The Reckoning for Earth – Chapter Six – The Plan To Eliminate America, And All Nations

by Mike McClaughry


Chapter Six

 The Plan To Eliminate America, And All Nations

Reckoning – the righting of wrongs. The rectifying of damages caused by wrong actions.

Various books and internet sites have confused what the New World Order is and who is behind it.
You have seen the stories, it is a conspiracy to take over the world Jews, aliens, the Illuminati, etc.

We will herein provide proof who the actual people are, who conspire to rule the whole world.

The British nobility have a Plan to be the ruthless ruler of the entire world, that began over 400 years ago.

It is not my words that they seek to rule the world, it is their words. They are hung by their own statements.

* * *

In 1558, Elizabeth I became Queen of England.

Her chief adviser was William Cecil. He was her Secretary of State. British intelligence was under him.
William Cecil started a dynasty where the Cecil family has headed British intelligence ever since then.

855px-Queen_Elizabeth_I;_Sir_Francis_Walsingham;_William_Cecil,_1st_Baron_Burghley_by_William_Faithorne_(2)sketch of William Cecil, Queen Elizabeth I, and Francis Walsingham
the sketch was made at the time of Queen Elizabeth I

William Cecil began urging Queen Elizabeth to expand British territory by making colonies.
They used slave trafficking and drug trafficking to finance their British Empire building.

On December 31, 1600 Queen Elizabeth I granted a Royal Charter to the British East India Company.
It engaged in slave trafficking and drug trafficking. It smuggled opium into China.

The British East India Company took over India, using the traditional British method for taking over a country.

Step 1 – economic takeover
Step 2 – government takeover

They first established trading posts in India that then became a government.

Starting in 1619, the British East India Company became the government in multiple areas of India.

* * *

Robert Cecil was the leader of an influential family called the Cecil Bloc. He was the head of British intelligence and he was a British Prime Minister. The Cecil family is one of the top British slavemaster families.

Robert_Cecil_-_3rd_Marquess_of_SalisburyRobert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil – aka Lord Salisbury

His sister had a son named Arthur Balfour. He was a head of British intelligence and a British Prime Minister.

Lord Arthur BalfourArthur J. Balfour  (left)

The slavemasters do not believe in democracy – which means rule by the people. They say that democracy is allowing rule by uneducated idiots. The slavemasters want a two class society where you have an elite class who rule over the commoners. The problem with that is you get these guys who assert they are elite when they are really sociopaths who should not be allowed to rule over anything.

The modern day slavemasters are the British nobility. At the core is the Cecil family.

In the later part of the 1800′s Robert Cecil built up an influential family network called the Cecil Bloc.

Robert Cecil used students at Oxford University as a recruitment pool for the Cecil Bloc. They then became British agents placed in governments, schools, and media around the world – especially in America. 9

It is a massive intelligence and propaganda network for forwarding the British nobility plan to rule the entire world.

* * *

In 1891 Cecil Rhodes created a secret society to bring the entire world under rule by the British nobility.

Cecil Rhodes had used the traditional British method for taking over a country, in Africa.

Step 1 – economic takeover
Step 2 – government takeover

In 1887 Cecil Rhodes took control of diamond mines in Africa and became one of the wealthiest men in the world.
Rhodes then used his private army to conquer and rule 3.5 million square miles of Africa, it was called Rhodesia.


Rhodes wanted to form a secret society –

Why should we not form a secret society with but one object, the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire.   6

Rhodes described this secret society –

development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, … the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire….  7

In February 1891, Cecil Rhodes and William Stead met and discussed how to organize the Secret Society.  10

The General of the Society was Cecil Rhodes.

Society of the Elect (also called the Junta of Three) –

Alfred Milner
William Stead
Reginald Brett

Circle of Initiates

Arthur Balfour
and some others

Association of Helpers

Lord Rothschild
Waldorf Astor
Lord Halifax Edward Wood
Lord Lothian Philip Kerr
Lionel Curtis
Robert Brand
Geoffrey Dawson
The Rockefellers
Other international bankers

The Association of Helpers is the visible aspect of the secret society. It is called the Round Table.
Lord Rothschild in Britain and other international bankers such as the Rockefellers, joined the Round Table.

Lionel Walter Rothschild - 'Lord Rothschild'Lionel Walter Rothschild

The Round Table members are in a junior position. They are not the top British slavemasters.

come igor rothschild and friends - slavemaster
Arthur Balfour and other members of the Cecil family joined the secret society. The secret society has always been dominated by members of the Cecil family. It was the Cecil family that gave power to the secret society.

Here is a quote from The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, professor of history

Cecil Rhodes… left his fortune to form a secret society, which was to devote itself to the preservation and expansion of the British Empire. …this secret society was created by Rhodes and… Lord Milner, and continues to exist to this day.

This society has been known at various times as Milner’s Kindergarten, as the Round Table… I have chosen to call it the Milner Group. Those persons who have used the other terms… have not generally been aware that all these various terms referred to the same Group.

Alfred Milner was able to dominate this Group… It is doubtful if Milner could have formed his Group without assistance… the Cecil Bloc gave him the political influence without which his ideas could easily have died in the seed…

The Milner Group could never have been built up by Milner’s own efforts. He had no political power or even influence. All that he had was ability and ideas. The same thing is true about many of the other members of the Milner Group… The power that was utilized by Milner and his Group was really the power of the Cecil family and its allied families…

Alfred Milner married into the Cecil family and he was the head of the secret society.  8



This is the group that has the grand plan
to rule the world – the New World Order.

The British nobility intends to be the ruler of the entire world by establishing a World Government.
The World Government would be led by Britain – either overtly or covertly. This is their Grand Plan –

Eliminate national borders
One World Government
One World Army
One World Court
One World Bank and currency

Thomas Jefferson warned against putting all power into one government body –

What has destroyed the liberty and the rights of man in every government which has ever existed under the sun? The generalizing and concentrating all cares and powers into one body, no matter whether of the autocrats of Russia or France, or of the aristocrats of a Venetian Senate.

