Forward then back

The use of religious front groups in “political action” Psychological Warfare campaigns.


The National Conservative Political Action Committee (NCPAC; pronounced “nick-pack”) was founded in 1975 by John Terry Dolan, Charles Black and Roger Stone, with help from Richard Viguerie and Thomas F. Ellis. The group got its start through direct mail solicitations. A kind of slogan for this venture was espoused by co-founder Terry Dolan: “The shriller you are, the better it is to raise money.”


john terry dolan

Roger Stone (center) and Charles BlackRoger Stone center Charles Black

Richard Viguerie was tightly connected to Rev. Moon’s Unification Church.

Pictured with Ronald Reagan in 1984

Ronald Reagan and Richard Viguerie

Thomas F. Ellis

Thomas F. Ellis

The NCPAC was used to get around the contribution limits of the Federal election campaign, and to run propaganda assault campaigns on slavemaster-unapproved candidates.

Just 4 years later, right when the Sandinistas seized power away from the preferred slavemaster dictator in Nicaragua, the financial director for NCPAC, Carl “Spitz” Channell, formed a “coalition” of religious organizations to raise funds for the contras called the National Endowment for Preservation of Liberty. Apparently Carl was also homosexual who paradoxically once gave a massive donation to an anti-gay organization.

Carl Russell “Spitz” Channell


This is Carl with Oliver North as portrayed in a political cartoon of “contra trading cards” –

Carl_Spitz_Channell_ contra scandal trading cards


In the next few years, the most prominent private donor to contras was Marion Gordon “Pat” Robertson and the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) that he had founded in 1961 and was the director of. CBN hosted the infamous propaganda outlet called  “The 700 Club,” show. Robertson interviewed Adolfo Calero and Steadman Fagoth, Nicaraguan contra leaders; Efrain Rios Montt, then-president of Guatemala who had committed massive human rights abuses and even President Reagan.

Pat Robertson

Pat Robertson2

Pat Robertson was “tight” with President Reagan, and was staunchly “anti-communist” – so you can tell where he fits into this puzzle easily.

He also interviewed a former president of El Salvador, Alvaro Magana, and individuals connected with the Salvadoran death squads. He actually praised death squad leader Roberto D’Aubuisson of the ARENA party as a “very nice fellow.”

Pat Robertson’s CBN, already itself a massive intelligence front group, sheltered the creation of another front group for the Reagan Administration (Oliver North) called Operation Blessing. This was headed by Capt. Robert Warren, retired Navy counter insurgency specialist, who was formerly of Operation Phoenix (the CIA assassination group in Vietnam).

Harry Aderholt, the Air Force officer who pioneered Operation Phoenix headed the Air Commandos Association – Green Berets – and in the same time period here, he was supplying the Salvadoran Army against its rebels.


Aderholt, together with Robert Warren opened a “clinic” in Guatemala that turned out to be a de facto concentration camp for Indians such as the Mesquitos – the horrendous human rights violations (such as hooking them on cocaine) that went on there are well documented now, but back then the CIA and Vatican propaganda outlets (and the British, of course) were busily accusing the Sandanistas of what they had done.

By 1987, Robertson’s CBN (through Operation Blessing) had contributed $3 million through fundraising telethons to another front group called the Nicaraguan Patriotic Association per it’s president, Juan Sacasa who was the Houston representative for the contras.

Jose Gonzales Souza had started Semilla (“Seed”) at the Chesepeake, Va, office of Pat Robertson’s National Perspective Institute. Souza was a graduate of Robertson’s Regent University and lead its Hispanic Studies.

CBN gave him money to start Semilla to “train and organize Christian leaders in the Western Hemisphere” – especially in Latin America.

Just to illustrate the interconnectedness of this maze of front groups, Souza’s Semilla project received $1,714.34 from Carl (“Spitz”) and the National Endowment for Preservation of Liberty (NEPL) which was a part of Oliver North’s multifaceted procontra propaganda project.

Basically, Operation Blessing was a thinly veiled front group of the various intelligence agencies around the world to keep “rebellions” down (amongst other typically nasty agendas) – it hid behind Pat Robertson’s 700 club as a “humanitarian relief” organization.

Just like Reverend Moon and its anti-communist lockstep activity – the CAUSA group.

This is a tightly interlocking directorate.

For example, Pat Robert’s CBN News Director James Whelan was a founding editor of the propaganda rag newspaper Washington Times, which is owned by Reverend Moon’s Unification Church!

james whelan founding editor washington times

When James Whelan left Sun Myung Moon’s Washington Times in 1984, he regretted his role in the growth of the ultra-con propaganda sheet, confessing: “I have blood on my hands.”  But the blood began to stain him before his stint at the Times, when he worked for the Sacramento Union under CIA “Mockingbird” publisher Richard Mellon Scaife. Whelan learned the fine art of propaganda under Scaife, qualifying him for employment by the Unification Church.

– Washington Post, Ultra-Conservative Propagandist James R. Whelan, Founding Editor of the Washington Times, Dies at 79, December 8, 2012

Blood on his hands indeed.


Whelan’s partner-in-propaganda-crime Pat Robertson even tried to run for President in the 80’s, and one of his campaign pledges was to withdraw diplomatic recognition from Nicaragua and recognize the contras as a “government in exile.”

How convenient…


While Robertson was campaigning for President, his wife Dede said –

“He is not a television evangelist. He has never been an evangelist. He is a television broadcaster. He has a law degree. He’s a businessman. He has a multi-million dollar business that he started with $70.”

For a hilarious (and very accurate) political satire of Pat Robertson by Saturday Night Live’s Dana Garvey( as Church Lady in “church chat”) – you really have to see this episode from 1988, Season 13, Episode 13.

Pat apparently, at the time, was having trouble “remembering” that he had ever been a televangelist, as you can see from Dede’s statement, and Dana Garvey just nails it on the perfect ridicule.

