Scientology Roots Chapter Twenty – 2 New World Order Police State

The Librarian says –
librarian
Hi there! You are currently
In the Reading Library—>
Scientology section—>
Scientology Roots book

 

scientologyroots book

Chapter_Twentyitle_-_2_t

The British nobility has been working on a Grand Plan to make themselves the ruthless ruler of the entire world.
They want to eliminate individual nations and establish a World Government that is headed by the British nobility.
They call it the New World Order. They also call it Globalism.

World Government
World Army
World Court
World Bank
World Religion

After they have eliminated individual nations – their World Government will directly rule every person in the world.
That will be a two-class society where the slavemasters rule over all others who are slaves without rights or freedoms.

Nazi Germany was a preview of the Police State the British slavemasters have planned. Germans who protested the Nazi regime were arrested by the Gestapo without judicial proceedings. Then the Gestapo killed them. The same way, anyone not submitting to British slavemaster rule will be ruthlessly annihilated.

The British method of taking over a country has been –

Step 1 – Economic takeover
Step 2 – Government takeover

They are using this same method to take over the world. They are now working to form 3 Unions – European Union,
Asian Union, and American Union. They start out as an economic union, but then are made into a government. Eventually, all three unions would be melded together into a world government, covertly controlled by the British nobility.

The name of the European Economic Community was changed to the new name of European Union (EU), as agreed to in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty. This EU now has one central bank in Frankfurt, Germany, one monetary system (except for three holdout nations), one judicial system, one government, and are working on one military force.

North America, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean Islands would be formed into the American Union. They will then change the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) to its new name – Asian Union.

At some future time, the governing body over these three Regions will assume full command, and will be called the Global Union. By this time, national sovereignty of all nations will be lost completely. 19

When George Bush was the American President from 1989 to 1993, he pushed hard for the New World Order.

Geroge_BushGeorge H.W. Bush

Statement by George Bush in Time Magazine 17 September 1990 –

The Bush Administration, would like to make the United Nations a cornerstone of its plans to construct a New World Order.

Then his son, George W. Bush, was the American President from 2001 to 2009.

george-w-bushGeorge W. Bush

He also pushed hard for the New World Order…

Associated Press 23 April 2001

Americas promise free trade, Summit yields agreement to create trade zone by 2005

Quebec –

Leaders of 34 Western Hemisphere nations, rich and poor, agreed Sunday to stick with an ambitious plan to create the world’s largest free-trade zone by 2005 and penalize any country that strays from the path of democracy.

Stepping up to a table in pairs to sign the accord, the leaders left many differences unresolved as they concluded a three-day summit marred by protests, both peaceful and violent.

In scattered incidents of violence, anti-trade demonstrators had lighted bonfires and smashed windows in an area along the St. Lawrence River. Since the summit opened Friday, more than 400 protestors were arrested and at least 46 police officers and 57 demonstrators were injured.

The duty-free hemispheric zone stretching from the Artic to the tip of South America had been embraced at earlier summits in 1994 and 1998 but had lost momentum in recent years. In staying with the 2005 target, the leaders rejected calls to speed up or slow down the completion date. All leaders of the hemisphere were present except for Cuba’s Fidel Castro, who was excluded.

The summit partners added the democracy clause that could strip a country of membership if it ceased to be a democracy, as in a military coup. Noting that democracy in certain countries continues to be fragile, summit host Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien had words of caution for Haiti for its flawed election last year.

President Bush headed home from his first international conference to face a tough battle to win negotiating authority from Congress to complete the deal.

Congress is deeply divided over whether to renew presidential negotiating authority that Bush needs to complete the deal. It enables the president to submit trade agreements to Congress which can be voted up or down but not amended. Bush promised a redoubled effort to “get it myself” by the end of the year.

.

North American Union to Replace USA? by Jerome Corsi 5/19/2006

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada.

What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada. President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled “Building a North American Community” published by the …Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The North American Union plan…calls for the only border to be around the North American Union — not between any of these countries.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union.

.

New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union And A One World Economic System by Michael Snyder on May 1st, 2012

When it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist. He firmly believes that more “global governance” will make the world a much better place.

At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the “global community”. Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements.

Obama once stated that “all nations must come together to build a stronger global regime”. To globalists such as Obama, it is inevitable that the United States of America will be merged into the emerging global system.

Just this week, Obama has issued a new executive order that seeks to “harmonize” U.S. economic regulations with the rest of the world. This new executive order is yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a North American Union and a one world economic system.

The goal will be to shape North America into an integrated regional economic unit similar to the European Union.

Most Americans have absolutely no idea how far plans to integrate the United States, Canada and Mexico have advanced.

In fact, a document uncovered by Wikileaks shows that those involved in the effort to integrate North America believe that an “incremental” approach is best. Apparently they believe that small moves toward integration are less likely to alarm the general population.

The following is from an article that appeared in The National Post last year…

The integration of North America’s economies would best be achieved through an “incremental” approach, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable.

The cable, released through the WikiLeaks website and apparently written Jan. 28, 2005, discusses some of the obstacles surrounding the merger of the economies of Canada, the United States and Mexico in a fashion similar to the European Union.

If the people of Canada, the United States and Mexico were told that there was a plan to merge all three economies, there might be massive protests to stop it, and the globalists do not want that.

A few years ago, the “Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America” (SPP) that was being promoted by President George W. Bush started to generate quite a bit of negative publicity. That caused those seeking to integrate the economies of North America to back off for a little while.

The more integrated the world becomes, the more likely it becomes that we will see nightmarish global tyranny someday. It is very frightening to think of what someone very evil might do if they had the chance to run the entire planet.

Once our national sovereignty is gone, it will be incredibly difficult to get back. If the American people don’t take a stand while they still can, their children may wake up someday as citizens of a very oppressive “global regime”29

.
If the American Union comes into existence, that will effectively eliminate the national borders and the United States will be superseded by the new government. That will be the end of the U.S. Constitution and the American way of life that has rights and freedoms.

alien video games

.


United States Constitution and Bill of Rights

.
The first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution are called the Bill of Rights.

The Constitution guarantees habeas corpus.

habeas corpus – a writ (written court order) that has the object of bringing a party before a court or judge. The right of a citizen to obtain a writ of habeas corpus as a protection against illegal imprisonment. A writ can be issued for inquiring into the lawfulness of the restraint of a person who is imprisoned or detained in another’s custody.

