to The Commonwealth Fund of New York for funds to start training psychiatric social workers at the London School of Economics – another very nasty British slavemaster front group, its connections go back to the Fabian Society – Annie Besant, Frank Podmore, etc.

The Commonwealth Fund had been set up in 1918 by Mrs. Stephen Harkness to “do something for the welfare of mankind.” To give an idea of how much money it had, the initial bequest was 10 million, and by the early 1950’s it had assets of over 90 million. It is one of the “funds” that had a significant impact on American “social policy”.

In 1932, Cyril succeeded prominent (and extremely racist) Eugenicist Charles Spearman as Professor of Psychology at University College, London – while still carrying out research at the Tavistock “child guidance” clinic.

Reference – this online bio verifies Cyrils association with Tavistock – “… in 1932, she spent three years abroad, studying at the University of London, and working under the child psychologist Professor (Sir) Cyril Burt, carrying out clinical research at the Tavistock Clinic, the Institute of Medical Psychology and the East London Child Guidance Clinic.”

Guess who was one of his students?

Tavistock man – John Bowlby.

John_Bowlby_2

Oh man, this just gets worse and worse don’t it?

After obtaining his MD in 1933, John Bowlby was encouraged by his close friend Evan Durbin to register as a Ph.D. student at Eugenics central – the University College in London – under Cyril Burt’s supervision.

This is something Bowlby never talked about ever in interviews – the reason why should be obvious.

It shows his clear connection to some very, very, dark activities of the British slavemasters – as well as clear connections to fostering WWII and the Nazis horrible experiments.

Burt, at the time, was heavily pushing that parents needed “treatment” because “nearly every tragedy of crime is in its origin a drama of domestic life” (as cited in Wooldridge 1994, p 99).

By the end of the 1930s and 1940s, Bowlby had picked up the torch from Burt as the next generation of psychotic slavemasters, and was expressing the same views.

end excerpts

If you recall from section one, a name showed up in association with this small print shop, or “Association” that published the OAHSPE. There were at least two “temperance” publications printed by the same shop, in the same year. They both utilize the name of Mrs. Elizabeth Thompson.

The first example I found is called Figures of Hell, and it can be found in the Internet Archive.

The second example was troubling to me. It is titled Kindergarten Homes for Orphans and other destitute children; A New Way to Ultimately Dispense with Prisons and Poor-Houses.

kindergarten_Homes_as_a_way_to_empty_prisons_by_oashpe_pub_thompson_1882

I have to admit, a title like that combined with the content and supposed delivery of the OAHSPE? Made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up.

This one, clearly shows the Eugenics influence of the British slavemasters.

Going after the children this early – put together with publishing an obvious propaganda campaign using angelic messengers channeling their new “scientific” word of god, makes it pretty damn obvious who is really behind this kind of rhetoric.

Remember what Mrs. Thomas solution was to “people don’t know how to live?”

Mrs T. said, “That is it, exactly. We should gather up in infancy those who are likely to become inmates of poor-houses, asylums and prisons.”

That is a truly scary statement.

terrible ideas - baby sorting

Pretty clear alignment with the psycho Eugenics people, if you ask me.

sword divider2

Section 4

transparent back flashing starThe OAHSPE – The PR, the “what it is” – transparent back flashing star

It’s role in Making America into a British Commonwealth

 

In the same Kindergarten Homes book by the happy sock-puppets, an address for the Oahspe Publishing Association is given:

151 W. 29th Street, New York

It gives a review for the OAHSPE, allegedly by T.A.M. Ward – Oriental scholar, who could very well be just another sock-puppet identity of Newbrough and Thompson.

It sounds like it – listen to what he was “quoted” as saying in the New York times – and this time he’s an “Egyptologist”.

Prof. Thomas A. M. Ward then spoke a few words concerning the book. He said he was an Egyptologist, and had deciphered the legend in the hieroglyphics on the obelisk in Central Park.

He deciphered the Central Park obelisk?

Oh, come on.

Like that’s real.

Kermit the frog excited

Here’s the New York Times article from October 21, 1882.

New_york_times_1882_oahspe new york times oahspe 1882

Yousa. Alrighty then!

On to what is the Oahspe –

It was presented to be a New Bible. It also contained a “cosmogony” of the Universe.

Cosmogony is a term that came into use around 1860-1865, and it meant a scientific theory or story of the origin and development of the universe, the solar system, or the earth-moon system. NASA1 described the difference between cosmogony and cosmology as:

Cosmology is the study of the structure and changes in the present universe, while the scientific field of cosmogony is concerned with the origin of the universe.

A publication called Historic magazine and notes and queries was a monthly magazine of history, mathematics, mysticism art science etc. In Volume 11, 1893 it carried a listing of “Faithist” publications.

The ‘Faithists’ were a group of followers formed around the “teachings” contained in the Oahspe.

A biographry written by later Oahspe cult leader Wing Anderson, is eerily similar to the later bio of another cult leader – L. Ron Hubbard – literally a cookie-cutter approach is employed.

Particularly pages 125 and 126 of Wing Anderson’s book are illustrative.

  • Newbrough is portrayed as having “amassed fortunes”, and “traveled” the world seeking to “answer questions” as to the nature of man.
  • Newbrough is quoted as asking “Was the man with the yellow skin so very different from his white brother?”. This is then offered as the reason for his world travels, and that he was “seeking the answer” to this question.

Again, much like Hubbard’s bio, Newbrough is portrayed as returning from these travels convinced of the “brotherhood of man”.

  • Newbrough, also like Hubbard, then spent time studying the insane.
  • Newbrough was an assistant doctor at a Kentucky mental hospital for two years, and found the experience “too painful” and decided to become a dentist instead and study psychic phenomena.

Interesting corollaries eh?  – sounds like a formula in use to PR this sort of religious clap-trap.

The very same year that his “channelings” of a new bible began (for his primary public of Americans) the British Society of Psychical Research was formed with it’s counterpart of the American one following just 2 years later.

In a letter of January 21, 1883, Newbrough wrote about how this book came about:

Briefly, then, Oahspe was mechanically written through my hands by some other intelligence than my own.

…In my own case I discovered, a great many years ago, in sitting in circles to obtain spiritual manifestations, that my hands could not lie on the table without flying off into these “tantrums.” Often they would write messages, left or right, backward or forward, nor could I control them any other way than by withdrawing from the table. Sometimes, the power thus baffled would attack my tongue, or my eyes or my ears, and I talked and saw and heard differently from my normal state.

…Truly yours, J. B. Newbrough.

P.S.–Oahspe has gone into the churches, reaching a community that most other spiritual productions cannot enter. The first edition of three thousand copies is nearly all sold. To the clergy of New York and Brooklyn we have sold about one hundred and fifty copies, and given away about as many more.

New York, Jan. 21st, 1883. J. B. N.

As usual, I think this was yet another British “mess with the American’s minds” propaganda operation, and in fact, in this same letter there is some evidence of British financing of this book, showing – if you can tolerate the blatant, “Oh-look god sent me money.”  shore story – a truly blatant and stellar example of dissembling.

So when I was told to publish the book, and perceiving it would require several thousand dollars to do it, I kept constantly saying to Jehovih, “I know this is from thee, through thy angels, and I have faith thou wilt provide in due season.” Well, one day the postman delivered a small paper box to one of the members of my family, addressed to me. It contained fifteen hundred dollars in bills, with a note for its application to be for publishing the book. I never learned who sent the money. One thousand dollars more, in bills also, were sent to me by an Englishman, a stranger to me. Five hundred dollars, also in bills, were sent to me by an errand boy who disappeared before we knew what the box contained, and so I knew not from whom it came. There thus came in all over eleven thousand dollars to me to publish and engrave the book. Besides this a few of my own friends threw in a little afterward, so that I had in all upward of fourteen thousand dollars sent to me, enough to publish the first edition and to provide a splendid printing press, type and stereotype machinery besides. Neither did I ever ask anybody for one single dollar for the publication or engraving.

14,000 dollars in 1882? That is a fortune! And of course it was not sent by “God” – if it even ever happened at all. Although, some Brits certainly liked to think of themselves as Gods, said with tongue held firmly in cheek.

Newbrough also claimed that the book came from the higher heavens and was “directed and looked over by God, the creator’s chief representative in the heavens of this earth.”

A group formed around Newbrough’s revelations and in 1883 they named themselves the “Faithists of the Seed of Abraham,” a term that came from the book. They moved to Las Cruces, New Mexico, where they established Shalam, a community founded to carry out the “OAHSPE” injunction to care for foundlings and orphans.

Editions of the OAHSPE

From this point forward, as far as editions, the waters muddy considerably. There was allegedly a second edition, but it didn’t show up til after his death.

The second edition is alleged by some sources, to have been edited by Newbrough.

But the fact that it was not published until after his death in the spring of 1891, marks a first point of probable cover-up concerning who actually created the second edition – particularly since it later shows up as published by the British Kosmon Press in 1910/1912.

.

What is known is that “more books” were added to it, and these additions were made by others.

I think that here is where the next generation of propagandists enter in.

This is a quite common phenomenon with British Slavemaster supporters. A number of people add to the propaganda, but it is published under one man’s name – thus creating the illusion of singularity. L. Ron Hubbard’s “scientology” materials are a classic example. Most of scientology is simply things with his name put on them.

For those that see that there is something wrong with all these “editions” and “here’s a new book” etc. etc., check this out.

There are people out there who, to try and continue or profit off this ridiculous propaganda campaign of the OAHSE, will even try to explain what is an obvious co-operative propaganda effort by humans (not by any GOD) – hoping it sounds mystical enough that you will nod your head sagely and go “ahhh. I see.’

Check out this guys “spin” on this:

The omissions from and changes to Oahspe from the original manuscript Dr. Newbrough received in 1881 is an assurance that Oahspe itself shall not become an object of adoration or worship….

…Words must stand on their own merit, irrespective of origin. Nor is the value of Oahspe greatly diminished by the omissions and revisions, since its purpose is to free mankind from dependence on indirect inspiration (any words, including Oahspe). – Jim Dennon, Seaside Oregon, July 1983.

All this inventing of propaganda to add to the Oahspe is a good thing – you see.

Next, we have what some call the third edition, (which was more accurately just an outcropping of the British sourced second edition) that was allegedly edited by Wing Anderson, yet another fruitcake propagandist, in 1910/1912 and then later published in 1935.

Wing Anderson lived in Chicago where he was employed as an engineer. He spent his spare time in various libraries researching psychic phenomena. In 1921, he moved to L.A. where he was “visited” by an ancient master in 1934 and inspired to republish the OAHSPE – while on the Board of Directors of the Psychic Research Society (the ASPR) apparently.

The American Society for Psychical Research (ASPR) was originally formed in Boston, Mass. in 1884. The British Society sent over Richard Hodgson, a psychic researcher and amateur conjuror, to oversee the new Society. Astronomer Simon Newcomb was its first President.

Due to financial difficulties, the ASPR was absorbed by the parent English society in 1899, although some have that event as being much earlier.

Five years later, in 1904, (November 10) James Hyslop forms the American Institute for Scientific Research.

He sent an announcement to the New York Times, which read:

To the Editor of the New York Times:

An important institute, intended to be of a National character, has been founded in this city for the purpose of organizing certain scientific investigations while it conducts in one of its fields a system of philanthropic work. Its needs are the subject of this brief explanation. It has been incorporated as the American Institute for Scientific Research.

“The institute will not engage officially in any investigations connected with this field (psychic research) but will act as a custodian of funds to be devoted to it….”

“I may add that the Board of Trustees for the institute has not yet been completed. But Prof. William James of Harvard University, Dr. Minot J. Savage, and Dr. R. Heber Newton are on the board, and it is intended to complete it with the selection of men having an equal standing in the country. James H. Hyslop. New York, Nov. 10, 1904”

– New York Times article: FOR PSYCHIC RESEARCH.; Institute Recently Founded — Needs Funds to Aid in Its Work. JAMES H. HYSLOP, New York Times, November 14, 1904

New York Times Hyslop

An interesting point to note here is that Hyslop, through the Abnormal Psychology branch of his Institute, did an in-depth study of schizo-phrenics and came to the conclusion that it was an infestation of spirits, or spirit possession.

That sounds an awful lot like Scientology’s body thetans.

The following year, 1905, Richard Hodgson, the President of the American Society for Psychical Research died. James Hyslop takes over, moves the ASPR to New York and puts it under the psychical research branch of his American Institute for Scientific Research, calling it Section B.

By the way, this happens to be the same year that Ploetz founded the German Society for Racial Hygiene, advocating eugenics. Ernst Rudin, a German psychiatrist, headed the Society.

Two years later, 1907, Hyslop suddenly decides to dissolve the ASPR.

“…it has been decided to dissolve the American Branch of the Society for Psychical Research at the end of the current year. [1907]

It is hoped that a scheme, upon which Professor Hyslop has been for some time past engaged, may result in the formation of an independent organization which will carry on the work of psychical research in America.”

– Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, Volume 1, January 1907

The list of members includes none other than J.P Morgan’s daughter – the wife of E.R. Satterlee, who later wrote Morgan’s bio. It shows her as living at 60 East 78th St., New York.

Concurrent with shutting down the ASPR Hyslop writes that “selective telepathy” is not possible, which to me, means they must have found evidence that it was and didn’t want it revealed too soon.

In the below excerpts, Hyslop refers to percipient, which is a term meaning one who has perceived a paranormal event.

Hyslop – “What I have been insisting on is that the only scientifically legitimate use of the term “telepathy” is that which merely names a group of supernormal phenomena whose cause is not yet known or understood and that the facts which support its claims at all are limited to the present active states of the agent. There is no scientific evidence for selective telepathy or the percipient’s selection of memories in other minds. This process may be a fact, but there is as yet no scientific evidence whatever for this….”

You can see what they are worried about  – “selection of memories in other minds.