It really is a must watch. You can watch either here at NBC or here at Hulu.


So, that’s the kind of nasty little puppet Pat Robertson was.

But…this man happens to be the tip of the iceberg is where things get really bad for Scientology’s stated purposes versus their real purposes.

This is a connection most of you are probably not familiar with, and it goes straight to the CIA and Scientology.



Moral ambiguity is more like it

The ‘father’ Cult – Moral and Spiritual Re-Armament.


Pat Robertson was at one time, heavily involved with the now-defunct Moral Majority – a group formed by Jerry Falwell.

reference – John J. Fiaka and Ellen Hume, “TV Preacher, Possibly Eyeing the Presidency, Is Polishing His Image,” The Wall Street Journal, October 17, 1985.

Falwell and Reagan

Jerry Falwell and President Reagan

Moral Majority (as was the Unification Church) were both outcroppings from something called the MRA – Moral and Spiritual Re-Armament.

The MRA happens to be one of two religious groups – one overtly christian and one not – chosen in 1950 and again in 1955 to front for CIA BlueBird and MKULTRA political operations – as revealed by CIA agent Miles Copeland.

Now, I’ve seen Miles Copeland quoted in places too numerous to mention. But what they all strangely seem to leave out is when this took place and a number of other correlating (and devastating) facts from Copeland’s book on the matter called The Game Player.

I obtained a copy of this book –

The Game Player by Miles Copeland_Page_1 The Game Player by Miles Copeland_Page_2


Here is the ONE part of the book that is often quoted in relation to scientology – without a date, without any discussion of what it actually meant, whose idea it was and why, and without mentioning that this was the second time that Hubbard and scientology was chosen which is earlier in the book.

(Blue arrow is marking the part about the MRA)

CIA uses Scientology from The Game Player by Miles Copeland

Note: That’s just plain odd, and absolutely terrible research. In fact, I’d even go so far as to say that such shoddy “journalistic” skills literally discredits what Copeland said! I believe that’s the point of utilizing idiot propaganda mouthpieces that don’t even bother to read the damn thing. Because I tell you what, this is a whole lot more significant than what it’s made to look like out there.

To actually get details about wtf really happened there, you’d have to actually READ the book, you see, and that’s how you can tell that just about none of the circle-jerk quoters out there even read it. They just quoted someone else’s quote, and so on.

It’s like in the movie Lake Placid, where one of the funniest one-liners by character Hector Cyr in response to a disbelieving statement by the local sheriff – was:

Well, they conceal information like that in books.


If anyone had actually looked at this book (instead of just cross-quoting) they would have seen exactly when this was all taking place.

July, 1955

starting political action july 1955 marked - The Game Player by Miles Copeland-2.

But, heck, after all it was a whole 4 pages earlier – far be it for me to criticize the obviously painful and impossible process for some people of having to flip some pages.

sarcasm little guy

Here’s the relevant text giving the date in two different ways.

So when the BA&H assignment in Egypt wound up in July 1955…

…… I had a wonderful time in Cairo, and now, as I look back on the period between July 1953 and July 1955, I see that it was eminently productive for the US Government, for my Egyptian friends and for BA&H as well as for myself.



Now let’s move on to more of the description of this “selection” of Hubbard and scientology.

I returned from my tour of Washington’s foreign policy bureaucracy with my job cut out for me. Kim Roosevelt had set my new unit in motion without me. He had told my first assistant, a bright and inventive young PhD named Bob Mandlestam, that he should get something started, anything that smacked at all of political action, so that Frank Wisner wouldn’t spot the unit’s inactivity and steal its office space and budget.

Bob Mandelstam in 1942 (3rd from left)

Robert MandelstamJLS (Japanese Language School) Univ. of Colo., summer 1942: Okamoto Sensei, Paul Farley, Robert Mandelstam, Roger Pineau, John Jago, Robert Kinsman, David Parkes

Bob eagerly put his imagination to work on some ideas he had been nursing since his university days.

His first was what he called ‘occultism in high places’, or ‘OHP’, a theory of political activism based on an impressively detailed study of ways in which leaders of the world based their judgements on one form or another of divine guidance.

…Then there was something called Moral Rearmament, known as MRA, an interdenominational politico-religious movement started by a nut named Frank Buchman. It purported to deepen the spiritual life of its members, thereby inducing them to behave responsibly and altruistically in their public lives. What caught Bob’s eye was the social level at which the movement operated. lt was aimed almost exclusively at leaders, and its literature was so designed. It was, in other words, appalling.

Note – Buchman was not a “nut”, what he was, was a Cecil Bloc intelligence agent for the British League of Nations/New World Order crowd – way out of Miles Copeland’s league. It’s interesting that Miles wants to call BOTH fellow intel agents (Buchman and Hubbard) “nuts”. Miles is either a complete idiot and totally clueless as to the real game that he professes to know so much of – which I doubt – or he’s doing that on purpose to HIDE the fact that these two men were intelligence agents.


But the arrangement we made with Moral Rearmament gave us useful secret channels right into the minds of leaders not only in Africa and Asia but also in Europe.

When Bob made similar arrangements with Scientology, the brainchild of another nut, this one a science-fiction writer named Ron Hubbard, we were on our way to having a political action capability which would make the highly expensive, largely ineffective and largely overt ‘covert action’ of Bill Casey’s CIA seem trivial by comparison.

‘MRA will hit ’em high, and the Church of Scientology will hit ’em low!’ Bob liked to boast, and he was right.

If you cynics who read this think I’m kidding, put the thought out of your mind. Back in the fifties, at least some of us understood that most moves on the international gameboard, as well as most moves in the various domestic games that were behind them, were based less on Machiavellian common sense than on old-fashioned superstition.