.
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

.
The Constitution also forbids the granting of any titles of nobility! All of these rights get in the way of the Police State that the British slavemasters have in mind. There has been an ongoing operation to undermine the Bill of Rights.

 

Slavemaster Attack on Rights and Freedoms

Trampling all over the American Constitutiontrampling on the constitution 1

.
An attack on the First Amendment – freedom of speech.

World War I was an European conflict that had nothing to do with the United States. American citizens were correct in being against America getting involved in the war. But the British wanted America to get involved on the British side.

In January 1916, British intelligence sent William Wiseman to America with the purpose of getting America into the war. Wiseman was able to influence American President Woodrow Wilson, and the U.S. declared war on April 6th, 1917.

William WIseman

American citizens were still strongly opposed and were vocal against America getting into the war. 

At the request of President Wilson, Congress passed the Espionage Act on June 15, 1917.

It made it a crime:

To convey information with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the armed forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies. This was punishable by death or by imprisonment for not more than 30 years or both.

To convey false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies when the United States is at war, to cause or attempt to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or to willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States. This was punishable by a maximum fine of $10,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or both.

The Act silenced American citizens opposed to the war – exactly what the British wanted it to do.

The Espionage Act of 1917 violates free speech, and it has been contested in court ever since. 1

* * *


An attack on the First Amendment – freedom of the press.

In 1940, British intelligence sent William Stephenson to set up and operate a British intelligence network in America.

stephensonWilliam Stephenson, code-name Intrepid

Stephenson covertly established and ran British Security Coordination in New York City. BSC headquarters was located in Room 3603 Rockefeller Center. They actually occupied the 35th and 36th floor of the building.

rockefeller center 1940s MI6 BSC and OSS intelligence

One action the BSC did – it had three thousand British agents operating to secretly manipulate the media nationwide. 

During World War II the Office of War Information was established headed by British agent Elmer Davis. The OWI censored all American media, telling the media what to say and what not to say – a violation of freedom of the press.

After World War II, British intelligence continued its covert manipulation and subversion of the American media.
CIA officer Frank Wisner instituted Operation Mockingbird – it was headed by British agent Cord Meyer. He had thousands of journalists on the CIA payroll.

Cord Meyer in 1948Cord Meyer

* * *

An attack on the Fourth Amendment – freedom against unreasonable searches and without specific court approval.

24 October 1952 – President Truman established the National Security Agency (NSA). By executive order of the President, the NSA is exempt from all laws which do not specifically name the NSA in the text of the law. Since the U.S. Constitution does not specifically mention NSA, then they are declared to be exempt from following the Constitution.

The President does not have the power to violate the Constitution. It is a violation of his oath in taking office, he is supposed to uphold the U.S. Constitution.

NSA is the world’s largest intelligence-gathering agency. It is responsible for collection and analysis of foreign communications. It also monitors all domestic communications. It’s eavesdropping mission includes the Internet, telephone calls, and other intercepted forms of communication.NSA_headquarters

Another attack on the Fourth Amendment – the right of the people to be secure in their persons 

BBC News Online Magazine by Sean Coughlan 15 October 2004

A US company has been given the green light to implant microchips in humans. It’s intended to provide medical information … but will it turn into a surveillance system?

This week, the United States Food and Drug Administration gave its approval for an implantable chip which can be used for medical purposes. A microchip the size of a grain of rice can be inserted below the skin – and will carry an individual’s medical records which can be read by a scanner.

But there are other applications. The Florida-based company behind the chip, Applied Digital, pointed to other commercial uses. Security is likely to be a key area for such microchips – offering the chance both to identify and track anyone carrying this type of implant. But there have been concerns about how such technology could be abused and become a form of surveillance, with movements and activities electronically monitored.

applied_digital_microchip

These microchips are scheduled to be placed in a driver’s license and passports. They are also being implanted in people. You can be tracked everywhere you go. That is where they are headed, they want to make it mandatory that everyone have a microchip implanted so they can be tracked everywhere they go. You will be under constant surveillance.

* * *

Another attack on free speech –

7 Mar 2001 Euro-court outlaws criticism of EU
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels

The European Court of Justice ruled yesterday that the European Union can lawfully suppress political criticism of its institutions and of leading figures, sweeping aside English Common Law and 50 years of European precedents on civil liberties. The EU’s top court found that the European Commission was entitled to sack Bernard Connolly, a British economist dismissed in 1995 for writing a critique of European monetary integration entitled The Rotten Heart of Europe.

The ruling stated that the commission could restrict dissent in order to “protect the rights of others” and punish individuals who “damaged the institution’s image and reputation”. The case has wider implications for free speech that could extend to EU citizens who do not work for the Brussels bureaucracy.

The court called the Connolly book “aggressive, derogatory and insulting”, taking particular umbrage at the author’s suggestion that Economic and Monetary Union was a threat to democracy, freedom and ultimately peace.

However, it dropped an argument put forward three months ago by the advocate-general, Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, which implied that Mr Connolly’s criticism of the EU was akin to extreme blasphemy, and therefore not protected speech.

Mr Colomer wrote in his opinion last November that a landmark British case on free speech had “no foundation or relevance” in European law, suggesting that the European Court was unwilling to give much consideration to British legal tradition.  34

* * *

An attack on Amendments 4,5,6 and habeas corpus –
habeas corpus – the right to appear before a court or judge as a protection against illegal imprisonment.
the right to not be seized without evidence presented to a court and authorization from the court
the right to not be held for a crime without indictment by a Grand Jury
the right to not be deprived of life or liberty without due process of law
the right of the accused to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, and to have counsel for defense

The slavemasters manipulate people with a technique called Problem-Reaction-Solution.

They use this to get people to accept an idea that is not in their best interests and that they would correctly oppose.

Nazi Germany used it to start World War II. The Nazis wanted to invade Poland but public opinion would be against that as an unprovoked act of war. So, some Nazis dressed up in Polish uniforms and attacked a radio station in Germany. The Nazis then claimed that Poland had committed an act of war against Germany, which was a lie.
Then Nazi Germany invaded Poland and it looked like Poland had started the war!

The slavemasters first create the Problem.
They use the media to stir up a public Reaction.
Then they provide their insane Solution.

It is an orchestrated show.

Steve_Martin_in_Leap_of_Faith__glowing_with_the_light_of_God__show

The British slavemasters used Problem-Reaction-Solution to get America into World War II. The American people were against getting into World War II. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was used as the means to get America into the war. There was American complicity in the attack.

