William Allen White

This article primarily covers William Allen White’s very active role in enabling and doing the bidding of the slavemasters in causing world wars to force humanity to submit to world domination by ‘the english-speaking peoples’. He was quite literally, a traitor to America.

– published Friday, February 2, 2018 –

The Librarian says –
Hi there! You are currently
In the Reading Library—>
Specific Persons section—>
William Allen White

Encyclopedia of The Bad Guys

library dark

William Allen White

by Virginia McClaughry

Only Anglo-Saxons can govern themselves.

On page 16 of The Milwaukee Journal – Feb 28, 1941 probably one of the most representative quotes for White, besides the above, would be this:

Would it not have been cheaper, 20 years ago… to have taken our place in the League of Nations…?

With the Elmer Davis propaganda department following that up with this:

But has it [America] really learned the lesson Mr. White expresses so simply?…Without some kind of world economic union of understanding, we merely prepare the way for another war…

William Allen White died January 29, 1944, just months before the end of World War II.

If you knew nothing else about the man, in my opinion just these two quotes would tell you not only all you need to know of his life, but also just who and what, the pure evil, that he spent his life in the sway of.

When I originally began writing this article in 2014 I had started off writing  –

As I sit here in front of my computer ready to begin writing about Mr. White, I find myself not quite knowing what to say about him, or where to start. If any of you reading this are at all familiar with my other work, you’ll know that this is not exactly the norm for me.

As I was researching him, I began to suspect that things were not quite as they were presented. Not that he doesn’t deserve a spot in the Hall of Shame, but still…I’ve learned to listen to my instincts and he is one of the few people I have come across – in this rats nest of world domination plans – that gave me pause.

Once I’ve tracked my metaphorical “gun” in on one of these guys, it is almost never that I don’t fire, and it is very rarely incorrect that I do.

But this one…gave me pause.

Don’t get me wrong – the gun is still poised, and it’s definitely in the right direction, but there is something else, perhaps someone else, that I need to take a closer look at there.

You see, today I received in his autobiography…

As I pick this up again almost 4 years later, with the benefit of all the research I have done in so many areas since that time, I understand and appreciate now what it was I needed to ‘sort out’ here.

It’s who White was connected with, his mentors if you will, that were so clogging the area of perception that I paused to better sort out what was coming from him and what was coming from others. It’s also who White doesn’t and won’t talk about in his autobiography that I had to also discover, because that was the real problem with White. Who was driving him, directing him

You can actually see what I’m talking about in those quotes above, how he does what he is told, but how that is practically dwarfed by the sheer volume of evil that is driving the train he put himself on, as he hangs himself out the window and yells out his words. White was not a ‘driver’. He was a passenger of evil, a servant of it. He was never a master.

That doesn’t relieve him of helping to bring about evil’s goals, not by a long shot, but at least we can put him into perspective and look at his life from what he was endlessly and painfully pressed to do. The man tried to break free from this influence on more than one occasion, but he clearly decided he lacked the courage to do what was right. I mean really do what was right and not back off from it ever again.

The man was conflicted, by his own hand, and it is my hope that in the years intervening since his death that maybe, just maybe he knows better now.

That said, this article is going to examine what this man did to help bring about evils goals – the Slavemaster goals – upon the backs of humanity. And, perhaps more importantly, who asked him to.

White once very sarcastically wrote that –

The people of Emporia, like others across the nation, patted themselves on the back. “We were the chosen people,” he wrote sarcastically, “imperialists always were-from Moses to McKinley.”

It’s interesting that even White himself tries to tell people that he knew in his heart what he was doing was wrong.

“For I, in my heart’s heart, had my doubts that sometimes squeaked through in a questioning editorial.”

Why did they need to ‘squeak’ through? Because he was afraid. He felt himself a mouse compared to the monstrous British lions who were his handlers.

The British and White

Its kind of sad that he never really handled what he did – he never told people the full truth of just how bad, how evil, and how deep that went and with whom.

If only he could have understood that body size or type does not a gauge make. If only he could have realised that these lions are far more trapped in their own world of hate than he could probably ever be and that even a mouse can free a lion.

Not by joining them in their world, but by holding firm to principles and true character, and inviting that quality (which is still there) to come forward in that big, bad lion. Lions can become great and loyal friends.

If only White had had the courage to do what was right despite being afraid? He could have had the chance to learn what he and the lion have in common besides blind, misdirected rage. What could be brought out instead, what it’s like to have a lion as a true friend.

Barry Hankins (who wrote the KSHS article that I will use often in this article) doesn’t quite want to see any of this about White, but yet I think that he does see it, because he keeps trying to explain the glaring signs he is seeing. As a result of his own perhaps… squeamishness – for lack of a better word –  he goes way too easy on this man.

You need to see this, because I know some of you like to sit there squirming in your chair over having to face the things I write, because you know they are true.

It’s true – the truth changes everything. That’s the point.

Barry tries to explain White’s statement about his doubts “squeaking through” and says:

Perhaps this explains the young White’s inconsistent and multifarious attitudes toward imperialism.

and in the reference note for White’s autobiography, Hankins further adds:

“It was not unusual for White to speak in later life as if his early positions and beliefs were somewhat provincial and shallow. He moved quite some distance from many of those earlier beliefs.”

Barry is probably a kind-hearted sort of man, and didn’t want to have to tear down the town hero. Well, that’s how the Slavemasters keep this kind of shit going!

The moral of the story here is NEVER back down from following down the truth. ALL of it.

Maybe Barry wouldn’t feel so kind-hearted if he actually faced the mountains and mountains of bodies that people like William Allen White helped the Slavemasters to arrange their murder, the rape of their countries, the destruction of their homes.

Forgiveness is not what White needs, wherever he is. He needs to face what he has done, face himself. (See my article How do you recover from what you have done ) At the very least, anyone and everyone who had any effect or fallout from his actions deserves the truth of his role.

If Barry were to truly examine White’s role in bringing about World War II, which is right up at the end of his life, perhaps he might begin to see what I’m talking about here.

We’re going to examine that time period very closely but first we need to begin at the beginning. The first time White enabled the slavemasters’ warmongering plans.

I warn you, I’m going to burst some major bubbles here about White –

Something that is long overdue with this man, and needs to be done.

Let’s get started.

_ _ _—-_ _ _

How White Became One of the ‘Chosen’

(not a good thing)

White the boy
(always about the clothes, this man was)

The following information is primarily taken from The Autobiography of William Allen White – 1946 and William Allen White’s America by Walter Johnson (a biography) 1947 first printing. Both of which I own very old copies of.

One of the more interesting things, to me, in comparing these two books, is where they agree on leaving something completely out of the narrative, and where the second one clearly shows that White himself tried to rewrite history or hide things. Particularly stand-out in that regard was his Round Table British intelligence connections and the fact that it was Senator Borah who pretty much single-handedly killed the League of Nations. Not ONE mention of that in White’s autobiography. Not one.

It wasn’t because he didn’t know him either. He did. This was a deliberate and outright omission. One which he took even further and tried to lie and say someone else led Borah’s group dubbed the Irreconcilables. This particular lie happened to be exactly the same one that British intelligence had chosen to say about Borah within only a couple years of his death.

The other thing particularly of note in the autobiography is the inordinate amount of time that White tries to justify, ignore, pretend he is ‘more mature’ and ‘seeing the reality of’ later on – which he doesn’t.

It’s really kind of sad to watch him try to joke, talk about himself in the third person, just all sorts of tactics really, trying to avoid admitting the truth to himself. The truth that all of it was intentional, all of it was willing, all of it was fully avoidable if he hadn’t been so obsessed with being somebody – his horrible compromise with his own personal integrity was in agreeing that to really BE somebody, you have to be somebody in the Slavemasters world.

I’ll tell you who becomes a real ‘somebody’ in the slavemasters world, one never ever to be forgotten. Famous. People like Thomas Jefferson, President Jackson, Senator William Edgar Borah – the ones who stood up to them and whom they could not beat.

If only White had been true to himself, he could really have been a somebody. But alas, he was too busy looking to be fawned over, feted, and admired. An igor forever looking up adoringly at the Slavemasters, hoping for nothing but to please them and partake of any leavings from their sumptuous table.

I have known many people like this, they make me sick. I don’t even know how the slavemasters tolerate them but maybe that’s their own desperation talking. They can’t get done what they want to do without plenty of Igors.

Ick. Well, enough about the life-and-times of a slavemaster and his motivations, for now. Let’s get to the subject of the making of an Igor or ‘chosen’, like Mr. White here.

Let’s start with the mentoring phase, who were this Igor-in-the-making mentors?

(White and college buddies on camping trip)

Please note, do you see that first name up there Vernon Kellogg? He worked for the Rockefeller Foundation and was a major eugenics proponent. His brother John started the Race Betterment Foundation in 1906. Please see Scientology Roots chapter 23: British Nobility Created Nazi Germany for more info about eugenics.

And that National Research Council? That’s no innocent organization either, it spawned one of the most nasty organizations ever called the Research and Development Board that did things like work with the Canadians to experiment on and torture hapless Canadian orphans in the name of ‘mental health’ research as well.

His involvement with that is also verified In a November 1932 publication of that Phi Delta Theta fraternity that he and White were part of –

Just a little different than that rather over-sterilized version White had in his autobiography describing Vernon. He makes him sound like’s just some sort mild-mannered philanthropist researcher. But, that’s White for you, that’s what he does.

White attended the same college, the University of Kansas, with William Borah in 1887. He speaks of their leader of Phi Beta, their mentor James H. Canfield, and how his guidance and influence held White through “all my life”. (p. 144)

This guy –

Ooph. Well.

Perhaps of more interest, is an interesting positioning that happened in the room which bore a long U-shaped table with Canfield at the head, and around him ranging his students. White notes: “I sat opposite William E. Borah, a solemn, shrewd, rather silent Phi Beta who cracked few jokes but understood them all.

A rather prescient positioning, opposite, as you will come to see.


You can see that White is already starting to show how full of himself he is, falsely, as compared to Borah who simply has presence without trying to look like he does. (always White’s problem).

Then there was what appeared to be The Prophecy – as I refer to it and as White obviously viewed it – of his German professor William Herbert Caruth. White was considering a career in politics and Carruth said to him:

White, your job in life, so far as politics is concerned, is to make your private sentiment public opinion. You are going to be a newspaperman. You will have a great opportunity. Remember that is what you are here on earth for.
(p 163 autobiography)

Clearly White took this to heart, and already at this age his urge to be famous was clearly his most driving impulse.

White had no desire for such anonymity. He had a passion to be famous. He told his wife that the reason he was buying a paper is because he would “never be known for having written such and such a story.” “I want the public to know that Will A. White wrote that piece.
(p 75 White’s America)

Although this paper buying happens a little later on here, I include it now so that you can see that is this man’s most driving ambition – which held true all the way to the end, in my opinion.

To fulfill this prophecy though, White needed to get a job as a newspaperman. This he did. By 1890, we begin seeing the influences upon him, or where he wanted to be (what station in life) and who he wanted to align with beginning to show.

White speaks of writing editorials in the Eldorado Republican jeering at the uprising of people forming the Farmer’s Alliance. “Naturally, because the editorials were pretty mean, I acquired some distinction with the ruling class. I still do not see why and how they took me seriously that summer…

Oh naturally.

Never mind his lame attempt at self-depreciation as if he didn’t know that he was doing exactly what this ‘ruling class’ wanted. He knew it.

What is he talking about though? Only what would become one of the most powerful movements to return to Jeffersonian democracy since the times of the American Revolution. You know, little things to be rightfully marginalized like that.

On pages 186-7, this ‘situation’ as he referred to it, was ‘getting serious’. The Farmers Alliance put out a state ticket in midsummer. It was supposed by the ruling class, the Republicans, to be: “the riffraff, rag, tag, and bobtail, the scum of the earth politically.

How oh so British of them.

And yet, all over Kansas, it was being noted by townspeople that schoolhouses were being lit up once or twice a week. (they were traditionally used for political meetings back then). White was writing many nasty editorials, trying desperately to ‘knock out’ this terrible travesty of the icky people upsetting the ruling class, when along came something even he couldn’t deny the power, the strength of.

Right square in mid-July, almost without notice….a procession two miles long moved down Main street in Eldorado. It was made of protesting farmers, their wives, and their children There were floats on hayracks filled with singers crying political protest to gospel tunes. There were mottoes: “Special privileges for None; Equal Rights for All,” “Down with Wall Street,” “Kill the Great Dragon of Lombard Street,” “Let us Pay the Kind of Dollar We Borrowed.”

Their platform:

“We borrowed money in the seventies before the resumption of specie payment and the return to a gold basis for currency. Now we are asked to pay in a gold dollar which is worth much more in crops and cattle and farm produce than the dollar we borrowed.” It was the free-silver issue, a form a fiat money.

White, of course, good slavemaster Igor-in-training that he was, noted (and tried to present as integrity) that:

“I was for the gold standard. Looking back over fifty years, I can say that the gold standard is the only economic principle to which I have consistently and bitterly adhered.”

Yeah. That’s not a good thing. At all. See my husbands The Reckoning chapter 24: Slavemasters in Latin America.

White understates his hatred of these ‘commoners’ (of which he apparently thought himself separate from) by saying: “I had a low opinion of the Farmer’s Alliance credo, and a still lower opinion of the leaders of the movement.

Despite White’s many screeching proclamations that it was all nothing and would go nowhere because it was a bunch of nobodies, by the end of the summer of 1891 the (junior) slavemasters in America were forced to face that they were up against a real political revolt.

This is when they decided to start moving White up the ranks.

He was made the Eldorado correspondent of the AP, of the Kansas City Star, St. Louis, Chicago and New York papers, he was also given a job writing syndicated articles for the American Press Association, a concern which sold stereotyped features to small dailies and weekly newspapers.

By 1892, all levels of the slavemasters were getting very concerned. Particularly by the Democratic party and what was now called “the Populists” were talking of merging together. This scared the crap out of the slavemasters and White. After all, if they ‘went down’ how could he be famous and rich and feted, slavemaster-style?

White tippy-tapped away desperately trying to make sure this merger did not happen.

On p. 214 he talks about that he deliberately colored the news to help try and defeat the merging of the Populist and Democratic movements. “I connived and conspired with men twice my age, and became the devil’s errand boy.” This is one of those points where he tries to use the Nuremburg Defense to get him out of how heinous this was, what a betrayal of humanity. He says that it was part of his job and that he “did not realize” that he was coloring the news. He can’t even admit the truth 40 years later without trying to lessen it with cleverly chosen verbiage.

The simple truth is that he LIED.

White goes on about how he didn’t understand what ‘they’ – the revolting Populists – were on about and wrote his mentor Canfield who sent him books on American socialism.

Oh fer….Cehrist.

I swear, the fricking slavemasters and their labels. Jeffersonian democracy is Jeffersonian democracy. It is simple. It is not some other thing with some other name the slavemasters invented to try and marginalize and re-invent that according to their idea of things.

Now, how you know that they are doing this is actually inherent in something that started happening. White’s boss Ewing Herbert said that “they were in rebellion against the United States” and the Republicans positioned it as a recurrence of the French Revolution while yelling Socialism at the Populists.

The French revolution, see that? Not the American Revolution.

That is a dead giveaway that this is a British and Vatican controlled opposition there. (see Why The Illuminati Conspiracy Theory Was Invented – Thomas Jefferson and The French Revolution )

White, the faithful mindless slave and mouthpiece, even 40 years later when he wrote his book still tries to improperly position that it was socialism to proclaim the rights of men. But even more interesting? He positions the rights of men with Karl Marx!

That’s a Kermit moment right there.

“They were trying to establish economic as well as political equality, to help the underdog, to cut down some of the privileges that wealth carried by reasons of its size and inherent power. It was all Karl Marx, highly diluted…”

Whatever, Mr. White. He’s so wrong it can’t even be anything but that he knows that he is wrong and doesn’t care. He simply refuses to acknowledge the truth of who he works for because it would threaten his fame, his comfort, all the things he decided were more important than the truth.

Watch him lie some more about what he did knowingly.

“I wrote jeering pieces about the Populists. Unwittingly, I lied about them and their motives and derided the intellectual scarecrows who led them…I was deaf to the cries of a bewildered people as I was blind in politics to their assemblage in serried ranks that did not break step for 50 years.”

On page 217, he names two people that were leaders of the movement – Jerry Simpson and Mrs. Mary Elizabeth Lease. He offers this odd anecdote that one wonders why he even included it at all, other than he seems to be obsessed with studying other peoples physical appearance, and trying to know them by their physical ‘tells’. (he does this a lot) He also strikes me as perhaps a closet homosexual, because he is really, really obsessed with talking about people’s clothing.

A tall woman, nearly six feet with no figure a thick torso and long legs, she was an incredible speaker. General James B. Weaver was present at one of the outdoor rallies and she had moved him deeply. Helping her on with her coat, his old hands rested a moment or two on her shoulders, a move obviously inspired by his affection for this ‘young woman’ (she was 40) who had stirred his heart deeply in a ‘sacred cause’.

Clearly this moving moment only motivated him even more to continue his supposedly unwitting attempts to destroy the people’s uprising by LYING.

And we, the Republicans…went on with our business of guiding the Republic in the profitable ways of a ruling plutocracy.”

Look at a picture of this woman he is so uncomplimentary of for yourself. See how way off he is? What I see is a strong and imposing woman who wasn’t flaunting her femaleness in the manner of trying to interest men. She is pretty, beautiful features, but it is that strength, that intelligence that just shines through even in this old photo, that I think intimidated little ego-challenged men like White.

Even when White was talking about meeting McKinley (who was quite literally his ticket to fame) he can’t seem to stop obsessing about his clothes, every tiny detail of them. But what’s worse in my mind is how he clearly knows this man is a nasty poser but is so blinded in his desire for fame that he will ignore even his own, in this case, accurate perceptions!

White’s description of McKinley, his bread-and-butter and the start of his real rise, shows that he knows how FALSE slavemasters are. Everything is an imitation with them.

When he was riding on the McKinley train through Kansas, responsible for a combination of intelligence about places and people as well as telegraphed editorials documenting (gloriously, of course) the journey, he writes:

“He was too polite, too meticulous in his observation of the formalities of the political Sanhedrin. He used too many hackneyed phrases, too many stereotyped forms. He shook hands with exactly the amount of cordiality and with precisely the lack of intimacy that decieved men into thinking well of him too well of him. His Prince Albert coat was never wrinkled, his white vest front never broken. His black string tie, or a dark four-in-hand was always properly tied but never attractively. He was well-tailored but not fashionaby dressed. His smooth fat face made the casual observer fell that it was a strong face. It was not. It was a wise face, wise with the ancient lore of politics, crafty with the ways that win men and hold them. …sweet…gentle…carefully calculated. “

See what I mean? Half of it is about his clothes! Down to even how he wore his tie, for godsakes.

“I did not respect his mind. It seemed to me that the whole diplomacy of his spirit was to conceal how little he really knew-how little about the real essentials of life and generous living and thinking.”

Oh, like White knew anything about any of that.

This does mark the beginning of where he seems to be jealous and bitchy about everyone who isn’t a high-level slavemaster. What is helpful though, is his ‘insider’ perspective of the true nature of many of the junior slavemasters and Igors that ‘poor innocent White’ was forced to rub shoulders in his quest to get to the top of the bucket of crabs.

On that note…

Getting two Slavemaster-chosen Presidents into office

White becomes a full-fledged Igor

The newly married White couple moved to Emporia, Kansas in 1895 and William bought the Emporia Gazette. Here he would become nicknamed “The Sage of Emporia” (which I fail to see as appropriate)

Just about the first thing that new editor White did was a vitriolic attack on William Jennings Bryan. He was running against Mckinley who was completely in the British Slavemasters pocket through J.P. Morgan.

In fact, there is a little known story about that.

By 1896, feelings ran high, and were inflamed by the superb rhetoric of William Jennings Bryan, a native of Nebraska. In Kansas, already badly off due to the grasshopper infestation of 1888, price-fixing by the railways serving the state, the financial panic of 1893, and an increasing difficulty in borrowing money for planting and ordering new inventories, popular frustration took the form of the Populist Revolt, in which the mass of the populations challenged the economic and political leadership of the state. With the cry of Raise Hell, not corn, the Populists embarked upon a bitter and vociferous campaign against the establishment.

The story goes that White, a short and portly man who considered himself something of a fashion plate, was walking to the offices of The Emporia Gazette when he encountered two loungers who had absorbed enough Populist resentment of the upper classes that they could not resist directing some insulting remarks toward White, and even poked a stick at him.

Deeply angered, White hurried to his editorial offices, wrote his editorial column, and dispatched it to the printer in the heat of the moment. Although he soon recovered himself and regretted the violence of his attack, the paper was already out and could not be recalled.

White and the Gazette quickly gained national notice as papers across the country reprinted this sweeping denunciation of Kansas Populism from the pen of a Kansan. Although the Populist won the statewide elections, Kansas electoral votes went to McKinley, and William Allen White became a favorite of Republican leaders. He remained a national figure for the rest of his life and is remembered in the William Allen White School of Journalism of the University of Kansas. It is ironic that the fame of an eminent Kansan should rest upon his scathing denunciation of the state and of a good share of its inhabitants.

Ironic, indeed, and all because a little man with a big, fat ego problem was retaliating against correct criticism of his ridiculous putting on of airs, like some first grader saying Nyaah! to the world. It should not be lost upon you that this is the character of the kind of people that the slavemasters can successfully recruit to their ’cause’, so to speak. Not exactly stellar examples of humanity.

Giant Ego – No Spine lives here

William Allen White (early 1900’s)

Now in the unfortunate position of preening over and practically drooling over his own self while reveling in all the attention of his ego-challenged existence at the same time as being unable to muster the courage to do the right thing (whether it relegates him to public scorn heading back to obscurity or not) White was now willingly walking the path of the evildoers.

He was then picked up by several of the top slavemasters along the way and he was so easily duped by fabulous wealth, castles, and titled nobility, so grateful for being elevated as he was, that he did everything he could to get just about the worst President in office that there could have been for those times.

It’d almost be sad, if it wasn’t so damn damaging and completely avoidable on White’s part. This was his decision, no one forced him to do any of it.

Let’s see just exactly what was going on and what he helped to do, starting with taking some things from White’s own words.

Describing the election year of 1896 on page 275, he talks of Hanna and the plank that came out of the platform committee at the convention ‘”as the New York Bankers wrote it”.

Here again he tries to plead ignorance, vainly I might add.

Only vaguely did I sense …at the convention…was the opening scene of a great political morality play which would hold the boards for more than fifty years-a play of which the long procession of Populists winding through the Kansas streets…was but the prelude. It was a revolt of the man with one talent or with five talents against the man with ten, who was hoarding his gains in unfair privileges.

Still with that I’m on the top looking down view, I see.

At the convention, White describes Hanna as an incredibly fat, and extremely oily, almost evil man. A young man named Cannon, a Senator from Utah took the podium, and gave a great speech. Hanna was prone to heckling the other speakers, secure in his ability to both control the audience and intimidate the speaker, even running them off the stage on one occasion.

But Cannon’s speech, grew and grew in both it’s intensity and the truth that it was imparting about Hanna and who he really worked for (which was British-controlled banker JP Morgan). When Cannon declared that the Republican party had “seceded from the truth” in a booming voice, Hanna stretched out in his chair like he’d been hit with a cattle prod, a steel sneer wired its way across his face as he groaned in a flat, harsh snarl: “Oh, my God!”.

White says that a tragic half-second’s silence ensued. Ten thousand eyes turned toward him…Hanna sicked the mob on Cannon. When it was all over, the party had adopted the gold standard Morgan had tasked him to do.

Note: Cannon had used the phrase “the parting of the ways” which became famous throughout the whole rest of the campaign to follow.

When White saw the ticker tape come in that William Jennings Bryan was now the Democratic candidate, he described his fear and rage over this. (he then tries to act like he changed later about it).

Someone yelled out – Marat, Marat, Marat has won!

Marat is a reference to French revolutionary leader Jean-Paul Marat, a completely wrong characterization of what was going on but an intentional one. Interesting, isn’t it?

It was with those words echoing in his heart that White entered the campaign of 1896, in his words “full of wrath and inspired with fear…that rude hands were trying to tear down the tabernacle of our national life.

In William Allen White’s America on p 89, White is quoted as talking about the Jennings Bryan Cross of Gold speech as that the nation was “in a state of mental and moral catalepsy.” and that the nation would have elected him President if they could.

He then said that all his opponents did for the next three months was to “arouse the people from their trance” and that it “took much shaking up to break the spell, much marching of the patient up and down the land under torches and to martial music to revive him and restore him to his natural faculties.

The patient? Yes, he does mean what you think he means. Mental patient.

The Republicans started calling Bryan Socialist! (followed by nihilist and anarchist) those do NOT go together. This shows the total desperation to say something, anything, evident in such completely ridiculous Scrabble bag of labels being thrown together.

It’s like they just kind of shake up that bag of labels (insults) and see what falls out and go with it.

Shake it once –

Communist French Revolutionary!   (never mind communism didn’t exist yet then)

Shake it again –

Socialist Rag Tag!

Shake it three times and “Hmm. What to do with that combination…”

gif by Brooke Wagstaff

Aw hell, just throw it out there anyway – You’re all Socialist Nihilist Anarchists!

Take that.

It’s funny though, what happens when slavemasters get really rattled. They really are that ridiculous (and that mental breakdown stupid). What did we get called lately…oh yes. Occult New Age Spies. Never-minding the ludicrousness of how does any of that even work together, and setting aside the bible-suckling Christian aspect of saying we’re working for the Devil (the occult part) My favorite part is the Spies bit.

Cuz, you know, we’re so HIDDEN and all.

Seriously though, it’s just as bad what they did there with trying to attack the revolution going on Mid-western America. Socialist Nihilist Anarchists! Let that sink in for a moment…

Alright then.

Now let’s look at what was really going on here, starting with some items from my husband’s The Reckoning book chapter 24: Slavemasters in Latin America.