He quotes Sir Oliver Lodge (another Society for Psychical Research member) in his investigation of Mrs. Piper:

“But, whereas, the kind of thought-transference which had been to my knowledge experimentally proved, was a hazy and difficult recognition by one person of objects kept as vividly as possible in the conciousness of another person, the kind of thought-transference necessary to explain these sittings is of an altogether freer and higher order, – a kind which has not yet been experimentally proved at all.”

Parallell with Hyslops article, fellow Society for Psychical Research member Duncan MacDougall publishes an article called HYPOTHESIS CONCERNING SOUL SUBSTANCE TOGETHER WITH EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH SUBSTANCE. This article was also published in American Medicine simultaneously.

This article emphatically insists that a PERSON could not exist and not occupy space – you can tell that idea really bothers these slavemasters.

“…after the death of brain and body, then such personality can only exist as a space occupying body….”

It is unthinkable that personality and conciousness continuing personal identity should exist, and have being, and yet not occupy space. It is impossible to represent in thought that which is not space occupying, as having personality, for that would be equivalent to thinking that nothing had become or was something, that emptiness had personality, that space itself was more than space, all of which are contradictions and absurd.

[Note: ALL of which is right – but look at how hysterically it is denied due to a confusion on what nothing is, or isn’t. A PERSON, without a body, is not a nothing.]

“The essential thing is that there must be a substance as the basis of continuing personal identity and conciousness, for without space occupying substance, personality or a continuing concious ego after bodily death is unthinkable.”

This is the same exact logical error that Fredrick Myers of the SPR demonstrated in his books – he tried to apply physical science laws to the non-physical.

So, now that’s TWO public articles smashing down both direct telepathy, and the existence of a PERSON independent of a space-occupying object or form. Combine that with the dissolution of the ASPR, and it becomes quite obvious that something has happened that is really giving them the heebie-jeebies.

But, don’t let that fool you because meanwhile – they are up to something entirely different behind-the-scenes.

Remember, when the American Society for Psychical Research was founded, telepathy became the first psychic phenomenon to be studied scientifically by the SPR and ASPR.  Slavemasters are terrified of telepathy in particular, due to it’s obvious connotations as being highly destructive to any kind of “secret” or “covert” activities remaining that way, in the face of such a skill in use.

But yet, they are literally obsessed with being able to read minds themselves!

Did you say machines can make me read minds2

Just a couple of years later, Hyslop resurrects the American Society for Psychical Research as a now independent organization – 1909. The origins of the OAHSPE was one of the first things that it embarked in investigation upon, and Hyslop contacted Nelson Standart and requested information.

In 1902 on April 5, the next generation of OAHSHPE propagandists had formed ‘The Brotherhood of Light Society” which was organized in Denver, Colorado. The Chief and Secretary of it’s “Outer Council” was Nelson Kennedy Standart (born 1866), he was an optician. Also a member was the first Oahspe printer, John A. Lent.

Nelson wrote to Andrew Howland (who had known Newbrough personally) and requested information about it’s origins. Howland had Justine Newbrough (daughter) write the Society (the A.S.P.R.) directly, promising her full cooperation. But instead, she deliberately burned her father’s paintings (per a 1960 interview). Between 1909 and 1917, Mrs. Howland and Justine Newbrough answered letters promising to cooperate with the investigation, but never did.

Nelson Standart cobbled something together to represent the “Lant proof sheets”, and Hyslop requested that he send them all, but Standart refused to let them out of his organization’s archives. (clearly he is hiding something).

He put together some notes and one proof sheet, but a few days after mailing the Lant information to Hyslop, he changed his mind and requested those notes back! Upon request, Hyslop was allowed to keep a photograph of Dr. Newbrough and the Lant proof sheet that had accompanied the notes.

Interestingly enough, just a year or so later is when the British 1910/12 edition would be printed in London.

By 1916, William Franklin Prince met James Hyslop and became his assistant.

Hyslop died in 1920. In-fighting imediately began, and the ASPR split into two main factions. One pro-Spiritualism, by mostly Spiritualists themselves, and the other group anti-Spiritualism, being skeptical of “discarnate spirits”; however this faction was VERY interested in telepathy and other more associated to someone with a body – phenomena.

William McDougall was elected President of BRITISH Society for Psychical Research, and also took over the American Branch from Hyslop.

Remember who he is? Mr Eugenics, the guy who mentored Cyril Burt, who in turn mentored one of the main Tavistick people – John Bowlby.

In 1923 a prominent Spiritualist, Frederick Edwards, was appointed President of the American Society for Psychical Research, (replacing McDougall) and the conservative faction (the anti-spiritualism faction) led by Gardner Murphy and Walter Franklin Prince declared that the Society was becoming “less academic”.

Walter Franklin Prince, Elwood Worcester, William McDougall, and Lydia W. Allison founded the Boston Society for Psychical Research immediately. Worcester served as the first president. Prince was previously research officer of the ASPR (which means he was part of “Section B”) and was pressured by McDougall and others to accept the position of the Principle Research Officer of the new society, which he did. He then headed up the investigation of Mina. Harry Houdini and J.B. Rhine worked with the group.

Mcdougall immediately sets about recruiting J.B. Rhine, and writes him a letter on May 18, offering him a fellowship at Harvard.

In the summer of 1925, J.B. Rhine enrolled in the psychology department at Harvard University, to study for a year with Professor William McDougall, through which he also became associated with Walter Franklin Prince of Boston Society for Psychic Research.

Just one year later (two years after the split) McDougall was appointed Professor of Psychology at Duke University in 1927, and helps Rhine establish his work and set up his lab.So, now the ASPR Boston branch, has switched to using a university as an umbrella to practice research under. Having a large supply of “subjects” to test probably didn’t hurt.

See The Man Who Murdered My MotherDuke University: The Anti-Life Zone article for much more about Duke.

On the opposite side of the U.S., Stanford University President Ray Lyman Wilbur essentially proposes the same idea – a separate institute of the university be formed to conduct “research”.

After William Franklin Prince’s death in 1934– the Boston Society for Psychical Research pretty much falls into obscurity until 1941, but now the bulk of their research is being carried out as “university” projects. By the time of his death, after a total of eighteen years of research with the American Society for Psychical Research and the Society for Psychical Research, London, and in spite of his doubts about certain phenomena, he eventually concluded that a case for the reality of telepathy and clairvoyance has been “absolutely and scientifically proved.” And that the evidence that the personality survives death was “very promising.”

You will notice that BOTH of those are the exact same two points that were heavily pooh-poohed in 1907 when the ASPR was suddenly dissolved by Hyslop.

See? They were lying – it wasn’t that it was untrue, as the reason they said those things, it was because it was true, and it scared them.

This same year, 1934, is when it is alleged that Wing Anderson purchased the Oahspe copyright, Printing plates, and 2,700 unbound books from Dr. Newbrough’s daughter, and published the bite sized 1891 edition.”

Unfortunately, that particular story line doesn’t add up, because as you recall, Newbrough’s daughter burnt some of the very items mentioned above!

However, there apparently was a publication starting in 1935 of the OAHSPE which is called the 1891 version. Wing formed the Essenes of Kosmon and publications began taking place on up to the 1955 printing which was documented in an ad in Mystic magazine.

Wing then established his Essenes of Kosmon community at North Salt Lake in 1944, but then moved the project to Colorado, disbanding it 13 years later in 1957.

Wing Andersons’ book that carried a bio of John Newbrough, also contained a particularly scary statement in the Foreword. Keep in mind that this book was published in 1940, not long after World War II officially began.

Wing writes:

“As the first republic was born on the American continent, so will also be brought forth on this continent the first true cooperative commonwealth with peace, plenty and security for all. When this new economy comes into existence it will be the product of Americans and not the fruit of either the third International or the Third Reich.”

Do you have any idea of the significance of that first statement?

Let me help you to pin it down a bit more.

From the New Columbian Encyclopedia:

Commonwealth – …the now independent components of the former British Empire and Britain’s remaining dependencies are described as the Commonwealth of Nations.

Commonwealth of Nations – voluntary association of Great Britain and its dependencies, certain former British dependencies that are now sovereign states… (states with full internal government but whose external relations are governed by Britain.)

Even though the “now independent components” have their own internal governments, their external relations are governed by Britain.

The United States of America, (formerly a “colony” of Britain) is to be one of those “now independent components”.

So, at the end of World War II, America is to be part of the “first true cooperative commonwealth.”

 

as in

BRITISH COMMONWEALTH

 

This would signify the completion of a covert intelligence operation begun as a result of the last truly “spirit of 76” Presidents – President Andrew Jackson.

See Scientology Roots – Chapter 14 – President Jackson

This explains why instruments of British government were incorporated into American government – quietly and secretly. The OSS, the Joint-Chiefs, etc. etc.

Actually, this goes even further back to Newbrough himself!

Considering all that we have documented as to his British “new world order” connections, that becomes more clear why we find Wing Anderson “carrying the torch” so to speak.

Newbrough, at one point apparently chose to “break cover” and show his knowledge of the British “50-year plan” as I call it – culminating in World War II.

I imagine he did this because he was a little peeved at the time for being “left out in the cold” by his handlers so to speak, due to some legal troubles with the New Mexico cult of Faithists he had formed. He ended up in New Orleans, and while there he published a monthly magazine called The Castaway. In the July 1889 issue, Newbrough wrote:

“We have fifty-eight years yet ahead [by 1947] to get ready in. At or before that time all the present governments, religions, and all monied monopolies are to be overthrown and to go out of existence.”

How ‘bout them apples…

In the Foreword, it is obviously known that people will suspect the truth that THIS IS AN INTELLIGENCE OPERATION, and Wing Anderson tries to head it off with the following:

“No doubt a few readers will assume that this book is propaganda of the Communists, fascists, Fifth Column or some other hates “ism,” and will write advising the author to leave the country if he doesn’t like it.”

“Wing Anderson is a member of the Masonic and Acacia fraternities, but is not a member of any Communist, Nazi, Fascist, revolutionary or political party. ….Americans should be able to solve their own problems without advice, instruction or interference from overseas.”

Of course, he neglected to mention that he was a 33rd degree freemason, which only the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry has, but also check out that nasty swipe at “Americans”, obviously said from a British view.

sword divider2

 

Section 5

transparent back flashing starThe OAHSPE – TAKE TWO – transparent back flashing star

Ray Palmer and the OAHSPE

The earlier (prior to Wing Anderson) conglomeration of a book, faded from view until Ray Palmer resurrected it in 1960 – just in time for MKULTRA’s “counter-culture” revolution earliest beginnings.

Ray Palmer ran Mystic Magazine after he left Ziff Publications as a result of their falling out over UFO articles in the late 40’s. A description of Mystic says that it is “primarily an occult non-fiction magazine which, in its early issues, was about half fiction and half articles.”

One of the Mystic issues had a channelled review of scientology by Mark Probert, about the August 1955 issue (#11) which is here at our blog. We also posted about the the March 1956 issue as well, where Hardin and Joanna Walsh are reviewing scientology – Joanna claimed that she was a spiritual teacher from another planet.

By the fifth issue of Mystic the fiction was greatly reduced and appeared only sporadically after the seventh issue – the channelling of a review of scientology being one of the “sporadic” pieces of fiction. The magazine settled firmly into a supposed non-fiction format about the time that Palmer sold his interest in its chief competitor, Fate, and the title was changed to Search with the October 1956 issue. I say supposed because most of the time it dealt with UFOs and other seach urban myths. It was still running at the time of Palmer’s death in 1977.

Palmer first began promoting the Oahspe in the February 1955 issue of Mystic, under the heading “The Most Amazing Book in the World.”

 

For a while, he possessed the only copy of a first edition of “OAHSPE” – I’d love to know who gave it to him, as it strikes me as very odd that anyone would part with what was then, an extremely rare book.

Palmer doled out excerpts from his book in succeeding issues of Mystic, the next that I know about was in the June 1955 issue, where he talked about The Book of Ben.

Remember, Wing Anderson and his group, the Essenes of Kosmon, published the 1891 Oahspe edition in several printings from the 1935 printing up to the 1955 printing.

By August that same year, Mystic was carrying an ad to buy the 980 page book for $5.00, payable to the Essenes of Kosmon, Rt. 2, Box 26a, Montrose Colorado.

.

Factual? Informative and Scientific? Geez, this could have been an ad for Dianetics and Scientology!

.

 

Four years later (after Search magazine began) Ray Palmer decided to privately publish the 1882 edition of Oahspe ( which was an 1888 reprint – quite rare at the time) in 1960.

From a History of Oahspe:

After a fifteen year search to find a copy of it, in 1960 ray palmer reprinted the 1882 Oahspe, which made this oldest edition available for the first time since the 1880’s. Marjorie Palmer’s Amherst Press continues to publish this Oahspe, which is the current American “green cover” edition.

Billed as being from Palmer Publications, (same as Mystic was) he photocopied the book and inserted the later written 1891 edition of the Book of Discipline (which was from after Newborough had died); and also the 1891 index was adjusted for page numbers and inserted into the 1882 photocopy edition.

He only issued 2000 copies, and per a 2009 comment by a later publisher: a massive effort spearheaded by publisher Timothy Green Beckley: “he…issued 2000 copies in a private edition even at a financial loss just to get the word out about this amazing book, which was one of his all time favorites.

.

Search Magazine also carried an article by Palmer in the September 1967 issue:

How I Discovered and Published Oahspe

A later reprint of this 1882 conglomeration by Palmer, was dedicated to “Raymond A. Palmer” – it was called the Raymond A Palmer Edition (two volumes of 1250 pages) and was published in 2009 by Inner Light Publications, a massive effort spearheaded by publisher Timothy Green Beckley.This edition included alleged pencil drawings by Newbourgh and paintings of the Prophets rendered by the artist, Rein.