How Miles Copeland liked to see himself –


But what he really was, was one of the people on the big board of the “dance-hall” creators, the orchestrators, as he likes to call them and Miles is there playing with dolls in his little corner of a square.

Even his buddy Nat tried to tell him that:

Nat said the bloke was only dramatizing the perfectly obvious.

‘There’ll always be players,’ he said, ‘but they can’t make any meaningful moves on the board until someone gives them the music, puts the orchestra together and hires the hall. There you have the two categories of people that make things happen in this world.’

To me at the time, the important question was how in the future I should associate myself with the orchestrators rather than the players…

– Miles Copeland (not wanting to understand that he will never BE allowed to be one of the real orchestrators)

Even though clearly he knows this is the case, Miles spends too much time trying to dissuade his readers of that very thing – that WWII was completely orchestrated by forces other than what it appeared – Hitler being simply “the bad guy” in this current dance-hall production that could darkly be called The Hitler Follies.

sockpuppets from history hitler lincoln

For example:

I was in a position to know that there was no Master Plan, no behind-the-scenes strategic genius orchestrating our behaviour…

– Miles Copeland, The Game Player


Yah. Ok Miles.

come on!.

Either he’s covering for that very thing (which definitely existed and does exist) or he’s too low on the food chain to even know about it. Neither one is exactly complimentary.

Be all that as it may, what did Bob and Miles mean by “hit ’em low”?

Low, in the sense of “common folk”, but Hubbard was also tasked to get into the minds of cultural leaders, hence the aggressive recruitment of movie stars, musicians, sports figures and such (and the preferential treatment of them over rank-and-file scientologists).

In an absolute fit of hypocrisy, MRA put out a film in the late 1950’s (while working for the CIA) accusing “Communists” of doing exactly what Hubbard and the MRA were doing – going after young people in schools.

orange-Subvert_Students crowning experience MRA scientologyTake on the top athletes and scholars and subvert them.

The MRA propaganda film “The Crowning Experience” depicts Communist agents plotting to destroy an American Negro university by “subverting” the top students. – image from here.


The Crowning Experience, Jim Hardiman, Copyright Moral Re-Armament, Inc., 1960. Random House, New York, 1960.
OCLC Number: 28807889 – This is the book version of the MRA propaganda film “The Crowning Experience”, which is the story of a Negro woman who was the President of a Negro University. She went through a variety of trials and tribulations, like Communists” trying to “subvert” her best students (photo here). She even met the President of the United States, but the “crowning experience” of her life was when the white Moral Re-Armament cult religion accepted her as a member. 


In scientology, the star-studded obssession later first manifested in a big way with the creation of Celebrity Center Los Angeles headed by Yvonne (Gillman) Jentsch.

Nothing like feet first.



MRA will hit ’em high, and the Church of Scientology will hit ’em low






Side note – It might interest you to know that like fellow CIA agent Ron Hubbard, Buchman and his followers constantly exaggerated and lied about their successes.

Any scientologists (or those well-conversant with scientology materials) out there will probably recognize this particular slant on things that Buchman had – that is also exactly like “defenses” scientology propagandists put out.

Moral Re-Armament cannot be honestly opposed on intellectual grounds because it is basic truth… Opposition to Moral Re-Armament has special significance. It always comes from the morally defeated.

– Remaking Men, by Paul Campbell and Peter Howard, page 66.


I highly recommend that you read The Religious Roots of Alcoholics Anonymous and the Twelve Steps – the clear parallels between CIA agents Ron Hubbard and Frank Buchman, and their front groups Scientology and the MRA are simply astounding – down to buying palatial “retreat” estates and more.

* * *


You know, speaking of lieing propagandists, I probably should take a moment here to point out that one of the evangelical fairy tales that is present out there concerns what is referred to as the “takeover” of scientology by the CIA.

This is a disinformation campaign (whether its perpetrators know it or not is beside the point) that is predominantly spread by two main sources.

  • Ron’s Org – an organization started by ex-pat scientologist “Captain” Bill Robertson and currently being promulgated by Erica and Max Hauri.



  • the Veritas/Sc – irs – ology bunch (who obsess about the government craving and then stealing Hubbard’s magnificent superman OT Levels) – that is very hard to say with a straight face, let me tell you. I should know.



Both groups try and have it be believed that scientology was “pure” prior to the 1970’s, but that it was then infiltrated and taken over by the evil CIA who “wanted the remote-viewing materials, the OT levels”.

You can see the problem with that now –

Hubbard was working with the CIA all the way since 1950!


wiley-uh-ohI hate it when that happens.

Down goes that fairy tale then.

Then we have another faction in more recent times – with people like Marty Rathbun, Steve Hall, Karen De La Carriere, etc., all evangelizing on the “enemy” is official scientology.

You will note the veiled distinction there.

Here’s one of their recently added evangelists and resident man-for-logic crusader, Chris Shelton, saying exactly that to Gerry Armstrong in March of 2015. I swear he sounds like he’s trying to be a mini Winston Churchill.


I firmly believe we should all stand shoulder-to-shoulder against the common enemy, which is the official Church of Scientology.

– Chris Shelton

official as opposed to what exactly…

aha moment

Obviously there is an unofficial scientology. You do realise don’t you, that Chris is leaving the door open for a different version of scientology. You know, a better managed, stripped-down, kindler, gentler, behavior modification front group.

Oh yea, that’s the ticket. That would be so much better.

eye roll

Personally, I think that’s the whole stupid plan of these people.

This faction that Chris busily evangelises for about logic and “critical thinking” – this faction specializes in human interest tabloid press.

It’s all about trying to put a “human” and “rational” face on scientology while at the same time also specializing in never no-touchy anything real about scientology’s CIA connections.

It’s taboo.

shh don't tellno-fly-zone


Considering a number of these people held high-level positions of one kind or another in the Church, not too hard to say why that is so protected a topic.

whistling girl.