Election Year – 1896, June 10.

When Mr. J.P. Morgan met the reporters he gave them an interview on the monetary system and politics in which he said:

“The dominating question is the currency problem. If that is settled satisfactorily Europe will buy our securities. If it is not, she won’t. That is all there is to be said. By a satisfactory settlement of the currency I mean a decision that this country will maintain the single gold standard.”

The outstanding Democratic candidate was William Jennings Bryan.

Bryan was a supporter of popular democracy and believed in the right to independence of Central and South America. He was a critic of banks and railroads, a leader of the silverite movement in the 1890s, and a peace advocate.

Because of his faith in the goodness and rightness of the common people, he was called “The Great Commoner.”

In the intensely fought 1896 and 1900 elections, he was defeated by William McKinley. In his three presidential bids, he promoted Free Silver in 1896, anti-imperialism in 1900, and trust-busting in 1908, calling on Democrats to fight the trusts and big banks, and embrace populist ideas. His father, Silas Bryan, was a Jacksonian Democrat.

The reason I bolded that part about President Jackson, is because in White’s scathing editorial of 1896 he says this:

We all know; yet here we are at it again. We have an old mossback Jacksonian who snorts and howls…

– What’s the matter with Kansas? – 1896 editorial

Not only is this clearly some kind of get even with daddy thing White has going here, it’s part of why he was so schmoozed for having the views that he did. The slavemasters were still bitchy, still undeniably cranky about what President Andrew Jackson had successfully done to them. And this is almost 60 years later.

If you want to know more about why they are so bitchy about President Andrew Jackson?

Take a look at these posts, book chapters and articles.

The bottom line is that President Jackson killed their bank and paid off the United States debt so they had 0 leverage that way any more. The only time we have ever been out of debt.

This is why the British slavemasters were extremely worried about William Jennings Bryan’s intense popularity with the people. After all, the last thing they needed was another President Jackson to mess up all their nasty little plans.

The Slavemasters and their Igors had just completed yet another of their punitive “Financial Panics” in 1893, and the people were pissed-as-hell at what was going on in America. Price-fixing, refusal to give loans to farmers to plant their crops and suppression operations were the game of the day, and the people began to rise up against this, with one slogan being Raise Hell! Not Corn!.

The rich first and second-level American Igors of the British Slavemasters (with one or two actual slavemasters in the mix) viewed this movement of the people with horror and revulsion.

Don’t touch me – peasant.

They knew that the people were going to gain control in Kansas (the heart of farming) and also elsewhere, that they would deliver their votes to Bryan thereby placing “new and dangerous” men in the United States Senate and the House of Representations.

New and Dangerous meaning not in control by the Slavemasters – of course.

So, they put their monstrous heads together and decided to have one of their high-level Igors go and create a puppet-boy of their own to run for President.

Yes master.

This particular Igor’s name was J.P. Morgan.

And the puppet-boy they secretly made a deal with the Republican Party to make their candidate?


Morgan makes a secret move to get William McKinley to be the bankers man

In Cleveland, Ohio, there was a young president of a big savings bank, named Myron T. Herrick, who was a personal friend for years of William McKinley, and of Mark Hanna of Cleveland. Mr. Hanna believed that McKinley would be a good presidential candidate.

Mr. Hanna talks to the young and impressionable Mr. Herrick and convinces him to go see Mr. Morgan about this.

Morgan reminded Herrick that the Republican platform should come out strongly for the single gold standard and that the candidate should stand squarely on it.

Herrick thinks this is a great idea, because as Morgan explained, it would force the Democrats to come out squarely with a Silver candidate on a Silver platform.

So that they could shoot it down, of course.

Morgan tells Hanna some facts (read BULLSHIT) concerning the monetary system of the country and the absolute necessity of maintaining the financial reputation of our Government abroad and of providing the means for the continued flow of gold from that side of the Atlantic to this.

Oh absolute necessity. But of course.

As is not surprising, Mr. Herrick was, of course, desperately impressed with being in the presence of such a “great man” and having been chosen for his god-on-high personal attentions and the importance of one’s reputation* with the gods of finance.

*Reputation as in CREDIT RATING, as in ability to get loans. As if that’s some kind of great character quality.

What’s a man without a good credit rating?

So, of course, gullible Mr. Herrick (which is why he was chosen) left this meeting convinced that “Mr. Morgan was right. ”

No one but the parties to it knew of this important conference until years afterward.

Mark Hanna was then given a practically unlimited slush fund by various Igors (bankers) of the British Slavemasters to accomplish putting McKinley in office. The Republican Convention was held and on 19 June 1896, due to Hanna and Herrick, McKinley was nominated, on a platform that contained an unequivocal gold plank.

Just like Dr. Demento Morgan had ordered.

I’m sure it doesn’t surprise you to learn that William McKinley gained ardent support from big business and massive amounts of fawning all over him publicly. Kind of like this scene out of the movie Fifth Element.



McKinley won the presidential election and was sworn in March 4, 1897.

– – –

Alright. Now this was the climate that White wrote his scathing editorial against Bryan.

Examining this more closely, it was August 13 (1896) when he waddled in all his finery to the post office and was accosted by “older men, shabbily dressed” (always with the clothes, see) who were poor from price-fixing and all the other nasty arrogant things the American ‘nobility’ was doing. Suffice it to say, they were none too happy with White’s prancing around and putting on of airs, not to mention his crazy and often quite vicious editorials. They surrounded him, calling him names and poking him occasionally with a stick as punctuation until he toddled away (his version of fleeing at the time, he was very fat) whereupon he stomped into his office and wrote What’s the Matter with Kansas?

White in 1896

What’s the matter with Kansas?

We all know; yet here we are at it again. We have an old mossback Jacksonian who snorts and howls…

“There are two ideas of government,” said our noble Bryan at Chicago.

“There are those who believe that if you legislate to make the well-to-do prosperous, this prosperity will leak through on those below. The Democratic idea has been that if you legislate to make the masses prosperous, their prosperity will find its way up and through every class and rest upon them.”

That’s the stuff! Give the prosperous man the dickens! Legislate the thriftless man into ease, whack the stuffing out of the creditors and tell the debtors who borrowed the money five years go when money “per capita” was greater than it is now, that the contraction of currency gives him a right to repudiate.

Whoop it up for the ragged trousers; put the lazy, greasy fizzle, who can’t pay his debts, on the altar, and bow down and worship him. Let the state ideal be high. What we need is not the respect of our fellow men but the chance to get something for nothing.

– William Allen White, The Emporia Gazette 15 August 1896

Just plain eww.

But did you see that? He’s pushing that exact hidden platform that Morgan gave to Herrick.

the absolute necessity of maintaining the financial reputation of our Government abroad

As if that matters to anyone but the British Slavemasters.

Here’s where it really gets interesting though.     

That Sunday morning he awakened to fame. Stacks and stacks of letters from all over the country. Thomas Reed, then speaker of the House said: “I haven’t seen as much sense in one column in a dozen years.” (which White had framed.)

White was just beside himself with the glory of it all.

White gets rewarded for that editorial by being invited by Mark Hanna to appear at the Lincoln Day banquet of the Ohio Republicans in 1897. He told them that for six or seven years Kansas had been “under the spell” of demagogues.

Mark Hanna – you know, the same Mr. Sneaky under secret orders from the British slavemasters through J.P Morgan – then sent out hundreds of thousands of copies of that editorial by White to support William McKinley during the United States presidential election, 1896.

Have a look at a couple political cartoons from this campaign – the first shows that “credit reputation” idea written on McKinley’s scythe cutting down all those nasty, bad weeds ideas.

As we touched on earlier, it happened to be the case that William Allen White was a little popinjay of a man – he was short, fat, and obsessed with “looking good”.

How he saw himself –

How he actually looked –

He was so obsessed about his image, that even later British Security Coordination head William Stephenson made a note about it as to using that trait to “control” White to do what they wanted.


It was from this exact point in time – 1896 – that William Allen White was now officially a pet dog of the British Slavemasters and their Igors.

It is no accident that Bryan was attacked as viciously as he was, and one of the things that you don’t see in the press of his election campaign was that he was supportive of the people of Cuba, Central America and South America in their struggles to become independent of the British slavemasters and their Igors.

It’s on this signed picture of his that I found –

To the South American Republics –
The Lord has made us neighbors. Let Justice make us friends.
Yours truly –
W.J. Bryan December 25, 1908.

It might interest you to know that John Jacob Astor (the 4th) was supportive of Bryan.

This particular Astor was what you would call a black sheep of the family, he didn’t go in for doing what his slavemaster family and friends wanted him to do. Astor had successfully set up a bank in the Honduras, planning to finish the Honduras railroad and to settle the Honduras debt with the Igor bankers in England to get the Honduran people out from under these Igors (and their masters).

In other words, he and his Honduras Syndicate was poised to knock the “Brothers of Light” out of Honduras completely, just like President Jackson had done to them previously in the United States. Honduras would then no longer be under the financial thumb of the British Slavemasters.

You can just imagine how the British Slavemasters felt about that idea.

Shortly after this, we get a rather key event in these suppressed peoples struggle for their independence – the so called Spanish-American War, yet another False Flag Operation.

You might also be interested in reading the section on this war in my post about false flag operations but basically William Allen White’s good buddy Theodore Roosevelt was part of those trompsing all over these people purely to keep their slave-plantations going – Cuba is just one excellent example.

To really delve into that area and all the atrocities going on by these Igors of the slavemasters, then my husband’s The Reckoning Chapter 24: Slavemasters in Latin America is a must read. For one thing, this war helped to inaugurate the first rumblings of establishing a British intelligence agency in the United States.

The American vehicle used to help with these first rumblings of international war planning was the Office of Naval Intelligence, or ONI for short, which had been established by General Order No. 292 on March 23, 1882.

The ONI was originally placed underneath the Bureau of Navigation, and the first intelligence agents were called “observers” or naval attache’s, beginning in November of 1882, when the first one was sent out. By March of 1885, the Navy’s war planning function was fully transferred to the ONI.

On 3 October 1890, the intelligence functions of the naval attache’s were transferred under the Office of the Secretary of the Navy, and from this point forward the Assistant Secretary was in charge of Naval Intelligence. (Reference: A Century of Naval Intelligence, 1996 )

The reason I told you this, is because you may wonder why certain people were placed as Assistant Secretary of the Navy – I know I did. The person in that position from now forward was always a British slavemaster plant and sycophant.

Like Theodore Roosevelt.

With the outbreak of the Cuban Revolution in 1895, this is when most of ONI’s work was shifted to accumulating information on the Spanish Navy and on Spanish coastal defenses, both at home and in the Spanish colonies. Two years after the Cuban Revolution, on 19 April 1897, Theodore Roosevelt became Assistant Secretary of the Navy – marking the point of the next stage of British slavemaster meddling in the affairs of the United States.

The first thing Roosevelt did, was that he immediately made clear that his supervisory function over ONI was going to involve more than signing a few papers. This is because the slavemasters were NOT going to allow Cuba and Puerto Rico to become non-slave plantations – it cut into their profits. Yes, it really was that cold-hearted.

The next thing you know? Roosevelt begins flexing his new “intelligence” position muscles, and pet British controlled press outlets began propagandizing for war in Cuba. Such as American magazine under R.J. Collier, for example, and William Allen White.

By the time of his December 18, 1896 editorial, White was a dream come true for slavemasters with world-domination ideas. And their eyes were set on Cuba. Please note that it was J.P. Morgan (and the British and Vatican behind the scenes of him) that called for War on Cuba. That makes twice now that White has been Morgan’s brown-noser.

William Allen White’s America quoting White p. 110 –

The people of Cuba are mongrels with no capacity for self government. If they throw off the tyranny of Spain they would have a tyrant of their own. They are a yellow-legged, knife-sticking treacherous outfit and the people of the United States have nothing in common with them.

After the sinking of the Maine but before the declaration of war he wrote:

As between Cuba and Spain there is little choice. Both crowds are yello-legged, garlic-eating, dagger-sticking, treacherous cowards…It is folly to spill good Saxon blood for that kind of vermin…

After the war started, now he promoted it saying on April 27:

War is good for the sorrow that it brings…and war…is good; it is one of God’s weapons for fighting the devil in man.

Oh man. . The author of this biography tries to mitigate it by saying that when White read this again many years later he said “This is terrible…”

Yea. It was. But White still wouldn’t admit his real motivation for lying like that, and being so utterly vicious.

In reflecting on this period, his utterly wrong attitudes and heinous behavior pandering to the rich to be famous and admired, he continues to justify his actions up one side and down the other in his autobiography.

To marginalize them behind this’s and that’s as excuses, never admitting the real reason. But, there is also here the only example where he comes the closest to being truthful when he said about his attempts just written: “Perhaps I shrink from the truth, even now, looking back at those days.


The slavemasters continued to do what they do, piling on the perks to bring even more attention and the all important money incentive to White. They even took his book, a really nothing book per se, called “The Real Issue” where White attempts to define what’s wrong with the Populists, a book which no one was interested in before, and had it be given a glowing review in Life magazine.

People said to him: God,man, you’ve hit it!

Even in his recollections here he refers to this as ‘the real thrill‘ – still not wanting to acknowledge just how badly he is being played.

It was a beautiful review written by Robert Bridges, who was one of the editors of Scribner’s magazine in its best years. He was the top ranking literary critic in the country.

…Our eyes filled with tears…it was a moment in life never to be forgotten. …We had entered into a new life. We were breathing another atmosphere.

Ah, that rarified TOP slavemaster atmosphere.

Damn. Could this guy be any more of a sucker? It’s practically heartbreaking to watch him be so played, so easily manipulated. I suppose he deserved it though. Be careful what you wish for, and all that.

You can see he’s a real Igor now, grasping and fawning at his ‘masters’ for their attention they give him.

He refers to what is his next meet-and-greet (and groom, whether he knew it or not) trip in still starstruck eyes saying: “‘Mine eyes have seen the glory’ of the seven hills of Olympus.”

The hills of Olympus? Oh for…

Why! Why!
Why do people keep falling for this shit!

How can this man live with himself? The mental gymnastics he had to have (and was still 40 years later when he wrote this) done to pretend that any of this means anything and the work involved to continuously block the stark, raving truth staring hi right in the face.

He was being totally played.

Continuing on his, thank you, thank you! tour he was having fondling his own wonderfulness, that fall of 1896 he went to Chicago to meet Chauncey Williams of Way & Williams, the firm that published his book.

He was taken under his wing and White describes this time of November 1896 as:

…a new world with a brand-new set of angels…I was moving in a rarefied atmosphere and my toes were just barely touching the insubstantial clouds beneath my feet. I used to pinch myself sitting there [at Chauncey’s house] or perhaps lunching with Chuancey and the literary nobility of some Chicago Club which was rich and sumptious beyond my imagining…

Oh! My goodness. I think I’m going to faint…

He acts like a woman, I swear.

The Round Table men’s League of Nations was first peeking its ugly head out, referred to as some talk of an Anglo American alliance and White made the mistake of opposing it, saying: “All that we need is to keep out of other people’s quarrels and to keep our hands off other people’s property.

Oops! Time to get that boy a new mentor. He had some dangerously wrong ideas.


He first met Theodore Roosevelt, the man to which White referred to as “the man who, more than any other in my twenties, thirties and forties, dominated my life” on a trip to Washington D.C. in 1897.

Congressman Charles Curtis told him that there was a man “down in the Navy department” that had been asking for him and had read What’s the Matter With Kansas and his book.

They went to lunch at the Army Navy club and “talked their jowls loose about everything”. White said that he overcame him and that he had “never known a man such as he.

He poured into my heart such visions, such ideals, such hopes, such a new attitude toward life and patriotism and the meaning of things, as I had never dreamed men had.

The man is practically swooning here.

White and Roosevelt

Roosevelt had the gall to use both a truth and a lie at the same time, trolling the baby-bird-with-his-mouth-open White. He admitted his scorn for McKinley and the “plutocracy that Hanna was establishing in the land.” Both of which were push-buttons for White.

Before everyone gets stars in their eyes about Roosevelt here, he was NOT the champion of justice and hero of the people that he wanted to be viewed as. What he was, was the next evolution of slavemasters who were turning mid-tide (in response to the problematic rebellion of the mid-west) and re-inventing themselves as the more correct version of democracy.

Yea. T-R-O-U-B-L-E. Practically the same thing that Charles Masterman, boyfriend of Churchill and British intelligence man was experimenting with over in England.

Roosevelt had done a book called “American Ideals and Other Essays” essentially trashing some of the more “predatory representatives of the American plutocracy” – White thought that he had met his first heretic among the ruling elite, but what he didn’t quite want to realize is that he had just become the fish in a MUCH bigger frying pan.

This wasn’t about getting rid of that ruling elite, but paring down the ‘rich bad-‘uns’ that obviously someone had decided are what prompted this uncalled for revolt. It wasn’t uncalled for, but this is how they think.

A couple of days later was White’s vewy fewst twip to New York City where he met people who actually “knew Robert Louis Stephenson” and who “knew Rudyard Kipling”.

No. Really?


You know, even more than 40 years later when he wrote his autobiography, in reference to the Cuba situation, White tries to marginalize his knowledge of the Spanish-American war and his vicious editorials about it. In the book, he refers to that as 1897 drew to a close, that “the Spaniards were having some sort of a war with the Cubans”.

Yea. Ok. Some sort of war. He can’t be sure though. I think this is White’s version of faking a blonde moment.

They’re having a war?

Let’s just say his editorials showed just a bit more knowledge than that.

Look at his lackadaisical characterization of it even in 1946 when he wrote this book.

“…it was probably one of those long drawn-out rebellions which the natives everywhere in the nineteenth century were making against Spanish rule.”

It’s nothing.

He says: “I wrote editorials about ‘free Cuba'” and then right after that he claims that he doesn’t remember which side he took – which is particularly horrifying – and then tries to ride over all that by saying “whichever side I took was taken in ignorance of the deep movements of the heart of man all over this planet that were moving toward freedom” which he then mixes with some completely non-sequitur linkage of THAT as somehow being equated with “the protection of the invested dollar of free men” up AGAINST Imperialism.

Word Salad

Yea. That’s what happens when you try to lie about something that you can’t get around, and/or when you are trying to protect someone who really can’t (and shouldn’t) be protected

Did you know, he even tried to pass off the vicious, vicious editorials he was doing as just kids stuff?

“We were as little boys making snoots across the fence, throwing rocks into the next yard, but innocent of the fact that we were starting wars that would last far into the next century, threaten all that we loved and wreck much that we cherished.”

Blah Blah Blah. Sing it now.

I mean really. How many ways can this man come up with to try and get out of what he did?

Let’s line them up.

  • Only vaguely did I sense …at the convention…was the opening scene of a great political morality play which would hold the boards for more than fifty years
  • I wrote jeering pieces about the Populists. Unwittingly, I lied about them and their motives
  •  “I connived and conspired with men twice my age, and became the devil’s errand boy.” It was part of my job, I didn’t realize I was coloring the news.
  • whichever side I took was taken in ignorance of the deep movements of the heart of man all over this planet that were moving toward freedom
  • We were as little boys making snoots across the fence
  • innocent of the fact that we were starting wars
  • Perhaps I shrink from the truth, even now, looking back at those days.

That’s one hell of a lot of denial going on there, with the only spark of truth being offered as a maybe. Please keep in mind that this is all before he really gets into riding with the Black Ones, where his words would literally help to kill millions.

Juxtapose all that with the fact that as White is in New York City frolicking and preening to his hearts content (for having done exactly these things he doesn’t want to remember that he did intentionally) his new mentor Roosevelt was getting his spy network going – the forerunner of what would later become the COI, then OSS, then CIA.

Roosevelt, by thenhad established close contact with the ONI Chief Intelligence Officer, Richard Wainwright and instituted a corps of special agents run by the naval attaches – all under the “orders” of “reporting on Spanish movements”. The attache’s would take in reports from their special agents (plus add their own intel) and these were forwarded to ONI and formed a special information report series.

That series was destroyed after the war because it was said that “the reports contained much data that would have been compromising to the special agents had the contents-and thus the agents’ identities-ever been made public.” – more likely it would have exposed just how much of a British-run activity this really was.

Moving up to re-election time now – 1900.

McKinley’s marching orders and those of his aggressive Vice President, Theodore Roosevelt, were expressed by William Allen White who “endorsed” (by request, you understand) both their election and McKinley’s war with Spain.

You know, the one he had offhandedly referred to as “some sort of war”.

You gotta see their unbelievably cheezy, not to mention lying-through-their-teeth, election poster here.

Whoo howdy. That’s quite the load of smelly caca right there.

If you want a brilliantly clear little view into the sick minds of the slavemasters about that – William Allen White’s editorials in 1899 are outstanding in that capacity.

For example, Is Expansion a Republican Policy? – Emporia Gazette January 6, 1899. (sourced in Kansas Historical Society Spring 1985, (Vol. 8, No. 1), p. 54, website also)

Originally though, White had looked to be opposing entering the war in Cuba. That wasn’t really an accurate assessment (that some people have made) though. If you look at the following, you’ll see that what he was really opposing was anyone non-white being allowed to rule themselves.

Back on December 28, 1896 he had written:

“The people of Cuba are mongrels with no capacity for self government. …they are a yellow legged knife-sticking treacherous outfit, and the people of the United States have nothing in common with them.”

White, as usual, reversed (or rather clarified) his position when called for – to favoring the War. This is something you will consistently see this man do. He does whatever the Round Table – Tweedsmuir network tells him to (we’ll get to what that Tweedsmuir network is later on).

White, therefore, now wrote favorably of expansion and trade in the conquered Philippines. However, he also cautioned against any attempt to assimilate the Filipinos into American society. He wrote that McKinley’s desired “benevolent assimilation” could soon turn to “acute gastritis.” He believed it impossible to extend the American system of self-government to the Filipinos or any other non-Anglo-Saxon peoples.

“Only Anglo-Saxons can govern themselves.”

Barry Hankins asks: “What, then, was the answer to the Philippine question? White offered two possible solutions; either the United States should totally dominate the Filipinos or it should exterminate them. Incredibly, in subsequent editorials he often favored the latter alternative.

Incredibly? You see the rose-colored blinders this man had on about White. Not incredible at all. This man was a petty, ego-challenged little fop who only cared about being slavered over and pandered to. He made that quite clear in that first editorial we went over earlier that set him on his path with evil.

I mean look at him here in this 1899 photo of him and his staff at the Emporia Gazette. He thinks he’s some kind of Lord or King or something. (he’s pictured top center)

What White actually said about the Filipinos was (on the day the Filipino insurrection against American troops broke out)

…it was impossible to teach the islanders civilization. [The United States] had attempted to civilize the American Indians, but there was not a civilized Indian to be found. …The Filipinos will be a burden on America. They will have to be murdered off just as the Indians were.

– What is to be will be, March 20, 1899, White editorial, Emporia Gazette – sourced in Kansas Historical Society Spring 1985, (Vol. 8, No. 1), p. 54, article by Barry Hankins – website also

White felt that the most humane method of doing this would be to ship them whiskey and let them drink themselves to death, because admittedly “there was no glory” in mowing down Filipinos with machine guns.

– White, “Fixing Up for Dutch Bill,” Emporia Daily Gazette, February 10, 1899. – sourced in Kansas Historical Society Spring 1985, (Vol. 8, No. 1), p. 54, article by Barry Hankins – website also

Well, if there’s no glory in it, why do it? Egads.

However, Mr. lecturing father-figure here (don’t laugh, that was one of the Slavemasters researched images for Americans) tells his readers quite sternly that “it had to be done” and that America was in “the best position to do it“. You can almost see him shaking his finger at them.

Readers were further admonished that the sooner the Filipinos were exterminated and Anglo-Saxons implanted in the islands, the better off civilization would be.

See the Brits using us to do their dirty work though? The fracking cowards.

Barry Hankins somewhat appropriately comments on that point: “It was in bad taste to glorify such a job. After all, America was merely acting as the world’s butcher.”  Putting what was really going on there as merely ‘bad taste’ and pinning this all on America as if it was our idea? Well, that goes way beyond ‘bad taste’ on Hankins part, that’s either down-in-the-basement ignorance or outright pandering to the Slavemaster agenda his own self.

That being said, the Coup De Grace was White’s editorial on March 20th that I mentioned above.

You gotta see this one in full –

Riots against the police are occurring in Havana. They will keep occurring. No Latin country governs itself. Self-government is the most difficult thing in the world for a people to accomplish.

It is not a matter that a nation acquires by adopting a set of laws.

Only Anglo-Saxons can govern themselves.

The Cubans will need a despotic government for many years to restrain anarchy until Cuba is filled with Yankees. Uncle Sam, the First, will have to govern Cuba as Alphonso, the Thirteenth, governed it if there is any peace in the island at all.

The Cubans are not and, of right, ought not to be free. To say that they are, or that they should be, is folly. Riot will follow riot. Anarchy will rise to be crushed.

And unrest will prevail until the Yankee takes possession of the land.

Then the Cubans will be an inferior—if not a servile—race. Then there will be peace in the land. Then will Cuba be free.

It is the Anglo-Saxon’s manifest destiny to go forth in the world as a world conqueror.

He will take possession of all the islands of the sea.

[meaning the Philippines, Cuba, Puerto Rico and Guam, the islands wrested from Spain by the U.S.]…

He will exterminate the peoples he cannot subjugate. That is what fate holds for the chosen people.

[chosen people meaning Americans]

It is so written. Those who would protest, will find their objections overruled. It is to be.

– What is to be will be, March 20, 1899, White editorial, Emporia Gazette – sourced in Kansas Historical Society Spring 1985, (Vol. 8, No. 1), p. 54, article by Barry Hankins

Wow. Just wow, right? This is one crazy motherfucker. (not to put too fine a point on it). He doesn’t even notice that he is contradicting himself in the same sentence! He writes that the Cubans need a despotic government where they will then be an inferior and servile race but juxtaposes that with “Then will Cuba be free.”