The same edition that Ray Palmer had created, (in addition to the two previous “editors”) also appeared 2 years earlier, but it had been “updated” into modern language.

sword divider2

Section 6

transparent back flashing starThe OAHSPE – TAKE THREE – transparent back flashing star

The next generation of propagandists arises!

 

This updated language 2007 edition was published online and in hardcopy in 2010. Known as the Oahspe Standard Edition, as usual,it includes additions such as the alleged “original pre-1882” Oahspe related material, including the Book of Knowledge and Book of Ouranothen as well as additional footnotes, combined references to 1882 and 1891 editions and an expanded comprehensive index.

Yet another conglomeration of a conglomeration – far removed from it’s earliest sources.

 

  • Images list and a great source for the “standard edition”.

It might interest you to know that the book includes the first known reference to a “star-ship,” – one example is in the older language version, Book of Aph, son of Jehovih, Chapter XVI:

“7. And now another gateway opened amidst the stars; and a cluster star was seen approaching from the southeast. It was as a star surrounded by stars, and brighter than all the others. This was the ship-star of Aph, the Orian Chief.”

Strangely, it is first called ship-star, which actually makes sense in it’s veiled allusion to that “stars” are really “ships” carrying gods around.

A few passages later, the term is turned around the other way:

“10. … Yet nearer and nearer gathered in the great star-ships and sun of Hautuon, till even like a net they joined and filled the earth’s atmosphere in the east and west and north and south, and below and above; on every side.”

In the later “standard edition” (PDF file in full) the quotes have been changed into more modern language.

One article on the net says:

…the book teaches that the biblically referenced star that glowed so bright on the night of Christ‘s birth was actually a spaceship. Here’s the quote from Oahspe itself:

“When the birth was completed, the angels of heaven re-entered their starship and hastened back to paradise.”

There’s a bit of problem here, and I suspect it’s a backdating point. The above quote comes from the standard edition, with it’s language redone for modern times.

The original much more frequently calls them: Fireships or Boats

.

NOT STARSHIPS.

.

So, perhaps the term star-ship or ship-star came from Palmer’s additions? That sounds like something he would do to “fan the flames” of his audience’s worship of BS occult ideas.

However, it could be as simple as that the term got added in the 1935 printing by Wing Anderson, which just happens to come right after the earliest referenced use of the term documented by the OED (Oxford dictionary).

The OED cites the earliest use as being in…wait for it…Astounding Stories magazine in the January 1935 issue.

To start the year we offer you Star Ship Invincible, by Frank K. Kelly.”

 

OED take notice – I just found a hard source for an earlier usage than 1935, and that is this:

A book called Thaumat-Oahspe, published in 1912, which I found in the Internet Archive. On page 39:

“…the angels of heaven re-entered their star-ship and hastened back to Paradise…”

p.38 also mentions that a “heavenly ship descended from the Throne of God.”

These are from a chapter that is not “sourced” to any previous OASHPE references (which the author usually does if it is), so therefore it is purely written by the pamphlet author.

The two excerpts above comprise the ONLY mention of any kind of “star” or “heavenly” ship, in the entire pamphlet.

However, page 41, mentions a “fire-ship” and page 46 mentions a “chariot of fire”.

Again – the only two uses of the word “star” are in the sections first detailed above.

This book was only digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008, and uploaded in 2009 it looks like, so it is likely that not many Oashpe “historians” know about it yet.

It was written by J. Nelson Jones, and published in Melbourne Australia by J.C. Stephens. “J” stands for James, per a will found online.

In the Preface

Some of the articles in this pamphlet appeared in the Melbourne “Harbinger of Light.” As the subject is continuous, and deals with the views announced by “Oahspe” on the falsity of Theological Christianity, it was thought better to publish the whole series in pamphlet form, and it is hoped they will be read with interest and profit by many who would miss their import if they had been separated by monthly intervals.

So, that would mean that the “star-ship” usage on p.39 is not from Newbrough, it is from this Jones character, in Australia.

But still, you see that the term is used in 1912, which is over 23 years earlier than the later Astounding source.

Interesting.

The fact that space travel is being discussed in 1912 lines up well with some other things but make no mistake – this is not prophecy, nor is it “from the gods” – it is hard knowledge known by only a few slavemasters at the time.

What I think is fascinating about that, is that here is this tiny little pamphlet showing up in a well out of the way place, meant to start a misdirection that would spiral into what you see it as today!

Stories like The Annunaki, The Pleiadians, and so on and so on. Complete bollocks, but this…this little book is vewy interesting – as Elmer Fudd would say.

A word on James Nelson Jones –

James Nelson Jones was an amateur astronomer, and was associated with the Bendigo observatory. As to what is Bendigo, there’s a history here. Bendigo hosted a presentation concerning bids to locate the world’s largest radio telescope, the SKM (square-kilometer array) in Western Australia. (May 2011 presentation)

 

The following is from an article mentioning his name:

Title: David Ross and the development of amateur astronomy in Victoria
Authors: Orchiston, W. & Brewer, A. –
p.175

David Ross, observed CometP/Halley on November 18, 1909 in Australia.
“One area in which Ross did not contribute was public astronomy, for unlike Baker of Ballarat, Jones and Beebe of Bendigo66…he was not very interested in offering the public of Victoria those services usually provided by the government observatories: public viewing nights…”

– The reference, 66, is Martin, D., and Orchiston.W., Observatories of Victoris. 2: The Historic Bendigo Observatories of J. Nelson Jones and John Beebe, Melbourne, Astronomical Society of Victoria (Historical Notes No.4). 1987.

 

James died in 1914.

sword divider2

Section 7

transparent back flashing starThe OAHSPE – Summary transparent back flashing star

Plus

Plagiarism by L. Ron Hubbard and company.

 

Perhaps some might ask: Why should we care about the OAHSPE’s history?

A couple of reasons.

The first is that this is yet another propaganda device to deliver a “history of man” that is done in the usual hairball style of multiple sources, that then pretend a work is done through a front man whose name is on the book itself.

The second is that you should become accustomed with tracking something as to it’s actual source, both in name and in time, as often-times this is the only way to nail down a particular Slavemaster propaganda operation.

The third is that the material has often been lifted and incorporated into any number of New Age Religions, including Scientology and “Rons Org” Scientology, and you should have some idea just how spurious those really are.

 

They are traps – they are bait with a hidden hook.

You are being FISHED.

You are a MARK – the target of a con.

10-fishdisguise-450x300

If you like that sort of thing, go right ahead, but at least you know now what you are getting into.

Now, as to L. ROn Hubbard and the OAHSPE –

Just about all of his Advanced Level (so-called) Operating Thetan III theories have been plagiarized/lifted from the OAHSPE.

What do Scientologists do on this supposedly advanced spiritual level of the Church of Scientology (and ‘Ron’s Orgs’)?

.

The Weird and Wacky World of Scientologists

 

ALL Scientologists who do the Operating Thetan (OT for short) Levels are:

  • TELEPATHICALLY  talking to Dead People and
  • CHANNELING Dead People.

They call them BODY THETANS.

A sampling of some of their materials on this, these are from OT V –

When you talk about telepathy, there is a proximity factor. When a thetan is pressed straight up against another thetan very tight, total tactile communication, you get this type of mental transmission.

– L. Ron Hubbard, HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978, ISSUE I, NED for OTs Series 1, NED FOR OTs RD, THEORY OF, p2 section MENTAL TRANSMISSION
The NED for OTs Issues are available as part of the Operating Thetan Level Six course here and at Wikileaks. A complete file of all the different OT levels is also at Wikileaks.

Example page of issue – page one

NED for OTs Series 1From page 3,4 –

In NED for OTs you are actually handling, in the main, dormant BTs and clusters. These are not really alive enough to run Incident IIs and Incident Is on. They have different considerations, these dormant BTs and clusters, but they add up to being dead or below being dead. They’re in the state that FBI agents and government officials eventually wind up in when they aren’t already simply an animated dormant cluster. If people who are busy trying to smash up Scientology realized what they themselves were heading for, they would have a couple of other thinks…

– L. Ron Hubbard, HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978, ISSUE I, NED for OTs Series 1, NED FOR OTs RD THEORY OF, p3,4 section Dormant BTs and Clusters
The NED for OTs Issues are available as part of the Operating Thetan Level Six course here and at Wikileaks. A complete file of all the different OT levels is also at Wikileaks.

Look– a threat!

If you are a “smasher” of Scientology you will end up as a Body Thetan on someone else’s body!

 

Come on…

come on!

When Hubbard first came out with Operating Thetan Level III – it was touted as “handling the Wall of Fire” with all sorts of magical abilities assigned to one’s completion of the level.

When no one really could do those things, (or even less, maintain their super-magnificentness) and to make money – Scientology came out with a later – you guessed it – talk to even deader people OT level. That’s called OT V now. In that issue from that level, you can see the “resell” about why OT III didn’t work.

But listen, you’re living in a universe which is crawling with this type of stuff. And planet Earth was a dumping ground to end all dumping grounds. Actually, the end of OT III is when those BTs and clusters that are easily put into communication are gone. It’s not when all BTs in the whole universe that ever will be, are gone.

You’ve never had any pcs like that unless you’ve worked in an institution and have seen some inmate living in a totally lifeless state, unaware of anything. NED for OTs handles this condition on BTs and clusters which existed without being suspected except for the occasional clue of a strange picture or a wild somatic.

– L. Ron Hubbard, HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978, ISSUE I, NED for OTs Series 1, NED FOR OTs RD THEORY OF, p2 section MENTAL TRANSMISSION
The NED for OTs Issues are available as part of the Operating Thetan Level Six course here and at Wikileaks. A complete file of all the different OT levels is also at Wikileaks.

 

Note: “NED for OTs” is OT V and “BT” is Body Thetan

* * *

See? There are now deader than dead Body Thetans to “address”.

That is a fine example of inventing “more” in order to keep the Scientologist on the hamster wheel of “trying to become OT” – on that endless enlightenment journey.

Remember Fredric Myers last chapter we quoted?

Volume II– Chapter X Epilogue Provisional Sketch Of A Religious Synthesis

It should be in itself progressive and evolutionary; it should bear a promise of ever deeper holiness, to answer to the long ages of heightening wisdom during which our race may be destined to inhabit the earth. This condition has never yet been met.

– Excerpt, Scientology Rootschapter 21-5Fredric Myers promotion of a new world religion.

We already know Hubbard lifted substantially from Myers book, this is just another example. Scientologists, ANY of them who do the “advanced levels” of any variation – are stuck on a route of “ever deeper holiness“.

A hamster wheel.

The_Hamster_Wheel_of_Scientology3

Just for the record – the above issue equates to level OT 5, and the same issues are studied as part of the course of Solo (by oneself) auditing – which is called OT 6 – and OT 7 being the level where one does the actual solo or by one’s self auditing of “body thetans”.

10 years after OT 3 was release, we have an: “Oh look! More BTs to audit!” invention by the management of the Church of Scientology, which just happens to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to do this new bridge of the added OT 5, OT 6, and OT 7 (also OT IV).

This is obviously simply about increasing the cash flow to Scientology’s black budget reserves (upwards of two billion dollars at the time) – not spiritual “enlightenment”.

money-5

Coming back to the point of the “lifting” of a large amount of the theory of Scientology’s OT III from the OAHSPE, the issue we just discussed mentions something called “Incident I and an Incident II”.

These are what is run on OT 3 – the Xenu and the Volcanoes 75,000,000 year ago alleged incident is called Incident II. Incident I is alleged to be quadrillions of years ago (ridiculous, yes) and is some sort of weird LSD-trip derived conglomeration of cherubs and screeching horns and other religious (Catholic) implications.

OT III is a solo audited level by the Scientologist, and is also done telepathically.

Instructions

”Locate by meter read or an area of pressure, a body thetan or group (cluster). Run Incident II.”

“Do not speak your commands. Just “intend” them. A BT controls easily. BT’s can be ARC broken by rough or careless auditing.“

– Full OT III Course pack of materials was found in the Internet Archive – it includes ALL the handwritten “originals” as they are referred to by Scientologists.

Some people call this kind of activity channeling, which, if you recall, is exactly what John Newbrough alleged happened with the “reception” of the OAHSPE materials.

It’s interesting, that Ray Palmer –  the guy who re-introduced the Oahspe back into mainstream American culture – was quite enamored of presenting the whole channeling of ancient masters BS.

Palmer first began promoting the Oahspe in the February 1955 issue of Mystic, under the heading “The Most Amazing Book in the World.”

Did you know he actually did the same kind of little promotional shpiel with Dianetics just six months later? Yes, indeedy. It was in the August issue of Mystic Magazine.

PDF of that – Mystic Magazine August 1955 Issue 11 – Raymond A. Palmer

Mystic Magazine August 1955 Issue 11 Front and Back Covers

Mystic Magazine August 1955 Issue 11 Front and Back Covers

 

It carried an article called Hypnotherapy versus Dianetics by a “Professor Alfred Luntz”, which per Borderland Sciences Research, is a “channeled” Personality by Mark Probert.

Professor Alfred Luntz (1812 – 1893) is one of the “personalities” that was channeled by Mark Probert, part of his Inner Circle of intelligences. In life, Luntz was a graduate of Eton, lawyer in Hanover student of philosophy and religion at Heidelberg and later Oxford, where he received a Ph.D. in the Episcopal Theological Seminary, and eventually a clergyman in the High Episcopal Church of England. After his “death”, he was purported to have been “stunned when he realized there was no heaven or hell as he had been eloquently taught and believed.

An Oxford man – which explains a lot – channeling ancient masters and dis-embodied spirits to gain knowledge? And fronting promotion for Hubbard and his “Dianetics”?.

wiley oh wow

Sort of like Frederick Myers and the SPR meets the Oashpe Take II – unfortunately.

Let’s go a little deeper into Scientology’s OT 3 level, where this whole auditing of dead people and using telepathy first gets revealed to the prospective “remade” human in the making.

.

Scientology and Demons/Entities

as the reason Man “is the way he is”.