— Thomas Jefferson to Joseph C. Cabell, 1816  Jefferson Cyclopedia

* * *

The Cecil family and their Round Table group sought to unite the world in a federal structure around Britain.

…Rhodes and Milner …sought to unite the world …in a federal structure around Britain. Both felt that this band should pursue its goal by secret political and economic influence behind the scenes and by the control of journalistic, educational, and propaganda agencies.

The idea for federation of the Empire was not original with the Group… The federation which they envisaged had been worked out in detail by persons close to the Cecil Bloc and was accepted by Milner and Rhodes as their own chief goal in life.

The second person to come into the Milner Group (Round Table) from The Times was Frederick Lugard… regarded as the inventor of the British system of “indirect rule” in colonial areas.

Lionel Curtis is one of the most important members of the Milner Group… In 1911 Curtis decided that the name of His Majesty’s Dominions must be changed from “British Empire” to “Commonwealth of Nations.”

At the same time, the idea of federation was swallowed up in a larger scheme for organizing the whole world within a League of Nations. To Curtis, the Empire was to be absorbed into a world organization. He sincerely felt that if the British Empire died …it would be born again in a higher level of existence — as a world community, or, as he called it, a “Commonwealth of Nations.”

…the Milner Group …continued to believe that the Irish, like others, could be bound to Britain by invisible ties if all visible ones were destroyed.

…England’s civilizing mission was to be carried out by force, if necessary…

– The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, professor of history  8

You can see that when the British slavemasters cannot rule a country overtly, they rule it covertly.
They have the same idea for their World Government. They will rule it through covert means.

* * *

The British slavemasters wanted America back under their control, so they implemented their takeover method.

Step 1 – Economic takeover
Step 2 – Government takeover

Their demented minions, the Round Table bankers such as the Rothschilds and Rockerfellers, orchestrated the economic takeover. They completed Step 1 in 1913, wherein they had ownership control of banking and all major industry in America. You can read about that in Chapter Four British Economic Rape of America.

Then they went to work on Step 2.

World War I was from 1914 to 1919.

The British slavemasters created a Peace Plan they wanted to implement at the end of World War I. Their idea was to create a League of Nations which would serve as a major stepping stone towards forming a World Government. They planned to use force on any nation that did not become part of the League of Nations.

Walter Phillimore… became an important member of the Milner Group (Round Table).

…and in 1918 drew up one of the two British drafts for the Covenant of the League of Nations.

The other draft, known as the Cecil Draft, was attributed to Lord Robert Cecil…

– The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, professor of history   8

In America, Senator William Borah spoke against the United States joining the League of Nations.

Senator Borah correctly pointed out that joining the League of Nations would mean that America would have to protect the British Empire. And, that the British Empire would have five votes against only one vote for America, resulting in the League favoring British Empire interests over American interests. We would not be in control of our own country. Borah also pointed out that the League of Nations was the first step to doing away with nations and forming a World Government.  11, 12

william_edgar_borahUnited States Senator – William Edgar Borah

The United States Senate voted against joining the League of Nations.

The Round Table created a group in New York for infiltrating and covertly manipulating American government.

The Round Table created the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City on July 29, 1921.    22

112613_58E68_DM_1.jpgCouncil on Foreign Relations

The chairman of the CFR has been Round Table member – David Rockefeller.

David_RockefellerDavid Rockefeller

Every American President, except two, has been a member of the CFR.
CFR members hold many other top positions within the U.S. Government.
Allen Dulles was a CFR member and he was Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Twelve members of the CFR have been United States Secretary of State, etc.

* * *

The Round Table men used various terms to describe their idea of forming a world government led by Britain.

In September 1935 the Round Table journal stated –

…it (Round Table) has never abandoned its view that the only final basis for freedom and enduring peace is the organic union of nations in a commonwealth embracing the whole world…   2

Do you see that word commonwealth? It has a very specific meaning.

Commonwealth of Nations – …the now independent components of the former British Empire and Britain’s remaining dependencies are described as the Commonwealth of Nations. Even though the “now independent components” have their own internal governments, their external relations are governed by Britain.  1

The Round Table group in America is the Council on Foreign Relations. It makes America part of the British Empire. The CFR is the means for Britain to determine America’s external relations – thereby covertly having America being part of the British “Commonwealth of Nations”.


 * * *

In 1935, the Round Table introduced a new term for their Plan to rule the world – New World Order.

In the House of Commons in October 1935, Leopold Amery, member of the Round Table, attacked the use of force to sustain the League of Nations.

NPG x2445; Leopold Charles Maurice Stennett Amery by Howard CosterLeopold Amery

Leopold Amery said:

From the very outset there have been two schools of thought about the League… There has been the school …that regards the League as a great institution, an organization for promoting cooperation and harmony among the nations, . . . provided always that it did not have at the background the threat of coercion.

There is another school which thinks that the actual Articles of the Covenant,  …that they have introduced a new world order

The Covenant, I admit, as originally drafted, embodied both aspects and it was because the Covenant contained the Clauses that stood for coercion… that the United States. . . repudiated it. From that moment the keystone was taken out of the whole arch of any League of coercion….    3

There is your first public mention of the term New World Order. The Round Table originated the term.

They want their world government to be able to apply coercion, through economic sanctions and military action. But the population was against it, so their strategy was to delay the idea until they could use their propaganda to get the idea accepted.

* * *

Lionel Curtis was a member of the Round Table.

Lionel Curtis

…early 1938 …Lionel Curtis wrote a series of books and articles advocating a new federal organization built around the English-speaking countries. Ultimately, this federation will be worldwide, but en route it must pass through stages, of which the chief is federation of the English-speaking peoples.

This international commonwealth would differ from the League of Nations in that its members would yield up part of their sovereignty, and the central organization would function directly on individuals and not merely on states.