What the holy ever living…fuck. I think you’re starting to see why that I said this man doesn’t get out of anything by trying to pretend later that he was “young and impressionable” as to both why he did this and his excusing of it.

This was total, utter, vicious and lying propaganda and he knew it. He was supposed to write it in order to rally the American public to go out and fight the British Slavemasters and their Igors war for them.

More than 40 years later, White wrote about this time period and talked about how:

Emporia had thrilled to imperialism in the waning years of the nineteenth century. The people of that day, he wrote, believed that America’s glory had resulted from the valor of United States soldiers and the blessings of liberty that were being extended to the dark places of the earth.

See that?

Emporia had thrilled? What bullshit. He is talking about himself and his own personal sockpuppets. Not scads of any real people. This is just more of his total delusions of grandeur about his “sage” words. You read what he said about Cuba. Does that sound sage to you or does it sound narcissistic, violence-prone and downright psychopathic?

Yep. Not hard to answer that one.

The other really important thing, just a single word, to notice in the above quote is this.


That was his job – get it? But he just told us what the propaganda campaign was.

“…blessings of liberty being extended to the dark places of the earth.”

The little shit ponzer was using the words and deeds of men like Thomas Jefferson to front for the idiotic and wannabe British slavemasters wars of DOMINATION.

Not Freedom.

Here’s Thomas Jefferson himself on that very point that White is trying to ride on the coattails of (and failing miserably) –

Before the establishment of the American States, nothing was known to history but the man of the old world…steeped in the vices which that situation generates….(p. 818)

The flames kindled on the Fourth of July, 1776, have spread over too much of the globe to be extinguished by the feeble engines of despotism ; on the contrary, they will consume these engines and all who work them. — To John Adams, vii, 218. (M., Sep. 1821.)

The light which has been shed on the mind of man through the civilized world, has given it a new direction from which no human power can divert it. The sovereigns of Europe who are wise, or have wise counsellors, see this, and bend to the breeze which blows; the unwise alone stiffen and meet its inevitable crush. — To Marquis Lafayette, vii, 193. Ford ed., x, 179- (1820.)

The light from our West seems to have spread and illuminated the very engines employed to extinguish it. It has given them a glimmering of their rights and their power. The idea of representative government has taken root and growth among them. Their masters feel it…Opinion is power, and that opinion will come. — To John Adams, vi, 525. (M., 1816.)

We have the same object, the success of representative government. Nor are we acting for ourselves alone, but for the whole human race. The event of our experiment is to show whether man can be trusted with self-government. The eyes of suffering humanity are fixed on us with anxiety as their only hope, and on such a theatre, for such a cause, we must suppress all smaller passions and local considerations. — To Governor Hall. Ford ed., viii, 156. (W., July 1802.)

Jefferson Cyclopedia pages 818, 352 and 353, and pages 775 and 819, respectively.

Want to see some more? Ok. You talked me into it. How about this one –

…But this opens with a vast accession of strength from their younger recruits, who, having nothing in them of the feelings or principles of ’76, now look to a single and splendid government of an aristocracy, founded on banking institutions, and moneyed incorporations under the guise and cloak of their favored branches of manufactures, commerce and navigation, riding and ruling over the plundered ploughman and beggared yeomanry. This will be to them [The Federalists – British front group bent on retaking America] a next best blessing to the monarchy of their first aim, and perhaps the surest stepping-stone to it.

— To William B. Giles, vii, 428. Ford ed., x, 356. (M., 1825.)

That’s White, alright.

Mr. Spendid Aristocracy

You know, right around this time guess what White became quite enamored with. Eugenics! You’re surprised, I know. Ha. But even in this, he couldn’t bring himself to admit that, cloaking what he was reading under the term ‘biology’ in his autobiography.

Books like “Anglo-Saxon Superiority” by Edmond Demolins and the writings of Herbert Spencer. These are Eugenics. He knew that, he just didn’t want others to know that later, which is interesting. But what these books also were? British slavemasters new ‘rule the world’ plans ala The Round Table and Cecil Rhodes.

The other area that he had began doing a lot of study of a few years earlier was abnormal psychology. He said that he had a fascination with it. This is why you see him referring to the people of America as “patients” that needed to be marched around until they came out of their “stupor” of wanting to elect William Jennings Bryan. Remember that?

Around the turn of the century though, where we’re at in time here, on page 326 he spends some time trying to describe his own abnormal psychology back then.

“Doctor” Freud White about Will White

Yez and how did you come to write zuch terrible things?
It was part of my job, I didn’t realize I was coloring the news.


Somehow, it all comes off as a distancing, an excuse, a denial of why he did the horrible things that he began doing during this time period, nor does he ever seem to want to touch on that he was fully supporting and enabling the slavemasters legacy of blood and tears. The very people he keeps trying to portray as innocent heroes that are just misunderstood.

– – –

During the years of 1901-1904 White was used by Roosevelt to write about his opponents, having been asked in the summer of 1901 to be part of his campaign planned for 1904.

Then…comes White’s next level up grooming.

On page 393, he talks about that in the fall of 1907 he and his wife go to New York City where they meet Robert Collier of Collier’s Weekly who gave a dinner at Martin’s a restaurant down at Madison Square.

There we had our first meeting with nobility, real British nobility–no one less than the Duchess of Sutherland…The Norman Hapgoods were there…The Finley Peter Dunnes…and Mrs. John Jacob Astor.

He’s fluttering again.

This is when he gets brought into the Tweedsmuir Network, although at this time it would more properly be called the Milner network, after British Foreign office man Lord Alfred Milner. Tweedsmuir was just starting out in his role as torch-passed to man.

The Tweedsmuir network would come to include Lord Halifax, Lord Lothian, Lord Robert Cecil, and Thomas Lamont – to name but a few.

Who was Tweedsmuir?

In short, one of Lord Halifax’s closest friends, they became friends while he was at Oxford. His real name was John Buchan. He was a Scottish novelist, and historian. After graduating Oxford he became the private secretary to Alfred Milner, in what came to be known as Milner’s Kindergarten, although he was considered part of the ‘outer circle’ until he proved himself.

He was quite involved in controlling writing publications in America in one way or another, particularly starting in WWI. (see Tweedsmuir Network article **here for more info)

What White failed to mention, probably intentionally, is that this dinner is what hooked him up with J.P Morgan’s partner, Thomas Lamont, who resided in New York City. And he is really what began his in to the Round Table level of slavemasters, culminating in a trip to London just a couple years later.

In between then and this trip, forming one of only two times White mentions Senator Borah, White had, again, innocently become caught up in a scammy land deal that violated Federal Law some time around 1909 and he wrote Borah. He told him the whole story and asked what we could do to get out of it. Borah told him to deed the land back to the man who had given it to him, and sent him a dictated letter to be sent with that. White did it and managed to avoid having to go to prison.

Somewhere this same year, he had published a book called “A Certain Rich Man” and this was the excuse given for his trip to Europe – he had been summoned.

Trip to Europe and England 1909 –

White’s mother was born Catholic, and one of the first things that they did was that they went to see the Pope. In England, they were put up at the Artillery Mansions, a haunt of the nobility where one had to be “introduced” to even get in.

He had a letter of introduction by Mr Howells to Henry James whom he visited his home.

He then went and visited the Mcmillan’s of McMillan & Company in London at their country home. He was intimidated by the number of servants and the embarrassment of having servants tending to his needs – it seems all he thought about was that they would see his underwear and his clothes that were frayed or missing buttons.

Although, I think I can sympathize with him on that score as it is truly weird. I have been in some of my family’s homes – the slavemaster side – where I found my underwear whisked away as a child after I deposited it in the laundry basket, discretely placed, and had them returned to me ironed. My cotton, childish underwear with Scooby Doo on it was ironed. It was odd, to say the least, like some unwarranted invasion of privacy.

One of the things that White commented on about his stay was that the house was full of young boys from Eton and Oxford “who were so much more intelligent than the college boys that I had known that I was amazed at what British civilization was doing for upper-class British youth. They talked politics. National politics.

It is interesting that he was there when Masterman was.

Could he have met him?

I think he most definitely did, as you will soon see.

He was invited to lunch at the publishing house with Thomas Hardy. He was questioned as to Kansas and America, most of which was apparently pooh-poohed in disbelief by the others, yet Hardy said something rather odd.

Hardy thought it was just excruciatingly funny that: “the same people would endure prohibition whose ancestors one hundred thirty years before had arisen in rebellion against the British government over the little matter of taxes.” He apparently was so restraining his laughter that it impressed White enough to write way more than he needed to about it. (White had commented earlier that Kansas had lived submissively under prohibition without raising an issue in politics.)

He makes note of meeting one British politician that he had “particularly wished to see” – John Burns, the labor leader, who came to a luncheon with two or three of the “left-wing members of Parliament” whom he says he can’t remember their names.

Oh, sure he can’t. I don’t believe that. He just doesn’t want to name them.

Apparently this Burns character called Lloyd George “a double crosser” who makes too many promises to too many people about too many things.

He mentions H.G. Wells, but is deliberately vague about where, when, and with whom he met him. Then there’s rather a large gap in his narrative, until he starts talking about huge parades taking place in England that summer, sporting Thomas Jefferson mottoes, of all things, over Lloyd George’s budget bill.

White saw one banner that said: Equal rights to all; special privileges to none. – Thomas Jefferson

He ordered the taxi that he was in to get in line behind that banner and follow it, saying it was the high day of their trip so far.

Galleries, concerts, strange places and stranger people all paled in significance beside this stupendous parade that shocked upper-class Britain to its foundations.

White, the big fat dupe, failed to realize that this was a caricature of the American Revolution, a controlled opposition engineered by none other than Charles Masterman and Winston Churchill.

I quote from my Masterman article –

Masterman worked closely with Winston Churchill and Lloyd George on the People’s Budget of 1909 and was responsible for the passage through parliament of the National Insurance Act 1911. Beatrice Webb was to note in her diaries his “almost unnaturally close friendship” with Churchill.

The people’s budget. You know, the one White describes in his book as ‘sticking it to’ the corrupt rich as it should, that he so admired. (as if they’re not ALL corrupt). Exactly what Theodore Roosevelt was putting stars in White’s eyes that very first time that they met.

Let’s back up here to what was going on in England with this controlled opposition I speak of. I will just excerpt the relevant section from my Masterman article since it’s already laid out nicely there.

Our story starts out with Masterman immersing himself in the ‘common’ level, perhaps the worst level of it there was. I won’t include all that here, but suffice it to say it was his intelligence-gathering period, trying to figure out what makes the people tick, what their problems were, etc. Then, he begins to write.

Begin excerpt

In 1901, Masterman wrote of “Realities at Home”. His special point was that the urbanisation of the race was producing a new type of human being, and the spread of London a new type of Londener-bred up “divorced from realities” in a standardised, artificial, overcrowded life.

The result is the production of a characteristic physical type of town dweller; stunted, narrow-chested, easily wearied; yet voluble, excitable, with little stamina.” This type was noted as yet completely untouched by any of the forces ambitious to civilise it, except that it was now able to read and write.

With one of his characteristic pieces of dramatic description, Masterman described the invasion and conquest of the residential regions by “the Ghetto”.

“This is the Ghetto, the enclosure into which is penned our labouring population. Outside, some incredible distance beyond its borders, is the world that counts those that look before and after, meditate, design and aspire. Within are those to whom the twentieth century belongs; who appear in the sunshine upon occasional days of national festivity, fatuously cheerful in the daylight, drunken, sodden and abusive when darkness falls…”

Ghetto street-kids 1901

In February 1903, Charles received a letter from Mr. A.G. Gardiner to come on the staff of the Daily News as Literary Editor. This is when he ‘officially’ started his career as a journalist. Even though Masterman had a damaged eye, he was an extremely fast reader with a tenacious memory.

The next thing we know, which no-one seems to know quite how this transpired, Masterman became a Liberal candidate for Parliament – this is probably due to Lord Sidney Buxton, one of his mentors. But then again, it could be as simple as that Lord Herbert Gladstone was one of his lifelong personal friends.

It was Gladstone that called him in, Masterman protested he couldn’t afford it, Gladstone waived it. He wasn’t sure he was a Liberal, so Gladstone told him “If your local Liberal Association accepts you, we shall.” And so it was that in March 1904, Charles Masterman became the Liberal candidate for North West Ham.

One of his speeches/writings is of particular interest during this time – appealing to the “workers” of Ham.

He called it the “spirit of the coming time.”

“First, that spirit will be National, with no appearance of unbalanced affection and an equal approval and sympathy for all men, a universal benevolence. It will proclaim always a particular concern in the well being of England and the English people; a pride in its ancient history, its ancient tradition, the very language of its grey skies and rocky shores.”

He’s practically doing Ruskin to the letter here.

“Secondly, it will, I think, dissever itself entirely from those former ralliers of a national spirit which have immediately identified a nation with a small and limited class, throwing up boundaries around its privileges against a hungry and raging crowd. There will be none of the follies of the ‘young England’ or attempts to revive a feudalism which had its vigour in its day, but now has ceased to be. The assertion will be of a spiritual democracy, with a claim for every English man and woman and child to some share in the great inheritance which England has won.”

It should be noted that in 1904 in just about all the British newspapers, most of the writing “agitating” for the “common people” was being carried out by Masterman alone.

It was around this time that Masterman hooked up with Arthur Balfour, then Prime Minister, at a dinner at the house of Sidney Webb – the First Baron of Passfield.

Masterman confessed that, under Mr. Balfour’s charm, “my pen was paralysed for a fortnight“. He was, however, considerably intrigued to hear him enquire of his hostess, “By the way, what exactly is a trades union”? Another observation, made as he said good-bye, “I have so much enjoyed meeting some clever young men. The young men of my own party are all so uninteresting“, threw even more light on what Masterman felt were his “deficiencies” as a Party Leader.

Apparently also around then, there was importation of indentured Chinese labour – a fancy way of saying SLAVES – brought in by Jardine & Matheson for the Cecil Rhodes gold mines in Johannesburg. “There was difficulty in obtaining native African labour, for which various reasons were assigned…the far too high death rate in the mining compounds.” – Masterman’s wife Lucy writes.

Look at the excuse given for importing Chinese slaves – see? They’re still at it, and remember, this is the same ‘noble’ Britain who was ohso outraged at slavery in America.

Masterman was advocating for the use of Chinese slaves and “pointed out that much of the black labour already recruited came from African climates which unsuited them for the climate in Johannesburg and that the whole Transvaal was dependant for revenue and commerce on the prosperity of the mines. Less defensible arguments were the objection to white labour for fear it should start a strong trades union movement and a desire to bolster up the interests of a British minority in face of the Boer inhabitants.

Lucy is less forgiving and writes: “At any rate a hubbub arose. Because the Chinese were to be kept inside compounds from which they were not to emerge and to be compulsorily repatriated at the end of their indenture, the conditions were flatly described as “slavery.

Missionary and religious circles were disturbed at the moral dangers of importing large numbers of young men into an enclosed celibate existence (fears which proved only too promptly to be justified).

To gain credibility, several slavemaster Igor authors jumped on the “outraged” side – such as H.G. Wells in his The New Machiavelli, and it should never be forgotten here that Masterman, for the rest of his life, never regretted HIS PERSONAL PART IN THE CAMPAIGN.

This was pure politics to drive down the other party and increase “support” by the “working class” of the Balfour branch of slavemasters – an experiment to see if it would work, then to be tried on America. A different way of gaining a colony, so to speak.

Balfour resigned the Premiership on 4 December 1905. This was a move by Balfour to create a confused electorate – but that was to get into power exactly who the Cecil bloc wanted…like Masterman. The newer ‘other guys’ would screw up and then the real power would take their place when it was time for WWI.

Masterman’s election platform in 1906 in West Ham was “Chinese Labour’. Masterman won, beating Mr. Gray by 6838 to 5094.

So, you see? Balfour used the Chinese labour issue to get Masterman in. Masterman wrote that his other platform was “trades unions”.  “England is at following at last the lead of Europe and the Colonies, Labour is awake and coming into its own” “An upheaval of social discontent and a desire for better things…a determination that attention shall be turned to the Condition of the people problem.

Oh yeah – they are for the people, right.

Masterman, somewhat self-aggrandizing, said that “It was an election which meant the end of one epoch in England and the beginning of another.

This is all a move headed toward getting America back – see that?

In the Life of Lord Randolph Churchill a story was told of Lord Salisbury and Sir Henry Drummond Wolf…Salisbury enquired, “What are your deals?” ‘I am a Smithite, a sincere Smithite’ answered Sir Henry. ‘And what is your real object? pursued Lord Salisbury. ‘Oh, to do good, just to do good.” About 400 “Smithites had been washed into the present Parliament, and he was wondering what they were going to do now that they had got into power.


The elections had been won by a “united, a determined and an enthusiastic uprising of the working classes.

That is all 100 percent pure Masterman.

So, that was the point – could we do it? Kind of thing.

Masterman pushed for a “universal system of medical inspection should be instituted in the public elementary schools” as part of the Education Bill – that was one of the few portions that survived. He worked on a series with W.B. Hodgson, who after he died, its title alone reveals what they were up to – To Colonise England, T. Fisher Unwin.

In December 1906, Masterman goes for a tour in Italy and Sicily with the Bishop of Oxford no less, Charles Gore. While in Italy, there is, of course, a visit to the Vatican. Gore was Catholic, you see, (even though he was of the Anglican Church) so there is our other half of the slavemasters kicking in here with Masterman.

In March 1907, Masterman forms a contact with H.W. Massingham which he kept for the rest of his life. The Speaker, which he wrote for, changed into The Nation and suddenly “leapt to the forefront” of importance in the political world. The first thing Massingham did was hire Masterman. Massingham wrote that Masterman was thinking of resigning from Parliament to write for the Speaker, and how he dissuaded him.

More interesting, is that he said that Masterman was being used to make the “reputations” of Lloyd George and Winston Churchill.

“…he was making the reputations of the new men, such as Mr. Lloyd George and Mr. Winston Churchill.”

Masterman, you see, wrote a Parliamentary sketch every night, and people who didn’t even know anything about whatever debates took their opinions from him.

“His qualities were then, as when he made the Daily Chronicle, a complete fearlessness, a brilliance of phrasing, a disinterestedness, and that sudden seizing of the effect of events at the moment, with all their implications, which make the difference between a first-class and second-class journalist in the extraordinary rapid hour-by-hour changes in the discussions of Parliament.”

Masterman came up with the idea of running the paper by holding a weekly meeting, which would include regular contributors as well as visitors, whose conversation would be entirely free, entirely reckless, entirely secret, and in which we could hammer out together ideas suitable for the paper to advocate.

Ah. Propaganda meetings!

Great. Just great.

These ‘meetings’ became the weekly Nation lunches.

Masterman wrote –

“Every kind of genius or freak streamed at times through that quiet room….Mr Nevinson would bring copper-coloured chiefs to tell us of some iniquity which was being perpetrated at the other end of the world. Mr Brailsford would introduce strange figures with heads shaped like eggs, bald-headed, with long beards, who, we would only casually learn, had spend the nest years of their life in prison (there is nothing in the world like the patience and acceptance of life by the Slav) and who subsequently had becoe Prime Ministers or members of high office in that strange land which we term, for want of a better title, Eastern Europe. I remember taking Mr. Lloyd George there, and someone else bringing Lord Robert Cecil. …The best of all I think, was when Vachel Lindsay was persuaded by us to recite in that amazing method of his, and on my challenging him to write a poem on President Harding, declaimed one that he had written on on President McKinley twenty years before, asserting that they were all the same. We had German Ministers after the war, who bowed so often and so profoundly on their departure that we never knew when to cease responding.”

End Excerpt

Ok, remember how White said that he met with John Burns and I asked…I wonder if he met with Masterman. Well, you could bet money now that he did, because guess what had happened in 1908…

Begin excerpt

And then, on 5 April 1908 Masterman’s friend Asquith becomes Prime Minister. Gee golly gosh! What happens next?

Herbert Henry Asquith, 1st Earl of Oxford and Asquith, KG, PC, KC, FRS, generally known as H. H. Asquith, was a British statesman of the Liberal Party who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1908 to 1916.

Masterman would now be “asked to join the Ministry” so off he goes to meet the new Prime Minister.

Apparently Asquith had hoped to offer Masterman the Under Secretary-Home Office (MI5) under Herbert Gladstone, (who is his cousin) but the only office open was Under Secretary at the Local Government Board under John Burns.

Masterman accepted on April 13th.

January 1909 – Masterman begins a lifelong friendship with H.G. Wells after visiting his house and they played a war game in the attic with Lord Buxton and others.

As per the budget for 1909, this maniac, Masterman, is now appointed under-secretary Home Office, directly under Winston Churchill as secretary. MI5. British intelligence Home. Sir E. Troup was “permanent secretary’ (I’ll explain what that means later on). Troup recalled that once a week Churchill and Masterman would come down with adventurous and impossible projects, which once they went over them were still adventurous but no longer impossible.

Gladstone was HIS chief, he told him “Take them and do what you can with them. I’ll take all responsibility, but you are better at managing the House than I am. I don’t care a scrap if people say how much better you do it than me-only get it done.

End Excerpt

Masterman was John Burns right-hand man when White met with him! And Masterman had formed his relationship with Welles not long before White came and somehow magically managed to meet Welles too. And it was just after White’s trip that Masterman was now in MI5 with Churchill!


I have saved the best for last though.

Guess what else happened right around the time that White was there in London?

The Round Table was formed.

This is all fully documented in my Round Table and Cecil Rhodes ‘Confession of Faith’ articles.

Briefly, Cecil Rhodes secret Society of the Elect had continued as such for another seven years after his death, only creating the publicly visible Round Table in 1909. The true secret society continued on behind the scenes.

The Round Table was more of, to put it in Cecil Rhodes words, an amalgamation of “helpers” groups. The goal, as expressed by Cecil, remained the same, clearly evident in the works and publications of the Round Table. Those deemed “Milner’s Group” like Lionel Curtis had been working on the formation of this new plan since the fall of 1908.

It was founded in 1909 as an association of organisations promoting closer union between Britain and its self-governing colonies.

It was Lord Milner’s idea to now form the Round Table, and as was their wont, things like this usually start out with a ‘mention’ which someone else (pre-arranged_ seconds and away they go.

Know when that happened?

At a conference at Plas Newydd, Lord Anglesey’s estate in Wales, over the weekend of 4–6 September, 1909 literally right on top of when White was there, if not right on top of. I don’t recall if his book gave the exact date of his return to the U.S. but I know he spent the entire summer in Europe and (mostly) in England.

Lionel Curtis was tasked to come up with what they called ‘the egg’ or basic plan/philosophy for the Round Table, and it was heavily influenced by the same man that influenced all of them, including Cecil Rhodes. I will include just one part from it, probably the most key part, as to what they are going to try to start selling humanity on now – using people like White to help them front it for them.

A man is not a slave in being compelled to work against his will, but in being compelled to work without hope and without reward.

Enforced labour is undoubtedly a hardship, but it is one which at present belongs to the lot of man, and is indispensable to progress. Mankind grows because men desire to better themselves in life, and this desire proceeds from the Inequality of Conditions…

– William Winwood Reade Martyrdom of Man

Let me translate that into Round Table-eze for you. Enforced Labour with Rewards – now that’s the ticket. Just try and overlook that part about that it is still enforced. By them.

Wow! Such a deal eh? No wonder the alliance between the British nobility and the Vatican was working out so well. Priests and Kings rule while the rest of us toil in still enforced labor but with some ‘hope’ and some rewards now.

Here. Have a fish!

Gee thanks. I feel so much better about everything now.

Gee Whiz. Can you believe this crap?


I guess I have now answered what went on in those gaps of time during White’s trip that summer of 1909, at all these lunches and dinners he was having with various British nobility. He had hooked up with the Cecil bloc and the Round Table.

Not only that, he had hooked up with Charles Masterman – soon to be Mr. Propaganda for World War I and the League of Nations as part of….wait for it…John Buchan’s network. The Tweedsmuir network, complete with its American member in New York – Thomas Lamont.

Go forth, Mr. White, and tell those little people in Kansas what we want them to think.

What happened next, is what they do when they wish to ‘elevate’ someone and throw them some perks. There is always a cost though, and White was bound to pay it in service to them.

Or else.

Slavemasters are not kind when you either don’t do what they say, or you embarrass them by getting caught.

The Round Table men took his book “A Certain Rich Man” and did their Cecil bloc thing with it. White, on his way home to America, saw a half page ad in the New York Times, plus an article with scads of “critics” praising his book and the revelation that somehow while he was gone, his book was now in its fourth printing because it was flying off the shelves!

That was one hundred percent orchestrated.

They were using that as a secret way to fund him and distance themselves from him. It looks like he’s just some author making money from a book that just somehow managed to be discovered by some literary critic and passed around. It looks ‘normal’ and not like it has any British intelligence involvement whatsoever. Plausible deniability.

Mark that well, it is what they do even up until today. You see someone’s book being feted like this? There’s a catch. Whether it’s some random person writing mediocre Christian love stories and suddenly rocketing to success, or some random ex-scientologist writing a equally mediocre book about escaping from Scientology and suddenly rocketing to success – these things are controlled.

They do not get high on the lists or achieve that kind of notice unless someone behind-the-scenes wants them to. And who that is, is pretty much never who you easily ‘see’ that is. Equally important is what is the price they must pay for this success, because there always is one.

But, did White even question this rather odd fortune suddenly landing in his lap? Of course not. No, he probably was told it was going to happen, that he would be ‘taken care of’.

Taken care of

Read – paid.

In one way or another.

What he did say about this, was that upon reading the article and ad, he and his wife fell to their knees thanking GOD for making them somebody!

The key word being making. They were MADE. It was not on any real merit of their own.

Just about makes you want to vomit, it’s so disgustingly shallow and so traitorous to humanity. Let alone any shreds of personal integrity the guy may have had remaining?

They’re gone now.