Alright, so that’s a brief up-to-the-minute encapsulation for you concerning scientology and the:

  • CIA took over and corrupted scientology….” Fairy Tale

as well as

  • What CIAno CIA here, it’s all just us plain-folks…Fairy Tale


So, remember now, we have the “christian” group – the MRA – and we have the non-christian group – Scientology having been chosen by CIA Political Action Chief Miles Copeland in 1955.

How’s about we take back this “christian” angle first, taking a little look-see at more recent times that show that scientology actually worked together with it’s fellow front-groups – the “christian” ones.

Let’s talk about the CNP first.

The Council of National Policy (CNP) had been founded in 1981 by Tim LaHaye (also founded American Coalition for Traditional Values), Pat Robertson was CNP president in 1987.

It was actually Tim LaHaye that pushed for the creation of Moral Majority by the way – in 1979. It was him that “encouraged” Jerry Falwell to form it, and Tim then sat on its board.


Tim LaHaye Tim-LaHaye

Side note: The CNP – whom Pat Robertson was on the board of – actually hosted Nicaraguan contra leader (and monster) Adolfo Calero at a 1984 gathering.

The political chief of the CIA's Contra forces, Adolfo Calero, third from left, and cocaine smuggler Norwin Meneses, right, during a 1984 meeti ng of an anti-communist group in San Francisco. The other men are local FDN supporters.

The political chief of the CIA’s Contra forces, Adolfo Calero, third from left, and cocaine smuggler Norwin Meneses, right, during a 1984 meeti ng of an anti-communist group in San Francisco. The other men are local FDN supporters.


Other board members of the CNP included: General John Singlaub (World Anti-Communist League and Unification Church supporter) and Oliver North (former National Security Council staff member).


john k singlaub

The CNP also has heavy ties with scientology. These activities are all under the part of the slavemasters behavior modification plan called “social change’ and “Christian family values” in America.

Tim’s wife, Beverly LaHaye, joined forces with Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) – a group created by the Guardian’s Office – the intelligence branch of scientology – in 1969, on several occasions beginning in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s.

Beverly LaHaye


In the 1990’s, Mrs. LaHaye and Bauer appeared and spoke together in a 1995 rally against psychiatric practices on children – which of course CCHR was also present.

The CNP, is just one example of so-called “evangelical” type front groups being just filled with Intelligence officers, Moon representatives and Scientology members.

Here are just a few names from this group – and I think you’ll get the picture.

  • Howard Ahmanson Jr. (CNP Board of Governors) Contributed to the Council of Foreign Relations according to their 1990-1993 reports
  • Thomas R. Anderson (CNP Board of Governors) Also sits on the board of the Moon front Family Research Council.
  • Rep John Ashbrook (CNP Board of Governors) Also a member of Moons front group “Christian Voice”.
  • Richard Bott (CNP Board of Governors) Former writer for the Moon owned Washington times.
  • Jeffrey Coors (CNP Board of Governors) Coors brewing Co.
  • Joseph Coors (CNP Board of Governors) President Adolph Coors Company
  • Arnaul D’Borchgrave (CNP Member) Editor in chief of the Moon owned Washington times, member of the Council of Foreign Relations(CFR).
  • George Gilder (CNP Board of Governors) Program director for Rockerfeller funded Manhattan Institute, friend of David Rockerfeller, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR).
  • Ron Godwin (CNP Member) Former Vice President of Falwells Moral Majority, Sr Vice President of the Moon owned Washington times
  • Allan Gottleib (CNP Member) Board Member of Moons front group, the American Freedom Coalition. In 1983 the Moon group CAUSA, founded by Bo Hi Pak, former Korean CIA and liaison to the American CIA, and Moons right hand man, granted Gottleib an all expense paid trip to Jamaica for a CAUSA conference
  • J. Peter Grace (CNP Member) Council of Foreign Relations, Knights of Malta, and worked with the CIA to remove classified info concerning former Nazi scientists so that they could immigrate into the U.S., supposedly so they could carry on their work (including mind control projects) here in the good ole U.S.of A.
  • Lt. General Daniel Graham (CNP Board of Governors) Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Deputy Director CIA, Military advisor to President Reagan, publicly endorses the Moon owned Washington Times. Also a member of the Moon organisation, World Anti-Communist League, and board of Directors for Moons CAUSA. Member of the American Freedom Coalition. Vice Chairman for the U.S. Council for World Freedom, which also is closely related to Moons CAUSA. Member too of the Council of 56, Religious Roundtable.
  • Robert Grant (CNP Directory) Founder of “Christian Voice”, and the American Freedom Coalition, both are Moon sponsored organizations. Graduate of the fuller Theological Seminary, and member of the Religious Roundtable. Bo Hi Pak has praised the union between these Christian organizations and Moonie orgs saying “…it shows what a great sense of humor God has.” Grants “Christian Voice” claims to be the nations largest Christian lobby, and according to the Philadelphia Inquirer, merged with Moon in 1987.
  • Sen. Jesse Helms (CNP Board of Governors) also of the Religious Roundtable, endorser of the Moon owned Washington times, and a member of the Council for Foreign Relations(CFR).
  • Max Hugel (CNP Member) Former special assistant CIA Deputy Director for Administration, and Deputy Director for Operations
  • Jack Kemp (CNP Member) Co Director of Empower American, whose board is dominated by the Council of Foreign Relations(CFR).
  • Alan Keyes (CNP Member) Former Ambassador to the United Nations. He was also part of Reagans National Security Team which was dominated by high level Council of Foreign Relations men(CFR).
  • Edwin Meese (CNP Executive Committee, CNP President) Former Attorney General, former Chief of Staff


But one of the main predecessors to this and other later front groups – was the other one chosen by Miles, the MRA.