Dean Acheson was a British agent who was the Assistant Secretary of State in America. Acheson implemented and oversaw the British/American/Dutch oil embargo that cut off 95 percent of Japanese oil supplies and escalated the crisis with Japan in 1941.

The American President was Franklin Roosevelt, and he had been a collaborator with British intelligence for decades. Due to code breaking, President Roosevelt was told about the attack on Pearl Harbor in advance. President Roosevelt decided to let the Pearl Harbor attack happen as a way of arousing the American populace.  33

pearl harbor 1 pearl harbor 3


Problem-Reaction-Solution
was employed on September 11, 2001 – to pass laws that take away freedoms and rights guaranteed to Americans by the US Constitution.

Four passenger jets were hijacked in the United States. Two of them were flown into the World Trade Center buildings in New York. The third one was flown into the Pentagon.

The United States has an air defense system that could have easily prevented this from happening. When an aircraft goes off its prearranged course, the air traffic controllers alert the military and a jet fighter is sent to intercept the off-course plane. The fighter can reach the off-course plane in about 5 minutes. If the off-course plane will not follow instructions from the fighter, the fighter is authorized to shoot the plane down.

In each case there was at least a half hour delay in notifying the military. The media reported that the air traffic controllers did not know what to do. That is a blatant lie. As soon as those planes went off course, the air traffic controllers knew they had to notify the military so it could send up a fighter. This is worked out in advance and was known.

A cell phone was used by a flight attendant to notify the air traffic controllers that a hijacking was taking place, well before the planes reached the targets.911_-_first_plane_hits

17 minutes later, a second plane hit the other tower…

911_second_plane_hits

58 minutes after the first Tower impact, a third off-course jet hit the Pentagon. It was not intercepted as it flew over the most heavily protected airspace in the world.

911_pics

The US government blamed it on overseas terrorists. The American public does not buy it, they correctly believe it could not have happened unless the US government allowed it.

This incident was used as an excuse for legislation that violates our Constitutional rights and freedoms.

The USA PATRIOT Act was passed into law on October 26, 2001 – Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (PATRIOT) Act.

The Department of Homeland Security is established and it can gather data on people from any public or private institution without regard to the Fourth Amendment.

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

Among the unprecedented rights the PATRIOT Act grants to the federal government are the right to wiretap without warrant, and the right to detain without warrant.

The PATRIOT Act is just the first phase of the attack on the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. In 2003 the Justice Department has emerged a draft of the Domestic Securities Enhancement Act, also known as PATRIOT II. Among other things, this act allows the Justice Department to detain anyone, anytime, secretly and indefinitely. It would also make it a crime to reveal the identity or even existence of such a detainee16, 18

That is a violation of Amendments 4,5,6 and habeas corpus –

habeas corpusthe right to appear before a court or judge as a protection against illegal imprisonment.
the right to not be seized without evidence presented to a court and authorization from the court
the right to not be held for a crime without indictment by a Grand Jury
the right to not be deprived of life or liberty without due process of law
the right of the accused to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, and to have counsel for defense

These laws are a denial of rights to every American citizen, including the innocent, for anyone can be detained, without charges, without any protective judicial proceedings and without any court order.

This creates the Nazi German Gestapo in America.

The Gestapo arrested and imprisoned people without judicial proceedings and even killed them.

They use the excuse of “preventing terrorism” to take away everyone’s rights and freedoms and thereby destroy the American way of life. It is a large step forward on their plan to install a Police State. This was the use of the staged “terrorist attacks” on September 11, using hijacked commercial jets to crash into buildings on American soil.

We are 100 percent against terrorist attacks. We are 100 percent in favor of preventing terrorist attacks.

But you do not get to violate the Constitution and destroy the American way of life as the “solution” to terrorists.

All language in the PATRIOT Act that violates the Constitution must be removed.

* * *

An attack on free speech and freedom of religion –

We need to make something clear. People of the Jewish religion are sometimes accused of a plot to rule the world. That is wrong. It is the British nobility who has a plan to rule the world and there are a few Jews who work for them. The vast majority of the people in the Jewish faith have nothing to do with that.

The Independent Order B’nai B’rith (IOBB) established the Anti-Defamation League to attack anti-Jewish people.

Both are part of the British New World Order network.

The Anti-Defamation League is now pushing for legislation to take away freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The ADL is calling it a “hate crime” to criticize any Jewish scripture, Jewish leaders or Jewish literature. You can be fined and jailed for that in Canada. Their current target is to have things be that way in the United States.

The United Nations is part of the British New World Order network. One of its organizations is called the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).

April 2004 – An Anti-Semitism Conference was held in Berlin. It resulted in an OSCE plan to fight anti-Semitism. 20

June 2004 – a meeting in Paris – Meeting on the Relationship between Hate Speech on the Internet and Hate Crime.

An international assembly initiated by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) met in Paris to plan a strategy for banning “anti-Semitic and xenophobic propaganda” from the Internet. (xenophobic – dislike of foreigners or strangers)

The conference began with calls on OSCE members to take extreme measures to keep “racist” material off the Net.

At this meeting the writers of “hate speech” on the internet
are positioned as being a causative agent of “terrorism”
and “hate crimes”.

 

At the Paris meeting, the U.S. delegation was under the leadership of two Assistant Attorneys General – who put forward a “Ten-Point Action Plan” that could serve as a basis for combating hate speech on the Internet while protecting freedom of expression and information. 21

Suzette Bronkhost, a Dutch official of the International Network Against Cyber Hate (www.inach.net), said the US Constitution should not allow extreme statements by “holocaust deniers”.

Suzette in 2009 – still at it.

Suzette Bronkhurst


Chairman of the OSCE – Solomon Passy

Solomon_Passy_-_May_2004.

Solomon Passy said – “We must not leave the door open to abuse. Freedoms do not include a right to spread hatred, lies and abuse, which could destabilize our societies.”

Passy is also quoted as saying: Anti-Semitism is equivalent to anti-globalism”.

OSCE_17_June_2004

There is the key statement that shows what this is really about…

Anti-Semitism is equivalent to anti-globalism”

They are actually concerned about people who expose and oppose the New World Order. They want to silence them.

Every one of these people and groups are advocates for globalism, they are agents for the British New World Order.
They intend to completely eradicate the United States, have it cease to exist – and have its Constitution cease to exist.