Upon their return, they were met at the docks by a suitably loving crowd from the American magazine, Ida Tarbell, Ray Baker, the John Phillipses etc. White states very clearly that he came home from that trip as “somebody” and that he was taking more and more part in the politics that ruled his state and the nation. What he didn’t say was for whom.

I’m somebody now.

He was somebody all right.

He was now a traitor to America.

But here’s the punchline.

He said that from now on the struggle of his life was to keep people around him from “knowing how keenly he realized it.” The kind of somebody that he was. So he tried to “make modesty a protective habit and a mask.

Get that?

He donned a mask.
To hide what he was really doing and who for.

He was now working directly for the Round Table slavemasters and had to hide that he was from then on.

Everything he does or says from this point forward has to be looked at with that taken into account.

Starting with the following year, 1910. What was White doing? Well, infiltrating and ingratiating himself with those loosely called the Progressives.

Who was in that group? Oh. You know.

People like Bob La Follette and Senator Borah, as well as Charles Lindbergh (the father, not the airplane flying son). People that were a threat to the slavemasters.

pp 436 and 437 White autobiography –

He speaks of the turmoil that Roosevelt returned from Africa to in the Taft administration. He quotes a letter he supposedly wrote to Roosevelt essentially talking him OUT of running for President again – which would have been during the key years leading up to WWII. This was in 1910.

He somehow manages to get himself inveigled with Robert La Follette and the progressive movement which is…odd to me. He refers to the rest of the ‘progressives’ as a rollicking crowd, excepting La Follette who he said was “grim” and so were his “followers in the Northwest” which would include Borah.

He lays claim for providing the draft for the Republican election platform that Roosevelt used as the basis of his Osawatomie speech.

Important note: One of the stupider ass-kissing things that he says is on p 438 where he refers to the crash of 1907 as having ‘cleaned up many bad debts. Credit expansion was evident everywhere.

Thousands, if not tens of thousands of lives destroyed across the nation and he thinks its just wonderful. Unbelievable. Business was great if you were a slimy, bottom-feeding slavemaster or Igor.

Me loves crashes. Yes, me do.

1912 – he refers to the campaign years of the supposed “progressive” movement of Roosevelt as “my feet were so deeply held by the undertow of the strange current that was moving across the world–the urge of civilization for greater justice in human relations, that I was guided by zeal more than wisdom.

Err. Right.

In Chicago, with Borah standing beside him on the platform, Roosevelt gave a speech. White describes this:

“He closed with the phrase which has lasted now through thirty years but which then literally sizzled in the hearts of his auditors and winged across the country solidifying the Roosevelt sentiment; We stand at Armageddon, and we battle for the Lord!” That phrase, coming at the end of three-quarters of an hour’s diatribe against privilege and of pleading for the cause of the underdog, set the issue of the year.”

This, was part of the British creation of a new class. Not the poor, not the rich, not labor. Just exactly as Charles Masterman had said.

They called it the “middle” class.

White writes:

Aimed at the little businessman, the country lawyer, the doctor, the teacher, the preacher, the real estate dealer, the skilled worker—those whose labor organizations were rich and prosperous, the printers, the railroad men, the hard-coal miners.

He describes that Roosevelt’s ‘opponents’ were malefactors of great wealth – “the bankers and their principal clients, the great investors, the holders of stock in those organizations which formed the conscious “aggrandizement of great wealth”.

He and Borah walked for a few blocks after this, and Borah told him this frightened him. He was right to be, and it’s just another notch up in my view of Borah (as if that was even possible) that he so quickly caught on to that this was a very frightening and evil thing going on here. This change. White pointed out that even La Follette balked at supporting Roosevelt.

This was not the progress that they had in mind. There was something foul brewing, and both Borah and La Follette knew it.

Let me make something very clear here. This change was a coordinated effort between both factions of the Slavemasters. The British nobility and the Vatican. My Masterman article talks a bit about him specifically coordinating with the Catholics in what he was doing.

White offers a strange anecdote about George Perkins “fluttering around… smiling and simpering like some sinister spectre” in his grey alpaca suit, hovering over Roosevelt at the close of the Republican National Convention, citing that White was “too close to the Colonel” who was “bubbling with rage and seeking revenge” (although its not clear to me over what).

Now, if we can get past White’s usual extraneous discussion of what someone was wearing and the rather over-the-top hypocrisy evident in his complaints about someone else’s fluttering, simpering and smiling – White was a King of that in his own right – let’s not miss the fact that Roosevelt is being handled here. As in controlled by a British intelligence go-between.

George Perkins.

I have to admit. He does look the ‘fluttering’ type. But then, so was White.

Perkins was vice-president of New York Life Insurance Company and a partner in J.P. Morgan & Co. It was Perkins that personally negotiated with Sergei Witte, finance minister to the Russian czar, to loan Russia money for building railroads. That is a terrible connection right there, all by itself. See Masterman article.

Then came the nomination of Woodrow Wilson by the Democratic party in June of 1912. White was not pleased, I think mostly because he couldn’t be as ‘somebody’ with Wilson as he could with Roosevelt.

Sometimes he does make accurate assessments, this was one of those times. He said Wilson was a “cold fish” who was “highty-tighty” – that part is simply code for that he didn’t schmooze White with the proper amount of flattery – but he also correctly observed that “when he tried to be pleasant he “creaked”.

True, that.

The man did ‘creak’.

As we all know, however ‘creaky’ the man was, he won the 1912 election. He was sworn in as President of the United States on 4 March 1913.

Before I talk about the next point of interest, I need to talk about a couple key areas from my Charles Masterman library article.

Who was appointed by Masterman to direct and coordinate the propaganda in the U.S.? Sir Gilbert Parker.  (Parker was one of the authors at the 2 September 1914 meeting). He had no formal title apparently, making him even more hidden. Tricky, tricky.

A Canadian novelist, he was also in charge of intelligence in Canada but his main job was to covertly influence Americans into joining the war.

His colleagues there, often referred to him euphemistically as the head of ‘American Publicity’. His assistants included Professor W. Macneile Dixon of Glasgow University and Arnold Toynbee of Balliol College. Parker started with a staff of nine men, eventually he had 54!

Parker set up house in London at 20 Carlton House Terrace. Few people knew that the office of the Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, was right next door at 18 Carlton House Terrace. From his address Parker sent thousands of books and pamphlets provided by Wellington House, often with charming, understated letters or prestigious enclosure cards. He sought to give the impression that he was just a friendly, honest supporter of the British cause who “merely wanted to promote international understanding and was willing to hear all points of view.”

The American audience to which Parker directed his efforts was tabula rasa – a blank slate – thanks to the lovely censorship efforts of the British, starting with cutting the German cable lines from Europe to the United States right at the beginning of the war.

By the end of September 1914, Parker had produced a long analysis of the American press. Within a few months of the start of his actual propagandizing work in the U.S. Parker boasted –

“We have an organisation that does not know it is an organisation in that country.’

Parker was very, very careful – and this is something you should note well tactics-wise – to never specifically advocate U.S. entry into the war.

That man was real piece of work, to put it mildly. There are lots of documented examples of the kinds of nasty, vicious and often false things he would orchestrate in the media, I highly suggest you read the Masterman article to see him in action.

One of his favorite tools was Walter Hines Page, an old friend of his from Parker’s days with the Atlantic Monthly – he would be appointed U.S. ambassador in London in the spring of 1915.

Parker pressured Page to introduce him to Herbert Hoover who was in Europe in 1914. Hoover was there to co-ordinate the shipping of food to Belgium. Parker then ran an op for the Foreign Service, accompanying Hoover for five days in November of 1914, all the while grooming Hoover and “showing support” of Hoover’s efforts. A long friendship supposedly began, reaching all the way through Hoover’s Presidency days – as did the manipulation.

After returning to London, Parker disseminated highly, shall we say, coloured, stories of the suffering of the refugees to papers in Britain and the U.S. In other words, he was LYING. Hoover, since he was there too, must have known that he was lying and yet he never said a word about it. Isn’t that interesting?

Ok, well, when I wrote that I hadn’t worked on this article yet, now look at this!

In the fall of 1915 White met a young Herbert Hoover in New York. At the supper, White was “tremendously shocked” when Hoover declared that both the belligerents had treated him badly when he tried to feed the Belgians.

White refers to himself as idolizing the British, “we considered them and their doings highly noble” and it really frightened him to hear Hoover “shake a dubious head about their intentions and their essential integrity as it related to Belgian Relief“.

So, Hoover’s spilling the beans. Well, hmm.

How ’bout them apples? I guess Hoover did say something about Parker and his slimy, lying assholery. Mea culpa. I think it’s great to see when people clearly demonstrate that they aren’t as stupid as the Brits seem to think we all are. If White’s account is correct then I say –

Excellent… Hoover!

Although, it’s interesting as to why he chose to tell White and the other anglophile self-styled “American nobility” at that dinner. Was he testing White? Or simply fed up…he does do two rather amazing broadcasts in 1939 and 1940, as to opposing the war and why. We’ll just let that all cogitate a while on the back burner for now.

Speaking of White’s hero-worship he had going on about the Brits, I also think this meeting with Hoover forms an excellent example of what happens when troglodytes like White come face-to-face with some good old fashioned truth about these heroes of his.

What’s his reaction?


The British are bad? Oh no! It can’t be true!

White was probably thinking…if I face that fear I’d have to stop sucking up to them and I’d lose all my cushy money and admiration! But that’s exactly what he should have done. It’s like Senator Borah’s favorite quote –

One of Senator John W. Daniels Virginia friends said he prayed that God might give him wisdom. “Don’t pray for wisdom for me, but for courage,” Daniels replied. “We usually know what is right, but often we are afraid to do it.

White’s reaction is pretty clear proof, if you needed some, that the people who get in bed with the slavemasters do know what is right, they just don’t want to do it because of fear.

Now I suspect, in fact I’d be willing to bet money on it, that after all that hob-knobbing with Burns, Wells and Masterman over in London, that White ended up involved in what was called the Creel Committee (The Committee on Public Information or CPI) a U.S. wartime propaganda organization controlled and watched closely by C.F. G. Masterman through Wellington House.

I give a fairly in-depth description of it in my article World War Propagandists – A Vignette but I’ll just give you a more condensed version for the purposes of this article.

On April 6th 1917 the United States of America officially declared war on Germany, joining the Allies against Germany and Austro – Hungaria on the Western Front in the First World War, which had been on – going in Europe since 1914.

The CPI – aka the Creel committee – was created to “protect the control and management of American society” by “a technical elite who would serve established power”.

The Wilson regime’s ministry of propaganda and manipulation immediately identifies the basic methods by which it will control the minds of the American masses: appeal to emotion while largely ignoring truth or logic, replace facts with symbols, demonize the “enemy” and promise a war which will “make the world safe for democracy”.

Let’s just say they didn’t exactly do a bang-up job, and the British intelligence Round Table guys took things over and taught them thar “mericans”, parenthetically speaking, a thing or two about the right sleazy way to do propaganda.

We already know that Gilbert Parker was in charge of media in the U.S., it was paramount that it never directly be advocated for the U.S. to go to war, and what was White doing?

Flip-flopping, right on cue.

In his editorials he first supported the Wilson lie of keeping out of the war (before it was official that we were). Then when war was declared, he supported whatever measure Wilson deemed necessary. The vigorous prosecution of the war and White also made sure that he repeatedly talked about his “earnest views” re: helping the British where we could.

Of course, the flip-side of all this “earnestness” was his now well-known viciousness. For example, he writes:

“We treated roughly laggards who withheld their subscriptions to the war effort. We were suspicious of families with German names.”

We, means more than just the old gag “Do you have a mouse in your pocket?” here.

He means WE as in the propagandists working with the CPI and Masterman. I believe this is where he first came into contact with Walter Lippman –  whom he later meets and refers to as his “friend” without any previous explanation of how that came about. I believe this propagandist work is how.

One of the ‘covers’ that the British were supervising the use of was the Red Cross. That’s exactly where White does his bit during the Summer of 1917. Compared to the carnage going on with real soldiers, it’s a frickin’ sick joke to see him all pompous and trying to look soldierly and important.

In the summer of 1917 I went to war. I put on the uniform of a Red Cross Lieutenant Colonel. Henry Allen and I went together, designated as “inspectors” of Red Cross activities in Europe.

What he really did, besides standing around looking like he’s ‘part’ of the War –

Was to hook up with British intelligence and the Round Table nobility, then go home and write articles and make speeches about Red Cross activities. He also denies having any “special intelligence”, which was a pretty odd statement to make. I think he was denying his BRITISH intelligence connections that he most definitely did have.

For example, during his really rough soldering job here (extreme sarcasm here) he went to Paris and mucked around and then he went to London and did basically nothing of real importance, then he went home.

That’s his autobiography version.

The other biography sheds quite a bit more light on some details White deliberately left out. Again. On page 280 of William White’s America it is documented he and his propaganda partner “lunched with H.G. Wells, dined with James Barrie and had tea with Lord Bryce.

Well, well.

What do we have here?

Wells, and Viscount Bryce were ALL working directly with Masterman and CPI propagandists – like William White here, although he had an extra-special in that had already been formed on that much earlier trip to London.

Mr. White? Why’d you leave all that out of your book?

You hiding something?

Now this Bryce character White was having tea with, he was really special.

In 1915 Wellington House (Masterman) had compiled the Bryce Report on the ‘Belgian atrocities’ which was compiled by Arnold Toynbee and published in thirty languages. A Belgian inquiry into German atrocities in 1922 failed to corroborate one single allegation in Lord Bryce’s report.

The worst of these tales, of babies twirled on bayonets, women with their breasts cut off, and grandfathers crucified on barn doors, were the inventions of Wellington House and widely disseminated through newspaper cartoons and advertisements.

That’s part of what Herbert Hoover was talking about that frightened White so much. Proof of what liars the British were being, and of course the corollary – what did that make White by association, since he was doing quite a bit of similar lying his own self.

Sort of like holding a mirror up to himself.

Know what else he’s doing during this time? Apparently he’s now reading, per him, “crates of nut books” about psychology and abnormal psychology.

I’m thinking he has been told he has to access us crazy Americans “secret psyche” by the British – one of their things – so he’s studying up.

Mr White Freud, I presume?

In his speeches he was giving around the country, he says that he became aware of what Roosevelt referred to as “predatory wealth” and that he began to have “an uneasy but growing sense that they were drawing together in some sort of an organization.” Talking to college professors, economists, sociologists etc. he said that some relation was being established between industrial life and the direction America was taking in the world of international politics. “We were moving into a new and strange time.

Ok. Well, how cagey was that? Is he trying to imply communist influence or what? Sheesh.


Both books leave out something even more important that happened during this trip to London, who else he met and hooked up with at this time.

Lord Tweedsmuir and Thomas Lamont (and I believe Lord Robert Cecil as well).

Thomas Lamont had “first met John Buchan in 1917 in London.” – the same time that William Allen White was there.

Their [Tweedsmuir and Lamont] network of common friends was a useful one at this juncture [1939] and included Lord Lothian, Buchan’s old professor Gilbert Murray, Lord Robert Cecil and the American journalist William Allen White.

John Buchan: Model Governor General by J. William Galbraith

Well, well. That’s kind of a rather important omission, wouldn’t you say?

But, my. What high muckety-muck circles White was moving in, I’m just so impressed!


Fast forward to the end of the War, in early 1919, when on p. 546 he specifically talks about his connections with Lippman. He says: “I asked Walter Lippman to intercede for me at the White house” because he wanted to go cover the Armistice. That didn’t work, so he went to John Phillips of American magazine who paid him to go write some articles and got him a passport.

Guess who he shared a cabin with accidentally-on-purpose on the way over?

Norman Angell.

Sir Angell was a League of Nations man – that pretty much says it all as far as he goes. He has quite the interesting array of preferred slavemaster propaganda subjects that he’s written books about, that you can view a list of at HathiTrust.

Ralph Norman Angell


For those who would like to know just a little more about this man. Even a cursory look at his correspondence reveals much about the man.

First of all, his last name wasn’t originally Angell. It was Lane.

He was born Ralph Norman Angell Lane.

In 1905, Angell became the editor of the Paris edition of Lord Northcliffe’s Daily Mail.

In 1909 he published a small book, entitled Europe’s Optical Illusion, using for the first time the name Norman Angell which he later legalized.

In 1910 he expanded this work and re-titled it The Great Illusion. This book has been translated into 25 languages, sold over two million copies, and gave rise to a theory popularly called “Norman Angellism.”

This theory, as stated in the book’s Preface, holds that “military and political power give a nation no commercial advantage, that it is an economic impossibility for one nation to seize or destroy the wealth of another, or for one nation to enrich itself by subjugating another.

– From the special collection of Sir Norman Angell, Papers, 1890-1976

Angell was part of what was colloquially known as the Milner group, or Milner’s Kindergarden nicknamed in reference to Lord Alfred Milner who was grooming the next-generation of Round Table recruits from the British nobility. They called this sort of thing lampado trado – the passing of the torch, in essence.

It goes back to the days of Milner’s predecessors such as Robert Cecil and Francis Bacon.

Even the most cursory look at Angell’s correspondence in and around this time period that William Allen White was sharing a cabin with him, reads like the who’s who of the Round Table and the British Foreign Office (intelligence).

For example it lists:  (my notes follow the -)

  • Esher, Lord. 1910-1915, n.d. –   Reginald Baliol Brett was one of Cecil Rhodes original Secret Society members that become the Round Table.
  • Balfour, Arthur J. 1913. – also Round Table and Society for Psychical Research
  • Rothermere, (Lord). 1914.
  • Bryce, James (Lord). 1915 – Charles Masterman propagandist whom White dined with.
  • Grey, Earl. 1915 – British Foreign Office
  • H.P.B. Lodge, Theosophical Society in England and Wales. 1915 – Okhrana and MI6 Operative Helene Blavatsky’s front group
  • Buchan, John. 1911-1935 – Tweedsmuir intelligence network, British Foreign Office, whom White also met on several occasions.
  • Kerr, Philip H. 1911, 1916. – Lord Lothian, Round Table, British Foreign Office, worked with Masterman to get the U.S. into their faked war to get America to ally with Britain again in world domination.
  • House, Edward M. (Colonel). 1916, 1919, 1932 – Round Table man who was the go between to get Wilson to front the League of Nations idea for the British.
  • Haldane, (Viscount). 1917. – J.B.S. Haldane, Round Table, ran intelligence ops in 1938 with British agents Somerset Maugham, H. G. Wells, Sigmund Freud, Havelock Ellis, and George Bernard Shaw as part of trying to get League of Nations take two into place. Part of previous Golden Dawn, Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor and Blatasky ops as well.
  • Lamont, Thomas W. 1918, 1942-1945. – J.P. Morgan partner in NYC, Round Table, RIIA, Tweedsmuir network contact of White.

Angell also worked directly with the Committee on Public Information in 1917. (otherwise known as the Creel commission). In his propaganda job he wrote for many papers, just picking two here –

  • Saturday Evening Post. 1915-1958.
  • Christian Science Monitor. 1916, 1936-1938.

Curiously, the list of correspondence only notes two items for William White, which is rather odd considering all this time they spent together. I’m thinking that due to the intelligence nature of what they were discussing over the years, that those letters were either destroyed or turned over to MI6 or Foreign Office files.

  • White, Wm. Allen. 1922, 1943.

Although Professor Quigley documents Angell’s membership in the governing body of the RIIA (the Round Table organization formed to control ‘foreign policy’ of pretty much everyone in the world without telling them up-front) he doesn’t realize that it began earlier than 1936.

The active governing body of the Institute [the RIIA] is the council, originally called the executive committee. Under the more recent name, it generally had twenty-five to thirty members, of whom slightly less than half were usually of the Milner Group.

In 1923, five members were elected, including Lord Meston, Headlam-Morley, and Mrs. Alfred Lyttelton. The following year, seven were elected, including Wilson Harris, Philip Kerr, and Sir Neill Malcolm. And so it went.

In 1936, at least eleven out of twenty-six members of the council were of the Milner Group. These included Lord Astor (chairman), L. Curtis, G. M. Gathorne-Hardy, Lord Hailey, H. D. Henderson, Stephen King-Hall, Mrs. Alfred Lyttelton, Sir Neill Malcolm, Lord Meston, Sir Arthur Salter, J. W. Wheeler-Bennett, E. L. Woodward, and Sir Alfred Zimmern. Among the others were A. V. Alexander, Sir John Power, Sir Norman Angell, Clement Jones, Lord Lytton, Harold Nicolson, Lord Snell, and C. K. Webster.

The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley, Professor of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, p. 153

The list of correspondence shows he began at the RIIA at least as early as 1928

  • Royal Institute of International Affairs. 1928-1967, n.d.
    See also: Cleeve, Margaret E.; King-Hall, Stephen; Toynbee, Arnold; Younger, Kenneth

And that he edited the (their?) British intelligence periodical called Foreign Affairs from 1928-1931.

As an overview for later years –

From 1929-31 he served as a Labor member of Parliament and member of the Consultative Committee of the Parliamentary Labor Party. He was knighted for public service in 1931, was a member of the Council of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, an executive of the Comité mondial contre laguerre et le fascisme [World Committee against War and Fascism], an active member of the Executive Committee of the League of Nations Union, and president of the Abyssinia Association. In 1933 he was presented with the Nobel Peace Prize.

– From the special collection of Sir Norman Angell, Papers, 1890-1976

Then, when we get into the next time it was necessary to bring out the spooks to do their thing with the next faked war designed to force America into a League of Nations take two – Angell is involved in several BSC front groups, and all sorts of efforts along that line.

For example, he and H.G. Wells get brought out of mothballs and correspond about various things in both 1938 and 1941. He also begins communication with the Foreign Office liaison point of all intelligence activities in the U.S. Lord Halifax (Ed Wood) in 1938 and for three straight years between the key time period of 1942-1945.

His involvement with White and Eichelberger goes off the charts, which makes it even weirder that his correspondence with White is supposedly almost non-existent. That is impossible to be the truth.

  • Citizens for Victory. See: Eichelberger, Clark M.
  • Eichelberger, Clark M. (International Free World Association; Citizens for Victory; American Association
    for the United Nations, Inc.). 1941-1954.

These two go together –

  • British Coordinating Committee for International Studies. See: Cleve, Margaret E. – This is an RIIA front. Round Table, Council on Foreign Relations.
  • Cleeve, Margaret E. (Royal Institute of International Affairs; British Co-ordinating Committee for
    International Studies). 1929-1935.

This one is particularly important –

  • British Information Services Chicago. 1960. New York. 1941-1956, 1960. (See also: Carter, John; Hutton, D. Graham.) –

This is where another correspondent of Angell’s, two actually come into play here. Kerr and Wheeler-Bennett.

Lord Lothian – that’s Philip Kerr – was using British consuls around the United States to set up local committees to “act as information bureaux.” He had hired John Wheeler-Bennett (another Round Table man), a well-connected Englishman teaching at universities in the States, as his personal assistant. He was a lot more than just some teacher.

In my husband’s book Scientology Roots chapter 22-3, he talks about him.

He was in the United States from 1939 to 1944 in various propaganda positions. He admits in his autobiography to having been “one of the earliest workers for the secret propaganda unit, Department EH” (Electra House, MI 6 headquarters for propaganda).

Peter Cusick and Ulric Bell, who worked for Elmer Davis of the Office of War Information had telephone conversations twice a week with John Wheeler-Bennett of the British Information Service. And on several occasions they were asked to be present at the BIS office in Rockefeller Center, while the British agents received confidential telephone messages from officials in London. (25 years later, the British were still trying to hide that British intelligence directly ran the Fight for Freedom)

Fight For Freedom was a William Stephenson created front group pretending to be an American grass-roots organization. Cusick was a member of it, while also being in the OSS and the Council on Foreign Relations – a British Round Table sister group.

Now let’s fill that in a bit more, taking information from my husband’s The Reckoning chapter 5-2: British Intelligence Sabotaging America

For two years, John Wheeler-Bennett was head of the secret Political Warfare Executive in New York. The purpose of this office was to maintain liaison with the American Office of War Information. Wheeler-Bennett said “…the leaders of the OWI in New York were all personal friends of mine…”  Wheeler-Bennett was a member of the Round Table. (15. autobiography of John Wheeler-Bennett)

William Donovan had been tasked by the British to form the COI in 1940, which was then split into two different organizations in 1941 – the OSS and the Office of War Information. Donovan headed the former, Elmer Davis the latter.

The Office of War Information censored American media. Telling the media what to say and what not to say – is a violation of the Constitution that guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

William Allen White worked directly with especially the OWI at that time.

By using Americans, such as White here, to issue propaganda, that gives the appearance it is American propaganda, but those Americans were really British agents who were issuing British propaganda.

The British Security Coordination operated under a rule to never allow the American people to find out that British intelligence had infiltrated and influenced the American government and media.

Under Guiding Principles, second rule, Political Warfare “demanded that the officers responsible should work in strictly covert fashion and should guard against the least risk of their output (or other results of their activity) being traced back to them or identified as British propaganda.”

– British Security Coordination, The Secret History of British Intelligence in the Americas, 1940 – 1945

See that Fight For Freedom part? That’s also Eichelberger and William White’s efforts right there.

Fight for Freedom members included –

William Donovan  (Head of Office of Strategic Services – OSS)
Allen W. Dulles  (member Council on Foreign Relations, OSS, Director of CIA)
Dean G. Acheson 
(member Council on Foreign Relations, U.S. Secretary of State)
F. H. Peter Cusick  (member of Council on Foreign Relations, OSS, CIA)
Elmer Davis  (Rhodes scholar, British propagandist, head of OWI)
Lewis William Douglas  (Council on Foreign Relations, trustee of Rockefeller Foundation)
Conyers Read  (Oxford graduate, OSS)
Joseph Alsop  (CIA)
James P. Warburg  (son of Paul Warburg)
Henry Luce  (creator of Time-Life magazine empire)
Geoffrey Parsons  (New York Herald Tribune, won Pulitzer Prize for his piece attacking American isolationism)
Ulric Bell  (head of Bureau of Motion Pictures of the Office of War Information)
Carter Glass  (newspaper publisher, Congressman)
Spyros Skouras  (Hollywood motion picture executive)
Henry P. Van Dusen  (trustee of Rockefeller Foundation)
Marshall Field III  (ROOM secret society member)

Other aspects that Norman Angell was involved with on behalf of the British intelligence effort here was re-defining for us Americans what democracy is – if you can believe the gall in that one.