Until federation abolishes sovereignty and creates a true world government amenable to public opinion, the nations will continue to live in anarchy…     3, 4

See? They eventually want to eliminate individual countries.

This commonwealth of nations is just a step towards what they really have in mind – elimination of national borders, resulting in a World Government that directly rules over every individual in the world.

* * *

Brock Chisholm advocated World Government, he was an agent for the British New World Order.

George Brock Chisholm – Canadian psychiatrist

Chisholm said –

The people who definitely do not want to fight any more wars must promise annihilation to any nation which starts to fight and must be prepared immediately and ruthlessly to carry out that promise without parley or negotiation.

This involves the continual upkeep of widely dispersed atomic rocket stations covering the whole world and a continual high pressure research program to discover ever more efficient methods of killing to keep ahead of any possible competition. This must go on until we, all the people, are re-educated to be able to live in peace together…

…to watch carefully for signs that any individuals or groups are becoming potential enemies and to kill them all ruthlessly before they can become strong…

shorter, more effective techniques of treatment. Shock, chemotherapy- group therapy… Hypno- and narco -analysis, psycho-drama- even surgery, can all be used, and some of these methods may be employed by other than trained psychiatrists.    23


Psychiatrist Harry Sullivan strongly advocated world citizenship in a World Government.

Sullivan was an agent for the British New World Order.

Harry_Stack_SullivanHarry Stack Sullivan

Quoting Sullivan –

I think that the peoples of the world would be less hesitant to become subjects of a world government eternally vigilant to maintain overwhelming destructive force, ready instantly to use every sanction and to destroy any who would again provoke war, if …it were certain that this mighty garrison state which would exercise sovereignty over every person in the world was to be but a temporary precaution to protect the helpless while men of good will would be working out a fully civilized way of life for the peoples of the earth.    5

Definition of Garrison State

A centralized state dominated by military rather than by civilian personnel and policies, especially one whose military preparations threaten to convert it into a totalitarian state. A permanent military installation, a police state.

This is what the British New World Order Police State looks like –


At the top you have the British nobility as the ruthless ruler of every person in the world.
Beneath them are their demented minions such as the international bankers.
Then you have the world army that will use force on anyone not accepting slavemaster rule.
At the bottom you have the slaves who have no rights or freedoms, they can only do what they are told.

* * *

World War II was from 1939 to 1945.

The United Nations was created at a Conference held in San Francisco on 25 April 1945. There were 74 members of the Council on Foreign Relations present at the conference, including Nelson Rockefeller.

The United Nations beats the drum for World Government – the British New World Order.

United Nations is a stepping stone towards the World Government the British nobility want to establish, where nations no longer exist, and the World Government will directly rule over every individual person on earth.

* * *

In 1948, the name British Empire was changed to British Commonwealth of Nations.

The British nobility plan to rule the entire world never changes. They have given it different names.

Here’s the progression of names:

  • Colonies of the British Empire
  • Dominions of the British Empire
  • Federated Union of the British Empire
  • League of Nations of the British Empire
  • Commonwealth of Nations of the British Empire
  • United Nations of the British Empire
  • The New World Order of the British Empire

There are numerous websites and books that misdirect you about who is behind the world conquest plan and the New World Order. They say its the Jews, Illuminati, Freemasons, reptilians, and so on. They point away from the actual people behind the New World Order – the British nobility.

So the next time you hear the term New World Order, understand that:

the only accurate meaning for it is –
the entire world united under the British Crown.

Like the Wizard of Oz hiding his true identity behind a curtain, the British nobility hides behind demented minions and front groups who do their dirty work and take the blame for it.

This book pulls back the curtain and reveals the true identity of the Wizard – the British nobility.

The Man Behind The Curtain - The Wizard of OZ

We will show you what evil the Wizard and his demented minions have been doing all around the world –
causing economic hardship, death and suffering to hundreds of millions of people…

Off to see the wizard - by Romita

We expose the Wizard and his evil agenda – so you can live as a free person.


Advancement of the British New World Order

Their method for taking over the world, is the same method they use on individual countries –

Step 1 – economic takeover
Step 2 – government takeover

They are now working to form 3 Unions – European Union, Asian Union, and American Union.
They start out as an economic union, but then are made into a government. 

The name of the European Economic Community was changed to the new name of European Union in 1992.
This EU has one central bank, one currency, one judicial system, one government, and working on one military.

North America, Central America, South America, and Caribbean Islands constitute an American Union.
They will then change the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) to its new name – Asian Union.

The three unions would be melded together into a world government and will be called the Global Union.
By this time, national sovereignty of all nations will be lost completely.  13

* * *

American President George Bush is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations.
He is an agent for the British New World Order.

Geroge_BushGeorge Bush

Statement by George Bush in Time Magazine 17 September 1990 –

The Bush Administration, would like to make the United Nations a cornerstone of its plans to construct a New World Order.

George Bush address to the Nation January 16, 1991 –

We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold war. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order — a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful — and we will be — we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.    6

George Bush address before Congress March 6, 1991 –

Until now, the world we’ve known has been a world divided — a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict, and cold war.

Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a world order in which “the principles of justice and fair play protect the weak against the strong…” A world where the United Nations… is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.

Even the new world order cannot guarantee an era of perpetual peace. But enduring peace must be our mission. Our success in the Gulf (war) will shape not only the new world order we seek but our mission here at home.

George Bush addressing the United Nations on 1 February 1992 –

It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.

pledge allegiance2

His son, George W. Bush, was American President from 2001 to 2009. He also pushed for the New World Order.

george-w-bushGeorge W. Bush

Associated Press 23 April 2001 –

Americas promise free trade, Summit yields agreement to create trade zone by 2005

Quebec –

Leaders of 34 Western Hemisphere nations, rich and poor, agreed Sunday to stick with an ambitious plan to create the world’s largest free-trade zone by 2005 and penalize any country that strays from the path of democracy.