September 2004 – Michael G. Kozak, Acting Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, testifies to the Congressional Helsinki Commission, he says

Michael G. kozak

“A crucial component in the fight against terrorism is the support and promotion of tolerance of all ethnic, racial and religious minorities. We applaud the OSCE’s commitments to fighting racism, anti-Semitism, religious intolerance…”  20

We should remember that they create the problem in the first place. They use their agents to create the “Problem” that they are offering up their insane “Solution” to. The few Neo-Nazi skinheads who make ridiculous anti-Jewish statements could be agents for the ADL. Now the ADL can point to them and say there is a Problem. But normal people do not act like nutcase skinheads and there is no actual Problem that needs solving.

In 2004, a target site was picked to attack, Jew Watch. That is likely a planted rabid anti-Jewish site. The Anti-Defamation League successfully made it illegal for Google to display this website in Germany and France.

16 October 2004 – President George Bush signs “Global Anti-Semitism Review Act” into law. It establishes a department within the U.S. State Department to monitor global anti-Semitism.

george-w-bushGeorge W. Bush

The Bush family was a primary supporter of Hitler and Nazi Germany!

They assisted in financing
the killing of six million Jews!

George Bush is a member of Skull and Bones, the Brotherhood of Death, that ran the extermination camps.

And he is now pretending he cares about Jews?

The ADL does not expose who really caused Nazi Germany and the murder of six million Jews – the British nobility and their demented minions. Instead, the ADL works for and with the British slavemasters – the very same men who caused Nazi Germany!

This is not about “monitoring global anti-Semitism” – it is about monitoring the people against the New World Order.


5 January 2005
– the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor released a report entitled Report on Global Anti-Semitism. Following is a list of activities the U. S. government now considers anti-Semitic:

1. Any assertion “that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world” is anti-Semitic.

4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.

5. Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community is anti-Semitic.

6. Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism is anti-Semitic.
.

First, notice they are mostly concerned about the people who expose the New World Order conspiracy.

They say if you reject Judaism you are an anti-semite racist.

It is propaganda to say anyone who rejects Judaism is a racist. They equate the word Jew with the word semite. The word Jew does not equal the word semite. A lot of Jewish people are not semites, they are some other race. All Jews are not semites and the religion called Judaism is not a race of people.

Rejecting Judaism because you do not accept the Jewish Bible, does not make you a racist.

If a person rejects Judaism, it does not follow
that he is therefore an “anti-semite racist”.

* * *

Now let’s take a look at hate-speech laws. The hate-speech laws say, if someone reads what you write, or hears what you say, and decides to “commit an act of violence against a Jew or his property” – you are fined or even jailed, and are now a “criminal”.

2005 – Anti-Defamation League official Christopher Wolf, a Jewish homosexual, was elected Chairman of the International Network Against Cyber Hate.

Christopher Wolf

Christopher Wolf


5 January 2007 –
The ADL pushes again for hate crime legislation, after having six previous failures since 1998.

Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the hate crimes bill – HR 254. 23

This is a much shorter version of S 1145 which failed passage in the Senate last year (2006). ADL, desperate to pass their hate bill, has deleted many items and is concentrating in this new streamlined version on getting what they want most: establishment of a bias-oriented justice system in America and union of federal and local police powers. With this foundation, ADL can then rely on federal and local judges to expand jurisdiction from violent physical crimes to verbal violence against protected groups.

The Constitution does not grant the federal government intervention in any local law enforcement. HR 254 gives the government the right to do what the Constitution forbids.

HR 254 asserts that there is a lack of effective countermeasures on the state level for hate crimes and that is a “serious national problem” necessitating federal intervention.

Federal and local judges (under pressure by the ADL) will establish legal precedents that protect groups such as homosexuals from physical violence and “verbal violence.” This will include the “hate speech” of Christians. This is exactly what has occurred in Canada and the many European nations who accepted hate laws.

The Anti-Defamation League has vowed it will never give up until a federal hate crimes bureaucracy, like it established in Canada, is in place in the United States. ADL is using the powerful homosexual lobby as a tool to pass a law that will ultimately make it a hate crime, punishable by prison or deportation to Israel, to criticize anything Jewish.

The statement that hate crimes are a “serious national problem” is a lie.

“There were few anti-Semitic incidents and, with one exception, they were of a purely verbal nature that resulted in no physical harm to any member of the Jewish community or any damage to Jewish property.”  22

– Statement at this Government web site

* * *


2007
The ADL pressured search engines like Google to filter out websites that criticize Zionism or homosexuality.

2007 – The ADL wants to re-define internet free speech as “home-grown terrorism.” The U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1955, designed to set up a federal commission to eradicate the “cyber-terrorism” which this bill alleges “streams” from the internet. The federal commission, if approved by the Senate and the President, will construe politically incorrect speech on the internet as words that hurt, i.e., “verbal violence.” H.R. 1955 says this speech incites extremists to “radicalization,” i.e., acts of violence.

Again, they are lying – the acts of violence they say may exist, are virtually non-existent.

Unless they stage or create them…

* * *

Here are some examples of hate-crime laws in action…

20 February 2006 – David Irving was convicted in an Austrian court for questioning the figure of Jews killed in the Holocaust. He was sentenced to three years in prison. He then “recanted” his previous skepticism that the Nazis used gas chambers to kill millions of Jews.

On Oct. 26, 2007 a 21-year-old Canadian woman, Jessica Beaumont, was fined $1500 for posting online two Bible verses critical of homosexuality. She was also required to pay $3000 to professional complainer Richard Warman who brought charges against her. Her crime? She derisively called him “a Jew.”

Jessica posted these verses: “Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.” (Lev.18:22) “If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their heads.” (Lev. 20:13)

The court ruled:

“Ms. Beaumont claimed, during her testimony, that she based this comment on her interpretation of a passage in the Bible, adding that she did not care if Jews would be offended by her ideas. However, irrespective of whether she ‘cares’ or not, s.13 of the Act dictates that the repeated communication via the internet of matter that is likely to expose targeted groups to hatred or contempt constitutes a discriminatory practice. Whether the person communicating the matter was in fact its author is immaterial. The mere act of communicating the material or causing its communication attracts liability under this Act.”  24

Beaumont was ordered to never again post Scripture critical of homosexuals or any other specially protected group, including Jews. She faces prison if she disobeys.