  • International League for the Rights of Man and for the New Democracy, Inc. 1940-1965, n.d. – file that one under WTF?
  • Education of Free Men in American Democracy. 1941
  • Common Council for American Unity. 1942-1943.
  • BSC front group, the Civilian Defence and Information Bureau – Which sent 85,000 copies of an article on the British Empire by Sir Norman Angell

He was specifically part of White and Eichelbergers Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies, another BSC front group, as well as spending some time writing the Coudert Brothers (another nasty connection, see Masterman article) in 1942, and 1946, in between crusading for League of Nations take two – the United Nations.

  • Crusade for World Government. See: Fitzgerald, John.
  • American Association for the United Nations, Inc. See: Eichelberger, Clark M.; Roosevelt, Eleanor B.
    American Bankers’ Association. 1932.

As you can see –

William Allen White’s cabin buddy here, Norman Angell? Was 100 percent connected into the British slavemasters intelligence network. You’ll excuse me if I note again, just how awful it is that White was hiding just what that meant.


What he does do, is chatter about that he and Angell were also table-mates during the voyage and that there was much rumoring and gossiping going on (that’s how White characterizes it) about the League of Nations which and I quote: “Wilson was determined to establish.” White also noted that, without any further explanation or realization on his part: “Angell had a lot of ideas about the League–better ones, I discovered later, than Wilson had.

Well, gee. I just wonder why that would be. Maybe because it was never his idea in the first place? I’ll show you.

Charles Masterman, doing his whole favorite ‘mentions’ way of doing things, asked Lord Grey to influence Colonel House, to in turn influence President Wilson, to in turn influence the American people, on something very important – The League of Nations.

London, August 10, 1915,
Sir Edward Grey to Colonel House

edward grey to colonel house suggesting league of nations aug 10 1915The Intimate Papers of Colonel House, Volume 2, page 87, available to read at Hathitrust

“…would be some League of nations”? – as if it’s just some offhand, spur-of-the-moment idea he had.

How very slick.


What’s important though, is that this is the FIRST time the League of Nations had ever been mentioned.

The second time that Lord Grey wrote Col. House, he is quite a bit more direct.


Did you catch it?

The Brits wanted our President to front for them and pretend like the League of Nations is his idea!

America’s idea.

So, I’m sure you can understand the extreme irony when, on p. 194, White notes that Norman Angell tells him that he was afraid “that imperialistic forces would check Woodrow Wilson’s place at the conference.” White is sitting there thinking the whole time it was Wilson’s idea, see, so this is particularly nasty to watch Angell lie and misrepresent the situation to him and White doesn’t even question a thing he says!


It was at the peace conference on January 3, 1919 that White attended his first press conference. He particularly enjoyed his contacts with Colonel Edward House, noting that he thought he was a “sincere and resolute person”.

Just a little off there.

House is about the least actually sincere person I could imagine, but resolute? Oh definitely. Just about all the wrong things, unfortunately. But, White hung on his every word.

White writes in a letter to his wife on January 8, “He told me that the weakness of Wilson was his inability to get on with people who disagree with him.

As if that would help him when he’s lying, how very droll of House to tell White that. Probably knowing he would actually believe “that was the problem” with American opposition to the League of Nations, no doubt.

Some other people there that White knew, were Walter Lippman (whom he notes he was happy to see again) and also…Thomas Lamont who was noted as a ‘friend’.

Cute, that.

More like White’s U.S. handler. I should note here that there was much consulting going on between these two, starting in 1917 and going all the way up through 1936 and another notation is of importance here, that of December 10, 1940 but I’m getting ahead of myself.

On White’s last day in Paris at the peace conference he had lunch with Ray S. Baker and Colonel E. M. House. When he arrived in London he said that it “seemed like home to be in England again.” On page 308 of William White’s America, he is noted to have said that he renewed his friendship with Normal Angell, Frederick Whyte, H. G. Wells and John Buchan – Lord Tweedsmuir.

Friendship? No. Intelligence debriefing and fresh orders, is more like it.

White was invited to go with Angell to attend meetings of the Labor party called to “protest certain provisions of the peace treaty.” My guess is that this was a sort of field trip to see how Brits handled attacks on policy points, so that White could learn tactics for use at home in the U.S., but also to see “Irish rebels” in action.

You see, one thing really stands out about this trip, which had to have come about after White’s meetings with Lord Tweedsmuir (Buchan). He gave him a pretty nasty propaganda project job to do.

This is some really tricky business.

For one thing, it appears that the Whites stayed in London for more than six months, putting this hatchet ‘job’ for him well after several key events going on back in the U.S., one of which was led by Senator William Borah.

The fact that White LEFT OUT what Borah was doing throughout all of this, particularly his famous speech of February 21, 1919 and his actions during the Summer and Fall of 1919, is hugely damning. Hugely.

The second factor is, that what you are about to see is purely and only coming out of what American senators, like La Follette, Borah etc. were doing against the League of Nations. White gets briefed by the British on what the ‘tactic’ is as if it’s wrong and then is told to turn around and blame what’s happening in America on the IRA!

Yea, it’s that crazy and that transparent.

Let’s bring in Borah’s speech here first. Although please be aware that this is no substitute for actually reading my Borah article if you really want to understand just what is actually going on here with this League of Nations.

But first, a brief ovview

Thomas Jefferson correctly pegged the British Slavemasters and their global domination schemes, and he suggested that what is needed to handle this psychotic tendency is to limit the British to their own island.

They would still have a fertile island, a sound and effective population to labor it, and would hold that station among political powers, to which their natural resources and faculties entitle them. They would no longer indeed be the lords of the ocean, and paymasters of all the princes of the earth. They would no longer enjoy the luxuries of pyrating and plundering everything by sea, and of bribing and corrupting every thing by land; but they might enjoy the more safe and lasting luxury of living on terms of equality, justice, and good neighborhood with all nations.

…While it is much our interest to see this power reduced from it’s towering and borrowed height, to within the limits of it’s natural resources, it is by no means our interest that she should be brought below that, or lose her competent place among the nations of Europe.

Jefferson Cyclopedia
Thomas Jefferson to John Adams Polar Forest November 25 – 1816

Jefferson also pointed out how they go about this.

…[their government] insinuates the same poison into the bowels of every other, corrupts it’s councils, nourishes factions, stirs up revolutions, and places it’s own happiness in fomenting commotions and civil wars among others ….

Jefferson Cyclopedia
Thomas Jefferson to John Adams Polar Forest November 25 – 1816

This is what is being disguised under the rubrick of “Foreign Affairs” policy, which is such a tremendous smokescreen for what these people are really after that it’s almost beyond belief.

Senator William Edgar Borah is also one of the few people that understood this about the British slavemasters, and also was well-informed as to when exactly this insanity called ‘balance of power’ began.

Thus, he began his speech on February 21, 1919 –

Mr. President, this constitution of the league of nations is the greatest triumph for English diplomacy in three centuries of English diplomatic life.

Borah Senate Speech, February 21, 1919 Against the League of Nations

Ok, now let’s really get into this speech now. It’s that important to what White is about to do (and will continue doing from here on out).

Sentaor Borah’s speech Against the League of Nations

Mr. BORAH. Mr. President, the people of the United States have the undoubted right to change their form of government and to renounce established customs or long-standing policies when-ever in their wisdom they see fit to do so. As a believer in democratic government, I readily acknowledge the right of the people to make in an orderly fashion such changes as may be approved by their judgment at any time. I contend, moreover, that when radical and important departures from established national policies are proposed, the people ought to be consulted.

Borah Senate Speech, February 21, 1919 Against the League of Nations

What a concept!

We are now proposing what to my mind is the most radical departure from our policies hitherto obtaining that has ever been proposed at any time since our Government was established.

I think the advocates of the league will agree with me that it is a pronounced departure from all the policies which we have heretofore obtained.

the people are entitled to pass judgment upon the advisability of such a course.

Borah Senate Speech, February 21, 1919 Against the League of Nations

… Mr. Taft informs the American people, from the pedestal of an ex-President, that this program does not destroy the policy announced by Washington in his Farewell Address and does not renounce the doctrine known as the Monroe doctrine–two fundamental principles underlying our foreign policy for more than 100 years in one instance and nearly 100 years in the other; two policies to which the American people have long been committed, and which, in my judgement, they still believe to be indispensable to their happiness and future tranquillity.

If, indeed, this program does dispose of these policies, it presents an entirely different question to the American people than if the reverse were true. This is one of the first things to be settled in this controversy.

Mr. Taft says: Article 10 covers the Monroe doctrine and extends it to the world.

‘The league is to be regarded as in conflict with the advice of Washington only with a narrow and reactionary viewpoint.’

Anyone who sees through this…is narrow and reactionary! Well, that’s convenient. And oh so British…

To think they have meetings and consultations over dreaming up these kind of characterization insults. It’s kind of sad when you think about it. Sad, because they can’t think on their feet and have to make “studies” and all manner of crutches before whatever it is becomes approved and shows up in a press article, or someone’s speech – like former President Taft here.

Speaking of George Washington, Borah brings up an interesting factoid.

… I venture to recall to your minds a letter which he wrote, prior to the presidency, to Sir Edward Newenham, in which he says:

“I hope the United States of America will be able to keep disengaged from the labyrinth of European politics and wars. • * * It should be the policy of the United States to administer to their wants without being engaged in their quarrels.”

The labyrinth – that’s a good word for that insanity called British Foreign policy.

In 1791 he [Washington] addressed a letter to Mr. Morris, in which he said:

“I trust we shall never so far lose sight of our own interest and happiness as to become unnecessarily a party to these political disputes.

Our local situation enables us to maintain that state with respect to them which otherwise could not, perhaps, be preserved by human wisdom.”

The author from whom I quote, Senator Lodge, commenting upon this, says:

“The world was told that a new power had come into being, which meant to hold aloof from Europe, and which took no interest in the balance of power or the fate of dynasties, but looked only to the welfare of its own people and to the conquest and mastery of a continent as its allotted tasks. The policy declared by the proclamation was purely American in its conception, and severed the colonial tradition at a stroke.”

Now that’s key – because that is exactly what the whole League of Nations business was trying to do. Remember what Cecil Rhodes said?

In his first will, written at the age of 24, he dedicated his yet unmade fortune to, amongst other things:

” . . . the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire. . . ” (Cecil Rhodes, by Basil Williams, 1921)

Borah continued –

I digress to say I wish every boy and girl over the age of 15 years could be induced to read the brilliant story of Washington as it is found in those two volumes. If they were not better Americans, with higher ideals, after they had read it, nothing could make them so.

Again, Mr. President, in a letter to Patrick Henry, dated later, he says:

“I can most religiously aver that I have no wish that is incompatible with the dignity, happiness, and true interest of the people of this country. My ardent desire is, and my aim has been, so far as dependent on the executive department, to comply strictly with all our engagements, foreign and domestic, but to keep the United States free from any political connections with every other country, to see it independent of all, and under the influence of none. In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of Europe may be convinced that we act for ourselves.”

This was the conclusion of Washington after years of observation, after the most pointed experience, after eight years of administration of public affairs, and with as wide a vision and with as farseeing a vision as ever accompanied a human mind upon this mundane sphere.

[Washington’s Farewell Address]

“Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?”

Why indeed.


…are we not undertaking the task against which the Father of our Country warned when he bade farewell to public service?

“Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground?”– George Washington

And yet in this proposed league of nations, in the very beginning, we are advised of an executive council which shall dominate and control its action, three members of which are Europeans, one member Asiatic, and one American.

If a controversy ever arises in which there is a conflict between the European system and the American system, or if a conflict ever arises in which their interests, their humor, their caprice, and their selfishness shall attempt to dominate the situation, shall we not have indeed quit our own to stand upon foreign ground?

Why should we interweave our destiny with the European destiny? Are we not interweaving our future and our destiny with European powers when we join a league of nations the constitution of which gives a majority vote in every single instance in which the league can ever be called into action to European powers?

Does the ex-President [Taft] mean to say to an intelligent and thinking people that this league which thus grants this power to European governments is not interweaving our destiny with European destiny? Does he assume to say that that is not a departure from the plain terms of Washington’s Farewell Address?

In other words – does Taft really think we’re that stupid?

Ah, but they do, or wish we were. I’ll show you more about that a little later in this article.

… The present war [WWI] has drawn us to Europe, but only temporarily. The question shall we enter European affairs permanently and shall we invite Europe, with her systems of government, some more pernicious than in the days of Washington, to America. We had a temporary alliance with France when Washington became President, but he fought against the making of these alliances permanent. That is the question here.

Now he will actually explain the Monroe Doctrine.

What is the Monroe doctrine? I apologize to the Senate for going into that question. I do so more for others than my colleagues, but I will be brief. Before the exigencies arising out of the conditions connected with a defense of this league it would not have been necessary to discuss it. All understood it alike. The Monroe doctrine is simply the principle of self~defense applied to a people, and the principle of self-defense can not be the subject of arbitration or of enforcement by any one other than that one who is to claim and enforce the principle of self-defense.

The ex-President said the Monroe doctrine is covered and extended to the world. That was the condition before Monroe announced it? The world was one. Monroe determined to separate it-and divide it, and that was the very object of it.

It was a distinct announcement that the European system could not be transferred to America.

The rest was simply detail.

It was the division of two systems; it was the political partition of two continents; Monroe or Jefferson never would have contemplated for a moment sharing the enforcement of the Monroe doctrine with any nation of Europe. We would not even join with England in announcing it.

Borah quotes what Thomas Jefferson actually said to Monroe about it.

This letter of Jefferson [to Monroe] states as clearly as can be stated the prime object of the announcement of this doctrine:

-The question presented by the letters you have sent me is the most momentous which has ever been offered to my contemplation since that of independence.

-That made us a nation.

This sets our compass and points the course which we are to steer through the ocean of time opening on us. And never could we embark upon it under circumstances more auspicious. Our first and fundamental maxim should be never to entangle ourselves in the broils of Europe; [The Washington policy] our second, never to suffer Europe to intermeddle with cis-Atlantic affairs.

Note: cis-Atlantic means the opposite side of the Atlantic ocean, from England.

Borah then correctly points out that the Monroe Doctrine was made for Americanot the entire world.

Yet we are solemnly advised that although we should share it with all the Governments of Europe and Asia and all the tribes of the different races which may in the future be organized into some form of government, it is still the doctrine of self defense which Jefferson and Monroe announced and which Mr. Root so clearly explained.

Now he will get into the League of Nations documents themselves.

We come now to the constitution of the proposed league of nations, which has been submitted to us. I shall not undertake to go into details; indeed, time would not permit to take up the many different phases which this constitution presents for consideration. I want only to call attention to some features of it bearing upon this particular subject matter-that is, the effect it has upon these two great policies.

The mere reading of the constitution of the league will convince any reasonable mind, any unprejudiced mind, that if put into effect the policy of Washington and the policy of Monroe must depart. The propositions are irreconcilable and can not exist together. In the first place, the league provides for an organization composed principally of five great nations, three of them European, one Asiatic, and one American.

Every policy determined upon by the league and every movement made by it could be, and might be, controlled solely by European powers, whether the matter dealt with had reference to America or Europe. The league nowhere distinguishes or discriminates between Enropean and American affairs.

It functions in one continent the same as another. It compounds all three continents into a single unit, so far as the operations of the league are concerned.

The league interferes in European affairs and in American affairs upon the same grounds and for the same reasons. If the territorial integrity of any member of the league is threatened or involved, whether that territory be in America or Europe, the league deals with the subject. If it becomes necessary for the league to act through economic pressure, or finally through military power, although the procedure may be voted by European powers alone, it may exert that pressure in America the same as in Europe. The very object and purpose of the league is to eliminate all differences between Europe and America and place all in a common liability to be governed and controlled by a condition authority. If the United States, for instance, should disregard its covenants, as provided in the league, it would be deemed to have committed an act of war against all other members of the league; and under our solemn obligation and agreement we would have authorized the European powers to wage war against us and upon the American Continent. And yet men deliberately and blandly state to the American people that this league constitution preserves the Monroe doctrine and the doctrine given us by Washington.

Britain wants to be able to have other people gang up on us if we don’t do what they want.

Borah then takes up a point from the League of Nations document, and an obvious British shill in the senate tries to disrupt his speech, and lower his credibility by acting like Borah is somehow being inaccurate about the document.

It’s truly hilarious to watch what Borah does with the little ponzer.

I read from article 10 as an illustration:

The high contracting parties shall undertake to respect and preserve as against external aggression the territorial existence and existing political independence of all States members of the league.

Take for illustration one of our own associates and allies:

England has possessions in three continents. As has been said, the sun never sets upon her possessions. They dot every sea and are found in every land. She today holds possession of one-fifth of the habitable globe, and we in article 10 guarantee the integrity of her possessions in the three continents of the earth.

***notice how Borah specifically said: “Take for illustration“, clearly indicating that he is not quoting from the document, and yet here comes the ponzer saying –

Mr. HITCHCOCK. Will the Senator state what he is reading from!

Mr. BORAH. I am reading from article 10 of the constitution of the league.

Mr. HITCHCOCK. That is not the language of article 10 as printed in the Senate document at the request of the Senator from Massachusetts [Mr. LODGE]. There is nothing said about possessions there at all.

Mr. BORAH. Did I read possessions?

Mr. HITCHCOCK. I understood the Senator to say possessions.

Mr. BORAH. No; I think the Senator is mistaken. I will read it again:

The high contracting parties shall undertake to respect and ·preserve as against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence of all States members of the league.

Mr. HITCHCOCK. That is correct.

Mr. BORAH. I presume that her territorial integrity necessarily involves her territorial possessions.


Silence from the peanut gallery aka the British shill, Senator Hitchcock.


Thinking he can fence words with Borah rightly ends with Hitchcock wearing the dunce cap.

Borah gets back on point again –

So, Mr. President, the first obligation which we assume is to protect the territorial integrity of the British Empire. That takes us into every part of the civilized world. That is the most radical departure from the Washington policy. I will come to the Monroe policy in a minute. Now, how are we to determine that?

[quoting League of Nations document]

In case of any such aggression or in case of any threat or danger of such aggression the executive council shall advise upon the means by which the obligation shall be fulfilled.

Does that mean what it says, and is it to be executed in accordance with its plain terms?

If the territorial integrity of any part of the British Empire shall be threatened not the Congress of the United States, not the people of the United States, not the Government of the United States determines what shall be done, but the executive council of which the American people have one member.

We, if we mean what we say in this constitution, are pledging ourselves, our honor, our sacred lives, to the preservation of the territorial possessions [British possessions] the world over and not leaving it to the judgment and sense of the American people but to the diplomats of Europe.

Hitchcock then thinks that he really isn’t a dunce, it must have been a fluke, so he pumps himself up “Yah mon, I can do this!” and tries again. This time it’s even worse for him.

Mr. HITCHCOCK. The Senator again uses the words “territorial possessions.” That is what I am objecting to.

Mr. BORAH. Mr. President, I will leave it to an intelligent audience to determine whether or not “territorial integrity” does not include ” territorial possessions.”

Mr. HITCHCOCK. If the Senator will refer to article 7, the indications are there that the dominions of the British Empire are to be regarded as separate and independent self-governing countries –

Mr. BORAH. Mr. President, I am coming to that in a few moments. I admire the careful use of language by the Senator from Nebraska when he says there are “indications.” This constitution is prolific indeed of “indications.”

“Indications.” Yep.

Nicolas Cage Laugh

And Hitchcock goes down for the count. Not another word out of him. Can you have a double-dunce cap?

Raquel Torres dunce cap

Borah pounds the point home some more –

That is the duty devolving upon us by virtue of the league, to enter European affairs. What would be the duty and the obligation of England, of France, of Italy, and of Japan to the other member should a disturbance arise upon the Western Continent? Suppose some threat of danger to the Republic should come from Mexico or from Mexico and its allies. We are not even consulted as to whether we shall call in help, but the duty devolves upon the council, in its initiative capacity, to at once assume jurisdiction of it and to proceed to the American continent to determine what its duties shall be with reference to American affairs.

This league operates upon the Western Continent with the same jurisdiction and power and the same utter disregard of which continent it is upon as it does in the European Continent. Does anybody deny that proposition?


This is an utterly brilliant metaphor, that he’s about to launch into, that perfectly illustrates the utter insanity and hypocrisy (not to mention asinine stupidity) of this league of nations idea.


Note: “William Howard”, mentioned below, is Borah’s pseudonym for former President Taft.

Let us take a homely illustration; perhaps it may better illustrate the argument.

A great many years ago a man by the name of Europe opened a farm. He begins the tillage of his great /farm, but turmoil, strife, and dissension arise among his tenants.

Finally a dissatisfied European by the name, we will call him, America, determines to leave these turmoils on the European farm to go into the forest, open a clearing, and establish a new farm.

He says, ” I shall go where I can worship God according to the dictates of my own conscience. I shall go where I can set up a new system of farming.”

He goes into the wilderness and sacrifices and finally establishes a farm of his own.

After he has established it he declares, after reflection, “I am afraid those Europeans will come here and cause me the same disturbance and trouble and establish the same kind of a system which we had in Europe; so I will establish a partition fence.”

He does establish a partition fence. When he has finished the fence he says, ” I will neither go to your farm nor shall you come to mine; I have had some experience with you, and I do not want to try it again.”

So he builds an insurmountable wall or fence between his neighbor Europe and himself.

It stands for a hundred years. People sit about and discuss it, and pass many eulogies, declaring over and over again that it was one of the wisest things that a farmer ever did.

But Suddenly! a new inspiration dawns, and it is thought that It would be a good idea to tear down the wall or fence and to commingle and intermingle the systems; to join one farm to another and have one superintendent.

It is said to the farmer America, “Let us tear down this, fence.”

He replies in surprise and consternation, “I built it for a purpose.” “Well,” it is contended by the idealist, “We think it is better to tear it down.”

At this time there rises up a man by the name of William Howard. He says to farmer America, ” Let us tear down that wall fence of yours. It must be done right away. Anyone who opposes can not be trusted overnight.”

The farmer says, ” I do not think it would be well.”

“But,” William Howard replies, “it is just the same after it is torn down as it is when it is standing up. We are going to put a fence around both farms, and that will be the same as a fence between the farms.”

William Howard further says, ” Let us go into partnership with your neighbor Europe.”

America says, ” I do not want any partnership. I came here to get away from that very thing.”

William Howard urges, in spirit of unselfishness and good naturedly, “It is just the same without a partnership as it is with it. Let us transmute or combine these two systems and make them one.”

“But,” farmer America says, ” I came to this country to get away from that system. I do not want one system; I want two systems. I do not like their system of farming.”

William Howard replies, ” One system is just the same as two systems.” He declares, furthermore, “I know something about this; I ran this farm for four years myself [laughter in the Senate]; I know how to run it; and I declare to you that the best thing for you to do is to tear down your wall fence, to unite your two systems, and make one farm out of it and one common overseer.”

He further, by way of a profound argument, casually remarks, “I had such remarkable success while I was running this farm and received such universal commendation upon my work after it was over, having received the approval of 2 tenants out of 48, that I am sure that I can run both farms, at least, I am anxious to try.” [more laughter.]

Belly-laughing breaks out all over the galleries, can’t you just see it?

pound tthe ground laughing full out laughing

So much so, that order had to be restored!

The VICE PRESIDENT. The galleries must preserve order.

They must have been literally bringing the house down with laughter!

Borah finishes up with –

Mr. BORAH. Mr. President, some of us declare that this proposition tears down the farmer’s fence. We say furthermore that we do not want two farms made into one. If you want to do so, all right, go ahead; but let us make no mistake about what we are doing. Let us not try to fool ourselves or anyone else.

Now he goes into the British involvement a bit more.

What do other countries think about it, Mr. President?

The English press, we are informed in so far as it has commented upon this subject at all, has regarded it as an abrogation of the Monroe doctrine. Mr. Lloyd-George said in the very beginning of these conferences that Great Britain could concede much to the United States if, as the result, they were to draw the United States out of her isolation and away from her traditional foreign policies.

But when we come to deal with England, we must deal with her intelligently and with a disregard for our own interests and our own rights, for one of the distinguishing characteristics of that proud nation is that England always looks after England’s interests. I admire her for doing so.

Her national spirit never fails her. …She has entered into many leagues and combinations which have dissolved, but her proud national spirit never forsakes her. Ultimately she relies upon this instead of treaties and leagues. …I admire her for her national spirit, for her vigilance in guarding the interests of the Empire.

Did you see that? “which have dissolved” – because England’s word is for shit when it comes right down to it – but what a great way he put that, subtle but deadly precise in pointing out the lack of trustworthiness there.

And that “national spirit” part?

That’s a direct hit on their attempt to portray nationalism as some sort of disease that everybody other than England has – everybody that doesn’t want to be one of their dominions, that is.

That particular insult of “nationalism” would get used repeatedly all through the last century, with such interesting and supposedly varied people (they were on the same team) as John Foster Dulles and even Church of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard, both tooting the horn of that “nationalism” was the cause of war. (they weren’t the only ones either, by far).

*See The End Is Not Yet – Allied Scientists of The World for sourced direct quotes.

This next part is where Borah brings up (as I mentioned earlier) that England has been trying to get their rule-the-world government into place since the Rise of the Slavemasters in the time of Queen Elizabeth I.

Borah said this in 1919, at which point in time this was three centuries ago.

Mr. President, this constitution of the league of nations is the greatest triumph for English diplomacy in three centuries of English diplomatic life. This constitution, in the first place, is lifted almost bodily, as you will see if you will compare the two, from the constitution proposed in January by Gen. Smuts.