If you recall, this was the one that was supposed to target “leaders” around the world.

The key to understanding a front group such as Moral Rearmament (MRA) is that it:

  • A: focused most attention on converting the influential and the rich and
  • B: It steadfastly opposed “communism”.

It was meant to distract people off the very obvious 2-class feudalism system that was being put into place on a global level.

This is why it featured “surrender” to Jesus Christ in pursuit of four moral absolutes: purity, unselfishness, honesty, and love. This is not about improving people’s lives, it’s about distracting them from rebelling against “civilization as we know it” – which means the slavemasters idea of how things should be.

Always to their benefit first, of course.

So, let’s talk about John Mott now.

Who’s he?

Well, John Mott founded the Young Men’s Christian Association – better known as the YMCA.

John Raleigh Mott

John R. Mott

This was another front group to”combat communism” around the world, sponsored by J.D. Rockefeller Jr. on behalf of his Vatican/British nobility slavemasters – such as Robert Cecil, Lord Salisbury, for example.

The type of propaganda used were things like what a smug little man named Frederick Gates put out.

Frederick Gates

Frederick taylor gates

Who’s he?

Well, in 1902 Rockefeller Sr. established the General Education Board and he appointed Frederick Gates as the Board’s chairman.

Gates wrote an article in August of 1912 entitled “The Country School of To-morrow” (The World’s Work, August 1912).

In our dream we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and a responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science.


Obviously, this is Nesilim (Vatican and British) feudalism visited upon the entire world – as a plan, and not everyone was asleep at the wheel on what this meant.

A man named John Hylan, a Judge and New York City mayor, spoke about this paper 10 years later in a speech of March 26, 1922.

John Hylan

He said:

“…this is the kind of education the coolies receive in China, but we are not going to stand for it in these United States. One of my first acts as Mayor was to pitch out, bag and baggage, from the educational system of our city, the Rockefeller agents and the Gary plan of education to fit the children for the mill and factory.”

While I appreciate his passion, you will notice he thinks these ideas and plans were actually Rockefellers in the first place – they weren’t.

Rockefeller was, by comparison to those he answered to, a step-n-fetch it for the Slavemasters.

come igor rockefeller - slavemaster

You also need to remember this in context here – the slavemasters had just lost the main reason for WWI, getting the U.S. to agree to the League of Nations.

Senator Borah from Idaho pretty much singlehandledly (and singlemindedly) crushed their plans in that arena, when the Senate voted down the Treaty with the League of Nations crap in it. (See Borah post)

The League of Nations was an attempt to turn American back into the very thing we founded our country in escape from, in opposition to, and in separation forever with – that was as stated in the original Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Speaking of which, many people miss some of the profound power of those original words and their inter-relationship one with the other in those original statements.

I’m not meaning some kind of lawyerly word-parsing looking for a way to get some guilty criminal off the hook, no, I’m talking why they wrote what they did, and how they did.

What do you think this clause means, for example?

all Men are created equal

From the second paragraph in the Declaration of Independence.


“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

Do you see any kind of a 2-class system inherent in the bolded part?


Did you know that Jefferson had originally written, “We hold these truths to be sacred and un-deniable…” and Benjamin Franklin changed it to, “We hold these truths to be self-evident.” ?

That’s odd, don’t you think?

Look at why.

self-evident means not needing to be demonstrated or explained; obvious.

sacred means revered due to sanctity

sanctity means ultimate importance and inviolability.

inviolability.- too important to be ignored or treated with disrespect

So…put them together and you get the idea that these rights are to be revered because of their ultimate importance and are never to be violated, ignored, or disrespected.

And that’s just Jefferson’s word sacred!

The other word he used was undeniable.

undeniable means unable to be denied or disputed.

Add that into the mix and you get the idea that these rights are to be revered because of their ultimate importance and are never to be violated, ignored, or disrespected, since they are unable to be denied or disputed, period – no debate.

That’s a hell of a lot stronger than Franklin’s wimpy replacement of self-evident.

spock fascinating

Besides the above statements, Jefferson and the founding fathers went even further, they also killed any kind of “supremacy of rule” based on religion, and particularly stabbed through the heart any supremacy or favoritism towards the Catholic Church/Christianity in America.

Constitution –

..but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States


Furthermore, the Declaration of Independence clarifies that governments should only derive their power through the consent of the governed.


These two things combined were devastating.

Jefferson and friends basically stabbed through the heart and killed the whole king/priest 2-class system of the slavemasters in our corner of the world. This was a first ever for the slavemasters.

This is why you see Popes of the Catholic Church inventing and levying the slur “communist” starting as far back as the mid 1800’s – it was about what America did.

This is what they tried to stop the rest of the world from doing.

This is not what America is now, unfortunately.

It might interest you to know that Jefferson actually was inspired by George Mason.

The Virginia Declaration of Rights was drafted by George Mason in May 1776 and amended by Thomas Ludwell Lee (1730–1778) and the Virginia Convention. It was adopted by the Virginia Convention on June 12, 1776. Thomas Jefferson borrowed many ideas and phrases from the Virginia document when he drafted the Declaration of Independence a few weeks later. The Virginia Declaration of Rights has also been heralded as a model for the first ten amendments to the federal Constitution, the amendments known as the “Bill of Rights.”

But before that, Jefferson wrote something else rather enlightening.

The Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking up Arms puts forth the reasons for America’s rebellion that were raised in the 1775 congressional declaration. The spirited and creative qualities of Jefferson’s draft of this helped secure his selection as chair of the committee to draft the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

It’s a very interesting document.


So when you understand what the word communism is actually meaning – threat to the 2-class system of the slavemasters – these front groups of the YMCA and the statements by Frederick Gates from within America become downright Machiavellian.