 

The BBC’s Panorama show did an segmented expose (April 27, 1987) called The Road To Total Freedom, where they created an animated version of the OT III story – here’s a video of that part of the show.

 

Scientology’s OT 3 materials themselves have a few provenance problems (besides lifting from the Oahse). I thought maybe we should address those first.

Problem 1 – Some top Management Scientologists inadvertently gave away it’s true origins, a comic book from the 1930’s. They referred to the arch-villain of OT 3, Xenu, (clearly visible in the handwritten originals) as x-e-M-u, with an M instead of an N.

Warren McShane, president of scientology’s Religious Technology Center, in civil action no. 95-B-2143, Religious Technology Center v. F.A.C.T.Net, Inc., et al., U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Proceedings before the Honorable John L. Kane on September 11, 1995:

24 A The very first tab under Tab No. 1. You can see there are
25 references to the Galactic confederation, 76 planets, but

page 229
1 within that there is information on what are called incidents
2 that you see there, Your Honor, in parentheses. Those itself
3 are trade secret. Any descriptions in that first page which
4 actually described what happened to the individual himself is
5 a trade secret.
6 But it may be easier to explain what’s not. The
7 discussion of the — of the volcanoes, the explosions, the
8 Galactic confederation 75 million years ago, and a gentleman
9 by the name Xemu there. Those are not trade secrets. The
10 officers mentioned there are not. But the — the parts in
11 there that actually described what happened to the individual
12 and how to handle it, especially when it goes onto page 2 from
13 that point forward, that is trade secret.
14 Q Everything thereafter?
15 A Yes.
16 MR. KELLEY: Is page 2 Tab 2?
17 THE WITNESS: Tab 2, I’m sorry.

And later in his testimony:

18 THE WITNESS: This particular exhibit I am looking at
19 is O.T. III. And as I explained to the court the other day,
20 when we were talking about what’s generally known in the 75
21 million years ago and Xemu and the volcanoes, which is
22 knowledge that has been known for years, that is contained in
23 bits and pieces in the first paragraph of page 1. This is
24 page 3. Your Honor, if you look at the first full paragraph,
25 it starts with “one’s” on the handwritten part.

page 472
1 THE COURT: All right.
2 THE WITNESS: First full paragraph where it says
3 “one’s body.” From that point on — at least on that point is
4 what’s trade secret. Mr. Hubbard describing what has occurred
5 to the individual, not the general description of what events
6 happened 75 million years ago, but what happened to the
7 individual person. That is a trade secret. That’s what’s not
8 published in any works. From that point forward is a
9 description of the actual technology itself and how to undo
10 that great catastrophe that occurred.

It’s not a “trade secret” because Scientology is supposedly a religion, not a business, and I believe that’s the way the courts saw it – once the posturing in all these lawsuits was finished. But, it’s interesting how much Warren McShane harped on that the basic “story” was already published.

Be all that as it may – the original handwritten issue of OT 3, clearly says Xenu, with an N.

Original OT 3 scan

The amusing part about that is, that leading Church officials don’t even know what the hell their own materials state! If it’s so important and all, one would expect there not to be confusion over the name of such an infamous Galactic “criminal” as Xenu supposedly is.

game of thrones - eye roll

Of course, the other problem with this slip-of-the-tongue, is that from a similar quality of literature level (fanzines) the story of Xemu the intergalactic overlord came from the Strange Tales fanzine!

               Xemu

xemu2

Issue #103, December 10, 1962 – Strange Tales

zemu and the fifth dimension strange tales december 1962

You can see the story for yourself at Marvel’s digitized library.

The basic story is:

When newly built houses in the area have been found to sink into their foundations, Reed Richards sends Johnny to go and investigate. What Johnny stumbles upon is somebody from the 5th Dimension, who has been involved in these incidents, when Johnny learns the truth, he finds himself suddenly transported to the 5th Dimension.

In the 5th Dimension, Johnny is taken before Xemu a dictator who rules the dimension and plots to take over Earth, and he discovers that the area where the houses were being built is where they materialize when they travel to Earth’s dimension. Put in a wet prison to prevent his flame powers, Johnny is freed by Valeria who is the daughter of Phineas, who used to be the ruler before Xemu overthrew his rule.

With the help of the Human Torch the people of the 5th Dimension are able to overthrow Xemu and retake their realm.

Xemu

Xemu

When this character first he appeared in Strange Tales #103 (1962), his name was spelled Zemu. This was changed when he later appeared in Fantastic Four #158 (1975).

Fantastic_Four_-_Xemu_and_Xenu_

The Xenu/Xemu Controversy –

There are several spoken mentions of “Xemu” on a Class VIII course lectures, one called Assists specifically.

And they had elected a fellow by the name of Xenu, ahhh, could be spelled X-E-M-U, to the supreme “rulah”, and they were about to unelect him. And he took the last moments he had in office to really “goof the floof.”

The remaining four instances on the tape are all “Xemu” and not “Xenu”:

Note: The full lecture is also available at Wikileaks.

It appears Hubbard himself was unclear whether the name was Xenu or Xemu, which sort of kills the idea that it was even his idea to incorporate this cockimamie name into Scientology “advanced” levels in the first place.

It is also obvious that the reason they keep saying XEMU is because the fanzine story is the source for that name choice within the rest of this completely invented story of the Wall of Fire – OT 3 incident. Getting the name all messed up is typical of the hamstrung Wile E. Coyote men and women who are tasked to try and make Scientology look like it is a “valid” subject.

A difficult job!

Scientologist who tries to make OT 3 valid

The next problem with OT 3 –

Problem 2 – The handwriting on the OT 3 document does not match earlier Hubbard handwriting from 1955.

Hubbard Handwriting Comparison - OT 3

 

A few example letters:

Hubbard_handwriting_1

  1. Both the capital ‘T’ and the “h” are very different.
  2. Huge difference in the formation of the cursive “b”.
  3. Printed (versus cursive) capital “D’ is not even close to the same.
  4. The “W” comparison is interesting. Also Note the “e” difference, not once in the OT 3 document was there a unique “e” like appeared several times in 1955.

Those should get you started, there are many more examples to illustrate that this is two different people writing these documents, once you start really looking.

This raises some ugly questions.

In the world of heirarchal importances of documents in Scientology, a handwritten original of Hubbard’s is akin to the Word of God. Putting the above together with the fact that Church officials, and even Hubbard himself, can’t seem to get the name Xemu versus the Xenu (in the handwritten original) – straight? Lends further weight to that something is rotten in river city, when it comes to who is really writing Scientology.

Why would someone do this?

Propaganda and mind-control experimentation, which we have already documented elsewhere that Hubbard was in total lockstep with those types of programs from even before the “invention” of Dianetics and Scientology.

LOCKSTEP

The lockstep being the use of novels, fiction to control the publics’ mind into a direction you want it to go.

A recently declassified CIA document covers the subject of Psychological Warfare, (written in 1942 approx.) and under the heading of media methods for bringing about the psychological states they wish to bring about, you see this:

psychological_warfare_outline_1942_media_2a

We see books listed, but novels (meaning fiction for the masses)are particularly singled out.

When it came to creating this sort of fictional propaganda (such as Xenu and the Body Thetans) – it was the effect on the target’s mind that mattered to the people engaged in this sort of social engineering.

See Creswell to Bruce, CIA Declassified document.

The first CIA document also pointed out that this sort of psychological warfare “…embrace every known form of communication of information.”

Like – false histories of earth and the universe posing as a “enlightenment course of study” within a religion?

Besides Scientology’s OT levels, that’s exactly what the Oahspe was, which we already knew simply from the connections and background of the people involved in it -this is just another way to look at it.

And now we move onto –

Problem 3 – The whole “story” presented in OT3 is a conglomeration from other sources that are disturbingly all similar. This posits ONE SOURCE for either the presentation of these stories in English (starting in the 1800’s) or one source for the origin of the stories themselves.

Note: To explain this phenomena, one sometimes hears the oft-repeated propaganda slogan of “truth is universal” or something similar. Well, so are LIES when they are invented, backdated and then “varied” to look like they came from a specific culture.

Such is this case with this particular story, and on that note, let’s head into what Scientology’s OT Levels are lifting from the same basic LIE POOL as the Oahspe.

The people charged with orchestrating the Scientology mind-control experiment in the 1960’s time period, resurrected this OAHSPE material (and the Xemu the Galactic Overlord story) and incorporated them into their new Fabulous and Secret – Operating Thetan Level 3. Just like the Oahspe, they billed it as coming from a single source – L. Ron Hubbard.

They took what was already a conglomeration, and made a new conglomeration.

This happened basically the same year before Stanford Research Institute would be initially tasked by British intelligence (through their lackey OSS men) to invent a “new image of man” for man – in other words, another propaganda operation. “Image” meaning propaganda and fiction, not the truth and the real thing.

From my Compendium on the British Security Coordination, Section V: Back to the Beginning

In Section II we learned that the OSS Psychology Division (created in 1941) later became the R&A (Research and Analysis) Branch and was initially led in 1942 by Dr. James Phinney Baxter III (President of Williams College) and then later by Harvard historian Dr. William Langer in 1943.

OSS man William Talbot was Dr. Langer’s assistant from 1944 on, and then in 1946 he becomes the first head of the newly formed Stanford Research Institute (SRI) where his former junior Dr. Hamilton gets himself an “in” for a nice cush job there at Stanford, where he can then help out George White with MKULTRA LSD and Sex experiments for years.

The Tavistock men, the British junior slavemasters who had led the whole psychiatry and let’s subjugate people game and invented “assessment”, and their Spy Igors – the OSS men who were really British intelligence run by the SOE and BSC –

These are who started and ran Stanford Research Institute.

So now we have another man who joined the SRI party that is proven to be OSS/CIA (British Intelligence).

John William Gardner.

This British intelligence man (the OSS/CIA branches), was also later the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) from 1965-1968.

He used his position within the government to launch a research center at Stanford Research in 1968, and one of it’s first tasks was to postulate the future of Western Society.

Quite euphemistic, it was actually a study on how and what to change Man into resulting in the book Changing Images of Man in 1974.

Their initial findings were sobering, and in the introduction it was summed up as “We have met the enemy, and it is us”.

 

John William Gardner

John W. Gardner - OSS

John W. Gardner – OSS

 

More excerpts –

In 1972 the DoE had shifted the mission of the SRI research center toward “inquiry into educational-policy problems” (more euphemistic language) so in order to continue the long-range implications of the line of inquiry already begun by Willis Harman, a second research facility was created at SRI – The Center for The Study of Social Policy. Joseph Campbell worked for this new branch, and together with Willis the study was completed and then the report released in 1974 in book form, edited by O.W. Markley and Willis Harman.

**Please see the PDF in our Just Dox section of the Reading Library – Changing Images of Man OCRd  – This book is a result of a Tavistock Stanford Research Institute (SRI) early 1970′s “mind” restructuring project supervised by Willis W. Harman.

willis_harman_changing_images_of_man

My husband does a quick summary of this in one of the chapters of his book Scientology Roots.

It is a guide on how they want to mentally restructure man – by changing the image (propaganda) that they were previously using to herd humanity into whatever direction, to the new image that they wish mankind to believe itself to be.

One thing they proved in their study was that everyone can do telepathy. In the book they validate L. Ron Hubbard and specific fundamentals used in Scientology, several times.

They include charts, such as a chart for gradient levels of awareness.

Scientology always has been a part of the slavemaster behavior modification operation. Scientology and the CIA have always been dance partners on the dance floor of social engineering (behavior modification).

– Mike McClaughry, Scientology Roots, Chapter 26-3 War for Minds of Men.

Anyone exploring Changing Images of Man should bear Willis Harman’s words in mind:

“There’s a war going on between your side and mine. And my side is not going to lose.”

Willis Harman also just happens to have held an executive position at SRI over the MKULTRA LSD testing on college students and psychiatric patients program in the 60’s – alongside Ken Kesey, and Scientologists Robert Hunter of the Grateful Dead, and Grace-Marie Haddy who went on to become an intelligence agent for the both the Guardian’s Office and the Office of Special Affairs of the Church of Scientology. See Brotherhood Part 5A for more about her.

-end excerpts

The fact that this was first asked to be done within a year of Scientology’s “changed” image/propaganda – resulting in suddenly  creating advanced levels purported to give one superhuman abilities?

Cannot be a coincidence.

 

It’s another lockstep with British intelligence and their American counterparts, is what it is.

LOCKSTEP

It’s not much of a surprise, that one of the most obvious things about the Oahspe excerpts you are about to see, in parallel to Scientology’s OT 3, is the continuous reference to both singular and plural “walls of fire”.

This Wall of Fire positioning became one of the cornerstones of Scientology promotion of it’s OT 3 level.

David Ziff (of the zionist Ziff Publishing Empire) took over and became the long-time editor of Scientology’s Advance! Magazine. By Issue 15, (1972) the Wall of Fire analogy to the OT III incident was well in place.

Captain_of_AOLA_David_Ziff_1969_-_Advance_#5

But you also see this, in the same issue.

This promotion of The Wall of Fire continues right on up through today. Here is an example from Advance! #208, p.19, in 2011, and Advance #196 from 2007.

advance 208 19  Light, ot symbol and wall-of-fire - Advance issue 196

Ron Hubbard first referred to this as the Wall of Fire, in a taped lecture nicknamed RJ67, given on 20 September 1967.

1967 is the same year (and in fact the same month as this lecture) that Ray Palmer did a whole editorial on his resurrection of the old edition of the OAHSPE, and approximately 7 years after he first re-published it (privately).

Search Magazine, article by Palmer in the September 1967 issue: How I Discovered and Published Oahspe

Search_magazine_september_1967

Reminder: OSS man John Gardner, the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) from 1965-1968, would launch the research center at Stanford Research (SRI) in 1968, within just months of this change-of-course to the new “advanced levels” in Scientology.