Stepping up to a table in pairs to sign the accord, the leaders left many differences unresolved as they concluded a three-day summit marred by protests, both peaceful and violent.

In scattered incidents of violence, anti-trade demonstrators had lighted bonfires and smashed windows in an area along the St. Lawrence River. Since the summit opened Friday, more than 400 protestors were arrested and at least 46 police officers and 57 demonstrators were injured.

The duty-free hemispheric zone stretching from the Artic to the tip of South America had been embraced at earlier summits in 1994 and 1998 but had lost momentum in recent years. In staying with the 2005 target, the leaders rejected calls to speed up or slow down the completion date. All leaders of the hemisphere were present except for Cuba’s Fidel Castro, who was excluded.

The summit partners added the democracy clause that could strip a country of membership if it ceased to be a democracy, as in a military coup. Noting that democracy in certain countries continues to be fragile, summit host Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien had words of caution for Haiti for its flawed election last year.

President Bush headed home from his first international conference to face a tough battle to win negotiating authority from Congress to complete the deal.

Congress is deeply divided over whether to renew presidential negotiating authority that Bush needs to complete the deal. It enables the president to submit trade agreements to Congress which can be voted up or down but not amended. Bush promised a redoubled effort to “get it myself” by the end of the year.


North American Union to Replace USA? by Jerome Corsi

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada.

What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada. President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled “Building a North American Community” published by the …Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The North American Union plan…calls for the only border to be around the North American Union — not between any of these countries.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union14


New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union And A One World Economic System by Michael Snyder on May 1st, 2012 –

When it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist. He firmly believes that more “global governance” will make the world a much better place.

At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the “global community”. Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements.

Obama once stated that “all nations must come together to build a stronger global regime”. To globalists such as Obama, it is inevitable that the United States of America will be merged into the emerging global system.

Just this week, Obama has issued a new executive order that seeks to “harmonize” U.S. economic regulations with the rest of the world. This new executive order is yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a North American Union and a one world economic system.

The goal will be to shape North America into an integrated regional economic unit similar to the European Union.

Most Americans have absolutely no idea how far plans to integrate the United States, Canada and Mexico have advanced.

In fact, a document uncovered by Wikileaks shows that those involved in the effort to integrate North America believe that an “incremental” approach is best. Apparently they believe that small moves toward integration are less likely to alarm the general population.

The following is from an article that appeared in The National Post last year…

The integration of North America’s economies would best be achieved through an “incremental” approach, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable.

The cable, released through the WikiLeaks website and apparently written Jan. 28, 2005, discusses some of the obstacles surrounding the merger of the economies of Canada, the United States and Mexico in a fashion similar to the European Union.

If the people of Canada, the United States and Mexico were told that there was a plan to merge all three economies, there might be massive protests to stop it, and the globalists do not want that.

A few years ago, the “Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America” (SPP) that was being promoted by President George W. Bush started to generate quite a bit of negative publicity. That caused those seeking to integrate the economies of North America to back off for a little while.

The more integrated the world becomes, the more likely it becomes that we will see nightmarish global tyranny someday. It is very frightening to think of what someone very evil might do if they had the chance to run the entire planet.

Once our national sovereignty is gone, it will be incredibly difficult to get back. If the American people don’t take a stand while they still can, their children may wake up someday as citizens of a very oppressive “global regime”.    15

Barack Obama

In the New World Order individual nations will cease to exist. That will be the end of the United States of America.
That means all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution will be lost. Think about it.


Sabotaging the Bill of Rights

The first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution are called the Bill of Rights.  16

Some of the rights and freedoms are –

freedom of speech and freedom of the press
right of the people to keep and bear arms
habeas corpus – the right to appear before a court or judge as a protection against illegal imprisonment
the right to not be seized without evidence presented to a court and authorization from the court
the right to not be held for a crime without indictment by a Grand Jury
the right to not be deprived of life or liberty without due process of law
the right of the accused to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, and to have counsel for defense

All of these rights and freedoms get in the way of the Police State that the British slavemasters have in mind.
There has been an ongoing operation to undermine the Bill of Rights and the American way of life.

* * *

An attack on freedom of speech –

World War I was an European conflict that had nothing to do with the United States. American citizens were correct in being against America getting into the war. The British wanted America to get involved on their side.

In January 1916, British intelligence sent William Wiseman to America tasked with getting America into the war.
Wiseman was able to influence American President Woodrow Wilson, and the U.S. entered the war in April 1917.

William WIseman
President Wilson got Congress to pass the Espionage Act of 1917. It was a crime to speak against the war effort.

The Act silenced American citizens opposed to the war – exactly what the British wanted it to do.

The Espionage Act of 1917 violates free speech, and it has been contested in court ever since.

* * *

Attacks on freedom of speech and freedom of the press –

In 1940, British intelligence sent William Stephenson to operate a British intelligence network in America.

stephensonWilliam Stephenson, code-name Intrepid

Stephenson had three thousand British agents operating to secretly manipulate the American media nationwide. 

During World War II the Office of War Information was established headed by British agent Elmer Davis.
The Office of War Information censored all American media, telling the media what to say and what not to say.

Wikipedia has his real name as "David Choi" but I have not verified that as yet.Elmer Davis

British intelligence created and paid for a front group called Fight for Freedom. It vocally and physically attacked American citizens who spoke out against America entering World War II.

After World War II, British intelligence continued its covert manipulation and subversion of the American media.
British agent Cord Meyer headed CIA Operation Mockingbird. He had thousands of journalists on the CIA payroll.

Cord Meyer in 1948Cord Meyer

* * *

An attack on freedom against unreasonable searches and without specific court approval –

24 October 1952 – President Truman established the National Security Agency (NSA). By executive order of the President, the NSA is exempt from all laws which do not specifically name the NSA in the text of the law. Since the U.S. Constitution does not specifically mention NSA, then they are declared to be exempt from following the Constitution.