Jessica claims she has Nazi sympathies. However, this is an excellent example of a “public spectacle” that will hopefully be agreed with by the general public, who doesn’t normally like the pro-Nazi groups. But pay attention, because as the world moves toward hate crimes persecution and the coming of the second INQUISITION, our modern day inquisitors (hate law enforcers) will first select victims with extremist views. This is not an accident, they are counting on the idea that society will not want to stand up for these people. But the free speech rights of every person are diminished by the legal precedents handed out to “extremists”.

The Independent Order B’nai B’rith lodge in Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress, were the creators of Canada’s federal hate crime law and persuaded Parliament to pass it in 1971. It was only a few years later, that a simple addition of a section, section 13.1, was then proposed and passed. Section 13.1 outlaws communications “likely” to incite hatred or contempt of members of a federally protected group. The same thing will happen in the United States – just watch.

The IOBB/ADL has recently pushed through similar statutory tools banning “cyberhate” in most European countries, and established legal precedents as in the case of David Irving.

.
1984 on the Horizon: Congress Moves to Regulate Thought Crime by Bob Ellis, Dakota Voice on July 9th, 2009 –

Here are just a few items …on how “hate crime” legislation is already being used against people for exercising their opinion, free speech, and freedom of association, both internationally and already here in the United States:

Last year a Catholic priest in Canada, Fr. Alphonse de Valk, who was investigated by the Canadian Human Rights Commission for the “crime” of teaching what the Bible says about homosexual behavior (that it is a sin) and marriage (that it is between a man and a woman).

The Ontario Human Rights Commission slapped Protestant printer Scott Brockie with a $5000 fine for refusing to print homosexual-themed stationary.

The Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal fined Hugh Owens several thousand dollars for quoting the Bible in a letter to the local newspaper.

Mayor Diane Haskett in London, Ontario, was fined $10,000 for refusing to proclaim a gay pride day.

Focus on the Family must cut out any portions of their broadcasts dealing with homosexuality for radio stations in that country.

Last year the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal ruled that youth pastor Stephen Boissoin was guilty of writing a letter to the editor of the Red Deer Advocate which might expose homosexuals to hate and contempt (Boissoin’s 2002 letter said homosexuality was immoral, physically dangerous and should not be promoted in schools).

Not content with their success in quashing open refusals to bow at the altar of political correctness, the Canadian pro-homosexual group EGALE (Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere) is calling for the Canadian postal system to censor the mail for “hate mail”. 

Swedish Pastor Ake Green in 2004 was sentenced to 30 days in jail for preaching a sermon in which he defined homosexual behavior as sinful and harmful to society.

A British couple were questioned by police on possible “hate crime” charges after they wrote a letter-to-the-editor of their local newspaper criticizing city officials for distributing brochures at city hall promoting homosexual behavior.

Catholic Charities in Boston was forced out of the adoption ministry because they refused to put children in homes of homosexual couples.

Boston school teachers have been threatened with termination if they fail to cast homosexuality in a positive light to students.

The University of Toledo fired a black administrator for writing a “letter to the editor” of a local newspaper about the inconsistency of comparing homosexuality to ethnicity.

Christians in Philadelphia were arrested for reading Bible verses and praying out loud during a homosexual festival.

The state of New Mexico issued a fine of $6,600 to a Christian photographer (a private businessman) who didn’t want to photograph two lesbians make a commitment to each other.

A Colorado law passed last year (2009) to allow men to use women’s restrooms and shower rooms if they “felt like a woman” also contained provisions which prohibits the publication for public consumption any material which is “discriminatory” against homosexual behavior. So while churches can (for now) continue teaching within their own walls what the Bible says about homosexual behavior, they cannot publish anything in public which does. This includes any Christian book publishers or other ministries in Colorado. 

We all understand the need to criminally punish assaults on persons and property. We also understand the need to restrict direct threats of violence against persons and property.

But this bill is actually seeking to punish thoughts and opinions. Even without a threat of violence against persons or property, this type of regulation can be used to brand you a criminal and punish you for expressing a value statement about a particular issue or behavior.   27

 * * *

 
One of the more disgusting tactics to go on in Congress is to piggy back a bill that will not get approval, onto another bill that will get approval. This sneaky tactic is how the ADL got their Hate Crime Bill passed into law in the United States – their Hate Crimes Bill was added as an “amendment” to the 2010 Department of Defense authorization Bill.

28 October 2009 – U. S. Hate Crime Bill gets signed into law by President Obama.

Obama hate crime law

After donning his halo, Obama stated – “No one in America should be forced to look over their shoulder because of who they are, or because they live with a disability.”

Obama Halo
.

Except for now, it’s the Christians
who have to look over their shoulder.

How about the people that don’t think homosexuality is “cool” or “normal”? They aren’t allowed now, to have any view other than “homosexuality is ok” before the thought-and-speech police come knocking at their door?

thought police 2 

Let’s look at the bill itself now. The Hate Crime bill starts on page 1471, this is on Page 1488 –

(3) CONSTRUCTION AND APPLICATION — Nothing in this division, or an amendment made by this division, shall be construed or applied in a manner that infringes any rights under the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Nor shall anything in this division, or an amendment made by this division, be construed or applied in a manner that substantially burdens a person’s exercise of religion (regardless of whether compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief), speech, expression, or association, unless the Government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest, if such exercise of religion, speech, expression, or association was not intended to

(A) plan or prepare for an act of physical violence; or

(B) incite an imminent act of physical violence against another.

(4) FREE EXPRESSION — Nothing in this division shall be construed to allow prosecution based solely upon an individual’s expression of racial, religious, political, or other beliefs or solely upon an individual’s membership in a group advocating or espousing such beliefs.

(5) FIRST AMENDMENT — Nothing in this division, or an amendment made by this division, shall be construed to diminish any rights under the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

(6) CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS — Nothing in this division shall be construed to prohibit any constitutionally protected speech, expressive conduct or activities (regardless of whether compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief), including the exercise of religion protected by the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States and peaceful picketing or demonstration. The Constitution of the United States does not protect speech, conduct or activities consisting of planning for, conspiring to commit, or committing an act of violence.

 

The bill now says that it’s OK to impinge on people’s First Amendment freedoms even if they are not conspiring to commit a violent crime or deliberately inciting one, as long as the burden “is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest…”

In light of this more permissive language, the new law could be combined with the federal “aiding and abetting” statute to justify prosecuting people whose speech allegedly influenced others to commit hate crimes, even when that result was unintended. For example, a minister who inveighs against homosexuality could be prosecuted if a member of his congregation assaults gay people.  25

 
2009
– Another law the ADL is attempting to get passed is HR 1966, the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act.