Look at Step-n-fetch-it Rockefellers pet mouthpiece’s statement again –

Gates wrote an article in August of 1912 entitled “The Country School of To-morrow” (The World’s Work, August 1912).

In our dream we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and a responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science.

Talk about who is the real enemy of mankind here. Wow. And what a far cry from Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration of Independence and the whole premise founding the United States of America this a-hole is.

So, like father like son, John D. Rockefeller Jr. also tried to find ways to support missions whose goals were presented under the guise of “saving the world from Communism.”

You can appreciate the horrifying irony there now, I trust.

perish the thought - wry ick face

Our boy John Mott was a millenarian whose special talent was to sell the world on “hastening” the Second Coming of Christ by evangelizing the world “in this generation.”

That last is a very key phrase. It is a very specific propaganda that has been repeated ever since this time.

For example, it’s carried forward by Geoffrey Gorer, British intelligence agent during WWII.

Geoffrey Gorer worked for the Yale Institute of Human Relations and the OSS. Tavistock Institute of Human Relations is a sister to Yale Institute of Human Relations. Both are Rockefeller-funded. Both are rat-nest think tanks for hatching social engineering methods. They are part of a network of front groups practicing Social Psychiatry.

Gorer wrote an essay in 1956 which clearly illustrates the goal of this network.

The essay was entitled The Remaking of Man.

One of the most urgent problems – facing the world today is how to change the character and behavior of adult human beings within a single generation.


Ah, but L. Ron Hubbard was over 5 years earlier than Gorer, saying the same goal, and also adding that religious element into things just like John Mott.

It seems inevitable that, as theta conquered MEST and made it into higher and more complex organisms, the problem of getting enturbulated theta and MEST separated for the next generation would be resolved, at last, on an intellectual level and within one generation; theta mastering the problem of smoothing itself out within the organism itself. Actually, at a swift glance, this is Dianetics.

…Inevitably a high form of life [read Messiah/God] could be expected to resolve this entheta-enMEST problem without an intervening death cycle.

– p. 22, BOOK ONE: The Dynamics of Behavior, CHAPTER ONE COLUMN A The Tone Scale; Science of Survival (1951) L. Ron Hubbard.


That is, unless you are one of the “evil ones” – than you are damned, essentially. Always gotta have that ridiculous threat in there, you see.

Oddly enough, or perhaps not so oddly, hardly any re-interpretation of scripture is necessary, save that the boldness and scope of past considerations about the human soul, God and the Devil, and Heaven and Hell are stabilized and made contactable.

Those who succumb to the Forces of Evil and are unable to live more than evil and destructive lives would seem, should these conclusions be borne out on further investigation of a scientific nature, to be entered not only upon a dwindling spiral in one generation but upon a decline toward a final end of pain or nonsurvival as personal identities.

– p.227, Book II, CHAPTER EIGHTEEN COLUMN AN, Level of Mind Alert; Science of Survival (1951) L. Ron Hubbard.


Hubbard repeats this same theme in many places. Here is one where he ascribes the “one lifetime” idea over onto Buddhism which is very telling to me – it tells me immediately that what people think Buddhism is, isn’t what it is. Not only is it obviously not ancient at all, but it has also obviously been written by one of these declamatio propagandists-for-hire on behalf of the slavemasters probably in only the last 150 years or so.

Their unique style of propaganda always hangs them.


And if you lived a fairly pure life, lacking in sensuousness and evil practices,  …you could break the endless chain of birth and death… But to reach salvation in one lifetime, that was the hope of Buddhism.

– LRH book The Phoenix Lectures


Was it...

oh really

Sounds more like Round Table and Roman Catholic church propaganda to me – courtesy of the ever-lending Jesuit missionaries no doubt.

And so John Mott here, well he noticed that other people in the world (particularly China) weren’t taking too kindly to the typical BS propaganda of the Nesilim slavemasters long-used in Europe.

It reminds me of this scene in Tombstone.


John Mott knew that trouble was brewing in the “poor” countries who had NO love of the slavemaster stupid 2-class system and were not in the mood to accept that yoke. He figured that unless more tolerance and social concern were shown by so-called American (they aren’t any more American than the Pope is) missionaries throughout the Third World?

The missionaries (really the slavemasters, you understand) would find themselves facing the same kind of angry nationalistic reaction that America did against Britain and the Roman Catholic Church.

And that took them nearly a century to get America back under again.


You can see why they weren’t wanting any more of that around the world – from their twisted perspective.

Mott had interesting ways of trying to mix science with religion (he said science was the probing of God’s mind) and also some rather unique propaganda methods to moralize about stripping people of money.

Shades of scientology’s regging tactics here – future of humanity, creating a “clear” planet, and all that. So consistent these crazy bastards are, eh?

For example, Mott said:

“To ask money of a man for the purposes of the world-wide Kingdom of God is not to ask him a favor,” he once wrote. “It is to give him a superb opportunity of investing his personality in eternal shares.”

Eternal shares?

wiley oh wowPat Robertson move over.

pound tthe ground laughing

Money was “so much stored-up personality,” Mott argued, accumulated days of human labor that survived its owners and therefore could be used after death to extend the owner’s life on earth.

This concept of the transubstantiation of money into an immortal soul bore a striking resemblance to the Catholic Church leaders rationale, as it also did to the British Nobility/slavemasters.

Fancy that.


With that chosen propaganda explanation, Mott then incorporated the “culture and methods of corporations” into the missionary movement. Over the years, millions of dollars poured into Mott’s pursuit of a streamlined, efficient “evangelism”.

Live forever, get your soul shares right here!


Two significant factors motivated Mott – ruling the world “under Christ” – and we know what that really means – and the obsession with China and its “its huge potential harvest of souls” which of course, really was about all those lovely hordes of people that could be put to work and slave away happily for the slavemasters. And yes, it really is that disgusting.