The President does not have the power to violate the Constitution. It is a violation of his oath in taking office, he is supposed to uphold the U.S. Constitution.

NSA is the world’s largest intelligence-gathering agency. It is responsible for collection of foreign communications.
It also monitors all domestic communications. It’s eavesdropping mission includes telephone calls, Internet, and other intercepted forms of communication.

* * *

An attack on free speech –

On March 7, 2001 the European Union court outlawed criticism of the European Union. The court ruled the European Union can lawfully suppress political criticism of its institutions and leading figures. The ruling stated that the European Commission could restrict dissent and punish individuals who damaged the institution’s image and reputation.    21

* * *

An attack on Amendments 4,5,6 and habeas corpus –
habeas corpus – the right to appear before a court or judge as a protection against illegal imprisonment.
the right to not be seized without evidence presented to a court and authorization from the court
the right to not be held for a crime without indictment by a Grand Jury
the right to not be deprived of life or liberty without due process of law
the right of the accused to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, and to have counsel for defense

The slavemasters manipulate people with a technique called Problem-Reaction-Solution. They use this to get people to accept an idea that is not in their best interests and that they correctly oppose.

The slavemasters first create the Problem.
They use the media to stir up a public Reaction.
Then they provide their insane Solution.

The technique was employed on September 11, 2001 – to pass laws that take away rights and freedoms guaranteed to Americans by the U.S. Constitution.

Four passenger jets were hijacked in the United States. Two of them were flown into the World Trade Center buildings in New York. The third one was flown into the Pentagon.

The United States has an air defense system that could have easily prevented this from happening. When an aircraft goes off its prearranged course, the air traffic controllers alert the military and a jet fighter is sent to intercept the off-course plane. The fighter can reach the off-course plane in about 5 minutes. If the off-course plane will not follow instructions from the fighter, the fighter is authorized to shoot the plane down.

In each case there was at least a half hour delay in notifying the military. The media reported that the air traffic controllers did not know what to do. That is a blatant lie. As soon as those planes went off course, the air traffic controllers knew they had to notify the military so it could send up a fighter. This is worked out in advance and was known.

A cell phone was used by a flight attendant to notify the air traffic controllers that a hijacking was taking place, well before the planes reached the targets.911_-_first_plane_hits

17 minutes later, a second plane hit the other tower…

58 minutes after the first Tower impact, a third off-course jet hit the Pentagon. It was not intercepted as it flew over the most heavily protected airspace in the world.


The US government blamed it on overseas terrorists. The American public does not buy it, they correctly believe it could not have happened unless certain people in the US government were complicit and allowed it.

This incident was used as an excuse for legislation that violates our Constitutional rights and freedoms.

The USA PATRIOT Act was passed into law on October 26, 2001 – Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (PATRIOT) Act.

The Department of Homeland Security is established and it can gather data on people from any public or private institution without regard to the Fourth Amendment.

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

Among the unprecedented rights the PATRIOT Act grants to the federal government are the right to wiretap without warrant, and the right to detain without warrant.

The PATRIOT Act is just the first phase of the attack on the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. In 2003 the Justice Department has emerged a draft of the Domestic Securities Enhancement Act, also known as PATRIOT II. Among other things, this act allows the Justice Department to detain anyone, anytime, secretly and indefinitely. It would also make it a crime to reveal the identity or even existence of such a detainee17, 18

These laws are a denial of rights to every American citizen, including the innocent, for anyone can be detained, without charges, without any protective judicial proceedings and without any court order.

They use the excuse of “preventing terrorism” to take away everyone’s rights and freedoms and thereby destroy the American way of life. It is a large step forward on their plan to install a Police State. This was the use of the staged “terrorist attacks” on September 11, using hijacked commercial jets to crash into buildings on American soil.

We are 100 percent against terrorist attacks. We are 100 percent in favor of preventing terrorist attacks.

But you do not get to violate the Constitution and destroy the American way of life as the “solution” to terrorists.

All language in the PATRIOT Act that violates the Constitution must be removed.

* * *

An attack on free speech and freedom of religion –

Freedom of religion is the right to believe it, or not believe it.
Freedom of speech is the right to state in public what you believe and don’t believe.

The Anti-Defamation League is pushing for legislation to take away freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
The ADL is calling it a “hate crime” to criticize any Jewish scripture, Jewish leaders or Jewish literature.

The ADL claims they are fighting religious intolerance, while they are intolerant of people who reject Judaism.

The homosexual lobby is partners with the ADL in pushing for “hate crime” legislation. In 2005, Anti-Defamation League official Christopher Wolf, a Jewish homosexual, was elected Chairman of the International Network Against Cyber Hate.

Christopher WolfChristopher Wolf


Here are some examples of hate-speech laws in action…

February 20, 2006 – David Irving was convicted in an Austrian court for questioning the figure of Jews killed in the Holocaust. He was sentenced to three years in prison.

October 26, 2007 – a Canadian woman, Jessica Beaumont, was fined $1500 for posting online two Bible verses critical of homosexuality. Beaumont was ordered to never again post Scripture critical of homosexuals or any other specially protected group, including Jews. She faces prison if she disobeys.   20

1984 on the Horizon: Congress Moves to Regulate Thought Crime by Bob Ellis, Dakota Voice on July 9th, 2009 –

Here are just a few items …on how “hate crime” legislation is already being used against people for exercising their opinion, free speech, and freedom of association, both internationally and already here in the United States:

Last year a Catholic priest in Canada, Fr. Alphonse de Valk, who was investigated by the Canadian Human Rights Commission for the “crime” of teaching what the Bible says about homosexual behavior (that it is a sin) and marriage (that it is between a man and a woman).

The Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal fined Hugh Owens several thousand dollars for quoting the Bible in a letter to the local newspaper.

Swedish Pastor Ake Green in 2004 was sentenced to 30 days in jail for preaching a sermon in which he defined homosexual behavior as sinful and harmful to society.