That you may not think I am stating it strongly, let me read a word from the London Times on the second day after this constitution was adapted:

•The project, if not the same as that outlined by Gen. Smuts, is like it as its brother.

• It is’ a cause for legitimate pride to recognize in the covenant so much of the work of Englishmen. •

• It is again a source of legitimate pride to Englishmen that article 19 in the covenant might almost be taken as an exposition of the principles animating the relations of Great Britain with India and the dominions.

There’s that dominions thing that Hitchcock was trying to distract off of earlier.

Listen to this language-

That the dominions are in this document recognized as nations before the world is also a fact of profound significance in the history of these relations.

The gentleman who wrote that editorial had not acquired the capacity of using language to conceal his thoughts; he labored under the disadvantage of having to use language to convey his thoughts.

The fact that the dominions of Great Britain and her colonies are recognized as nations is a matter of “profound significance.”

Yes; when they finally settle down to business England will have one vote, Canada one vote, New Zealand one vote, Australia one vote, and South Africa one vote, whilst the American Nation, brought into being by our fathers at so much cost of blood and treasure and preserved through the century by the vigilance and sacrifice of our forbears, this Nation with all her wealth and resources will have one vote. In both the executive council and the delegate body the same proportion obtains, and those two bodies direct, dominate, and mark out the policy of this entire program, whatever it is to be, under the league.

A matter of “profound significance!”

Sock-puppet voting British-style!

sockpuppet voting

church lady

I ask you who are in favor of this league, are you willing to give to any nation five votes against our one? Do you presume that the questions of interest, of ambition, of selfishness, of caprice, of humor will not arise in the future? Have they not already, in a proper way, but none the less in an unmistakable way, made their appearance since the armistice was signed? Are we not already advised that we must use the same intelligence, the same foresight, the same prevision, and the same patriotism that our fathers used against the inherent, the inevitable selfishness of all nations? Yet we are seriously proposing that we shall join a league whose constitutional powers shall determine-what? Shall determine policies, politic and economic, upon the two continents and shall give to our greatest commercial rival [England] five votes to our one.

Oh yeah!

church lady live gif

He’s got them by the short and curlies on that one. No getting out of how bad that looks, and is.

To further illustrate this point, on a more personal basis – this is literally almost like jail. Where you do not get to decide your actions, a damn committee does.

In the TV series Oz, Season 1: Episode 1 the prison guard instructs the new prisoners.

We tell you when to sleep, when to eat, when to piss.”

How long would you put up with that in your own home?



This is the point that Borah is making about the League of Nations stacked vote, and its intrusive, unseemly bossiness of our affairs.

Borah takes this even further –

Mr. President, I have called attention to some of the obligations which we assume. Let me repeat a single statement. You have now observed the number of votes in the executive council, but that is not all. There are Italy and Japan associated with England, and more nearly like her in their systems and in their policies than they are like the United States.

There are already treaties between those nations and England, which Mr. Balfour frankly says are not to be abrogated; in other words, we are in the very beginning put up not only against this extraordinary vote by one nation but we have the disadvantage of contending against a system, which system covers other nations as well as that of Great Britain.

We all want the friendship and the respect of and future amicable relations between Great Britain and this country. That also was Washington’s wish; that was Jefferson’s wish; that was also Lincoln’s wish; but never for a moment did they surrender any power or any authority or compromise their capacity in any way to take care of the situation in case there should not be an agreement between the two powers.

What has England given up in this league of nations? What has she surrendered? Will some one advise me? Did she surrender the freedom of the seas? That was pushed aside at the first meetings of the conference as not subject to its jurisdiction.

Has she surrendered her claim for the largest navy?

“What has she surrendered?”

And that’s another key point – it’s a “something that isn’t there” which makes it something you might find yourself normally easily distracted from the fact that it is missing, but not when you point right at it like he just did. Now it stands out clear-as-day.

What has England surrendered?

Nothing. You can’t find anything because there isn’t anything, and that’s the point.

On the other hand, we have surrendered the traditional foreign policy of this country, which has been established for 100 years; and we have gone behind these powers and placed at their disposal our finances, our man power, and our full capacity to guarantee the integrity of their possessions all over the globe.

Is it an even balance, is it an equitable, is it an honest arrangement between these great powers and the United States?

Not even at all, and definitely not honest.

Now he comes hard at this new Nationalism slur they are just starting to throw around, and shows what this is all really about. The interesting thing is, check out the propaganda, the BRITISH propaganda coming from Leon Trotsky.

I come now to another feature, which to me is even more interesting, more menacing, than those over which we have passed. Conceal it as you may, disguise it as some will attempt to do, this is the first step in internationalism and the first distinct effort to sterilize nationalism.

May I call attention to a statement from perhaps the most famous internationalist now living. I read from a book entitled “The Bolsheviki and World Peace,” by Trotzky.

He says:

The present war is at bottom a revolt of the forces of production against the political form of nation and State. It means the collapse of the national State as an independent economic unit.

In another paragraph

• * •The war proclaims the downfall of the national state. • * •

• * •We Russian Socialists stand firmly on the ground of internationalism. • * *

The German social democracy was to us not only a party of the international-it was the party par excellence.

Again, he declares:

The present war signalizes the collapse of the national states.

He proceeds to argue that the only thing which can take the place of the national state is internationalism, to internationalize our governments, internationalize our power, internationalize production, internationalize our economic capacity, and become an international state the world over.

Bolshevism? Yep.

Britain was behind that too.

BOTH sides of it.

See Charles Masterman and WIlliam Dudley Pelley library articles for proof.

And like Jefferson said –

…[their government] insinuates the same poison into the bowels of every other, corrupts it’s councils, nourishes factions, stirs up revolutions, and places it’s own happiness in fomenting commotions and civil wars among others ….

Jefferson Cyclopedia

As in – The Bolshevik “revolution” – largely used to hinge yet another war around.

Borah continues, saying that creating this “internationalism’ is what is at the bottom of all this posturing.

That is at the bottom of this entire procedure, whether consciously or unconsciously, upon the part of those who are advocating it.

It will be the fruit of this effort if it succeeds-the dead sea fruit for the common people everywhere.

It is a distinct announcement that the intense nationalism of Washington, the intense nationalism of Lincoln, can no longer serve the cause of the American people, and that we must internationalize and place the sovereign powers of this Government to make war and control our economic forces in an international tribunal.

And there you have it.

The rise of turning the term “nationalism” into an insult.

All to try and marginalize correct dissent against the insane power-mad global domination ideas of the British Slavemasters.

I have said many times in a number of posts since this blog began in 2010, that this attack word of nationalism originated with the British and now you can see when they began heavily pushing it, and about what. America refusing to become part of their Empire, and then extended to anyone else refusing to become part of their Empire.

You see it in play? Look for the British. They’re always lurking in the shadows there somewhere, somehow, and in some way.

Those using it are either agents for British intelligence, one way or another, or they are Dupes being used or affected by agents for British intelligence.

The difference is, Dupes will often correct their actions when they find out the truth whereas Agents won’t. Why? Because they already know the truth, that’s why they do what they do. Think about that the next time you think you’re being rational by giving them the benefit of a doubt. They don’t have any doubt, but they sure wish you would.

They sure wished that Borah could have been manipulated that way.

Or how did they put it?

crush all disloyalty and every movement for the severance of the Empire.”

You know, like America did in the American Revolution. They have never gotten over that.

* * * 


That was really something, wasn’t it. I just love that man and his passion for what’s right.

Ok, so, we are now almost 5 months after that monumental speech that had such an impact on America, when on June 7, the Whites left London for a ‘visit’ to Ireland.

Yea. It’s just a ‘visit’.

His autobiography notes that this visit has a rather specific purpose, stated as: “to investigate the Irish nationalist demands for freedom from Great Britain.

Uh oh. The real objective is showing already.

This trip produced the article “Through American Eyes” for the British weekly review the New Europe, on June 19, 1919. (Volume 11 pages 223-227). Wikipedia tells us –

The New Europe, subtitled “A Weekly Review of Foreign Politics,” was a weekly political magazine published in the United Kingdom between 1916 and 1920. Funded by David Davies it spread ideas related to federalism. It was led by the political activist and historian Robert William Seton-Watson; others involved with the magazine included Erskine Childers, Anatole France,  the brothers Reginald “Rex” Leeper and Allen Leeper,  Henry Wickham Steed, A. F. Whyte, Ronald Burrows, Oscar Browning, James Frazer, Tomáš Masaryk, Bernard Pares, Samuel Hoare, Leonard Woolf and Salvador de Madariaga.

Steed and Seton-Watson, as well as Whyte were all part of Charles Masterman’s propaganda efforts.

The New Europe first issue came out on Oct. 19, 1916, it was published by Eyre and Spottiswood. I tracked down volume 11 at Hathi trust, where White’s article was, on p. 223.

Let’s look at how it is characterized in the William Allen White biography first.

White stated that England the U.S. had to work together to keep the peace. “Co-operation in aims, in ideals, in peaceful competition for the world’s business, is necessary. Jealousy is fatal.” Referring to the League he wrote that “if we fail, the League fails.”

He pointed out, rather blatantly obviously that the great obstacle to the Anglo-American cooperaton was Ireland. The Republican party White declared was organizing the Irish-American vote against the League of Nations. Their plan was to defeat the League by demonstrating that it was a British device to rule the world. “To prove that it becomes necessary to convince the Americans that Great Britain is a grasping oppressor of unwilling captive peoples. The Irish situation furnishes the example needed.

With supposed extraordinary foresight WHICH HE DID NOT HAVE, he stated:

“And the Americans, thus aroused against England and persuaded that England is backing the League of Nations for British Imperial aims, may lose their heads and permit partisan malice and jealousy to defeat the ratification of the League in the American Senate. If that is done, Wilson and his party are discredited for the 1920 elections, the Republicans will whoop it up against England…..The whole fabric of the pan to check the progress of humanity is based on the fiction of England as the Cruel Stepmother. Destroy that fiction, prove that England is not oppressing Ireland and America will ratify the League.”

Ok. So that’s all that gets mentioned about it in William Allen White’s America (and nothing in White’s own autobiography).

This is actually so key to what’s going on, that we’re going to do a full analysis of it, starting with looking at the full article. Notice how he starts right off with the Round Table (and Charles Masterman) propaganda line of “the English-speaking people”.

Cover of the New Europe issue his article was in and TOC highlighting his article –

Article text –

The hope of the world is an intelligent, sympathetic understanding among the English-speaking people that they will work together to keep the peace. France, for the moment, is enjoying a dream of power. Some-thing of the visions of the Grand Monarch, of Richelieu, and of Napoleon is just now moving in the hearts of the French governing classes. They are profoundly interested in the map, in boundaries, in spheres of influence, in trade extensions, in military movements, expeditions, and “the pride, pomp, and circumstance of glorious war.” Unless there is a political revolution in France, unless the present Foreign Office of the Republic is thoroughly reorganised, France probably will be more or less quarrel-some during the next decade, she will have no keen interest in peace.

The Slav countries, Czechs, Jugoslavs, etc., will be going through a period of educational growth and economic regeneration. The whole Slav world will be in the brawling period of early adolescence. The Slavs will be a liability rather than an asset to peace until they reach their sober years. This may be two generations ahead; optimists feel it may take but one. Germany, smarting under the shame of defeat, must be nursed along into habits of peace, and international tact will be severely strained to keep her out of war. Japan has her aspirations which would be realised rather more easily by war than by peace.

Indeed, wherever one looks one sees the imminent danger of war. The people who will most profit by peace, by leaving boundaries as they are, or by establishing the habits of arbitrament and international adjustments in the world—in short, by “peace on earth among men of good will,” are the men of the English-speaking countries.

The English-speaking people have arrived at that place in their economic evolution where war no longer pays. They fight well—the German knows that—but they can trade better than they can fight their way into domination. A frontier no longer bothers them. From the point of view of gaining economic influence inside any border or of securing political advantage for the English-speaking races to-day with their equipment of ships and machines and their trading instinct, it is vastly better to treat and trade than to fight. We have the raw materials, we have the genius for mass production, we have ships, we have our own ports in every quarter of the globe, we have facilities for making the short haul from these ports of either assembly or manufacture, to any land that needs the things we have for sale, and then, best of all, we have the League of Nations.

For the League of Nations, whatever else it does or fails to do, does afford to the trader of the world a sure protection in his international trade—such a protection as never surrounded commerce before.

Under the League of Nations “the whole world loves” a trader, and we, the English-speaking nations, by ancient breeding, by reason of our vast natural resources, all carefully tucked away in absolutely undisputed boundaries, by our far and yet even advance in economic, industrial, social and political evolution, are the world’s traders.

To restate this: we English-speaking people, bred of an old strain, all mixed and set—the Saxons, the Celts and the Northmen—face no danger of our stock degenerating through a native cross in any new colony, for we are firmly planted near every people who are rising in the economic scale, whether in Africa,. Asia, South America, Eastern Europe, or the islands of the sea. And thus we are planted near these natural markets for the wares of an advanced civilisation while, as a people who have gone  through the infantile diseases of a race, we all of us—Britons, Americans, Australians, Irish, New Zealanders, South Africans, Canadians—have solved or are peacefully solving through evolutionary processes, our problems of the economic distribution of wealth, of the political distribution of power, of social adjustment and of industrial organisation.

We shall not have to waste our strength on these things. This is true of no other race, except, perhaps, of the Germans, and their taste for war has given them plenty of handicaps and distractions to last them through the next two or three decades. Even our good friends the French will have problems of  colonisation, transportation, home, finance, and European continental politics to keep them too busy to dominate the world’s commercial highways for a generation. The field is wide open to the English-speaking people—


If they co-operate, share the same ideals, the same habits, the same opportunity, they must hunt in a pack. That does not mean close political union; for, in the plane of civilisation upon which the English-speaking people are moving, political forms have ceased to be of great consequence. They concern interior national development, not exterior relations.

America, for instance, which is quite outside the political union binding the other English-speaking peoples, is quite as much a part of the Union to all intents as South Africa or Australia. But co-operation in aims, in ideals, in peaceful competition for the world’s business, is necessary. Jealousy is fatal.

The United States and the United Kingdom and the British Empire have each learned the great necessary lesson of internal national co-operation. It is their great secret —this genius for large combination. They must now learn that lesson in international co-operation. By its strength it will save for humanity the ideals we fought for in the great war. For the example of this co-operation of the English-speaking peoples will prove what may be done by all mankind.

If we can make an English-speaking group function automatically without force, without  intrigue, without pacts, treaties or “covenants—make it work merely because it should work in the interest of intelligent self-interest, then, we can make the same idea function for the salvation of the world in the League of Nations. If we fail, the League fails. And there is right now one serious obstacle before us. It is Ireland.

Ireland probably is merely a symbol of discord. But symbol, or what not, Irish discord is the one thing which will alienate America from Great Britain. Just now a strong anti-British current is running in American politics. The Republicans—who have recently turned tail-twisters and love to bait the British lion in campaign oratory—have gone out hopefully for the Irish vote. They are thrifty souls, and are scooping up the Irish vote while digging pits for President Wilson.

Their game is this: they must defeat the League of Nations in the American Senate by proving to the American people that the League is a British device to rule the world.

To prove that, it becomes necessary to convince the Americans that Great Britain is a grasping oppressor of unwilling captive peoples. The Irish situation furnishes the example needed. America is filled with men and women of Irish blood whose traditions are rife with Irish stories of Ireland’s wrongs in other days and times. The Sinn Fein fable to-day of a nation struggling for freedom is the story needed to fructify the anti-British sentiment implanted in American hearts by school histories of the iniquity of George III and watered by the old tales of Ireland’s wrongs. And the Americans, thus aroused against England and persuaded that England is backing the League of Nations for British Imperial aims, may lose their heads and permit partisan malice and jealousy to defeat the ratification of the League in the American Senate. If that is done, Wilson and his party are discredited for the 1920 elections, the Republicans will whoop it up against England to justify the slaughter of the League and incidentally to bag the Irish vote and the pro-German vote; and, while the demagogues triumph, humanity will suffer. For, with the League of Nations abandoned, English-speaking peoples will have to spend their energies in wars and preparations for wars. The whole fabric of the plan to check the progress of humanity is based upon the fiction of England as the Cruel Step-mother.

Destroy that fiction, prove that England is not oppressing Ireland, and America will ratify the League; and, if America ratifies the’ League, the battle is won.

Ireland is a football in American politics. It must be taken out of American politics for the good of Ireland and for the future peace of the world.

For the crisis is indeed grave. Let the League of Nations fail, and fail because America distrusts Great Britain in her treatment of Ireland, and a breach is made in the English-speaking group. That breach is bound to widen; in America the professional Irishman will widen it and the former pro-German who has been singing low since the American declaration of war, will come out of his hole and begin propaganda against the British. He and the professional Irishmen will join hands. These two groups united will make a strong minority. It will hold a balance of power.

Without the League of Nations this minority will force America out of the English-speaking group into an independent place under a black flag. Germany, resurrected in ten, twenty, or thirty years hence, will try to gather a group of nations about her. And America, while she might not be counted in the German group, would be no Ally of the English against the German group if the Irish continue to have a  grievance and join with the Germans. Now, we Americans make no claim that we were of any particular military value in this war, but surely we were of some moral value after we got in. And we hope that our American influence in the world will be worth considering. We have no interest in Ireland except as Ireland affects us and we feel that to ignore Ireland will weaken the bonds between America and the English-speaking people. To give Ireland her place as a Dominion with Canada, Australia and South Africa will save American influence for the League of Nations.

It is up to England—to the British Parliament, for argument in America will avail nothing. Blaming Ulster will not suffice. Explaining the position of the Church will hardly help. If there is to be co-operation among the English-speaking peoples the Irish question must be settled.

Ireland should be counted among the English-speaking peoples; she should join in the common aspiration, reap the common rewards, and go forward to the same race destiny. The Celtic element in our blood is too deeply blended to allow an essential Celtic separation. We need the Irish in our business—all of us: British, Americans, Australians, South Africans, New Zealanders. And Ireland needs us—for terminal facilities, as it were! But we should have a free Ireland, as free as Canada or New Zealand.

And just now if the League of Nations is formed Ireland must be taken out of American politics. We have no interest as Americans in how the Irish question is settled. But, of course, it will not be settled until it is justly settled. And it should be justly settled even if it did not threaten the safety of the world.

For no nation, no people, no race movement such as that now apparently about to form “can long survive half slave and half free!” It is something more than the demagoguery of American politicians that stands in the path of our progress as an English-speaking group seeking to save the world to peace. It is a deep instinctive feeling that we should work together as free peoples; that there should be no unwilling members, no conscription of peoples. The Irish people must be our equals; if they feel that they have rights as a self-governing dominion such as Canada or Australia has, they must have it. Our whole reason for taking the mandate to serve the world as English-speaking people, is in our race freedom. And as we need Ireland, may an American venture to suggest that so we must make her free.

And there need be no fear that the common sense of Ireland will turn freedom into license. Sinn Fein and Irish separatism are the figurative exaggerations of an ardent people. Sinn Fein is an extreme expression of an extreme nationalism, provoked by extreme provocation. Between Sinn Fein and Ulster lies a compromise. And, if one may judge from a short stay in Ireland, one would feel that the time for compromise is ripe.

Bolsevik Soviets are organised all over Ireland waiting only for an out-break to rise. Unless there is a compromise with Sinn Fein, such as its conservative leaders can accept—and there is no doubt but they would like to let go of the tail of the bear—the uprising will come. But, given moderation, Ireland will function with the English-speaking peoples.

Ireland is too deeply embedded in the race movement of the English-speaking people to aspire seriously to leave the destiny of our group.

Ireland’s lot is with us, with America, with the British Colonies, with the United Kingdom. She will not “cut the painter.” But if she feels the need of it for her self-respect as a nation, she should stand as unhampered as the other British Dominions.

To give Ireland justice, Great Britain must be generous. Generosity for Great Britain is only justice for Ireland; but it is the price Great Britain must pay for the dominance of the English-speaking people. We have won the war for democracy; we must hold the peace for democracy.

After all, democracy is at bottom an obligation rather than a privilege, and Great Britain must take hers. The establishment of Ireland as one of the great Dominion democracies of the English-speaking peoples is right now the quick, full, generous price to be paid for the establishment of a world federation of democracies which shall bring mankind one day nearer its goal. That is the great need of this grave crisis.

William Allen White.

Oh for the love of…if that isn’t the biggest pile of horseshit I’ve ever seen in my life.

Man, you can tell in so many ways that White did not actually even write most of this, it’s as if he WROTE AROUND what he was told should be said. And could he have thrown in the Round Table slogan of English-speaking peoples any more times? I lost count at around a dozen.

I think perhaps the worst, the most disgusting (and said in so many ways) part of this article was the 100 percent BRITISH slavemaster attitude towards Ireland having independence. Thomas Jefferson would have annihilated this guy White on just that point alone, as being a total traitor to America.

There really is no two ways around it.

Next –

I’m going to pull out a number of items all by themselves now.

First of all, just what the heck is a “professional Irishman”? That sounds like total British propaganda and veiled hate-speech to me, as does this statement –

We have no interest as Americans in how the Irish question is settled.

We? What the holy-mother-of…right does White have to say we Americans, as if he speaks for all Americans. That’s just so ridiculously puerile in its attempt at loftiness I am reminded of this picture of King White.

We Americans…

We, my patootey. That’d be a big fat F U to White on that one.

Don’t fail to note that he has segregated any Americans of Irish descent as somehow not Americans with that statement as well, and let’s not overlook the totally British-and-only-British degradation of their fight for independence as “the Irish Question“. That’s just disgusting. Can you imagine what Americans today would think of…let’s say the American Revolution was right now…being referred to as “the American Question“?


As if it’s just a question to be “discussed” in polite company over brandy and cheroots after dinner, and then dismissed.

Next –

As promised, you can see from when I first mentioned this little Irish ‘visit’ of White’s, that he’s going to lay the blame of any failure of the League of Nations at Ireland’s feet.

If we fail, the League fails. And there is right now one serious obstacle before us. It is Ireland.

So, let me get this straight.

Senator Borah, who’s leading the opposition is not an American now, is he, Mr. White?

Of course he is, but notice the avoidance by White, just like in his autobiography, at even mentioning Borah’s name in this. What does he characterize it as?

The Republicans—who have recently turned tail-twisters…

No names. No specifics. Just “the Republicans” – as if every single Republican in Congress had the same views as Borah. Not all of them did, nor were there no Democrats who agreed with what he was pointing out. The final vote to cast down the League of Nations on 19 March, 1920 was 49-35, falling twenty votes short of a two-thirds majority needed for approval. Some Quite a view of those votes favoring casting it down were Democrats.

And by the way? The Brits, using the same favored propaganda published that Masterman often used – Eyre and Spottiswood – that this article of White’s is being published by, had already begun the preparations to agitate for WWII by publishing the Protocols of Zion nearly right on top of that final vote.

What does he position these Republicans-with-no-names as being, by where he positioned his sentences before that statement? Oh yes. This –

Irish discord is the one thing which will alienate America from Great Britain. Just now a strong anti-British current is running in American politics.

Oho. So it’s only and ALWAYS the Irish that have a strong-anti-British view, is it? Never mind India, China, Africa, Central America, Russia, the list goes on and on. Ah! But it’s all the Irish people’s fault.

That’s another Kermit moment right there, at White for even trying to float that particular boat.

Alright, now get a load of this repeated and re-worded same attitudes.

The Irish people must be our equals

But not so equal, only kind of equal…

if they feel that they have rights as a self-governing dominion

You Irish don’t get your own land to rule, you silly beasts! What are you thinking? You can’t be another America, sayeth White, No, you have to be a VASSAL of Britain. Because, well because you’re Irish.

And you don’t even wear the right clothes or pose properly, with your head cocked just so.

So there. I win.


we must make her free.

To be a vassal of Britain. Right. The next part must be read with the accompanying long-suffering sigh that White is putting out there –

But if she feels the need of it for her self-respect as a nation, she should stand as unhampered as the other British Dominions.

What the hell kind of effed up statement is that? There’s that word and idea again. A nation that…isn’t really a nation. It’s a DOMINION.

As in…dominated.

Word Root of dominion. The Latin word dominus, meaning “master,” gives us the root domin. Words from the Latin dominus have something to do with being another’s master. Dominion is controlling power, similar to the power of a master over others.

As in Slavemaster.

Which is another reason why we call the British and the Vatican that. Ok. Now watch this closely –

To give Ireland justice, Great Britain must be generous. Generosity for Great Britain is only justice for Ireland; but it is the price Great Britain must pay for the dominance of the English-speaking people. We have won the war for democracy; we must hold the peace for democracy.

There he goes with the WE again, only this time it’s either a Freudian slip or he didn’t write this, because he just said WE as in WE the British, not WE Americans.

Americans didn’t fight for democracy to be a DOMINION of Britain. We fought for INDEPENDENCE. Period. And we won. We certainly didn’t become an independent nation to help Britain stop others from becoming independent nations, that’s for damn sure.

I think that’s what should happen now. We should be backing anyone who wants to throw off the yoke of either the British or the Vatican slavemasters.

But that’s me.

Now watch this –

The establishment of Ireland as one of the great Dominion democracies of the English-speaking peoples is right now the quick, full, generous price to be paid.

– Conversation between England and Ireland –

Oh please. Mr Slavemaster. Can I please serve you as a dominion? Can I? Please…Please?

Sick. Sick. SICK!

We should also expect to see ye old Communist accusation trotted out – can’t let that go unsaid – and so we do.

Bolshevik Soviets are organised all over Ireland waiting only for an out-break to rise.

An outbreak? An outbreak of what? Not wanting to be one of Britain’s colonies or dominions? I think that was what is called a revolution, Mr. White. We had one here in America, where you supposedly are a citizen. Ever heard of it? There was this guy named Thomas Jefferson right in the forefront of it, ever heard of him?

We didn’t settle for “being a dominion” either.