That is one hell of a lockstep – those three things (Palmer-Hubbard-SRI) put together.

Here’s Hubbard  –

{note: OTs = Operating Thetans – the “advanced” Scientologist}

I formed the Sea Organization of OTs in order to have an area where a Scientologist could come, who could safely then walk through this last wall of fire. As the road to OT has to do with confronting and confronting life and confronting both the evil and the good thereof, the people of the Sea Organization are also becoming very experienced in the handling and confronting of MEST. This, however, is not part of the program for people we put through this last barricade.

Objections to learning the ultimate truth of this universe and what happened to it and why are so deeply implanted in people that it is necessary for any extremely advanced level to be relatively out of the common area and not planted on the crossroads of the world. So therefore the Sea Organization is simply organizing bases which are off the main track of man and in these bases we will be able to push people through and also to handle situations with regard to Scientology to help it get in Ethics on this planet.” (Ron’s Journal 67)

If you’d like to listen to RJ67, here it is:

http://wlstorage.net/file/scientology-rons-journal-wall-of-fire.mp3

I will describe what points are of interest to what I’m writing about here.

The player is a bit unwieldy, but just drag the bar on the player to about one third for the first point mentioned below, and experiment with it until you get the minutes at the right point.

  • 14:52 …trained in the field of Intelligence by the Allied governments.
    Governments – PLURAL. He was actually trained by the British, just like most of the OSS intelligence agents were during World War II. See Hubbard Trains at Pemberley and Passes article.
  • 26:30 – ‘The Band of Fire…”
  • 27:37 – Marks the beginning of the transcript quoted above – “…safely walk through this last Wall of Fire.”

Now here is a video – Class VIII lecture “Assists” –

Points from video matched up with handwritten original OT III materials –

  • 4:29 – Hubbard Clearly says XENU (one word) but then follows that with saying can be spelled Xemu.
  • 5:15 – Collection points, boxed up and put on space planes.
  • 6:11 – Billions and Billions and Billions of people boxed up, brought to earth from Coltus and then stacked around the major volcanoes of earth, then blown up with a hydrogen bomb
  • 7:05 – Brought down after the explosion, packed up in processing points, put in front of big projection screeens (- to be “educated”).
  • 7:53 – Boxed up again, the boxes were mixed with boxes from the alternative collection point – ie Las Palmas boxes mixed with Hawaii boxes and vice-versa.

First 3 points above go with these written pages (the second are written a year later in 1968) – these are from the Full OT III Course pack of materials found in the Internet Archive .

Original OT 3 scan  from scientologyNEW0T3 incident2 from scientologyNEW0T3-2

These two describe the other two points marked in the video –

from scientologyNEW0T3-3incident_2_page_4

Taken from an analysis of OT III found here, we have in plain text, then, the following proposed “story” of OT III.

The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 years ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet – 178 billion on average) by mass implanting..

He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H-Bomb on the principal volcanos (incident II) and then the Pacific area ones were taken – in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic area ones to Las Palmas and there “packaged”.

His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading data by means of circuits etc was placed in the implants. When through with his crime loyal officers (to the people) captured him after six years of battle and put him in an electronic mountain trap where he still is. “They” are gone. The place (Confederation) has since been a desert.

…Incident II is over 36 days long. Capture on other planets was weeks or months before the implant. Those on Teegeeack (Earth) were just blown up except for Loyal officers who were (shortly before the explosion on Earth) rounded up.

Sequence of Incident II for thetans on another planet –

  1. Capture (being shot),
  2. freezing,
  3. transport to Teegeeack (sometimes via a relay point),
  4. being placed near a volcano,
  5. beginning implant up to “the pilot”,
  6. various picture sequences,
  7. the 7s and C.C. and OT II materials,
  8. 36 days of picture implants which give a vast array of materials and three explanations for the bombing,
  9. transport to Hawaii or Las Palmas for packaging up into clusters.

The pictures contain God, the Devil, angels, space opera, theaters, helicopters, a constant spinning, a spinning dancer, trains and various scenes very like modern England. You name it, it’s in this implant we call in its entirely “R6” –

Hubbard – earlier than 1967 – mentions this “blown up civilizations” idea in a Saint Hill Special Briefing Course lecture:

Just a few trillion years ago the whole confounded place was all blown up, the suns were disorganized, planets all thrown to hell and everything else. Well, the little guys with the airplanes showed up again, and they still could put up the theta traps for this boy.

– Saint Hill Special Briefing Course lecture The Free Being 9 July 1963

This clearly indicates an already existing familiarity with the OAHSPE but the change-of-course, the decision to start incorporating it into Scientology’s new advanced levels, would not come until the intelligence handlers back of all this changed their direction – in 1967/1968.

They had a new plan.

Get it?

Before we switch to looking at what the OAHSPE says – take a look at this cover of Advance! magazine from 1990, #106, and notice how “angels” are pulling the “doomed souls” out of the Wall of Fire, and the “main” spiritual article title for this issue.

Scientology Advance mag 106 - 1990 - Oahspe wall of fire trapping drujas

Advance_106_1990_-_The_Fallen_Spirits

Keep those in mind – when you read the excerpts I’m about to detail.

Note: Drujas are demons, disembodied spirits that “latch” onto men.

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXII:

I send wise angels down to them to deliver them out of darkness. And they come and bear the drujas away from thee, for thine own good and theirs.

Excerpts from BOOK OF WARS AGAINST JEHOVIH, Chapter II

Fifth: The labor of the Lord God shall be to prevent drujas returning to the earth to dwell with corporeans; to capture drujas on the earth and carry them off to the nearest Lord’s heavenly place, and there deliver them.

Hubbard, positioned as “source” of the Advanced Levels of Scientology, is therefore being positioned as being a “wise angel” or even God himself, delivering us out of darkness by helping us “run off” our evil drujas – Body thetans.

You can see that the last Advance! magazine cover I showed you illustrates this perfectly.

AN interesting aside from Hubbard the “demon purifier”, is that Lurian Kabbala positions the Israelites in the exact same light.

Israelites as “demon purifiers” (according to Lurian Kabala) –

The dispersion of Israel has for its purpose the salvation of men’s souls; as the purified souls of Israelites will fulfill the prophecy of becoming “A lamplight unto the nations,” influencing the souls of men of other races in order to free them from demon influences.

The Raising of the Sparks (Netzotzim): The symbol of a divine spark encased in earthly matter is an ancient Gnostic symbol, which takes on new life in the Kabbalah.  In the Gnostic version, a spark of divinity is entrapped in an alien and evil world, and imprisoned in the soul of man. According to the Gnostics, the individual’s knowledge of the spark within himself (Gnosis) results in its being liberated from this world, and the Gnostic adherent abandons both body and self to join the infinite pleroma (heaven).

In contrast to the Gnostics, Luria held that when the spark of divine light is freed, the world is reintegrated and restored, rather than escaped and discarded. It is the individual’s divinely appointed task to not only liberate those sparks that are entrapped… within his own body and soul, but also those sparks in the world that he or she encounters along life’s way. Through proper ethical and spiritual conduct the individual is able to free the holy sparks… enabling the exiled divine light to return to its source, thus promoting the completion of Tikkun ha-Olam.

A large portion of Scientology’s OT V materials borrow from the Lurian Kabbala as well. For example,

On OT V, the person has to look for body thetans that are being or in body parts.

NOTS_27_Checklist_for_auditing_1_nov_1978

Excerpt –

Nots_27_checklist_body_parts Some examples –  Nots_27_some_examples

Lurian Kabbala –

There are superior and inferior souls, according to the organs with which they are respectively coupled. There are souls of the brain, souls of the eye, souls of the hand, etc. Each human soul is a spark from Adam, the first man.

And Hubbard’s early materials are almost verbatim along this line. As an interesting side note, one of the NOTS issues talks rather confusedly about there being a “core” to the body that Body thetans like to stick to, that isn’t the body. I find that darkly amusing, since obviously whoever really wrote that issue didn’t seem to want to know who that was – the one that does run the body. But they are not a body thetan and you can’t make them leave. So, they just kinda skipped right over that and tried to go around it.

giggle

HCL-21 ANATOMY OF THE THETA BODY 16 April 1952

Then you get what we call the genetic line. … has its own theta body, and as the Greeks said, the mind was in the stomach. it carried what you might call a theta body line in the stomach. That was its center of awareness. And when it was joined, it was joined in the head by the other lines and in short, you had a genetic line coming along and being joined by an already composite line.

Now the composite line had what you might call a stomach theta body, or a stomach soul. And this stomach soul and the genetic line soul are overlaid in the middle of the body.

…Precise you might say, a geographic position in the human body. There’s one on the right side, there’s one on the left side, of the central soul. There’s one behind the central soul and there’s one in the solar plexus area, and then the next two are outboard of the first two I’ve mentioned, so that you have the two outboard souls. Then the next one is the stomach soul with the two side inboard souls. So your right side would have two souls, your left side has two souls. And then you have the central soul forward and the central soul back. And in addition to all these there is the theta body of the genetic line which is evidently resident somewhere in the middle of the body.

These three subjects, Lurian Kabbal, Oahspe, and Scientology are all “locating” the Drujas/Sparks/Body Thetans as being in and around body parts.

Not entirely accurate, is about the best you could say about that.

Vincent_Price

Next –

 

Excerpts from Book of Fragapatti, son of Jehovih, Chapter III:

… Onward moved the float, the fire-ship, with its ten million joyous souls…

Speeding swiftly across the swamps of Ull, where seven corporeal stars were dismembered a thousand million years ago, now set with a’ji’an fields, and forming nebulae; whereto they bring, at times, the drujas, the dark spirits of other worlds, that they may take on the semblance of corporeal forms to complete their neglected good works in times past…

…Presently, now, the float neared the borders of Chinvat, the earth’s vortex, just beyond the orbit of the moon. Here Fragapatti halted for a day, sending swift messengers down to the lower heavens, and to the earth, to resolve where he should anchor during dawn.

And, the next day, he ordered the lights lowered, and now slowly moved toward the rolling earth; down, down, till he reached the third grade of plateaux from the earth’s surface, called Haraiti.

earth_with_ship

The transporting of all the “souls” on fire-ships to Earth – is pretty much the same idea as Hubbards DC-8 spaceships, just different descriptors.

Humorously referred to as Air Xenu, by some.

Air-Xenu

Hubbard described that the body thetans are captured and transported to Earth (Teegeeack is the name he gives) – clearly the same idea as the excerpt says using the moon as its stop-over point.

Hubbard described that: Incident II was for thetans on another planet – pretty much the same thing as “the drujas, the dark spirits from other worlds” that were being transported. Both body thetans and drujas are ergo alien spirits from other planets being transported and sent to Earth.

OT_III_Oct_2_1968_-_21_nearby_stars

One wonders sarcasm  where Hubbard’s earlier arch-enemies of humanity, the Espinolians/Marcabians fit into all this.

marcab2

*Please see Anthropology Earth and The Universe Time Track – according to L. Ron Hubbard for much more on his previous colorful “histories” of Earth and the alien Confederation.

The “Endless Progression” –

Excerpts from Book of Fragapatti, son of Jehovih, CHAPTER XXI.

Nevertheless, there are many spirits in heaven who have not fulfilled either a spiritual or a corporeal life, and they can see but little and hear but little; for which reason I commanded that they should be called drujas, signifying, spirits of darkness.

… the Gods cannot deliver thee to My emancipated heavens, till thou hast served thy time in the lower heavens. One great light have I bestowed unto all men, that they may progress forever. … but to man only have I given progress.

The second paragraph carries that “endless progression” idea from the same time period as Fredric Myers (of the Cecil-bloc Society of Psychical Research) – remember that?

It’s a hamster wheel – and Scientology officials have (and still do) promote that same bullpuckey.

Bob Thomas, U.S. head of Scientology’s prior incarnation of their own person intelligence department – the Guardian’s Office – gave a version of this same idea as the Oahspe and Myers, in 1971.

Bob Thomas left – Arte Maren right

Scientology Robert 'Bob' H. Thomas and Arte Maren demonstrating emeter NYTimes June 8 1971

Bob Thomas, who is now head of the Hubbard organization in Los Angeles, and has become probably the most important Scientologist in the United States, explains this seeming contradiction calmly.

“As the research advances the technology changes at the advanced level. It doesn’t confuse, because the lower levels are not changed very radically by any of the new researches. It’s like every stage of development that’s reached, the next stage is researched and then put out.”

Doesn’t that, I asked him, make processing eternal or endless?

If processing is eternal,” he answered, “it’s only because the degree of rehabilitation of the human being, from our point of view, is eternal. But there are finite states of attainment, approaching this infinitude. We have no limitations, we project no limitations as to how powerful and advanced a state of consciousness man can attain.”

When I suggested that it all seemed as if man might never be free, totally, because he would always have to depend upon Scientology to show him The Way, Thomas said,Freedom is a relative term. One of the basic Scientology viewpoints is that absolutes are not attainable in the physical universe. But you can get more and more and more free, and that’s what’s happening in Scientology.”

Scientology: The Now Religion by George Malko,  New York: Dell/Delacorte Press, 1970; found in the Internet Archive as part of a PDF. You can also read it online here.

 

You will notice that this statement: “As the research advances the technology changes at the advanced level.” is the exact same explanation of why, when OT III failed (and they couldn’t explain so many failures away) those who are really behind this then came out with NEW OT Levels 5, 6, 7, and 8.

NOTS Issue 10 – Scientology New OT 5,6,7
Why there are now more BT’s to audit.

end_of_OT_III_changed_NOTS_10

See, now it became that there were certain kinds of body thetans that were gotten rid of on OT III.

As compared to originally, 20 April 1968? Completion was simply “Getting rid of all body thetans.

end_of_OT_III_20_april_1968

Two years later, in October 1970, it was issued as “No more body thetans.