A British couple were questioned by police on possible “hate crime” charges after they wrote a letter-to-the-editor of their local newspaper criticizing city officials for distributing brochures at city hall promoting homosexual behavior.

Boston school teachers have been threatened with termination if they fail to cast homosexuality in a positive light to students.

Christians in Philadelphia were arrested for reading Bible verses and praying out loud during a homosexual festival.

The state of New Mexico issued a fine of $6,600 to a Christian photographer (a private businessman) who didn’t want to photograph two lesbians make a commitment to each other.

A Colorado law passed last year (2009) to allow men to use women’s restrooms and shower rooms if they “felt like a woman” also contained provisions which prohibits the publication for public consumption any material which is “discriminatory” against homosexual behavior. So while churches can (for now) continue teaching within their own walls what the Bible says about homosexual behavior, they cannot publish anything in public which does.

We all understand the need to criminally punish assaults on persons and property. We also understand the need to restrict direct threats of violence against persons and property.

But this bill is actually seeking to punish thoughts and opinions. Even without a threat of violence against persons or property, this type of regulation can be used to brand you a criminal and punish you for expressing a value statement about a particular issue or behavior.   19

On 28 October 2009,  President Obama signed U. S. Hate Crime Bill into law.

Obama hate crime law

After donning his halo, Obama stated – “No one in America should be forced to look over their shoulder because of who they are, or because they live with a disability.”

Obama Halo

Except for now, it’s the Christians
who have to look over their shoulder.

How about the people that don’t think homosexuality is “cool” or “normal”? They aren’t allowed now, to have any view other than “homosexuality is ok” before the thought-and-speech police come knocking at their door?

thought police 2
2009 – Another law the ADL is trying to get passed is HR 1966, the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act.

Sec. 881. Cyberbullying

(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

Jews and homosexuals do not need special laws to protect them from violence against their person or property.
They are already protected by the same laws that apply to everyone else.

Jews and homosexuals should not be subjected to violence against their persons or property. I do not subscribe to Judaism or the homosexual way of life – but I will object to any violence against them. At the same time, I defend the right for anyone to speak out about what they think is wrong with Judaism or the homosexual way of life or any other subject they wish to express their ideas about. They should not be punished for doing that.

And now for a some good news – Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act was the hate-speech provision.
On 26 June 2013 the Canadian Senate repealed Section 13.

All hate-speech laws must be repealed.

* * *

Amendment II in the Constitution is the right for the American people to keep and bear arms. Whenever someone uses a gun to kill other people, the New World Order men use that event as an excuse to outlaw guns in America. You can see why they want to disarm Americans, they do not want an armed population existing within their Police State.

Guns do not kill people. Only people kill other people. It takes a person to aim a gun and pull the trigger. It is a sad event when a person uses a gun to kill someone. However, you cannot use it as an excuse to undermine the Constitution. The right to bear arms is an important Constitutional protection. If you outlaw guns, then only the criminals will have guns and the law-abiding citizens will have no protection.

* * *

The slavemasters do not believe in rights and freedoms.

Any criticism of the World Government Police State will get you put in jail or far worse.

The British nobility, assisted by their demented minions, the Round Table international bankers, have engaged in slave-trafficking, drug-trafficking, instigating and financing needless wars, self-serving banking practices and self-serving business practices.

Sociopath – has a pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the welfare of others

New World Order = the worst sociopaths in the world have direct control over every individual person on earth.

They will continue the atrocities they have always committed. So, the New World Order is not so new.

What will be new is having these sociopaths in direct control over your life and the life of your loved ones.

And your rights, freedom, well being, welfare, and happiness – means absolutely nothing to them.

It will be the worst nightmare the world has ever known.

The train is coming on down the track – and it ain’t the train of freedom.

train on tracks coming - the ostrich solution
The ostrich solution does not work – he’s going to get clobbered by that train.

You have to see the train and take the appropriate action to prevent the impending disaster.

There are a number of destructive situations that the slavemasters have instigated in America. Some of them are drug trafficking, excessive taxation, financial abuses, and laws that violate the Constitution. All of those things need a reckoning.

At the top of the list is to get America to withdraw from any “American Economic Union” or “American Union”.

An initial step to rectifying slavemaster influence in America, is to get Americans who can vote to read this book.

small wing divider

We need a new definition of the Dark Age.

Dark Age – that period of time when sociopaths were able to head governments, religions, and mental health.


The Dark Age will end when only caring people are the leaders and they have their way with the world.


The Reckoning Table of Chapters



1. New Columbia Encyclopedia

2. Round Table Journal, article: First 25 Years, Vol. 25, Issue 100, September 1935

3. The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, professor of history

4. Round Table journal June 1939

5. Psychiatry of Enduring Peace and Social Progress – Chisholm and Sullivan 1946 – PDF from the Just Dox – Psychiatry section of the Reading Library.

6. On June 2, 1877 Cecil Rhodes wrote his Confession of Faith. See Cecil Rhodes Secret Society – Proof

Why should we not form a secret society with but one object the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under British rule for the recovery of the United States for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire.

7. On September 19, 1877, Cecil Rhodes drafted his first will. The first clause of the 1877 will bequeathed his wealth as follows:

To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world… the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire…

See Cecil Rhodes Secret Society – Proof

8. The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, history professor

9. Anglo American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, professor of history

The Cecil Bloc was a nexus of political and social power formed by Lord Salisbury…

This Cecil Bloc was built up by Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil, Viscount Cranborne and third Marquess of Salisbury. Salisbury was Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary…

The methods used by this man… can be summed up under three headings:

(a) a triple-front penetration in politics, education, and journalism

(b) the recruitment of men of ability (chiefly from All Souls) and the linking of these men to the Cecil Bloc by matrimonial alliances and by gratitude for titles and positions of power

(c) the influencing of public policy by placing members of the Cecil Bloc in positions of power shielded as much as possible from public attention.