Sec. 881. Cyberbullying

(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

 

And now for a some good news – Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act was the hate-speech provision.
On 26 June 2013 the Canadian Senate repealed Section 13.

* * *

The truth about all of these hate speech laws is this…

1. They are written based on propaganda that is just a bunch of lies.

2. They are biased by favoring Jews, homosexuals, and the New World Order people.

3. They are attempting to silence people who have a correct view on these issues.

4. They are not legal because they violate the basic law of the U.S. – the Constitution.

5. They want to undermine the American way of life that includes freedoms and rights.

6. They want to replace the American way of life with their Police State.

7. They undermine the Constitution because it stands in the way of their Police State.

8. They want to hide their evil agenda and prevent people from informing others about it.

It is all just one big propaganda show to cover up their evil act – creating a Police State.

The New World Order people are moving to set up a utopia for themselves wherein they can do any criminal act they want to, and anyone objecting is put in jail. It goes beyond that. Putting the people who oppose them in jail is just a step towards what they really want to do to them – kill them.

* * *


Amendment II to the Constitution is the right for the American people to keep and bear arms. Whenever someone uses a gun to kill other people, the New World Order men use that event as an excuse to outlaw guns in America. You can see why they want to disarm Americans, they do not want an armed population existing within their Police State.

Guns do not kill people. Only people kill other people, using whatever weapon they choose. It takes a person to pick up a gun, to aim it, and to pull the trigger. It is a sad event when a person uses a gun or any other weapon to kill other people. However, you cannot use it as an excuse to undermine the Constitution.

The right to bear arms is an important Constitutional protection. If you outlaw guns, then only the criminals will have guns and the law-abiding citizens will have no protection.

Some States in the United States have enacted laws against handguns. Those laws have been struck down by the Supreme Court because they violate the Constitution.

* * *

The British nobility world domination effort is called the New World Order (NWO).

What this is really about is silencing the people who expose and oppose the New World Order.

People against the NWO are given the racist label “anti-Semites”

as well as being given the label “domestic terrorists”

.wiley oh wow

The crimes against humanity by the New World Order men and their few Jewish collaborators are a historical fact.

The British nobility and their demented minions
are guilty of the most cruel acts imaginable.

They and their minions are the terrorists, not the people who object to their inhumane actions and expose them.

Their propaganda is used to create laws to jail the people who expose and oppose them.

They have created special laws to protect Jews and homosexuals. The Jews and homosexuals do not need special laws to protect them from violence against their person or property. They are already protected by the same laws that apply to everyone else.

Jews and homosexuals should not be subjected to violence against their persons or property. I do not subscribe to Judaism or the homosexual way of life – but I will object to any violence against them. At the same time, I defend the right for anyone to speak out about what they think is wrong with Judaism or the homosexual way of life or any other subject they wish to express their ideas about. They should not be punished for doing that.

Freedom of religion means the right to believe it – it is also the right to not believe it.
Freedom of speech includes the right to state in public what you do not believe in.

People have a right to state in public that they do not believe in Judaism. To prevent them from doing that violates freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

The ADL and the United Nations OSCE claim they are fighting religious intolerance, while they sit there displaying intolerance for the people who are not Jewish and do not agree with Judaism.

The Church of Scientology also advocates the New World Order and is allied with these people in getting internet laws passed. The Church of Scientology is engaged in “anti hate-speech” actions with the ADL and the OSCE. Birds of a feather, flock together.

The ADL and the Church of Scientology seek to put in jail people who are critics of their religion. While claiming to be against religious intolerance, the ADL and Scientology viciously attack any critic of their religion. That is religious intolerance on their part.

The Anti-Defamation League, the United Nations OSCE and the Church of Scientology are not working for human rights, they are working to take away human rights.

What they are really doing is trying to prevent anyone from exposing their evil plans and actions.

All hate-speech laws must be repealed.

 

New World Order Police States

The British slavemasters and their demented minions have created many Police States in the world.

Nazi Germany was one of their Police States. Guatemala is another one.

Guatemala shows us the way people are treated in a Police State.

United Fruit was a company owned by minions of the British slavemasters, such as Allen Dulles. United Fruit took advantage of countries in Central America, making huge profits from selling their fruit while keeping the people in slave labor conditions.

Central_America map

United Fruit had a stranglehold on the Guatemala economy The peasants were not allowed to own the companies in their own country and use their natural resources to benefit themselves.

United_Fruit

Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán was the President of Guatemala who decided to change that. He advocated land reform where the Guatemala people got to own the land and businesses.

Arbenz was for the PEOPLE – so…he had to go.

FOTOGRAFIA DE JACOBO ARBENZ GUZMAN PRESIDENTE DE GUATEMALAJacobo Arbenz Guzmán

The New World Order men who owned United Fruit Company, hired Edward Bernays to conduct a propaganda campaign against Arbenz – wherein they accused him of being a Communist. They then staged a “revolution” that resulted in forcing Arbenz to resign.

50 years of retaliation

bombing arbenz

The Guatemalan peasants were made to pay now, in hunger and torture for supporting land reform, and for trying to attain a better future for themselves and their families in their own country.

Allen Dulles was Director of the CIA. The CIA installed Colonel Castillo Armas as the new “president”.

Armas_arrivesCastillo Armas – slavemaster puppet dictator

The US Ambassador furnished Armas with lists of radical opponents to be eliminated, and the Guatemalan bloodbath began. Thousands were arrested. Many people were tortured and killed. United Fruit got all its land back and to punish the people further for daring to support Arbenz, the Banana Worker’s Union was banned. Terrible working conditions and slave labor were back. Armas cut out one-third of the voters by barring illiterates from voting. He outlawed all political parties, labor confederations, and peasant groups. He closed down opposition newspapers and burned “subversive” books. Guatemala still has the worst record of human rights abuses in Latin America.

The Guatemala people protested and civil war emerged.

50_year_bloodbath_Guatemala

The moneymen wanted still more, so they prodded the military to take measures to establish a US base for counter-revolutionary actions, in order to maintain cheap labor for the landowners and US corporations, and to “preserve the System”. Terror was their preferred weapon, and the CIA was the one to make it happen.