OT_III_eps_20_october_1970Clearly, someone had decided to extend this auditing of Body Thetans with the “new” OT Levels in 1978, in order to explain the failure of the OT III completions, and to extend the money-making bonanza. Worse though, it was a calculated effort to extend the hamster wheel effect of scientologists trapped in this MKUltra archetypal mind control experiment.

By 1981 – they changed things again – wanting to hurry people onto their New OT Levels because they cost a PILE of money, and that dang solo-auditing on OT III? Was basically costing the guy nothing!

Well, we can’t have that now can we…

how_dare_you_question_me_-_vincent

They didn’t even bother with waiting for the guy to say “no more body thetans left” – they simply looked for a “nice win”!

NOTS_OT_III_move_to_nots_asap_10_november_1981

Excerpt –

OT_III_attest_-_look_for_nice_win_now

You can practically see the dollar signs in their eyes.

Mo’ Money! Yah!

More-Free-Money

Not to mention, looking to try out some new mindfuck techniques in the process.

Later on, under David Miscaviges helm (after Hubbard died) as an explanation for the same building pile of failures, first he tried releasing new “versions” of the same advanced levels, and when all hell broke loose with the expose of the money-making 6 month check of people on OT 7? Currently, he sends people back down the levels, to keep the money coming and keep people on that hamster wheel in a different way.

ALL of which is a perfect continuance of the same old propaganda as Newbrough was tasked to promote on behalf of British intelligence – the endless serving in the lower heavens and the endless progress (and never arriving=failure) being misdirected away from and said that it is a “gift” given to man.

Oh, it’s a gift to run on this hamster wheel.

hamsterwheel

That people have to pay tens of thousands of dollars for.

Come on…

come on!

More on “Finishing” levels –

The OAHSPE also talks about what, in scientology, would be the “solo-auditor” working to lift the body thetans to enlightenment, thereby achieving the first resurrection (as in coming back from the dead).

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXI:

4. And if a mortal have greater wisdom and strength of soul than the drujas, he ruleth over them, to a good purpose, reforming them and raising them up out of darkness and helplessness.

…When a mortal dieth, and he had dominion over his drujas, not only his spirit will rise to the first resurrection, but his drujas also, whereupon they are all delivered into light.

It’s interesting that the “End Phenomena” – EP for short – in scientology for the NEW OT levels, V, VI, and VII, is “Cause over Life.” The word “life” being a decidedly tongue-in-cheek reference to the body thetans.

New_Era_Dianetics_for_OTs_-_Cause_Over_Life_ep

Excerpt –NOTS_ot_v_vi_vii_ep

Scientology/Oahspe “completion” state

Exact Match

 

Clustering –

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXII:

… Yea, the twain, not knowing it, will bind themselves together with great tenacity.

Excerpts from Book of Fragapatti, son of Jehovih, CHAPTER XXIX.

Hoab now turned his attention to the hosts of panic-stricken drujas, who were constantly forming themselves in knots

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XIV:

Such spirits as come to mortals purposely to inflict them with pain or misfortune shall be called evil spirits. And when they go in groups, having a leader, that leader shall be called beelzebub, that is, captain of evil (prince of devils).

This concept of “knots” of clusters of drujas was lifted almost completely into OT 3, forming in fact, one of the core “handlings” of drujas or body thetans, as this issue demonstrates.

Hubbard’s OT III instructions (says its revised 12 August 1969 on the original) – these are from the Full OT III Course pack of materials found in the Internet Archive .

making_clustersgigantic_clusters

And this issue concerning clusters of body thetans (BTs for short) first written 25 October 1969, with several revisions since then.

Pages from scientologyNEW0T3-5

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XIV:

All the foregoing… shall be called drujas.

Now, behold, there were millions of angels in those days who knew no other life, but to continue engrafting themselves on mortals. And, when one mortal died, they went and engrafted themselves on another.

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXI:

…They go not, for the most part, away from the mortal they inhabit whilst he liveth; nay, they have not wisdom or strength to go more than one length away.

…And they inhabit mortals and the houses that mortals dwell in. Some mortals have one or two of them; some a score; and some have hundreds of them.

This lines up perfectly has having been also lifted directly into the OT III materials, the idea that the “drujas” attach themselves to you.

From the Full OT III Course pack of materials found in the Internet Archive  – the funny looking symbol you seen in the below is the symbol for “thetan”. Hubbard says: “One’s body is a mass of individual thetans stuck to oneself or to the body.

One's_body_is_a_mass_of_thetans_-_cluster

 

The number of body thetans varying – Section III Addition Tech, February 15, 1968, p. 5.the_number_of_body_thetans_varies_widely_-_Sect_III_add_Tech_p_5_feb_15_1968

 

Scientology/OAHSPE

Exact Match

 

Note: The OAHSPE also explains why some people have more drujas than others.

body thetans hold one back

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXI:

(5) But if the drujas have greater power than the mortal, then they pull him down in darkness, making of him a man to lust after the affairs of earth. Sometimes they help man to riches and great power; and if he have sons and daughters who are brought up in idleness and ease and luxury, then the drujas fasten upon them, leading them in their own way, of lust and debauchery, or hard-heartedness.

The interesting thing is that in the scientology OT III materials, several of the references refer to “problems” with the body thetans are due to a lack of “training” on the part of the erstwhile solo auditor. This is another way of saying “weak”, and also, in scientology these people who fail to handle their body thetans properly are viewed as “out-ethics” (meaning they are an immoral person) and that they are “dramatizing” their body thetans (their “case” – it’s called) – yet another derogatory as to their character in failing to “lift” the drujas, so to speak.

So that’s another exact match on both the points of a “weak” mortal, and also the types of “out-ethics” talked about in this part of the OAHSPE.

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXI:

  1. The flesh-eater is their delight; and the drunkard their great joy. The man of riches, and kings, and generals, and fighting men, and harlots, and soldiers, are great treasures to them.
  2. … When mortals engage in war, slaying one another, the drujas have great merriment, taking part, by inspiring the mortals into the conflict.
  3. The pleader (lawyer) is a favorite to them, for his vocation bringeth them in the midst of contention and craft and lying; he is to them a fortunate habitation.
  4. The magician that worketh miracles and tricks is their favorite, for with him and through him, they can make themselves manifest. And when they show themselves, and are questioned as to who they are, they answer to any name that will please or flatter, even at times pretending to be Gods and Saviors!
  5. The tattling woman that talketh of her neighbors is a good home for drujas; and if the woman be given to talk evil, they are rejoiced beyond measure. The man that is a great boaster, and liar, and slanderer, is a choice house for them to dwell in.
  6. The cheater and defrauder, the miser and the spendthrift, the curser of Jehovih, the curser of the Gods, is like a citadel for them to inhabit.

In general – these are the same types of things that scientology’s ethics officers try to discipline their adherents on. Of course, it’s not exactly a fair system, as you might have gathered. RICH people get mild treatment, and both the former leader (Hubbard) and the current leader (Miscavige) have a rather strong tendency to employ batteries of lawyers and cause conflicts everywhere they go – not to mention being liars, cheaters, and defrauders – but hey, who’s splitting hairs.

sarcasm

Much like John Newbrough, one might add.

A note on Point 10 –And when they show themselves, and are questioned as to who they are, they answer to any name that will please or flatter, even at times pretending to be Gods and Saviors!

It’s an exact match with the ideas in early Hubbard materials about the body thetans “copying” and pretending to be anyone.

HCL-21 ANATOMY OF THE THETA BODY
16 April 1952

Any one of them forms the foundation of what we called earlier in Dianetics, demon circuitry.

…The demon circuitry sets as individual and obsessions in the theta body, and these theta bodies being low toned and in a somewhat hypnotic and neurotic, at least, state, will copy and mimic other human beings which they observe or feel in their environment. And they will hold these imitations and they will hold on to the aberrations which they observe and they are very confused, normally. They’re extremely confused. They do not know there are any other theta bodies present, and they are just as willing to hurt a body as to help it.

The “Top Guy” – You

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXI:

…And if a mortal have greater wisdom and strength of soul than the drujas, he ruleth over them, to a good purpose, reforming them and raising them up out of darkness and helplessness.

…When a mortal dieth, and he had dominion over his drujas, not only his spirit will rise to the first resurrection, but his drujas also, whereupon they are all delivered into light.

Note: see Scientology Roots Chapter Seven – 3 Scientology Is Brothers of Light Religion concerning Scientology’s Bridge to the Light, as well as ascending to “God” references found elsewhere in Scientology.

Delivered into Light” – if you are good to your drujas
transparent body - into the light OT III

An earlier Hubbard reference shows that the “end goal” of his “entity” processing was to “concentrate a person out up through the top of the stack [of entities attached].”

top_of_the_stack_-_entities

Same exact idea as the OAHSPE basically, if you successfully had “dominion” over your drujas you will “rise to the first resurrection.

Reference – Hubbard College Lecture #4 THOUGHT, EMOTION AND EFFORT 4 March 1952

 

Clusters have Leaders –

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XIV:

Such spirits as come to mortals purposely to inflict them with pain or misfortune shall be called evil spirits. And when they go in groups, having a leader, that leader shall be called beelzebub, that is, captain of evil (prince of devils).

That’s another obvious reference used in Scientology’s “cluster” idea, but also note the hierarchial aspect there.

Matches precisely Hubbard’s OT III instructions (12 August 1969) – these are from the Full OT III Course pack of materials found in the Internet Archive .

gigantic_clusters

Pause to Reflect –

 

We’re going to take a moment here to look at a couple things.

Besides OT III, there are also a number of much earlier Hubbard references, showing consistency in this line of “handling demons” within Scientology. This one particularly shows clear knowledge of the OAHSPE way back in the earlier days of Scientology – the organization or hierarchy of drujas/souls – which Hubbard calls theta bodies or “lines” back then.

Now riding over the top of this whole line all the way down through the universes to now evidently, is this first duo, the first double, the basic unit two. One of these theta lines is slightly senior to the other.

And that you will find, as the others peel off, is the native, controlling, natural you; and that’s what you recognize as you. You say, “Who am I?” well, it is the senior of the first duo.

And the conduct of the senior of the first duo is modified by the junior of those two, and is then modified by the additive lines on and on and on and on until the senior of those is quite normally asleep, gone.

As far as he’s concerned, he believes he’s dead or he has strange ideas about himself. His ideas of awareness, he’s sort of delegated everything to everything else. He’s in apathy, really. Homo, homo sapiens.

The central senior soul, the central senior theta line is itself completely capable of doing the entire job. And the person could only be considered, could be considered a clear only if he were
monitored and governed solely from this unity of one. And your second one might still remain, but it would be a junior position.

[entities/theta bodies] Now those come in on the individual. They come in on the individual, but not unbidden. He asked for them. Or one of his, one of his entities asked for them authorizedly or unauthorizedly, out of a compulsion to join up. Therefore you have this, this stack that looks like this.

… And these entities in turn have enough compulsion on them to add in even more beings, so that you eventually wind up with a very large number.

…They are, actually have been gathered up in groups.

…You’re just sort of holding them trapped. And they’ve tried to go back, and go where they’re supposed to go between lives and they try to do this and they try to do that. Maybe they’re so groggy they don’t know enough to do this, and so on.

– Hubbard College Lecture (HCL)  #21- Anatomy of the theta body 16 April 1952 – see Research and Discovery volumes.

 

I’d like to point out that even though you can now obviously see that Hubbard was already incorporating elements of the OAHSPE into Scientology right from the beginning?

The difference with OT III is that it was a change into a whole invented cosmology with ships and walls of fire and so on, then presented as an “advanced level” of enlightenment, and an official course in Scientology.

Much more like the OAHSPE – a highly self contained explanation, you understand, versus a more general observation of “entities”.

Also, we should take a moment and refresh your memory as to why all this hoodoo and voodoo over “demons” that need to be “handled” – and how that relates to the Stanford Research Institutes new “image” for man needed, or rather re-make of man.

Remember how just two years after the OAHSPE was published, The American Society for Psychical Research (ASPR) was originally formed in Boston, Mass. in 1884? And that by 1899 it had to go back under the original British one?

OK, but next, remember how five years later, in 1904, (November 10) James Hyslop forms the American Institute for Scientific Research, and through the Abnormal Psychology branch of his Institute, he had done an in-depth study of schizo-phrenics?

He came to the conclusion that schizophrenia (or unsolved “craziness”) was an infestation of spirits, or spirit possession.

demon possession

And right with the OAHSPE too – it has a point talking about the drujas driving the mortal mad.

demon_possession

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXI:

(7) On some occasion the drujas rule over their mortal, and his neighbors call him mad, and they send him to a mad-house, which is to them a city of delight. When mortals engage in war, slaying one another, the drujas have great merriment, taking part, by inspiring the mortals into the conflict.

See where they were going with that? And more importantly…where Scientology was going right along-side.

You can reduce psychosis to this definition: Psychosis is the condition of an entity or “idle spirit,” you might say, moving in to control, but being stuck on the track.

But there is your basis on psychosis, and also on neurosis…

– Anatomy Of The Theta Body an L. Ron Hubbard lecture 16 April 1952


Yet another lockstep
with British intelligence/Slavemasters.

LOCKSTEP

YOUR craziness is caused by an infestation of body thetans – get it?

OK, let’s continue on then.

Drujas just mess people up –

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXI:

But if the drujas have greater power than the mortal, then they pull him down in darkness, making of him a man to lust after the affairs of earth. Sometimes they help man to riches and great power; and if he have sons and daughters who are brought up in idleness and ease and luxury, then the drujas fasten upon them, leading them in their own way, of lust and debauchery, or hard-heartedness.

…The man of riches, and kings, and generals, and fighting men, and harlots, and soldiers, are great treasures to them. The pleader (lawyer) is a favorite to them, for his vocation bringeth them in the midst of contention and craft and lying; he is to them a fortunate habitation.

character of body thetansScientology materials from the OT III course express this as that body thetans just “hold one back” in a 1968 issue called Character of Body Thetans.