One of his sisters was the mother of Arthur J. Balfour…

10. Anglo American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, professor of history

One wintry afternoon in February 1891, three men were engaged in earnest conversation in London. …these men were organizing a secret society that was …one of the most important forces in the formulation and execution of British imperial and foreign policy.

The three men who were thus engaged were already well known in England. The leader was Cecil Rhodes… The second was William T. Stead, the most famous …journalist of the day. The third was Reginald Baliol Brett, later known as Lord Esher, friend and confidant of Queen Victoria…

The three drew up a plan of organization for their secret society. The plan of organization provided for an inner circle, to be known as “The Society of the Elect,” and an outer circle, to be known as “The Association of Helpers.” Within The Society of the Elect, the real power was to be exercised by the leader, and a “Junta of Three.” The leader was to be Rhodes, and the Junta was to be William Stead, Reginald Brett, and Alfred Milner.

Cecil Rhodes …left his fortune to form a secret society, which was to devote itself to the preservation and expansion of the British Empire. …this secret society was created by Rhodes and his principal trustee, Lord Milner, and continues to exist to this day.

This society has been known at various times as Milner’s Kindergarten, as the Round Table Group… I have chosen to call it the Milner Group. Those persons who have used the other terms… have not generally been aware that all these various terms referred to the same Group.

The Milner Group could never have been built up by Milner’s own efforts. He had no political power or even influence. The power that was utilized by Milner and his Group was really the power of the Cecil family and its allied families…

Milner built up a body of assistants known in history as “Milner’s Kindergarten.”

11. Borah Senate Speech, February 21, 1919 Against the League of Nations –

I contend, moreover, that when radical and important departures from established national policies are proposed, the people ought to be consulted.

I think the advocates of the league will agree with me that it is a pronounced departure from all the policies which we have heretofore obtained.

I want to declare my belief that we should arrange the machinery for taking a vote of the people of the United States upon this stupendous program. …the mass of the people ought to be consulted and their approval had before we proceed.

…in this proposed league of nations, in the very beginning, we are advised of an executive council which shall dominate and control its action, three members of which are Europeans, one member Asiatic, and one American.

If a controversy ever arises in which there is a conflict between the European system and the American system, or if a conflict ever arises in which their interests, their humor, their caprice, and their selfishness shall attempt to dominate the situation, shall we not have indeed quit our own to stand upon foreign ground?

Why should we interweave our destiny with the European destiny? Are we not interweaving our future and our destiny with European powers when we join a league of nations the constitution of which gives a majority vote in every single instance in which the league can ever be called into action to European powers?

We come now to the constitution of the proposed league of nations, which has been submitted to us.

…the league provides for an organization composed principally of five great nations, three of them European, one Asiatic, and one American.

Every policy determined upon by the league and every movement made by it could be, and might be, controlled solely by European powers, whether the matter dealt with had reference to America or Europe.

If the United States, for instance, should disregard its covenants, as provided in the league, it would be deemed to have committed an act of war against all other members of the league; and under our solemn obligation and agreement we would have authorized the European powers to wage war against us and upon the American Continent.

I read from article 10 as an illustration:

The high contracting parties shall undertake to respect and preserve as against external aggression the territorial existence and existing political independence of all States members of the league.

England has possessions in three continents. She today holds possession of one-fifth of the habitable globe, and we in article 10 guarantee the integrity of her possessions in the three continents of the earth.

The fact that the dominions of Great Britain and her colonies are recognized as nations is a matter of “profound significance.” Yes; when they finally settle down to business England will have one vote, Canada one vote, New Zealand one vote, Australia one vote, and South Africa one vote, whilst the American Nation, brought into being by our fathers at so much cost of blood and treasure… this Nation with all her wealth and resources will have one vote.

I ask you who are in favor of this league, are you willing to give to any nation five votes against our one? Do you presume that the questions of interest, of ambition, of selfishness, of caprice, of humor will not arise in the future?

Yet we are seriously proposing that we shall join a league whose constitutional powers shall determine… policies, politic and economic, upon the two continents and shall give to our greatest commercial rival [England] five votes to our one.

What has England given up in this league of nations? What has she surrendered? On the other hand, we have surrendered the traditional foreign policy of this country, which has been established for 100 years; and we have gone behind these powers and placed at their disposal our finances, our man power, and our full capacity to guarantee the integrity of their possessions all over the globe.

I come now to another feature, which to me is even more interesting, more menacing, than those over which we have passed. Conceal it as you may, disguise it as some will attempt to do, this is the first step in internationalism and the first distinct effort to sterilize nationalism.

That is at the bottom of this entire procedure, whether consciously or unconsciously, upon the part of those who are advocating it. It is a distinct announcement that the intense nationalism of Washington… can no longer serve the cause of the American people, and that we must internationalize and place the sovereign powers of this Government to make war and control our economic forces in an international tribunal.

12. Borah Senate speech November 19, 1919, Congress Record, 66 Cong., I Sess., pp. 8777-8778; 8768-8769, 8781-8784

I think, therefore, this moment is just as appropriate as any other for me to express my final views with reference to the Treaty and the League of Nations. It is perhaps the last opportunity I shall have to state, as briefly as I may, my reasons for opposing the Treaty and the League.

What is the result of all this?

  • We are in the midst of all of the affairs of Europe.
  • We have entangled ourselves with all European concerns.
  • We have joined in alliance with all the European nations which have thus far joined the League and all nations which may be admitted to the League.

We are sitting there dabbling in their affairs and intermeddling in their concerns.

In other words, Mr. President — and this comes to the question which is fundamental with me — we have forfeited and surrendered, once and for all, the great policy of “no entangling alliances” upon which the strength of this republic has been founded for 150 years.

Those who are differing over reservations, tell me what one of them protects the doctrine laid down by the Father of his Country. That fundamental proposition is surrendered, and we are a part of the European turmoils and conflicts from the time we enter this League.