The repressive military dictatorship of the Armas regime was followed by a succession of one CIA puppet dictator after another. The protest became more violent. The military continued its violent suppression of anti-government elements, but a Mayan guerrilla army began to form.

banana soldiers

To counter-act the Mayans, during the Johnson presidency, the Green Berets were sent to Guatemala to transform its Army into a modern counter-revolutionary force. That is the origin of what is referred to as the “killing machine” that still operates in Guatemala today.

Death squads were started. The death squads had lists of people that were “suspected communists”, or who opposed the existing system. They were hunted down and killed. The police, the army, and the death squads, were all armed and trained by the CIA.

Peasants, students, labor leaders, and professional persons were jailed by the thousands by the Guatemalan military. Journalists, lawyers, teachers, members of opposition parties, and anyone who expressed sympathy for the anti-government cause were simply machine-gunned down. If anyone tried to improve the peasants situation, they were subjected to torture, mutilation, and death. And thousands more, just trying to live and overcome their poverty and the massive injustices occurring –  simply “disappeared.” By the end of 1968, the protestors were wiped out.

But still it did not end. The CIA had links with a Guatemalan Army unit, the G2, that maintained a network of torture centers and body dump sites throughout Guatemala and had killed thousands. G2 is a group of 2,000 Guatemalan Army Intelligence officers. Operating out of the US Embassy, CIA undercover agents, secretly working with the G-2, trained, advised, armed, and equipped these officers to do viciously barbaric crimes.

In the 80’s General Efrain Rios Montt, a graduate of the School of the Americas, at Fort Benning, Georgia, came to power in a 1982 coup. He was PR’ed as a “born-again” Christian reformer. But what he really was, was one of the most savage of the Guatemalan dictators. During the 17 months of Rios Montt’s “Christian” campaign, 400 villages were destroyed, 10 – 20,000 Indians were killed, and over 100,000 fled to Mexico.

This is what is meant by a Police State. People who object are killed without any judicial proceedings. The people have the status of a slave and they have no rights or freedoms. And the slavemasters can do whatever they want to the slaves without any penalty to themselves. This is what the British slavemasters have in mind as their New World Order.

This is the slavemaster “society” that we will live in if we allow the New World Order. Do not make the mistake of assigning mild motives to their current steps towards a Police State. Their hate-crime laws are a step the British slavemasters are making toward that end.

The British slavemasters and their demented minions do not believe in any human rights or freedoms, regardless of what meaningless lip service they may use to make you think otherwise. The slavemasters are not going to create a society that has rights or freedoms.

The American revolution had the purpose of getting out from under the oppression from the British nobility. The British nobility knows they can never win an open war with the United States. So, they have resorted to conducting covert warfare against America. Americans have failed to recognize a covert enemy at work. This must change.

And it is changing.

Good thing, because otherwise, one day soon they will wake up to find America and its Constitution no longer exists.

 

Slavemaster Mentality

Since their earliest beginnings more than 500 years ago, the British and Vatican slavemasters have hired propaganda mouthpieces to issue statements that shift the focus of their agenda onto other sources.

A relevant example for this chapter is that they hire out/produce materials that say there is a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and that they are the cause of wars and economic hardship. You can see proof in Chapter Fifty – 4.

No, it is not the Jews doing that, the British and/or Vatican slavemasters are doing it.

The average Jewish family is no more behind all these atrocities and cruelties than you and I are. They are also targeted for domination and elimination by a slavemaster’s whim.

The top British and Vatican slavemasters do not actually believe in any religion, they march to a different drummer. They are a group unto themselves and that is where their commitment lies.

Nazi Germany was another good example of a British and Vatican slavemaster operation. They targeted the Jews for extinction. Some of their minions who supported Nazi Germany profess to be Jewish. That is revealing. That shows the “Jewish” international bankers are not actually loyal to Jewish people. By professing to be Jewish, they have brought unwarranted ill will against the average Jewish families, who were wrongfully made guilty for things the British slavemasters and their demented minions were doing.

.
The characteristics of the slavemasters are:

  • an unquenchable thirst for having the most power and wealth for themselves only
  • they wish that everyone would be subordinate to them, to exalt and worship them and bend the knee
  • they verbally and in writings assert their superiority, but usually cannot do anything truly “superior”
  • they usually do not fight their own battles directly one-on-one, they trick or hire others to do it
  • they spend every minute of every day hating and resenting anyone or anything – continual conflict is the desired state of operation, even in their own mind
  • their hidden hatred of life, especially toward themselves, encompasses abnormal sexual practices
  • lack of caring and compassion for the welfare of those they deem “rebellious” or “unacceptable” – usually pretty much everyone –  any cruel act is therefore justified.
  • they often deem themselves to be above the law, it does not apply to them
  • if they fail at their two basic tactics (covert manipulation and love-bombing) they will resort to physically forcing their ideas on other people. True freedom of thought is very dangerous to them and is not easily tolerated. This, despite whatever positions they may take publicly or “on the surface”
  • they continually operate covertly, hold secret meetings, and work always to hide their evil agenda
  • they must cloak their dark character with religion, flowery words, and espousing a noble goal. The White Mask on top of the Black Mask
  • they use reversals of truth such as usually positioning themselves as the “white” guys, the good guys
  • they accuse innocent others of having the qualities of their most hidden agenda; being racists, terrorists and causing wars
  • they feel they are justified in using any means, however cruel, to achieve their ends

The above is a starting list comprising elements of their mentality, philosophy, beliefs and practices.

Slavemasters use demented personalities as their minions to carry out their evil will.

Here are some examples of slavemasters and their demented minions.

Demented Minions Gallery #1Slavemaster_minions_gallery_#1.

Demented Minions Gallery #2

+1 Slavemaster: Robert Cecil

Slavemaster_and_minions_gallery_#2.

Demented Minions Gallery #3

+1 junior Slavemaster: Arthur Balfour

Slavemaster_and_minions_gallery_#3

Do you believe that if these sociopaths get to have control over everyone with a World Government, that they are going to suddenly become decent people and create a utopia for you?

The only utopia they are working to create is for themselves, a slavemaster utopia where they can do whatever they want and no can object. Their idea of utopia is where no one has any freedoms or rights. You are constantly spied on in all your communications, you are tracked wherever you go, you can be arrested without any due process of law and held indefinitely, you can be forcibly sterilized or exterminated; and anyone voicing disapproval can be killed.