Note: One of the other ways dreamed up of “stopping the spread of communism” was the use of Health organizations as a cover, to be used to ferret out information about each and every person’s personal lives – the better to control and “convert” them to the slavemaster way, or to identify “natural leaders” and target them for behavior modification.

I myself fell under that “plan” of theirs, I told that story in my first post about Synanon and Scientology.

One of the first of these type of cover organizations was the Rockefeller funded (but not ordered) Bureau of Social Hygiene. Its stated mission: research and education on birth control, maternal health, and sex education. Together with that, the American Social Hygiene Association was created to direct “scientific” study of the biological and social factors that influence human sexual conduct.

One of the first “evangelizers” helping to spread the slavemaster disease under the guise of purely business – as in corporations – was one of our favorite propagandist Frederick Gates.

He would argue to his followers that the advance of “the American corporation” represented “the Will of God”, thereby coming up with the slogan for Standard Oil’s kerosene in China as (from the New Testament) “the light of the World.”

standard oil - light of the world

You see why Mott was characterizing the whole corporation idea as a fine idea to the countries that the slavemasters wanted their resources – it was part of getting the people to let them in.

Sort of like the Big Bad Wolf story, in a way, where religion is one of the methods the wolf used to try to get at the little pigs.


I want what you have and I want it NOW!

mad crying baby

says the bratty slavemaster.


The overview of all these religious “missions” was actually very well stated by Gates.

He said that a “study of the map of the world” disclosed to him that the different missions were really a single “invading army,” whose “masterfulness of strategy and tactics, [was] controlled and directed by one master mind,” God.

Except that “god” is really certain men.


You know, ones that look like this –

Pope nicholas V by Peter_Paul_Rubens in 1616.

So, it was in this climate that John Mott “activated” Frank Buchman – so to speak – in 1909.



The story goes that Mott asked him to go to Pennsylvania State Uni­versity as the YMCA secretary there, in order to reconcile differences that had arisen between the faculty and the stu­dents and had led to a student strike. On the first night of his arrival there were nineteen liquor parties. The situation seemed hope­less. Buchman began to work on certain people who were in key positions in the institution and was instrumental in “convert­ing” them.

In the Twelve Steps, A. Orange tells us most of the students and faculty didn’t like him much though.

Note: The Orange Papers is a truly excellent resource, by the way. It went offline in late 2016 but I managed to recover it out of the internet archive. Here’s the main page link and here’s more about Buchman’s Oxford Group and Moral Re-Armament or MRA.

…effective July 1, 1909. He moved in with the boys at the YMCA, and lived there for years. The students didn’t like Buchman.

During his first year, Buchman reckoned, he was probably the most unpopular man on campus. Some of the students reacted sharply both to his earnestness and to what they felt were his puritanical attitudes, and he was nicknamed ‘Pure John’, a jibe derived from a contemporary cartoon figure. He became accustomed to seeing ‘Pure John — 99 per cent pure’ scrawled on vacant sign-boards; he was guyed in the college revue, caricatured in the college magazine.
On the Tail of a Comet: The Life of Frank Buchman, Garth Lean, page 34.

The other faculty at Penn State didn’t seem to like Buchman much, either. One commented, “Buchman oozed the oil of unctuous piety from every pore. I would not be interested in seeing him again if it were at the cost of having to shake hands with him.”


orange-Buchman-PennStateFrank Buchman (center, 2nd row) with Penn State students.
The reformed campus bootlegger Bill Pickle (with the mustache) is to Buchman’s left.


Buchman was a homosexual by the way, that may have had something to do with the dislike. Putting supposed piousness together with making sexual passes at young men under one’s care doesn’t exactly lend itself to respect. But, by 1915, when he left, 1,200 men out of a total of 1,600 were attending Bible classes.

As long as they aren’t restless and rebellious – eh?


Bible studies – ick. Sticking people on that stupid, false, endless treadmill of going to heaven – but of course never actually getting anywhere.


That’s sick.

But, not having that kind of intensity directed at them and their plans is really all they seem to care about – they don’t care what they have to invent to try and stave that off.

To illustrate my point, guess what Mott’s next assignment coming down through Rockefeller Jr. was?

After revolutions against the slavemaster system had broken out in both Mexico and China in 1910, Rockefeller sent Mott to set up a China Medical Board to blend medical science and religion into a powerful new institution the Peking Union Medical College.

By 1917, Mott had “re-organized’ this college (founded in 1906) to be, according to Dr. Simon Flexner, “the John Hopkins of China.”

This all led to establishing a foothold for the testing of psychiatric (and others) pharmaceuticals on the Chinese people to try and figure out how to repress their rebellious nature.

The below picture is from 1921, showing the trustees of the Peking Union Medical College. Edwin R. Embree (secretary of the Rockefeller Foundation) is 4th from left.

trustees of peking union medical college - 1921

If we wait until China becomes stable, Mott told the members of Junior’s China Medical Board, “we lose the greatest opportunity that we shall ever have.

Oh my god – see, they don’t want the people to have peace and stability if the slavemasters are not allowed to be in power.

That’s just so horrifyingly evil.

Oh - the Horror! - Silent film star

That nation will only have one generation in its modern era,” he wrote after the proclamation of the Chinese Republic in 1911. “The first wave of students to receive the modern training, will set the standards and the pace.

At this point Mott had become essentially the slavemaster go-between to Rockefeller, not the other way around. Kind of a “show me the money” relationship.

Mott’s little YMCA operation got exposed later in the U.S. – some pretty scandalous stuff got revealed, including getting raked over the coals for the lie that it was a “Christian missionary crusade to save the world from communism” when it was really about taking over control of other people, their countries, and their resources. But, it was still fully operating in all the “target” countries.

– reference: Thy Will Be Done: The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil.