Sheesh. I mean really. And then he has the gall to say:

…the anti-British sentiment implanted in American hearts by school histories of the iniquity of George III and watered by the old tales of Ireland’s wrongs.

Oh, man. That’s the only reason for Borah and the rest of the large number of Americans that were against British domination, because hey. We’re all implanted with false history.

Wrong. Dead wrong.

I’ve read for myself, firsthand, who did what, and if our school histories do anything today? They tend to marginalize and lower that true and very, very, magnificent story of what happened here in America.

And just how bitchy the Brits still are about it.

Last but not least, notice this statement.

  • Their game is this: they must defeat the League of Nations in the American Senate by proving to the American people that the League is a British device to rule the world.

Borah did prove that, using their own documents from the League of Nations to do it. Scroll up and look at his speech again where it starts: “I read from article 10 as an illustration” and you’ll see just what happened when they tried to get out of that the League of Nations was most definitely “a British device to rule the world.”

What’s interesting, is that this article of White’s is almost 4 months to the day after that speech and the British were obviously still trying to spin their way out of that trap Borah caught them in. They never did succeed.

Next –

To prove that, it becomes necessary to convince the Americans that Great Britain is a grasping oppressor of unwilling captive peoples

Which it most definitely was. China, anyone? How about India…MILLIONS of people were enslaved or even outright killed under British rule. Oppressor is right. And when is anyone a willing captive? That’s an oxymoron, not to mention some kind of deeply seated S&M fetishism in politics on the part of whoever came up with that lovely sentence there.

It wasn’t hard to ‘convince’ America – we had LIVED it. As has much of the rest of the world. No ‘convincing’ needed. White’s wording there is because he’s been told to treat the idea he stated, that Britain is a grasping oppressor etc., as if it’s only propaganda and not based in any factual experience.

Tricky, but no dice unless you’re down with being a total moron about British history.

One of my favorite statements of all –

The whole fabric of the plan to check the progress of humanity is based upon the fiction of England as the Cruel Step-mother.

England as the Cruella DeVille of the world?

I like it! But it’s not quite disgusting, corrupted and evil enough. I think this is better.

The Walking Dead – Tales from the Crypt

Much better. Maybe add a top hat and a monks robe to really complete the visual.

So…wow. That was White’s “Through American Eyes” article.

Why are we not surprised that the London Times then practically immediately turned around and reprinted his most significant statements on June 23, 1919 hailing it as “a striking article on the Irish Question in its bearings upon Anglo-American relations.

And White?

He sailed home with the determination, courtesy of John Buchan and his stable, to fight for ratification for the Versailles Treaty and for American entrance into the League of Nations as the only sane procedure for and get this…bringing about the beginning of a “new heaven and a new earth.”

White the hero for justice and humanity now, is it?

Not really.

But do you know what he’s been told there by the British, with that “new Heaven and new Earth” idea? It’s based on a declamatio story to end all declamatio stories about the “City of God” and the “City of Men” – as in ye old Priests and Kings rule the world idea of the Holy Roman Empire. As taken from the Nesilim.

Lionel Curtis of the Round Table and the Royal Institute for International Affairs would take that same slogan that White had just been fed and resurrected, expand and reword that in 1938 to “The Commonwealth of God” as being the goal of World War II – aka the United Nations. That is really a key thing to understand, and I go into it in full detail in my Borah article.

Suffice it to say that while White is now running around with stars-in-his-eyes over this “New Heaven” and “New Earth” idea he’s just been fed –

The truth about what’s really behind that idea is not exactly something to be awestruck about, more like in thrall. And that’s what White consistently makes such an oh-so-easy mark for. The man does basically spend his life trying to be in thrall to the slavemasters. He really is, unfortunately, a kind of real life Renfield to all of their Draculas.

In a dramatically titled chapter called “Through the Valley of the Shadow” he opens with:

“When I returned from Europe in 1919 the fight upon the League of Nations was raging. It was lead by “a group of irreconcilables” under Lodge.”


White specifically lied in his characterization that it was led by Lodge. The other author (White Biography) described the Irreconcilables as: 12 republicans and 3 Democrats, led by W.E. Borah, who as isolationists were opposed to ratification under any condition.”

Clearly White knew that, so it’s starting to get rather revealing that he repeatedly lies about this. I think it’s the slavemaster thing where they refuse to name the person who they most fear and who is giving them the most trouble.

Yep. They do it to my husband and I too.

Speaking of which, remember all that positioning of that it’s the IRISH that are the cause for any anti-British sentiments out there? Did you know they still use that same positioning even today, towards people who effectively expose them and challenge their hegemony?


Look at this edited screenshot of a comment we received back on 14 December 2015, to the first of my British Security Coordination library articles.

The exact same insults of Borah and people like him that White used. Communist and IRA (as in the Irish Republican Army fought for Irish independence from Britain).

I guess we’re in good company then to garner that level of double-insult.

Next –

White says that he felt that it was “his duty” under the auspices of the League of Nations Association to go out and make speeches favoring the adoption of the League. I paid my own expenses.

William Allen White’s America documents on p. 314 that he then tries to explain that purely on the basis that he paid his own expenses, this somehow therefore means he was not corrupt or working for the British.

Say what?

Man, that’s the third Kermit moment this man had scored. That’s gotta be a record. Him paying his own expenses is what he was told to do specifically so he could deny that he was “paid” to do it. Ask him if British intelligence had asked him to do all those speeches, and do everything else they asked of him, he’d have a slightly more difficult time getting out of that one.

But, with this guy? He would have tried anyway.

He also started writing editorials that carried the idea that basically anyone opposing the League is “endangering the peace of the world.”

Here’s another example of something he wrote:

“Americans must always read with pride that their president more than any other man in the world is responsible for giving the world its first draft of a real League of Nations…our American democracy may be honestly proud that it has raised up one who put into the hearts of all the world…the aspiration of our hearts for the coming of a peace of good will among men of good will.”

I already proved that was a lie (he’s referring to Wilson). He was NOT the source.

White repeated faithfully what House told him. That Wilson’s “greatest weakness,” he noted, “was his penchant for playing a lone game. He did not take advice well.”

Good doggie. Did what he was told, didn’t he.

Interesting note: He talks about meeting John D. Rockefeller Jr., heir to Standard Oil, at a conference and “becoming friends.”

In the other biography,  on p. 319 it notes that after Wilson returned from his Summer tour – the one where Borah dogged his every step discrediting the League of Nations (and do note: this author doesn’t mention Borah either) White is quoted as saying that there’s just some “Irish-Americans are saying Britain is trying to dominate the world” with no names.

White writes: “It is inconceivable that the League will be rejected…The stars in their course are with it…”

He sounds just like a character in the movie: The Princess Bride.

Last line in the clips: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Same for White here.


So much for that idea.

When the League of Nations was shot down and was deader than dead, White wrote that he felt “very disillusioned and defeated”. Yet again, he still doesn’t mention Borah’s leading role in that.

In the autobiography, something else strange to note here. His son takes over writing about his last two decades, effectively leaving no real record of just how far in bed with British intelligence this man really was, all the way up to and through WWII.

But, never fear. Between the other biography and my own research?

I’ll fill in the rest.

Let’s start with White’s trying to offset Borah regarding the issue of Freedom of Speech. This is a particularly onerous, or should I say odorous area of White’s history, that is often repeated with near reverence even by mid-west school children today. That…makes me angry, because it’s so misleading, and just so wrong to do our own sick version of lampado trado (passing of the ‘torch’) laying in lies in generations of American children.

It needs to stop.

I’m hoping to help set that in motion by putting things into a larger perspective here. One that as far as I can tell is conveniently left out to children, high-school and college students alike.

In my Borah article, I go quite deeply into the actual history of what we know today as the ACLU. It was nothing but yet another front group for British Intelligence, redefining our “civil liberties” on the British model, and specifically using folk songs as a cover (Walter Fuller).

But this went even deeper than that, and a whole lot higher in the hierarchy of the Slavemasters.

When the American Legion asked him to compose an editorial on “Constitutional Morality” in June 1921, Borah’s piece argued that “the most vital problem in American politics at the present time is the preservation of the great guarantees of civil liberty, found in our constitution and so long supposed to be secure and indispensable.

Borah’s editorial also attacked the behavior of “the political pharisees – the man who is always professing great devotion to the Constitution and always betraying it, or disregarding it,” and who is:

“constantly expressing the fear that the people may have their minds poisoned by false doctrines; hence the necessity of censoring the press and circumscribing public meetings and arbitrarily punishing men for expressing ‘dangerous’ views.

Beware of Democracy’s False Friends by William E. Borah, United States Senator from Idaho; The American Legion Weekly [Volume 3, No. 26 (July 1, 1921)]

Immediately following that we something interesting happening at the ACLU.

1921 and 1922 –

At the suggestion of Felix Frankfurter of Harvard, the American Civil Liberties Union decided to ask William Allen White to serve on the national committee of that organization. Frankfurter, William Z. Foster, who was seated as fraternal delegate to the unlawful Communist convention at Bridgman, Mich.; Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Crystal Eastman, Roger N. Baldwin, Morris Hillquit, Scott Nearing and many other radicals, some of them Communists, are members of the national committee of this organization; and White’s defiance of his friend, Governor Allen, in the 1922 coal strike troubles in Kansas was the recommendation for White’s availability as a committeeman.

– Chapter 7 of a book written in 1924 called REDS IN AMERICA, – a propaganda book, but as usual it does contain some kernels of truth.

In a further attempt to try and re-position himself and his masters as not being who Borah was talking about (when he was), in the summer of 1922 White wrote and published “To An Anxious Friend.” A statement for free speech, it earned him the 1923 Pulitzer Prize. (Which ‘prize’ of course, was controlled by his masters.)

To an Anxious Friend
Published in The Emporia Gazette July 27, 1922.

You tell me that law is above freedom of utterance. And I reply that you can have no wise laws nor free entertainment of wise laws unless there is free expression of the wisdom of the people – and, alas, their folly with it. But if there is freedom, folly will die of its own poison, and the wisdom will survive. That is the history of the race. It is proof of man’s kinship with God. You say that freedom of utterance is not for time of stress, and I reply with the sad truth that only in time of stress is freedom of utterance in danger. No one questions it in calm days, because it is not needed. And the reverse is true also; only when free utterance is suppressed is it needed, and when it is needed, it is most vital to justice.

Peace is good. But if you are interested in peace through force and without free discussion – that is to say, free utterance decently and in order-your interest in justice is slight. And peace without justice is tyranny, no matter how you may sugarcoat it with expedience. This state today is in more danger from suppression than from violence, because, in the end, suppression leads to violence. Violence, indeed, is the child of suppression. Whoever pleads for justice helps to keep the peace; and whoever tramples on the plea for justice temperately made in the name of peace only outrages peace and kills something fine in the heart of man which God put there when we got our manhood. When that is killed, brute meets brute on each side of the line.

So, dear friend, put fear out of your heart. This nation will survive, this state will prosper, the orderly business of life will go forward if only men can speak in whatever way given them to utter what their hearts hold – by voice, by posted card, by letter, or by press. Reason has never failed men. Only force and repression have made the wrecks in the world.

Here’s a man though, White, who had informally advised and socialized with every US president from Theodore Roosevelt to Franklin Roosevelt, all the while remaining at his post at the Gazette – on call to write whatever they wanted him to write.

He not only supported the first World War (and attacked on command by Masterman’s crew, anyone who opposed it) but he did the same thing again in World War II, at William Stephenson’s command.

And yet he talks about force and suppression as if it’s something he is against, stands there and says “I’m for free speech.”

No he wasn’t.

He supported, completely at the beck-and-call of, people who have done nothing but try and suppress the most necessary free speech there is both then and now. The kind that exposes him and who he worked for.

The kind that you’re reading right here, right now. Do you seriously think White would be for what I am exposing here? Or would he devolve and try to destroy my life, and the lives of anyone who might be supportive of me while shouting racist epithets at me and how I’m ‘unfit’ so that my kind of free speech somehow doesn’t seem to be around any more.

Yes. That’s the kind of man that he was behind that mask he specifically said that he wore.

Next, we see White being so full of himself that he tried to run for Governor of Kansas in 1924. Making his platform, and get this, anti-racism! (using the Klu Klux Klan, of all things).

This, from one of the most racist men I have ever seen, as we have already well covered. Just as hypocritical as what he had just tried to position him as with ‘free speech’.

We’re seeing a trend here with that…

Next, we see White being given a dang Law Degree, together with Albert Einstein by Harvard University in 1935. Isn’t that about the worst thing you ever heard of? It really shows how utterly useless Harvard is as an educational standard. It seems it’s more of a coffee-clutch for slavemasters to bestow ‘prestige’ in their little Alice-in-Wonderland world of imaginary self importance. (see what a Harvard education actually is)

Please note: from here on out all page notations, unless otherwise noted, are from William Allen White’s America.

p. 516 –

On September 26, 1939, Clark Eichelberger director of the League of Nations Association (that White was on the board of) and the Union for Concerted Peace Efforts – called White from New York and asked him to head a committee which would explain to the public the need for supporting Roosevelt’s cash-and-carry law. Clark’s other front group for the British, the Union for Concerted Peace Efforts, also asked White to head the Non-Partisan Committee for Peace through Revision of the Neutrality Law.

Cordell Hull was who recommended him.

The new generation of British intelligence knew White’s number, they started right out schmoozing him by saying (excerpted) “We knew that around your name would rally a large number of people…would recognize in your leadership the answer to their difficulties.

Yep. He’s still full of himself all right.

The pompous frack even had himself pictured wearing a goddamn British monacle for godssakes!

Even President Roosevelt, on orders from the British, joined into the schmooze-fest of White, writing:

I need a few helpful thoughts from the philosopher of Emporia. Things move with such terrific speed these days that it really is essential to us to think in broader terms and, in effect, to warn the American people that they, too, should think of possible ultimate results in Europe and the Far East.

President Roosevelt to White, 1939.

By October 15, 1939 White was in New York doing a talk over CBS called: “The Hour is Striking” and starts doing his Ohmigod I’m so wonderful! routine to himself again.

This was the first time I had ever had hold of a lever that controlled a national current,” White confided to his readers on November 6. “It was interesting but scary!” – positioning himself like he was Dorothy and the public was the scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz or something, or like Wiley Coyote trying to look innocent.

This isn’t Kansas anymore?


This was arranged by Tweedsmuir through Thomas Lamont. I say that for several reasons. One of which is that just five days after he does this, guess who arrives to New York to stay at Lamont’s house?

John Buchan – Lord Tweedsmuir.

Now things get very ugly.

Tweedsmuir wanted to establish a confidential group of Americans to keep a “watching brief” for Britain. He explained to the Information Minister, in a late October 1939 letter, that “few Englishmen know all sides of American life.

A ‘watching brief’.

What a damn euphemism for turning Americans into traitors to their own country and spying for the British.

The Watching Brief

Tweedsmuir felt strongly that Britain needed to be fully cognizant of all elements that could influence political decisions. Lord Lothian, then in Washington D.C. as ambassador, agreed with him. That’s the climate in which this visit to NYC was planned.

Note: All elements, would come to include a still young L. Ron Hubbard who was in New York at the time, and shortly after this visit and would soon be elevated by being asked to join the prestigious Explorer’s Club. (See John Buchan – Perhaps Another Link In the British Intelligence Grooming of A Young L. Ron Hubbard )

This ‘watching brief’ group that Tweedsmuir had in mind that would be exactly what William Stephenson would later even more fully enact after Tweedsmuirs death in February 1940the exact month that L. Ron Hubbard became an official member of the Explorer’s club, oddly enough.

But…to begin Tweedsmuir’s plan, there were a few hurdles to overcome.

Travel to the U.S. required the Kings permission, once he secured that the Department of External affairs released a notice to the press on Saturday October 14: “The Governor-General, acting on medical advice, proposes to go to New York on October 19th for special treatment. He hopes to return to Canada on October 25th.

The Under-Secretary of State for External Affairs, Dr. O.D. Skelton told the Canadian minister in Washington that the press release was issued “to avert the possibility of any political interpretation being given to the visit.

Tweedsmuir arrived to New York on October 20th.

He and his wife were staying at Thomas Lamont’s house who had “first met John Buchan in 1917 in London.” – the same time that William Allen White originally hooked up with both of them.

Their network of common friends was a useful one at this juncture, and included Lord Lothian, Buchan’s old professor Gilbert Murray, Lord Robert Cecil and the American journalist William Allen White.

John Buchan: Model Governor General by J. William Galbraith

During his stay, Lothian and Tweedsmuir met and discussed the ‘watcher brief’ plan, with Lothian telling Tweedsmuir that he had already executed a similar plan by using British consuls around the U.S. to set up local committees to “act as information bureaux.


This is why Lothian had hired John Wheeler-Bennett (another Round Table man), a well-connected Englishman teaching at universities in the States, as his personal assistant and instructed him to travel widely. He was establishing these committees for Lothian. “I want you to be my eyes and ears,” he wrote, “{b}etween us we know a great many people in America and we can use them to make further contacts.”

Tweedsmuir met with John D. Rockefeller, journalists (including staff of the New York Times such as Elmer Davis), President of Harvard Dr. James Conant and Genville Clark who was on his proposed list of eleven men to keep this “watching brief” for the British government. (Clark was also on the board of Harvard).

William Allen White was one of the people on his list.
John Buchan: Model Governor General by J. William Galbraith

He was now part of what actually was a ‘fifth column‘ of the British within the United States, showing yet again what a traitor this man was.

Tweedsmuir, somewhat Lothian’s superior, was well satisfied with his visit when he left at the end of October. He felt certain that that Lothian would be in touch “with every class” in America and informed Information Minister Macmillian the British government would be “properly fed with the right kind of ‘dope.’

If you look at what Philip Kerr (Lord Lothian) wrote to Lord Halifax on 14th December, 1939, it becomes very interesting in light of the later dual propaganda activities of the BSC and Stephenson, and what White was being asked to do with this “national current” as he put it.

Lord Lothian wrote to Halifax: “American opinion is still… almost unanimously anti-Nazi.”

So…what’s the problem then? There is no division, no conflict within America – that’s what.

We were also still anti-British, is why this was a problem.

And Lothian stated that:

“There are formidable elements which are definitely anti-British which take every opportunity to misrepresent our motives and attack our methods….”



Good god, as if that was even possible with these double-dealing swine.

Wretched, indeed, is the nation in whose affairs foreign powers are once permitted to intermeddle.

— Thomas Jefferson To B. Vaughan. ii, 167.

Lothian continues, showing they feel they need to get control of the press, and shows his nasty little bigoted view of that it needs to be through “important” and “high class” American correspondents.

“I have no doubt that the best corrective is the fullest possible publicity from England and France through the important and high class American correspondents of what the Allies are thinking and doing.”

It should not be lost on you that he’s talking about William Allen White here, as one of those “high class” propagandists of theirs.

Things roll along until Tweedsmuir died in February 1940…enter William Stephenson.

He was a self-made millionaire and had been selected to be the British Passport Control Officer (PCO) in New York city, and his first assignment was a stealth one – he was sent on a Winston Churchill sanctioned reconnaissance mission to the U.S. in April of 1940 where he met with J. Edgar HooverJ edgar hoover to “make a deal” so that they could create and operate a British spy network in the U.S. with FBI approval (more on that later).

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is supposed to find foreign agents in America and arrest them. The Director of the FBI was J. Edgar Hoover. In April 1940, Stephenson met with J. Edgar Hoover to “make a deal” so that they could operate a British spy network in the U.S. with FBI approval.

At the time, Hoover was under strict injunction from the State Dept. to refrain from collaboration with the British. He told Stephenson that he needed a Presidential sanction. Stephenson arranged for one of his buddies close to President Roosevelt, to get approval from the President. President Roosevelt endorsed it enthusiastically saying: “There should be the closest possible marriage between the FBI and British Intelligence.

President Franklin Roosevelt and J. Edgar Hoover betrayed America by allowing Stephenson to operate a British intelligence network in America.

J_Edgar_HooverJ. Edgar Hoover

That’s not all Stephenson did while he was in New York.

He activated Tweedsmuir’s list.

He told Eichelberger to get White and form up a new Committee along the lines of what Lord Lothian was talking about – trying to get us off our anti-British position by pushing the angle of merely helping the British. Tricky, see.

So, the next month, May of 1940, White again hurried to New York City where he and Eichelberger laid the plans for a new committee, all about helping Britain. He attended a luncheon with Frederich Coudert, the sponsor of what was basically a fund-raiser for the committee.

One such connection was developed by William Allen White, the nationally prominent Kansas journalist, who was one of the individuals on Tweedsmuir’s list. In May of 1940, White and another colleague, Clark Eichelberger formed a “Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies” establishing over three hundred branches throughout the United States within the first two months and actively promoting as much assistance to Britain as possible.

John Buchan: Model Governor General by J. William Galbraith

One of the first members of White’s Committee was Thomas Lamont, another one of Tweedsmuir’s friends to first join the committee had an even more sinister connection – Lewis Douglas, former principal of McGill University in Montreal, who had left at the end of 1939 to return to the United States. Experiments under the cover of war-time were already going on at McGill, little known to most historians. But, when Ewen Cameron arrived things really got going. Boy, did they.

Back to Stephenson again briefly now –

Once he had reported back to London, he was then briefed and prepared for his next mission during over the next month, and then was sent back to the U.S. in a more official capacity. He arrived aboard the SS Britannic on 11 June, 1940 with John Arthur Reed Pepper (his SIS man) and family in tow.

(click to enlarge)

“The role of the PCO was, of course, a rather transparent cover for the local representative of the Secret Intelligence service (SIS).

– Introduction by Nigel West; BRITISH SECURITY COORDINATION, The Secret History of British Intelligence in the Americas, 1940- 1945 first published in Great Britian by St. Ermin’s Press – 1998

Now the ‘fun’ begins. The sick, twisted kind of ‘fun’ of the British. I’m going to cover all that far more extensively in my article: British Security Coordination Part VI: America Mine but for the purposes of this article about White we need to fill in the items that revolved around him.

Starting with –

Father Coughlin – the Catholic undercover attack shill – just three days after Stephenson arrived drummed up attention for this new committee by using negative press. This was one of the tactics that would get repeatedly used. Masterman had used it during his career in Parliament to keep (or put) public attention on a particular issue that it was wanted on.

Coughlin The Catholic Agitator

Doing his job, Coughlin commented that Coudert was behind this committee in Social Justice of June 24, 1940 and called it a “fifth column”.

Which is both true and false at the same time.

Fifth column, oh yes, definitely. But saying Coudert is behind it is a total misdirection. He’s a flunky, not a master.

It was the Tweedsmuir/Vansittart network of the British foreign office that was behind this.

Also contrary to some people’s accounts out there, White was an active chairman of this committee and played a decisive role in the formation of its policy. The committee was announced on May 20 to the nation.

What was it’s name again?

Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies

Now that Stephenson was there, White established over three hundred branches within the first two months. (John Buchan: Model Governor General by J. William Galbraith)

The Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies launched a massive propaganda campaign to mobilize the American public, including utilizing the President as a willing puppet.

Example – President Roosevelt’s ridiculously LYING speech delivered on December 29, 1940. At around 2:22 is when he uses the slogan “arsenal for democracy”.

Meanwhile, propaganda films began to be generated about “Hitlers Plans”, like this one –

Apparently, sometime in 1940, someone at the British Ministry of Information sought a direct telephone link with the Committee, but was dissuaded by the ambassador, Lord Lothian who said:

It would be most disastrous to the William Allen White Committee were it ever to be established that it was communicating and collaborating with any branch of His Majesty’s Government.

I haven’t fully verified that quote yet, but it sounds like something Lothian would definitely say.

The Committee’s offices were at 8 West 40th Street, New York City. That building was home to other British intelligence fronts like Eichelberger’s League of Nations Association, Sandy Griffith’s Market Analysts Inc. which sponsored opinion polls.

The building is between 5th and 6th avenues.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Guess who else previously had an office at that same building in 1916?

Nikola Tesla – pictured in his office at 8 West 40th Street

White even created his own news service in August of 1940 called the William Allen White News Service headed by John Balderston. It was based in exactly the same building as William Stephenson and the BSC (as well as a number of other British fronts). Why are we not surprised…

Early in August they “descended on Washington”, as Ross puts it, “to overcome the ‘lethargy’ of the President” . Mr. Miller induced John Balderston to come from Hollywood to New York to issue a confidential ‘wire letter’ twice a week to fifty newspapers, known as the ‘William Allen White news service’ (cf pp 452, 457-9) .

– Porter Sargent Getting US into the War (1941); p. 81

“Descending on Washington”

image from here

The Committee also acted as cutout for the BSC, sponsoring propaganda broadcasts on radio station WRUL. For example, Frederick C. McKee (Treasurer) ‘requested’ – which means Stephenson requested –  shortwave radio broadcasts from France aired on Station WRUL in Boston. (You can read all about the BSC and WRUL in my BSC Compendium Part V)

Here’s another example (May 1, 1941).

Radio, polls, slanted news releases…such busy little beavers the British and their sycophants were.

Then came posters, posters and more posters, spread as far and wide as possible.

The Only Way We Can Save Her [Democracy]: American cartoon, 1939, by Carey Orr against U.S. intervention in European wars.

Looking at all that unbelievably bogus propaganda, reminds me of the line out of the opening to The Fellowship of the Ring.

But they were all of them deceived.

I’m sure that was the desired effect of this massive campaign by the British.

But not everyone was fooled.

I’d like to show you some standout examples of that. The first is, remember Herbert Hoover and how he had so frightened White by telling him the truth of the way the British really acted, were really like, at that luncheon during WWI? Yea. Him.

Listen to what he has to say.

Herbert Hoover – 1939

Broadcast July 6, 1939 – urging U.S. Neutrality in the European conflicts.

Broadcast September 1, 1939 – the day of the staged ‘invasion’ of Poland by Hitler.

Now check out this amazing broadcast by Indiana Senator Raymond E. Willis “Speaking Against The Lend Lease Bill” on February 24, 1941. He talks of House Bill 1776 – 96 senators holding a council of war and that thousands of letters are coming into him running around 20k to 100 pleading with him to not let our men be sent to die in another useless war.