Excerpted –

character_of_body_thetans

Clearly the same attitude towards these hypothetical causes of all man’s ills – the drujas/thetans.

You can reduce psychosis to this definition: Psychosis is the condition of an entity or “idle spirit,” you might say, moving in to control, but being stuck on the track.

But there is your basis on psychosis, and also on neurosis…

– Anatomy Of The Theta Body an LRH lecture 16 April 1952

Note: Scientology has various words for the drujas/evil demons – words like: theta lines, theta bodies, entities, circuits, demon circuits, demons, body thetans and clusters.

Just_a_quick_little_listen_couldnt_hurtIs that a Body Thetan I hear?

Is that a Druja in there - Scientologists in auditor mag 1976

So much for the basic theory – now we get into the real crux of the matter, the parts where Scientology’s OT III is practically following point-by-point the blue print of the “story” of these exiled drujas.

I’m going to juxtapose them one after another – OAHSPE first, OT III second, and I have given the quotes headings, or segment titles.

The Battleplan

Gathering them up

Fire-boats

fire_boat

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXIII

At’yesonitus and his generals, with their millions of angel hosts, cleared off the drujas of the earth, the angels of darkness. They extended east and west and north and south, around all the earth, in all the divisions thereof, into every nook and corner.

  1. Day and night At’yesonitus and his armies labored, ceased not nor rested, but in good method went right on, filling all the lowest place of heaven with their transport boats of fire.
  2. And the boats sped hither and yonder without ceasing, loaded in their ascent with the screaming, frightened drujas, all under guard, and duly preserved against accident or harm by the wise angels over them.
  3. Some drujas were easily captured and carried away; some weak, helpless and harmless; but hundreds of millions of them mad, and most desperate; some evil, fearful in desperate oaths, and foul talk, and dangerous withal.
  4. But others were most pitiful in their love to linger with their mortal kindred; mothers, whose children dwelt on the earth; and children spirits, whose mothers dwelt on the earth. To separate them and carry away such drujas was a most heart-rending task, requiring God-like souls to accomplish it.
  5. Jehovih had said: As a mortal mother will cling to the mortal body of her dead child, till her friends must tear them apart, the while all souls who look on are broken-hearted because of her love, even such is the bond betwixt the spirit of the dead and the mortal yet left behind.
  6. But when My wise angels look upon them, and perceive they are carrying each other down in darkness, then shall they be torn asunder; and the spirit shall be taken away and provided for ultimate resurrection, and only permitted to visit the mortal kin under due guardianship.
  7. On the battle-fields of the earth were hundreds of millions of spirits in chaos, still fighting imaginary battles, not knowing their bodies were dead; knowing naught but to curse and fight; roving over the battle-fields, and would not away, save by capture and being carried off.
  8. Thus did At-yesonitus and his mighty hosts clear the earth. But of their great labors and wonderful adventures a thousand books might be written, and thousands of heroes singled out, whose great achievements overwhelm one’s belief because of the manifested love and power.

Scientology OT III – Gathering them Up

reference comparisons

video – Class VIII lecture “Assists” –

  • 5:15 – Collection points, boxed up and put on space planes.
  • 6:11 – Billions and Billions and Billions of people boxed up, brought to earth from Coltus and then stacked around the major volcanoes of earth, then blown up with a hydrogen bomb.

space planes OT III

From the written OT III materials – found in the Internet Archive

The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 years ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet – 178 billion on average) by mass implanting..

Capture on other planets was weeks or months before the implant. Those on Teegeeack (Earth) were just blown up except for Loyal officers who were (shortly before the explosion on Earth) rounded up.

Sequence of Incident II for thetans on another planet –

  1. Capture (being shot)

Hubbard — Saint Hill Special Briefing Course lecture The Free Being 9 July 1963 –

Just a few trillion years ago the whole confounded place was all blown up, the suns were disorganized, planets all thrown to hell and everything else. Well, the little guys with the airplanes showed up again, and they still could put up the theta traps for this boy.

scientology/oahspe

Exact match.

 

Note: There is another exact match in the OAHSPE to scientology’s “suppressive person” doctrine. Hubbard says that this person has the same problem.

#1

[Regarding a Suppressive Person]

He is so engaged in fighting some imaginary battle in the past that he has no time to have any friends in the present.

Everyone to him is an enemy … you see, well, there’s an insane person; he’s always fighting an imaginary enemy. That’s one of the biggest definitions of insanity. Or he’s retreating madly from an imaginary enemy.

OUT TECH: A lecture given on 21 September 1965, Saint Hill Special Briefing Course, (SHSBC-430)

#2

Suppressive Person – a person who suppresses other people in his vicinity. A suppressive person will goof up or vilify any effort to help anybody and particularly knife with violence anything calculated to make human beings more powerful or more intelligent. The whole rationale of the suppressive person (SP) is built on the belief that if anyone got better, the SP would be for it as the others could overcome him then. He is fighting a battle he once fought and never stopped fighting. He is in an incident. Present time people are mistaken by him for past, long-gone enemies. Therefore, he never really knows what he is fighting in present time, so just fights.

Modern Management Technology Defined. Los Angeles: Church of Scientology of California Publications Organization United States, L. Ron Hubbard, 1976.

Oahspe:

“…spirits in chaos, still fighting imaginary battles…”

Scientology/Oahspe

Exact Match

Place to implant them

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXIII

  1. And yet not much less were the labors and adventures of Yussamis in Ugadisspe and her six heavenly places, where his etherean hosts labored unceasingly, preparing places, and keepers, and nurses, and physicians, and teachers for the delivered drujas, the thousands of millions.
  2. And Yussamis and his Gods developed the six heavens of Ugadisspe; established places for the tens of millions of drujas; and provided order and discipline, and altars of worship, and schools, and colleges, and factories, and all things whatsoever required in a primary heaven.

This one is matched by the general principle of Scientology’s OT III – that of “auditing” or enlightening the Body Thetans with special processes, but also by the fact that the materials state places these beings were taken, and implanted, and then boxed up.

I think Hubbard was just expanding upon the OAHSPE’s “education” of the drujas idea, when he goes into what the Body Thetans were “implanted” with.

 

Transport them

Wall_of_Fire_by_MattTheSamurai

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XV:

…And after this he returned to Gessica, chief God…

Gessica had the vessels constructed with walls of fire around the margins, to prevent the drujas escaping. And there were built in all four hundred vessels, each capable of carrying one hundred million drujas.

The manner of driving the drujas into them was by leaving part of the fire-wall open, and by fire-brands in the ethereans’ hands cutting off sections of drujas from the hells. In this way the ethereans drove the drujas into the vessels, whereupon the doorway in the wall of the ship was closed.

And then the workers of the ship put it under way and carried them up to Hao-yusta, where the Gods and Goddesses received them, placing the drujas in pens, walled with fire, where they could be treated and restored to reason, after which they were to be liberated in installments…

Scientology OT III – Transport them

reference comparisons

video – Class VIII lecture “Assists” –

  • 6:11 – Billions and Billions and Billions of people boxed up, brought to earth from Coltus and then stacked around the major volcanoes of earth, then blown up with a hydrogen bomb
    [the Walls of Fire]

hubbards wall of fire - h-bomb OT III

From the written OT III materials – found in the Internet Archive

Sequence of Incident II for thetans on another planet –

  1. transport to Teegeeack (sometimes via a relay point),
  2. being placed near a volcano [Walls of Fire]

volcanos OT III

Volcano List – OT III –

OT_III_-_list_of_volcanoes

NOTS issue 10 – Scientology OT 5, 6, 7 materials –

NOTS_10

Excerpt – “But Planet Earth was a dumping ground to end all dumping grounds.

Aliens and Us #2 - Dumping Grounds

Scientology/Oahspe

Exact Match

 

 

Sort them/packaging

conveyor belt sorting drujas

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXIII

  1. Jehovih said unto Yussamis: Thou shalt assort the drujas; the peaceful to themselves; the dumb to themselves; the mad, the chaotic, and all other of My afflicted ones; provided sections and places for them. And teachers and nurses and physicians; for they shall be delivered out of darkness also. Yea, every one of them shall become as a star of glory in heaven.

 

Scientology OT III – Sort them/packaging

reference comparisons

video – Class VIII lecture “Assists” –

  • 7:05 – Brought down after the explosion, packed up in processing points, put in front of big projection screeens (- to be “educated”).
  • 7:53 – Boxed up again, the boxes were mixed with boxes from the alternative collection point – ie Las Palmas boxes mixed with Hawaii boxes and vice-versa.

packaging OT III

From the written OT III materials – found in the Internet Archive

Main OT III issue

…taken – in boxes …and there “packaged”.

Incident two issue

incident_two_-_no_date

Sequence of Incident II for thetans on another planet –

Point 9 – transport … for packaging up into clusters.

Sorting/Packaging – Exact Match.

 

 

Trap them with “walls of fire” and give them “subjective bodies” (matrix/virtual reality)

walls of fire trap

Excerpts from Book of Fragapatti, son of Jehovih, CHAPTER XXIX.

Thus proceeded Hoab and Athrava: First walling the place around with fire, so none of the druj could escape, and then dividing them into thousands of groups, by means of fire also; then creating subjective bodies for them, to which they bound themselves willingly, and which prevented them from fastening to one another.

(This is what drujas call re-incarnation in another world.) And whilst they were thus provided temporarily by their teachers, and governors, and nurses, many of them imagined themselves to be kings and queens and high priests, and even Lords and Gods!

blank screen mind control OT III

This is basically implanting false ideas, identities, and images – they aren’t real. Apparently the story-teller was trying to communicate that these “angels” wanted to control where and what the drujas “bound” themselves too.

However, an early Hubbard reference also mentions this “must have a body” fixation along the same lines here.

John_Henry_Fuseli_-_The_Nightmare must have bodies

Now it [theta body] has some specific obsessions with which you should be very well familiar. And these obsessions are these. One, it has to have a body. Two, it has to be, these are plants, by the way,
these are planted. There are points on the track where they’ve agreed to this, but these are mostly implanted into the theta body to get it into order. Has to have a body.

– HCL 21- Anatomy of the theta body 16 April 1952

But for this part “ then creating subjective bodies for them” there is also a exact match with the NOTS 15 issue of Scientology’s OT 5,6,7.

NOTS_15_-_heading

Excerpt –

nots_15_-_body_built_of_thetans

Note: In the newer version, the OT V materials, it talks about having a “transparent” body, which is very similar to the “light” body discussed in the OAHSPE.

transparent body - into the light OT III

Their state of mind –

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXIII

At’yesonitus and his generals, with their millions of angel hosts, cleared off the drujas of the earth, the angels of darkness. They extended east and west and north and south, around all the earth, in all the divisions thereof, into every nook and corner.

…Some drujas were easily captured and carried away; some weak, helpless and harmless; but hundreds of millions of them mad, and most desperate; some evil, fearful in desperate oaths, and foul talk, and dangerous withal.

Bad Drujas.
Evil_minions

This next one from the OAHSPE, is pretty damn amazing, because it’s pretty much exactly the conceptual (and in some cases) the exact procedures of both OT III and OTV/VII of Scientology.

Procedure to “handle” them

Split the basic two, break apart the drujas by Strategm, persuasion or “with a strong hand”.
Surround them with flames of fire (volcano eruptions and explosions) and carry them off to the boats (spaceships) and deliver them to the prepared places, and cause mortals to hate them.

men-on-conveyor-belt

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XV:

…And then the workers of the ship put it under way and carried them up to Hao-yusta, where the Gods and Goddesses received them, placing the drujas in pens, walled with fire, where they could be treated and restored to reason, after which they were to be liberated in installments…

Surround them with flames of fire (volcano eruptions and explosions) and carry them off to the boats (spaceships) and deliver them to the prepared places, and cause mortals to hate them.

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXII:

… Yea, the twain, not knowing it, will bind themselves together with great tenacity.

But thou shalt deliver them apart nevertheless, by stratagem, or persuasion, or with a strong hand. And when thou hast them separate, thou shalt surround the drujas with flames of fire, and carry them off to the boats, which are bulwarked with fire. And thou shalt deliver them in the places My Son, Yussamis, hath ready prepared for them.

Thou shalt not only deliver the drujas, but cause mortals to hate them.

“with a strong hand” –

Exact Match.

NOTS_15_-_heading

Excerpt –

Nots_15_-_thetan_hand

Take a look at how close those Oahspe excerpts are to Hubbard’s very early materials on the subject.

Now all of a sudden we take apart the composite theta body which is you, into its component theta bodies, and we take these apart as regard to the experience, and we find the potentiality of which a central theta line is capable.

…So you just make sure that you differentiate from entity to entity and try to get them unstuck off the track very neatly and nicely and get the theta being back in power.

…If you have a psychotic entity on your hands… you have to audit this entity…

Now, here you have, then, a simple problem of finding out where he is stuck in the track, and in what kind of an incident he’s stuck.

First, what entity is stuck, when is he stuck, and run it out…

And one after another, you spot and straighten up these entities.

– HCL-21 ANATOMY OF THE THETA BODY 16 April 1952

Now, therefore auditing procedure as I would recommend it at this time – which is subject to change – auditing procedure would be simply this: You clean up theta lines only to the point where you can handily and easily reach the center. And then you clean up its line as far back as is necessary to keep it from holding on to other entities.

…..so the other procedure is to clean up the lines which are keeping it from happening, and then just to the point where you can clean it up, and so you get the person up the line on that.

Now, theoretically all the other beings ought to blow [leave] immediately that this thing decides – this center being, you, which is really you, by the way – will decide.”

– HCL-22 HOW To AUDIT A THETA LINE, PARTS I AND II, A lecture given on 16 April 1952

So, what do Scientologists do on the OT levels?

They audit demons called body thetans and groups of demons called clusters.

talkingtothedead1

 

And finally – last but not least, look at this one.