They plan to reduce world population to 500 million, their eugenics ideas will be used to decide who is to be killed.

Does all of this sound like a utopia for you and your loved ones?

WWII_Death_PitDoes this look like a utopia for these Jewish families?

Sociopath – has a pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the welfare of others.

The British slavemasters and their demented minions are the worst sociopaths in the world.

Never let a sociopath be in charge of anything, especially a World Government.

.

The Slavemaster Nemesis

Nemesis was the goddess of indignation against, and retributive justice for, evil deeds and undeserved good fortune. She was a personification of the resentment aroused in men by those who committed crimes with apparent impunity, and who had inordinate good fortune.

Ah, yes! The reckoning that is now taking place.

While they were so busy trying to spy on and rule over everyone else…

someone was watching them

Meals On Wheels

.
Some ask who we work for, meaning what private or government entity do we work for.

None. We just have some friends we work with.

We work and write for all of the decent people.

We should have a decent world to live in, where all can have their own place – and with a little work, we will have it.

docks and more docks
.

References

 

1. Wikipedia Encyclopedia

2. War against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race by Edwin Black

3. The Nazi Connection; Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism by Stefan Kuhl

4. …and the truth shall set you free by David Icke

5. http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/990212/france.shtml

6. Blowback by Christopher Simpson

7. Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse by Dr. Leonard Horowitz

8. Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism, and Toxic Warfare by Dr. Leonard Horowitz

9. Father, Son and CIA by Harvey Weinstein

10. The Search for the Manchurian Candidate by John Marks

11. In The Sleep Room by Anne Collins

12. Freedom newspaper

13. Article by David R. Reagan at the website lamblion.com

14. The Big White Lie: The CIA and the Cocaine/Crack Epidemic by Michael Levine

15. In The Wilderness newsletter by Michael C. Ruppert

16. Congress Records

17. Greenwich Village Gazette – article by columnist Robert Lederman

18. New York Times

19. United Nations document titled Our Global Neighborhood
A Report of the Commission on Global Governance, 1992
published in 1995 by Oxford University Press

20. Testimony before the Congressional Helsinki Commission by Michael G. Kozak,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor

  • Advancing U.S. Interests Through the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
    Europe Michael G. Kozak

21. Testimony before the Congressional Helsinki Commission in Washington, DC, by
Elizabeth Jones, Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs

http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/36246.htm

22. Government web site

23. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-254

24. CRHT Decision: Warman vs. Beaumont, October 26, 2007, Para.68, cited in “Free
Speech Monitor” from Canadian Association for Free Expression Inc.

25. Could Politically Incorrect Speakers Be Charged With Aiding and Abetting Hate Crimes? article by Jacob Sullum, 15 Oct 2009

26. Hate Crime Laws: Punishment to Fit the Crime By Michael Lieberman ADL
Washington Counsel. This article originally appeared in Dissent Magazine on July 8,
2010

27. 1984 on the Horizon: Congress Moves to Regulate Thought Crime By Bob Ellis on
July 9th, 2009 – Dakota Voice

28. Bigot Bonus Under a new federal law, the wrong beliefs can trigger a second trial
and extra prison time. Jacob Sullum | October 14, 2009

29. http://endoftheamericandream.com/

30. The Triumph of Eugenics in Prenatal Testing, Part I. How It Happened Mary Meehan 2009;

  • ref #1 from original is:
    • James F. Crow, “Conclusion,” Birth Defects: Original Article Series (hereafter referred to as Birth Defects), vol. 8, no. 4 (July 1972), 115-18; “A New Name,” Social Biology 20, no. 1 (March 1973), 1; and ibid., 1969-75 & 1979-81.
  • Ref #2 from original is:
    • Frederick Osborn to Paul Popenoe, 25 March 1965, American Eugenics Society Records, American Philosophical Society Library, Philadelphia, Pa. On Osborn’s background, see Frederick Henry Osborn Papers, ibid.; Osborn’s obituary in the New York Times, 7 Jan. 1981, B-12; and Mary Meehan, “How Eugenics Birthed Population Control,” Human Life Review 24, no 4 (Fall 1998), 76-89.

31. Peter Dale Scott & Jonathan Marshall, Cocaine Politics: Drugs, Armies, and the CIA in Central America, Berkeley: U. of CA Press, 1991, pp. x-xi.

32. Jovial German Magnate, Berthold Beitz, New York Times article devember 7, 1960

33. The Game Player by Miles Copeland

Miles Copeland juniorMiles Copeland junior

Miles Copeland worked for the CIA for several decades. This is what he said about Pearl Harbor –

The Game Player by Miles Copeland_Page_1

The Game Player by Miles Copeland_Page_2

The Game Player by Miles Copeland_Page_8

The Game Player by Miles Copeland_Page_9

 

34. The Telegraph (UK newspaper)

Euro-court outlaws criticism of EU
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels
12:00AM GMT 07 Mar 2001

THE European Court of Justice ruled yesterday that the European Union can lawfully suppress political criticism of its institutions and of leading figures, sweeping aside English Common Law and 50 years of European precedents on civil liberties.

The EU’s top court found that the European Commission was entitled to sack Bernard Connolly, a British economist dismissed in 1995 for writing a critique of European monetary integration entitled The Rotten Heart of Europe.

The ruling stated that the commission could restrict dissent in order to “protect the rights of others” and punish individuals who “damaged the institution’s image and reputation”. The case has wider implications for free speech that could extend to EU citizens who do not work for the Brussels bureaucracy.

The court called the Connolly book “aggressive, derogatory and insulting”, taking particular umbrage at the author’s suggestion that Economic and Monetary Union was a threat to democracy, freedom and “ultimately peace”.

However, it dropped an argument put forward three months ago by the advocate-general, Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, which implied that Mr Connolly’s criticism of the EU was akin to extreme blasphemy, and therefore not protected speech.

Related Articles

Mr Connolly, who has been told to pay the European Commission’s legal costs, said the proceedings did not amount to a fair hearing. He said: “We’re back to the Star Chamber and Acts of Attainder: the rights of defendants are not respected or guaranteed in any way; the offence of seditious libel has been resurrected.”

Mr Colomer wrote in his opinion last November that a landmark British case on free speech had “no foundation or relevance” in European law, suggesting that the European Court was unwilling to give much consideration to British legal tradition.

Mr Connolly now intends to take his case to Europe’s other court, the non-EU European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.