Now, in William Allen White’s America (p 543) an entry for December 10, 1940 shows that White is consulting with Thomas Lamont about the Century Club group that had maintained a headquarters in New York under Francis P. Miller, author and organization director of study groups formed by the CFR, sometimes called the Miller group.

They were pushing overtly for the U.S. to go to War and White didn’t agree. He threatened Lamont with relinquishing his position, and then 10 days later Coudert tells him that the Scripps-Howard chain was planning to launch an attack on White’s Committee. He writes a letter which is published that he is opposed to war, that gets him into more trouble, supposedly.

In Fact magazine, George Seldes (in the November 4 issue of 1940) wrote that the William Allen White Committee was the FIRST to advertise for America to enter the war.

Incidentally, later that month White was in Chicago celebrating Armistice Day (November 18) and giving a speech.

Elsa Maxwell and William Allen White (far right) speak at Armistice Day ceremony of the Chicago Chapter of the Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies

White did resign December 26, 1940, and when he went back home he told his readers that “the job was too big…he wanted to celebrate his 73rd birthday in peace” etc.

But he did not stop propagandizing and doing what they wanted, and as to all that horespuckey about being opposed to war? No he was NOT.

I think he just said that, and they staged that whole thing so he could keep his cover and go out a ‘hero’ to those Americans in the mid-west that we just saw the Senator from Indiana saying were hugely against the war.

Yep. That sounds like something White would do.

By the time the summer of 1941 came, White’s Committee (without White now, theoretically) was doing even more over-the-top propaganda, especially using British agent Lindbergh as representative of all Americans who are against fighting another war for Britain.

They even staged “burying” of stuffed ostrich heads in the sand to represent Senator Wheeler and Charles Lindbergh (and the isolationists) as this photograph dated July 31, 1941 shows.

The press caption read, “Wheeler and Lindbergh Denounced at Rally in New York City: Edgar Ansel Mowrer (left), freign correspondentand radio news commentator, joins with New York Supreme Justice Ferdinand Pecora and actress Tallulah Bankhead in burying in the sands of Oriental Beach the heads of two stuffed ostriches labeled Wheeler and Lindbergh at a rally of the Committee to Defend America today. Justice Pecora called Senator Birton K. Wheeler and Charles Lindbergh, the non-inteventionists whom the stuffed birds represented. ‘Wheelbergs abusing their freedom so speech.’ Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox, in a message sent to the rally, commended the Committee for its work to ‘awaken the people of this country to the perils which confront them.’ In the backgound at the extreme right right is Herbert Byard Swope who was a speaker at the rally.”

Look closer at the kids expression at what these people are doing. Sometimes it really is true.

A picture is worth a thousand words.

What is wrong with you people? comes through loud and clear. That would have been my expression too.

With the bombing of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese the Committee to Defend America acknowledged that its work had come to an end, and was dissolved for all practical purposes in January 1942. (the official cessation was in October 1942)

Committee members agreed, though, that there was still work to be accomplished, specifically to prepare the United States for push for the League of Nations next incarnation – which was the main point of this war, forcing American to do what the Brits and Vatican wanted – this time. So, the Committee to Defend America joined with the Council for Democracy to form Citizens for Victory: To Win the War, To Win the Peace. Nobody really listened much to it though, and it wasn’t very active.

On p. 556 of White’s autobiography he blamed the American people and Congress for Pearl Harbor. The day after he wrote a long editorial:

So when Japan attacked the United States, Japan proved to the various Quislings in this country….how deeply, deadly wrong they had been. They kept calling warmonger to those who were frantically trying to keep us out of war by helping other democracies in their struggle…This is the new order which Americans must set up and police for a hundred years if peace shall come to men of good will….The dictators, not we, have led us into this war….Those who cast those appeasing Quisling votes are more directly responsible for this war today than any other one force in American politics…”

Let me fill you in a little more on just how disgusting White’s blame there is.

Senator Borah had read Sidney Rogerson’s 1938 book called Propaganda in the Next War. One of the plots to get America to go to war to achieve Britains ‘Commonwealth of God” for them was one you might recognize. I didn’t tell you about this one yet. Know what Rogerson said would ‘might’ and ‘probably would work’?


It will need a definite threat to America, a threat, moreover, which will have to be brought home by propaganda to every citizen, before the Republic will again take arms in an external quarrel. The position will naturally be considerably eased if Japan were involved and this might and probably would bring America in without further ado.

When Borah read that? He said in an interview (1938) –

The United States is getting worked up over the prospect of war. I’m not. You are a young man as compared to me and neither of us will live to see the day when the United states is invaded. With the Atlantic on one side and the vast Pacific on the other we are safe. It would be folly from a military standpoint, for another country to try to invade us and they know it.

And what did the slavemasters ORDER Japan to do in December 1941 after Borah died?

Pearl Harbor.

And they brought his name up specifically, even though he was dead, as WRONG, WRONG WRONG! about that being fake too.

He wasn’t wrong about that either. President Roosevelt knew about that it was going to happen ahead of time and the sick fuck coward that he was, he allowed it just to make sure that America was forced into this war.

Miles Copeland CIA agent – The Game Player.

Page images –

pearl harbor was intentional and choosing the new 'enemy' - Game Player by Miles Copeland-3

It prompted him to tell of a meeting which the new intelligence chief, Admiral Sidney Souers, had just had with President Truman.

Truman and souers

When Sauers told the President that the new centralized intelligence unit he was organizing would see that there would never be another ‘Pearl Harbor’, the President replied, ‘You haven’t yet had your Top Secret briefing or you’d know that a bit of code-breaking had told us all about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance. What President Roosevelt needed was intelligence bearing on the question of what he should do about it.’

President Roosevelt got the intelligence, and he decided to let the Pearl Harbor attack happen as a way of arousing an otherwise apathetic populace.

They let Pearl Harbor happen intentionally (which smacks of arranging it, if you ask me) and then used it to further the same “war” that they had arranged in the first place!

.Pearl Harbor Headlines - Propaganda

.pearl harbor 4

avenge-pearl-harbor-2   remember-pearl-harbor-3

William Allen White was trotted out again in February 28, 1941 to blame Borah (and any other Americans who agreed) for Pearl Harbor – for having not allowed the League of Nations to go through in 1919.

On page 16 of The Milwaukee Journal – Feb 28, 1941 as I said in the beginning of this article, is probably one of the most representative quotes ever for White (besides this one from very early in his career: “Only Anglo-Saxons can govern themselves.“) would be this:

Would it not have been cheaper, 20 years ago… to have taken our place in the League of Nations…?

That quote is followed by an unbelievable pile of lies that has no source named. It is clearly a product of Stephenson’s BSC and his pet Rhodes Scholar Elmer Davis. Elmer, throughout the war, was basically in charge of telling the American media what to say (that British intelligence wanted them to) and what not to say.

So when you read the below, understand just who it is that is writing this.

“The League of Nations was not defeated on its merits, but because it was championed by Wilson and by the Democratic Party. That will be clear to anyone who studies the testimony of men who led the movement to defeat it. The campaign was deliberate and sinuous, as revealed in the book of the late Henry Cabot Lodge. In it the representatives of privilege were joined with men known as “progressives” who either were isolationists or for one reason or another opposed President Wilson.

The campaign against the league was financed by leaders of Big Business, as testified by the late George Harvey in his life of H.C. Frick. The money of Andrew Mellon and Henry Frick, the votes of Borah and Lodge, Penrose and Harding defeated the league. With that defeat the world lost the possibilities for peace which our weight in international councils for the adjustment of wrongs would have assured.

…But has it [America] really learned the lesson Mr. White expresses so simply?”

What do we take away from this?

  • we deserve WWII because of not doing the league of nations
  • the league of nations was not defeated on its merits –
  • it was “big business” Frick and Carnegie mounting a sinuous conspiracy by paying Senators La Follette and Borah etc to campaign against the league

If you read my entire article about Borah, that’s just so blatantly false it’s off the charts!

The article ends with a threat –

Without some kind of world economic union of understanding, we merely prepare the way for another war?

The BSC actually made that a kind of a slogan. A threat as a slogan. Seems fitting to the character of these people somehow. I believe some call that fascism.

Let’s take a little final overview here of a few things.

Final Overview

Freedom redefined

 “Only Anglo-Saxons can govern themselves.

In 1907, on the eve of the second Hague conference for the limitation of armaments, Henry White, sent by William Allen White’s then hero, President Theodore Roosevelt, to London to see Balfour – engaged with him in the following conversation as recorded by Allan Nevins in “Henry White, Thirty Years of American Diplomacy”.

Balfour (somewhat lightly): “We are probably fools not to find a reason for declaring war on Germany before she builds too many ships and takes away our trade.”

White: “You are a very high-minded man in private life. How can you possibly contemplate anything so politically immoral as provoking a war against a harmless nation which has as good right to a navy as you have? If you wish to compete with German trade, work harder.”

Balfour: “That would mean lowering our standard of living. Perhaps it would be simpler for us to have a war.”

White: “I am shocked that you of all men should enunciate such principles.”

Balfour (again lightly): “Is it a question of right or wrong? Maybe it is just a question of keeping our supremacy.”

Keeping our supremacy.


God ….has erected your seat upon a high hill or sanctuary and put into your hands the balance of power and justice to poise and counterpoise at your will the actions and counsels of all the Christian Kingdoms of your time.

Rule taken away from them, power taken away from the nobility, was not something the British were too fond of as an idea. So, starting as far back as the 1800’s, together with the Vatican, they had invented (and supported) many shadow-subjects that were along these lines, such as communism, socialism, and so on.

What all of those really are is a covert attack on a true Republican democracy like Thomas Jefferson had envisioned.

So, after having fed a perverted form of this called communism into Russia during WWI (which conveniently, anyone trying to gain independence from the British psychotic mold for the world, were then called communists and nationalists) the Brits happily supported Hitler to, as Porter Sargent put it – ‘save the world from communism“.

In a world of ‘communism’ as the British nobility and Vatican saw it (and invented the subject as a controlled opposition) there is a rather large problem for their hegemony.

You can see it very clearly if you narrow your focus to this part of the 1907 discussion between Henry White and Lord Balfour – where you can see that already there in time, Britain (the nobility) was becoming concerned at losing it’s ‘hold’ on the world.

White: “…If you wish to compete with German trade, work harder.

Balfour:That would mean lowering our standard of living. Perhaps it would be simpler for us to have a war.”


We don’t want to lower ourselves and work like ‘common’ people.

The world under natural rule of true democracy and freedom, or as they degraded it by calling it communism, would not so easily allow for the British and Vatican’s vulturous activities.

William Allen White revealed something interesting in that hack job article that he was asked to do by the Round Table men in June of 1919, when the British were trying to force a League of Nations on America. In Borah’s Senate Speech, February 21, 1919, that we already went into in some detail earlier, has a very interesting point we should look at again before I show you what I’m talking about from the White article.

Borah was quoting from Article 10 of the League of Nations charter: “The high contracting parties shall undertake to respect and preserve as against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence of all States members of the league.” He correctly ascertained that what this meant was that we, America, would have to use our money, our military, and our people to protect whatever the League voted that we needed to do.

Borah noted that in this League, the British Empire (through its dominions) would essentially constitute 5 votes to America’s 1 in any issue.

In case of any such aggression or in case of any threat or danger of such aggression the executive council shall advise upon the means by which the obligation shall be fulfilled.
[quoting League of Nations document]

Borah asked: Does that mean what it says, and is it to be executed in accordance with its plain terms?

And then correctly noted:

If the territorial integrity of any part of the British Empire shall be threatened not the Congress of the United States, not the people of the United States, not the Government of the United States determines what shall be done, but the executive council of which the American people have one member.

We, if we mean what we say in this constitution, are pledging ourselves, our honor, our sacred lives, to the preservation of the territorial possessions [British possessions] the world over and not leaving it to the judgment and sense of the American people but to the diplomats of Europe.

In essence, Britain (and the Vatican lurking behind them as usual) wanted to use America to control their slave-states (and help create new ones) on their command.

What was the real reason why?

It’s right there in that conversation.

Besides effectively eliminating America as a rival commercially, they could kill two birds with one stone and also then having us to go around whomping the world into submission as GOOD LITTLE SLAVES doing all the work so that the Brits and the Vatican can then…what?

White spills the beans –

The hope of the world is an intelligent, sympathetic understanding among the English-speaking people that they will work together to keep the peace. …The people who will most profit by peace…by establishing…international adjustments in the world—in short, by “peace on earth among men of good will,” are the men of the English-speaking countries.

The English-speaking people…can trade better than they can fight their way into domination.

From the point of view of gaining economic influence inside any border or of securing political advantage for the English-speaking races to-day with their equipment of ships and machines and their trading instinct, it is vastly better to treat and trade than to fight.

…the League of Nations…does afford to the trader of the world a sure protection in his international trade—such a protection as never surrounded commerce before.

Under the League of Nations “the whole world loves” a trader, and we, the English-speaking nations, by ancient breeding, by reason of our vast natural resources, all carefully tucked away in absolutely undisputed boundaries, by our far and yet even advance in economic, industrial, social and political evolution, are the world’s traders.

To restate this: we English-speaking people, bred of an old strain, all mixed and set—the Saxons, the Celts and the Northmen—face no danger of our stock degenerating through a native cross in any new colony, for we are firmly planted near every people who are rising in the economic scale, whether in Africa,. Asia, South America, Eastern Europe, or the islands of the sea. And thus we are planted near these natural markets for the wares of an advanced civilisation

– Whites ordered trip to Ireland produced the article “Through American Eyes” for the British weekly review the New Europe, on June 19, 1919. (Volume 11 pages 223-227). This article was all part of Charles Masterman’s propaganda efforts. The New Europe first issue came out on Oct. 19, 1916, it was published by Eyre and Spottiswood. I tracked down volume 11 at Hathi trust, where White’s article was, on p. 223.

My god.

Do you see it?

They sit like creepy vulture vampires or some sort of horrifying kind of parasite out of the Alien movies, watching out for (and over) what everyone else produces or makes in their own countries, just waiting to swoop down and TAKE it and we call that…’trade’.

When you have been identified as White put it, as “rising in the economic scale”, they begin with spies and propaganda resulting in a coup to take over your government, they kill any people who disagree along the way, then they take all your stuff for our own personal profits.

That’s what we call ‘trade’

Note: I would say this is a humorous note, but it’s far too horrifyingly accurate for such a simple characterization. But I did want to point out that Trader sounds an awful lot phonetically like Traitor – and works quite well either way in Thomas Jefferson’s so accurate characterization of them as Hostis Humani GenerisTraitor to the human race aka Trader to the human race. So devilishly accurate and undeniable, one wonders if Jefferson had that in mind as well.

This is also why I call them skekses (the vulturous creatures from the movie: Dark Crystal).

The bottom line is that these people don’t want to work or produce anything like those ‘common’ people. They want to take it from them and trade it and profit by it and then sit around acting like they are superior in so doing.

Wow. Is that an incredible insight or what? If I do say so myself, I’m quite pleased with bringing all that together for everyone to see so easily now.

Ok, so that’s the real strategy, that’s the real concern.

Now let’s fast forward three decades or so and let’s take a look at some production statistics for just Germany.

In 1939 Germany had a population of 80 million with a workforce of 41 million. Britain had a population of 46 million with less than half Germany’s workforce. Germany’s total income at market prices was £7,260 million compared to Britain’s £5,242 million.

Begin to see the problem?

White’s racist statements favoring Anglo-Saxons did not change at all in the intervening 40 years or so when he locksteps into the slavemasters vulturous agenda once again.

Oh Mr. White…We need you now.

Yes, Master.

I can see it. A New Heaven and a New Earth is once again within our grasp…

This why, among other things that White made sure to get himself all prominent in supporting, you see him supporting Clarence Streit’s Union Now.

Union Now!

Judging by press releases of the past few months and public utterances of government officials in high places, the movement has gained such headway as to receive official sanction and advocacy,” stated Senate Document #182, April 15, 1940 discussing Clarence K. Streit’s proposal for a British-American Union.

Changing conditions and the elimination of many once ‘democracies’ caused the Streit Plan to be quickly remodeled, just as the White Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies dropped all reference to ‘Allies’ after Great Britain’s heroic withdrawal of her troops from the Low Countries and France . With eight of the original fifteen now hanging in a state of suspension, Streit proposed “that the United States Government invite the British democracies to sign another Declaration-this time a joint Declaration of Interdependence (Rotarian, Oct. 1940)

William Allen White gave Streit’s plan his blessing, “I like it. I shall watch its progress with pride and delight.” His good buddy Dorothy Thompson chimed in, “It is a program for saving democracy.” and Alexander Woollcott was “tremendously impressed“.

This astonishing proposal is made by the New Republic early in January, 1941.

“Let the United States and Great Britain assume responsibility and leadership for the whole world, except that part of it at present under the heel of the totalitarians. Let these two great repositories of democracy pool their leadership in brains, vision and courage . Let them participate jointly in such economic, industrial and cultural activities as may grow out of this common undertaking.”

Oswald G. Villard, commenting on it in La Follette’s Progressive, Jan. 4, says:

“During many long years of journalism I have read astounding proposals, but this I think takes the cake for wildness, for absurdity, for a counsel of despair. What it would mean, of course, would be the hauling down of the American flag, not merely Clarence Streit’s ‘Union Now’, but a merging of the United States and Great Britain to rule the world . If that came to pass can anyone doubt it would be a short time before the Union Jack would be flying over this country again?

From the Saturday Evening Post, January 25, 1941 –

“What William, Cardinal O’Connell calls “exalted hysteria,’ burned high at Mecca Temple, in New York . The wick was Clarence K. Streit’s Union Now, which at first was propaganda for a confederation of Western democracies and turns out to mean simply Anglo-American union. There are Americans who have an expatriate passion for it. Somerset Maugham was there. As a British subject, serving his government here, he was for it . He had been converted. How astonishing! Henri Bernstein, the French playwright, was there. He denounced American isolationists . . . . We would remind him that freedom of speech is a right that belongs only to an American citizen. To the guest it is a privilege, and may be very easily abused . And we say the same to all the eminent literary persons who presume upon the amenities of their social welcome to be acting among us as foreign agents and propagandists, besides having the bad manners to tell us how ‘we ought to think and feel and behave.”

American journalist Clarence here, had been tasked to write a book, based right out of the Round Table’s man, Lionel Curtis, restructuring of the League of Nations plan – ye old New Heaven and New Earth aka Civitas De aka Commonwealth of God.

I go into all that in great detail in the section starting: “For Curtis to choose that as his title is not only no accident, it’s practically a flashing neon sign as to the heralded culmination of what was essentially a very long-term plan.” of my Borah article. It really is important for your understanding of just how dependent these people are on fostering lies.

Especially about history.

Magically! Little ole Clarence was elevated by having his book promoted by the Right Book Club which is sponsored by the Royal Family.

Yes, it really was called the “right” book club. Subtle, right?

Then more ‘personal opinions’ were brought out –

Our old Masterman word-junkie and plan-slipper (as in slip o’ the tongue) H.G. Wells had advocated a world federation in “Outline of History”. He was brought out of mothballs to sing the same theme song towards the drum of World War II. Welles reached a sort of symphonic climax in his “A New World Order”. Unite the world, says Wells, not just part of it!a la Streit.


Note: We can take that idea at least as far back as 1877, when our previous generational propagandist, ardent Catholic and Rhodes Secret Society fomenter W. T. Stead began beating that particular drum.

This was all part of the more current efforts of redefining democracy, something which White was completely on-board with. For example, White was involved with another British front called the ACLU at least as far back as 1930, if not earlier. He has it in his address book – with an entry date of 4/29/1930.

Note: his son, who was very much into following in the footsteps of his dad, is documented as being a member of the board of directors of the ACLU from 1948 to 1956.

J. Edgar Hoover apparently had White as being associated with the ACLU through their Foreign Policy Association – whatever that is – as far back as the 1921 era.

Hoover was suspicious of White and the ACLU, but then again. That’s Hoover. He was forever falling for whatever front groups that British intelligence set-up. Repeatedly.

One of the ways that White gets used to redefine democracy is by association, so to speak. He gets involved with William Donovan supposedly promoting the Bill of Rights through the ACLU.

The Union [ACLU] planned late in 1938 a celebration of the 150th anniversary of the submission of the Bill of Rights by Congress to the states, to take place on March 4th, date of the opening of the first Congress. A distinguished committee of sponsors was enlisted through William Allen White of Emporia, Kansas, Colonel William J. Donovan of New York and Miss Mary E. Woolley, former president of Mount Holyoke.

The Bill of Rights 150 years after, ACLU, June 1939.

Before you get all invested in thinking this show of support of the Bill of Rights was all above-board and truly patriotic, all you have to remember is just where White fits into this, as does Donovan – both completely in the pocket of the British and Vatican.

It was just a show, in other words.

Just like in the 1920’s when Senator Borah was making it quite clear that there was illegal suppression of exposing these people going on, he was pointing that out again here in 1938.

Just like then, we have White agitating about ‘free speech’ as if he’s for it. That is something that this 1939 ACLU short-lived celebration of the Bill of Rights sponsored – a reprint of White’s “How Free is our Press?”. There has been some question out there as to whether this existed, the announcement shows that it did. Plus, I obtained a copy.

Here is a PDF of that reprint –

William Allen White – Freedom of the Press (1938)

That is purely White trying to offset Borah. His pull and accuracy was resonating with Americans being less than thrilled with the British vultures maneuverings into trying to get us to be their club around the world.

Look carefully at the intro given by ‘someone’ at the ACLU on the first page of this reprint.

Reprinted from the NATION of June 18, 1938 by the American Civil Liberties Union to present an authoritative and simple statement of the influences qualifying the “freedom of the press.”

As this article makes clear, the main issues do not concern violations of a constitutional provision, but the pressures on the newspaper industry itself.

The experience of the American Civil Liberties Union makes clear that legal threats to “freedom of the press” only rarely involve the daily newspapers. They concern chiefly the periodical press and pamphlet and leaflet distribution. Mr. White’s article is useful in indicating how baseless is the usual cry of “freedom of the press” raised by the great dailies–commonly to obscure some other issue.

Oh man. That is really something.Double-speak galore.

I’d say it’s time for a little parenthetical response here. You mean like the issue you’re obscuring in your accusation of obscurance by those questioning British covert control of U.S. press?

That what you mean Mr. Anglophile Anonymous ACLU editor?

Then there’s the fact that by the time the Slavemaster plans for their next War were well underway here (World War II), they were even more paranoid of exposure.

That’s the climate in which, in a typical Controlled Opposition tactic, we find our little pet dog William Allen White writing the above article for Nation magazine titled How Free Is Our Press? on 18 June 1938.

One of Charles Masterman’s products for British intelligence during WWI was actually split into two main propaganda campaigns. The first was to redefine democracy in the way the British wanted it to be – organized on a hierarchal level and controlled by them, basically, and the second was to black PR position the REAL kind of democracy – Jeffersonian – as communist, Russian bolsheviks, and allegedly conspiring Jews trying to dominate the world.

To see an example of one of his stable of authors along the first line – redefining democracy – check this out.

Madison Grant’s Passing of the Great Race (1916), provides these pearls of pre-war eugenic wisdom:

…for wealth can be renewed while these strains of the real human aristocracy once lost are lost forever. In the new world that we are working and fighting for, the world of liberty, of justice and of humanity, we shall save democracy only when democracy discovers its own aristocracy as in the days when our Republic was founded.

Preface by Henry Fairfield Osborn, December 1917

Grant starts out by spending some time trashing the Founding Fathers, talking about that they were slave owners and racist basically, (which tells us where that particular propaganda line is coming from – the British) and then he confirms that he is an anglophile by saying that our Founding Fathers, in regards to equality, were just trying to say that they were “as good” as our British counterparts!

Equality in their minds meant merely that they were just as good Englishmen as their brothers across the sea. The words “that all men are created equal” have since been subtly falsified by adding the word “free,” although no such expression is found in the original document and the teachings based on these altered words in the American public schools of to-day would startle and amaze the men who formulated the Declaration. [bullshit alert]

…True aristocracy or a true republic is government by the wisest and best, always a small minority in any population. Human society is like a serpent dragging its long body on the ground, but with the head always thrust a little in advance and a little elevated above the earth.

– Part I, Chapter I Race and DemocracyPassing of the Great Race (1916)

These are the kinds of ideals that William Allen White just lived for supporting and wanted to think of himself as. A little elevated…

You know, there was still over-the-top propagandizing about him in 1954 in a Hallmark radio program dramatization of his life.


It’s not a bad thing to acknowledge excellence in others, of course. But false excellence ascribed onto those whose deeds are actually evil, now that’s a whole different kettle of fish.

Or in keeping with our metaphor here – a kettle of vultures.

Note: A group of vultures is called a committee, venue or volt. In flight, a flock of vultures is a kettle, and when the birds are feeding together at a carcass, the group is called a wake.

In Conclusion


White stated very clearly that when he came home from that 1909 trip to England, that from then on the struggle of his life was to keep people around him from “knowing how keenly he realized…” that he was now ‘somebody’.

In his own words, he essentially described that he had to hide this knowledge of who he worked for by donning a mask.

A mask of ‘modesty’ – read innocence and goodness

When his cabin buddy and British Round Table man Norman Angell wrote:

“The evil that men do lives after them…”

He could have written that for himself and Mr. White, because it does.

It most definitely does, and that is the crux of the matter for White’s actions. I don’t care how many kitties and kiddies and charitable donations, or smiles and rainbows one tries to throw into the mix here. This man should not be allowed to live down, hide, obfuscate, or run away from what he did and what he was part of willingly.

Wherever he is today, spiritually, he still must face up to the Reckoning for this life he led. Dying doesn’t change a thing.

While it may be true that what’s done is done? It is also true that what is undone that should have been done? Must still be done.

It’s the way of a spirit.

Thank you for reading.