Let us not underestimate that. There has never been an hour… that there has not been operating in this country, fed by domestic and foreign sources, a powerful propaganda for the destruction of the doctrine of no entangling alliances.

Mr. President, there is another and even a more commanding reason why I shall record my vote against this Treaty. It imperils what I conceive to be the underlying, the very first principles of this republic.

It is in conflict with the right of our people to govern themselves, free from all restraint, legal or moral, of foreign powers.

You cannot yoke a government whose fundamental maxim is that of liberty to a government whose first law is that of force and hope to preserve the former.

You may still keep for a time the outward form, you may still delude yourself, as others have done in the past with appearances and symbols, but when you shall have committed this republic to a scheme of world control based upon force, upon the combined military force of the four great nations of the world, you will have soon destroyed the atmosphere of freedom, of confidence in the self-governing capacity of the masses, in which alone a democracy may thrive.

We may become one of the four dictators of the world, but we shall no longer be master of our own spirit.

But your Treaty does not mean peace – far, very far, from it. If we are to judge the future by the past, it means war.

13. United Nations document titled Our Global Neighborhood
A Report of the Commission on Global Governance, 1992
published in 1995 by Oxford University Press

14. North American Union to Replace USA? by Jerome Corsi 5/19/2006


16. The first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution are called the Bill of Rights.

The Constitution guarantees habeas corpus.

habeas corpus – a writ (written court order) that has the object of bringing a party before a court or judge. The right of a citizen to obtain a writ of habeas corpus as a protection against illegal imprisonment. A writ can be issued for inquiring into the lawfulness of the restraint of a person who is imprisoned or detained in another’s custody.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

17. Congress Records

18. New York Times

19. 1984 on the Horizon: Congress Moves to Regulate Thought Crime By Bob Ellis on
July 9th, 2009 – Dakota Voice

20. CRHT Decision: Warman vs. Beaumont, October 26, 2007, Para.68, cited in “Free
Speech Monitor” from Canadian Association for Free Expression Inc.

21. The Telegraph (UK newspaper) Euro-court outlaws criticism of EU
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels  07 Mar 2001

The European Court of Justice ruled yesterday that the European Union can lawfully suppress political criticism of its institutions and of leading figures, sweeping aside English Common Law and 50 years of European precedents on civil liberties. The EU’s top court found that the European Commission was entitled to sack Bernard Connolly, a British economist dismissed in 1995 for writing a critique of European monetary integration entitled The Rotten Heart of Europe.

The ruling stated that the commission could restrict dissent in order to “protect the rights of others” and punish individuals who “damaged the institution’s image and reputation”. The case has wider implications for free speech that could extend to EU citizens who do not work for the Brussels bureaucracy.

The court called the Connolly book “aggressive, derogatory and insulting”, taking particular umbrage at the author’s suggestion that Economic and Monetary Union was a threat to democracy, freedom and ultimately peace.

However, it dropped an argument put forward three months ago by the advocate-general, Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, which implied that Mr Connolly’s criticism of the EU was akin to extreme blasphemy, and therefore not protected speech.

Mr Colomer wrote in his opinion last November that a landmark British case on free speech had “no foundation or relevance” in European law, suggesting that the European Court was unwilling to give much consideration to British legal tradition.

22. British spymaster Robert Cecil used the World War I Peace Conference to meet face to face with his agents in America – and they arranged the establishment of a front group for infiltrating and manipulating the American government.

On May 30, 1919, a meeting was held at the Hotel Majestic in Paris to discuss setting up an international group which would advise their respective governments on international affairs. Robert Cecil and Lionel Curtis were present for the British. Edward House and Whitney Shepardson were present for the Americans. The meeting created an Anglo-American Institute of International Affairs — one branch in London and one in New York.
(Source = The Council on Foreign Relations Handbook of 1936)

The Round Table front group in London is called the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
The Round Table front group in New York is called the Council on Foreign Relations.

The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, professor of history –

In 1919 Lionel Curtis was one of the chief founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs… He was, like all the members of the Milner Group (Round Table), a member of the Royal Institute of International Affairs…

The Institute was formed by the Cecil Bloc and the Milner Group, acting together…

It also has a parallel organization, which was regarded as a branch, in New York. This latter, the Council on Foreign Relations… The list of officers and board of directors… have always been loaded with partners, associates, and employees of J. P. Morgan and Company. …the RIIA agreed to regard the Council on Foreign Relations as its American branch.

23. In 1945 Harry Stack Sullivan invited Brock Chisholm to lecture at the William Alanson White Foundation on
The Psychiatry of Enduring Peace and Social Progress.

Some statements made by Brock Chisholm…

…at least three requirements are basic to any hope of permanent world peace.

First-security, elimination of the occasion for valid fear of aggression. This is attainable …by legislation backed by immediately available combined force prepared to suppress ruthlessly any appeal to force by any peoples in the world.

What basic psychological distortion can be found in every civilization of which we know anything? …the only psychological force capable of producing these perversions is morality, the concept of right and wrong…

The re-interpretation and eventually the eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training…

The pretense is made… to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness and social chaos. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and many other respectable people have escaped from these moral chains and are able to observe and think freely.

The people who definitely do not want to fight any more wars must promise annihilation to any nation which starts to fight and must be prepared immediately and ruthlessly to carry out that promise without parley or negotiation.

This involves the continual upkeep of widely dispersed atomic rocket stations covering the whole world and a continual high pressure research program to discover ever more efficient methods of killing to keep ahead of any possible competition.

The next fabulously insane lecture by Brock Chisholm, “The Responsibility of Psychiatrists”…

Two, to watch carefully for signs that any individuals or groups are becoming potential enemies and to kill them all ruthlessly before they can become strong;

… shorter, more effective techniques of treatment. Shock, chemotherapy- group therapy… Hypno- and narco -analysis, psycho-drama- even surgery, can all be used, and some of these methods may be employed by other than trained psychiatrists.