Spend two thousand years raising them up a set of GRADES and CLASSES.

Excerpts from BOOK OF WARS AGAINST JEHOVIH, CHAPTER XL.

Ahura had now toiled nearly two thousand years with his people, who for a great part had been drujas, but were now high in the grades. Of them, more than two thousand millions had been raised into light; had become Brides and Bridegrooms to Jehovih, and had been delivered into the etherean worlds.

Considering Scientology’s whole “bridge” to enlightenment, filled with all their auditing and training courses one must do, is called: The GRADE CHART –

I think we know where they got that from too.

 

But it goes further than that, it also aligns with other very early (under the helm of Francis Bacon and William Cecil) Slavemaster propaganda – Lurian Kabbala.

See Casimir Pilenas and the Protocols of Zion hoax for more information on “religious” propaganda personally supervised by these men.

Lurian Kabala – Ascending Path and “grades”

The “raising of the sparks” is the vehicle of Tikkun ha-Olam, the Restoration of the World. For Luria, unity with god is completed only through the restorative acts of humankind.

Scientology combines the above two sources – Kabbala and OAHSPE.

Quotes from Science of Survival –

Faced with the insanities of the world today, man’s chances of reaching God are not that good.

The biologist… has sought to dream for man an origin out of mud… and a source for him independent of God… Dianetics…may be of assistance to a resurgence in man of something of his belief in a Divine Being and in himself as an entity partially divine.      

The progress upward toward survival on higher levels is a progress as well toward God.

Not only that – the British intelligence controlled “study” on remaking “images” of man – at Stanford Research Institute also shows us another source for this “grades” of awareness idea – that Hubbard obviously also was ordered to lift/plagiarize and that the OAHSPE was itself originally a “tasked” project by the British slavemasters.

Looking at the OAHSPE quote again –

Spend two thousand years raising them up a set of GRADES and CLASSES.

Excerpts from BOOK OF WARS AGAINST JEHOVIH, CHAPTER XL.

Ahura had now toiled nearly two thousand years with his people, who for a great part had been drujas, but were now high in the grades. Of them, more than two thousand millions had been raised into light; had become Brides and Bridegrooms to Jehovih [God] and had been delivered into the etherean worlds.

 

Let’s look at the book Changing Images of Man again now, in light of propagating this same poisonous idea about spiritual hierarchies.

Changing Images of Man OCRd  – PDF file

Reminder –
pointing_finger_down

The book, Changing Images of Man, is a result of a British intelligence -Tavistock – Stanford Research Institute (SRI) early 1970′s “mind” restructuring project supervised by Willis W. Harman.

However, the institute itself was tasked along these lines in 1968, by OSS man William Gardner – the same year that Hubbard changed direction and created “advanced” levels in Scientology.

Stanford Research Institute was controlled by the same hierarchy of men who were pushing Eugenics, as well as behavior modification and “testing” techniques – run by the British Slavemasters through their highly controlled MI6 asset, the OSS. Some of these very men, started and ran Stanford Research Institute as a cut-out to continue their nasty experiments (including the later LSD, and Scientology “remote viewing” ridiculousness) with having a nice, large, Young-and-Dumb (to their ways) population of actually highly intelligent college students. In fact, the official that “asked” for this “Changing Images of Man” study, was an outcropping of the British Tavistock psychological assessment operation, John William Gardiner.

*For much more information about that – see British Security Coordination Compendium articles in the World Government Section of our Reading Library, especially #3 and #5.

 

The book contains many “strategies” concerning propagating the #1 British Slavemaster propaganda – Tabula Rasa – including these “grades” of “rising awareness” ideas.

An important overall view that should be understood concerning this whole myth of Xenu and The Wall of Fire, and the Angels and the Drujas from other planets – is the slavemaster view of using myths to “write on the tablet”, so to speak, of the minds of men.

 

Myths shape perception.

Changing Images of Man – p. 155.

 

Shape perception indeed.

 

Poison – is more like it.

mind poisoners - mind control

p 109

[in this book, the “spectrum of potential consciousness” is is later called “gradient scale of awareness”, the exact same concept that also surfaced in Scientology]

The notion of a spectrum of potential consciousness connotes extending the range of recognized “unconscious” processes … to include a vast range of reported experience in the provinces of creative imagination, “cosmic consciousness,” aesthetic and mystical experience, psychic phenomena, and the occult.

This range will include, importantly, both subconscious choice – man “hiding from himself,” repressing not only feelings and memories but also knowledge of his own potentialities – and supraconscious choice, the direction of a “higher self” manifesting itself in hunches and inspirations and “choosing better than we know.

CHAPTER 5 – Characteristics of an Adequate Image of Humankind

p 118

The meaning of divinity must somehow come to incorporate both the images of person as separate from God, and of person and God as different levels of the same reality.

That one goes well with the Science of Survival quote: “…Dianetics…may be of assistance to a resurgence in man of something of his belief in a Divine Being and in himself as an entity partially divine. The progress upward toward survival on higher levels is a progress as well toward God.

and the OAHSPE: “had been raised into light; had become Brides and Bridegrooms to Jehovih [God]

Next, Changing Images of man P. 132 –

The Relevance of a Gradient of Awareness for an Adequate Image.

What is the common characteristic of the various gradients we have reviewed? Recalling the operational definition of  consciousness (the organization of the biosystem; with awareness as the psychological equivalent or complementary aspect of that organization), it seems reasonable to cast the image of ascending stages of evolution in terms of a gradient of awareness

p. 129

Figure 9 shows a number of theories about the nature of the human and their underlying images that we will attempt to show can be integrated into a more holistic image/theory of humankind.

changing_images_of_man_figure_9_-_maslow

First, it is useful to introduce the concept of gradient, and to see how it applies to the systemic properties of existence.

By “gradient” we mean, simply, “the grade or ascent … a series of transitional forms, states, or qualities connecting related extremes” ( Webster’s).

THREE DIMENSIONS ON A “GRADIENT OF AWARENESS”

The Gradient of Human Needs – by Abraham Maslow (1962)

changing_images_of_man_figure_10_gradient_conscious

…described a gradient that parallels the above as being manifest by persons with different levels of need-fulfillment.

 

Notice that date of 1962 for Maslow’s work? Well, it was only a year later, November/December 1963 that Hubbard first began making “noises” about creating a classification chart for Scientology courses and “awareness levels”.

References –

  • HCO PL 26 Nov 63 “Certificate and Classification Changes, Everyone Classified”;
  • HCO PL 11 Dec 63 “Classification for Everyone”

found in the Organization Executive Course, volume 4 (both 1974 and 1991 versions.

Hubbard also began describing his supposed (obviously given to him) vision of this new gradient chart, in the Saint Hill Special Briefing course.

“Anyway, however that is, somebody now is in this position. He’s out here on the street, he hears about Scientology. So he goes around and he understands there’s an auditor there and he has some meetings on Friday night or something like that. And he decides he’ll go along. He’s heard from Bill or something. And he goes along there.

He sees a chart up on the wall of where he’s supposed to go. This tells him at once that there is someplace to go, that there is a way to get there, and if various states of arrived beingness are described with great reality on this chart, and so on …

…And this is all he has to study. And this is his practice of activity and it’s on this schedule and that sort of thing. And that shows him that he can move from that point on forward.

– Saint Hill Special Briefing Course lecture #325, renumbered 1991: #357 Certifications and Classifications, December 3, 1963, by L. Ron Hubbard

 

By April 27, 1965, L. Ron Hubbard was well into this whole “awareness levels” business – I found this persons course notes from a SHSBC lecture that were interesting.

Note: The link above is now broken, I just found out. If you look at this internet archive version of it (ignore the notice, just wait for it to load), you’ll see that it was deleted within a few weeks of the publication of my husband’s heavily documented Scientology Roots chapter 26-3 War for the Minds of Men that had this same link in it, the Church of Scientology of Moscow (of all places) forced Scribd to delete this from whoever had put it up!

_removed_by_the_Church_of_Scientology_Moscow_-_9_nov_2013_Scientology-Course-Notes-SHSpec-59-6504C27-Awareness-Levels

This, after it had been there at Scribd for a number of years even! The Church of Scientology Moscow, by the way, was raided by Russian police in 2011.

I did manage to save a screenshot of it way though, way back when I first found it.

screenshot_Saint_Hill_Special_Briefing_course_nbr59_6504c27

The interesting line was this:

“Awareness is always a matter of increasing perimeter [of reality].” You get concentric circles of awareness.

Notice how closely that matches with the Maslow “circles” diagram?

changing_images_of_man_figure_10_gradient_conscious

Well, so, who know that comparison of what Hubbard was doing in April 1965 was going to be such a hot ticket item eh? That it had to be taken down by the Church of Scientology, I mean. Of course, it didn’t look too good in my husbands Scientology Roots chapter either, with what that change was being lined up against there.

In the following month of May 1965, Hubbard released the Grade Chart of Scientology processes and courses, complete with those very same “awareness” levels begun after Maslow’s work first appeared.

By 1966, he had resigned his position with the official Church and had formed a BROTHERHOOD called the Sea Organization – dedicated to getting the fallen through the “highest levels” of the chart.

That all sounds a whole hell of a lot like this:

Excerpts from BOOK OF WARS AGAINST JEHOVIH, CHAPTER XL.

Ahura had now toiled nearly two thousand years with his people, who for a great part had been drujas, but were now high in the grades. Of them, more than two thousand millions had been raised into light; had become Brides and Bridegrooms to Jehovih, and had been delivered into the etherean worlds.

That’s so much the same it’s downright scary!

So, you do understand that –

YOU are viewed as a “druja”

– a spirit of darkness –

by these people?

 

That you need “raising” –

by cults – by brotherhoods – calculatedly designed to “catch you”?

ILLUMINATED BROTHER OF LIGHT

Cults like the Oahspe Faithists, the Mormons, The SSPX’ers, the scientologists, and many similar “religions” and “brotherhoods”.

Moral of the story is – don’t be in such a hurry to join one of those “brotherhoods” – they are all shabby imitations of what you are really looking for, and I do know what that is.

Those are not it.

* * *

Continuing –

I think I’ll include this one also. It’s one of my personal favorites, because it so shows the scaredy-cat British slavemaster mentality towards telepathy – at least telepathy that is not under their control. I have seen a number of Scientologists try to enforce (by ridiculing anyone who talks about it) this same view unless they are doing one of Scientology’s approved “levels” –  which is pretty strange, if you ask me.

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXII:

…Mortal kings shall issue edicts against magicians and prophets and seers and priests; and the consultation of spirits shall come to an end. And man on the earth shall turn to his own soul, which is My light within him, and he shall cultivate it and learn to think for himself.

So, I guess you can talk to your drujas but not to any other spirit anywhere or you’re a bad crazy person! Yep, that’s Scientologists and their attitude exactly. Interesting, isn’t it?

* * *

 

These next excerpts apply to Scientology’s expanded version of OT 3, called NOTs, or New Era Dianetics for OTs, which are their advanced levels OT V, VI, and VII on their Grade Chart.

Hey, you know what that means now – look at that!

thumbs up

Excerpts from Book of Lika, son of Jehovih, Chapter XXI:

When a mortal dieth, and his drujas had dominion over him, then his spirit becometh a druj also, and he becometh one with them, fastening on whoso cometh in the way…

…If the mortal can not control his habit for intoxication, or gluttony, or avarice, or debauchery, or laziness, or lying, or hypocrisy, preaching what he practiceth not, or sexual indulgence, or vengeance, or anger, or tattling mischievously, then is he, indeed, a victim in the hands of drujas, and at the time of his death, he becometh one with them.

Remember that Dormant BTs thing we looked at earlier?

OT III screens

In NED for OTs you are actually handling, in the main, dormant BTs and clusters. These are not really alive enough to run Incident IIs and Incident Is on. They have different considerations, these dormant BTs and clusters, but they add up to being dead or below being dead. They’re in the state that FBI agents and government officials eventually wind up in when they aren’t already simply an animated dormant cluster. If people who are busy trying to smash up Scientology realized what they themselves were heading for, they would have a couple of other thinks…

– L. Ron Hubbard, HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978, ISSUE I, NED for OTs Series 1, NED FOR OTs RD THEORY OF, p3,4 section Dormant BTs and Clusters
The NED for OTs Issues are available as part of the Operating Thetan Level Six course here and at Wikileaks. A complete file of all the different OT levels is also at Wikileaks.

If you are a “smasher” of Scientology you will end up as a Body Thetan on someone else’s body!

Talk about an EXACT MATCH with the Oahspe….

yikes_-_vincent_001

wiley-double yikes

 

There’s also this, from one of Hubbard’s earlier references.

HCL 21-Anatomy of the theta body 16 April 1952

… the remaining ones, let’s call these things idle entities, or some such word. These idle ones then, are very idle. They are actually theta beings which have run downhill to the point where they’re practically out the bottom. They couldn’t have a body if, it’s just, that’s where your; by the way, that’s where all these beings go eventually. They just peel off downhill they’re no longer capable of having bodies, they’re so thoroughly stuck on the track. Well, there’s these idle beings.

Which is also an exact match.

But also notice this particular line from the OAHSPE –

at the time of his death, he becometh one with them.

That’s saying he will become part of a cluster of drujas, so to speak.

Even worse as an exact match? Scientology’s OT V (NOTS) has an issue that says that “clusters” of these can be as bad as “socialists” – as bad those who are for “The People”!

NOTS_37_clusters_are_like_socialists

A thetan who is “dead” acts like a cluster – there’s nobody running the show – and his manifestations are those of a cluster. This is the Socialist, everyone belongs to “The State”, individualism is negated, it’s all “The People”.

So we are using the worst possible insult, scientology-wise, worse even than “suppressive person”, and that is the “dead and dormant” cluster.

This nasty political statement, this veiled attack on America’s “the people” democracy, gets put in a so-called “advanced” spiritual course?

Could they be any more obviously British Intelligence?