They tried again in 1918 – this time activating Buchman for a different purpose. Buchman had actually been present in China when Mott was dillying around trying to impress the Chinese with big expensive buildings. After Penn State he had taken off with his homosexual lover Sherwood Eddy for two years – during 1915 and 1916, Buchman traveled in China, India, Korea, and Japan.

He met with little success there, and unhappily noticed that the Communists were far better at recruiting than the Christian missionaries were, because the Communists did not display arrogant, condescending, know-it-all attitudes towards “the heathens”, and the Communists were not out to destroy the local cultures.

Side note: – Frank Buchman was there in 1917 during the midst of a revolutionary epoch during which Sun Yat Sen had briefly held power. This is significant, because it means that he was there at the same time that Paul Linebarger’s father (the “judge”) was acting as a consultant to Sun Yat Sen. I’d bet Linebarger probably even knew Frank Buchman. Considering Linebarger’s later involvement with Miles Copeland the CIA and choosing L. Ron Hubbard and Buchman for “political action” ops in 1955, that’s yet another coinky-dink for you to mull over.

So both Mott and Buchman knew there was a slight problem (sarcastically speaking) with spreading the “gospel” of the predominantly homosexual and pedophilic slavemasters as it was then being presented. In fact, it was because Buchman was kicked out of the boys dorm at the Hartford Seminary during this time, making him “available” for use in China – which is what happened next, backed by Mott and Rockefeller, and Harry Luce.

When he returned to the U.S.A. in 1917, Buchman was appointed Extension Lecturer in Personal Evangelism at the Hartford Seminary, in Hartford, Connecticut. There, he moved into the students’ dormitory with the boys, in spite of the fact that he was then 38 years old. Buchman gained a reputation for dwelling on the importance of sexual sin in his dealings with students. He was asked to move out of the boys’ dorm [in 1918] when the students complained about his “intrusive methods”.

In 1918 he was back in China. His return to China was financed by Harry Blackstone of Los Angeles, and Buchman was accompanied by a team of his own choosing that included Dr. Harry Luce, father of one of the co-founders of Time magazine.

Rockefeller again turned to his trusted friend John Mott, who proposed a plan that would enable global acquisitions of land and wealth as well as solving the philanthropic problem of who to support and fund for the furtherance ‘of the gospel’.

That gospel, having nothing to do with any actual religion other than the religion of “we rule the world” – if you follow me there. Who to support or fund is really just a veiled reference to that process of choosing “leaders” that would do what the slavemasters wanted – the hallmark of the later MRA, get it?

In a nutshell, Frank Buchman now gets his debut or shove into the limelight by the British/Vatican slavemasters, and became very busy spreading his “gospel” in the very countries that the slavemasters were having rebellions struck against them.  The rebellions were justified completely, the people didn’t agree that they, their country, and their country’s assets belonged to the slavemasters by some “divine” right.

That’s why the introduction of religious front groups with new “twists” on things – they’re trying to figure out how to get those dang independent types under control.

As mentioned earlier, Buchman was first sent to China – of course, slavemasters obsess about China endlessly.


In Kuling, China in 1918 he organized his first “house­party,” a type of gathering which was to become a Buchmanite trademark. Activities ranged from Bible study and “quiet times” to bridge playing and golf. There were also voluntary general meetings in which attendees “shared,” confessing their “sins” and offering witness to the “change” in their lives caused by adherence to Buchman’s principles.

In China, Frank Buchman’s behavior was so obnoxious that he offended just about everybody with whom he had contact.

orange-Logan_Roots+BuchmanBishop Logan Herbert Roots and Frank N. D. Buchman (right) in China


It was the norm for Buchman and his cohorts to go to great lengths to attract the rich and famous, and, when they were hooked, to shamelessly exploit their names, a tendency which would become more pronounced in the coming years.

It was in China that he met a young Episcopalian minister named Samuel M. Shoemaker Jr., who was also having no success as a missionary. Through psychological mind games that involved criticizing Shoemaker and putting him down, Buchman converted Shoemaker to his own beliefs, and Shoemaker became Buchman’s faithful follower and right-hand man for more than twenty years – it was through one of his followers that Alcoholics Anonymous would be started, which at first was part of Buchman’s Oxford group.

Sam Shoemaker


In the early twenties Frank Buchman began to hold these houseparties at Ivy League colleges in the U.S. and at Oxford and Cambridge in England. Buchman became obssessed with controlling people’s sexual impulses doing what he called “soul surgery”. Real-life examples of this can be found in Frank Buchman’s Secret published a few months after Buchman’s death in 1961.

But, first he was called back from China to the U.S. by the British. He was asked to come attend the Washington Disarmament Conference in 1921.

Even propaganda pieces about him verify this point, but they act like he was some lone crusader by himself (which isn’t what happened at all).

Example – San Antonio Light newspaper, June 1, 1958.


In the midst of all the vastness of the ocean during his journey of November 1921, another story goes that he “reflected” on his position at the Hartford Seminary and then on the train-ride to Washington D.C. he “decided” to resign – as if there weren’t scandals as the real reason.

It finally crystallised one night when he was travelling to Washington to meet delegates to the current Disarmament Conference.* ‘Resign, resign, resign,’ the rhythm of the train’s wheels seemed to say, and he jotted down, ‘Resign on principle. Don’t worry about finances. You must make an untried experiment. Step out alone.’

  • Frank Buchman info website.

What is true, however, is that the real reason for his resignation is that he had been chosen by the British/American slavemasters to carry out their gospel – that of the New World Order.

It was on 20 December 1921, that Colonel David Forster (member of the British Delegation to the Disarmament Conference) had invited the conference delegates to meet Buchman. Thirty came.

Arthur Balfour, the nephew of slavemaster Robert Cecil, headed the British delegation – it was him that ordered that Buchman be brought in.

Sir Robert Borden (former Premier of Canada) Lord Lee, Lloyd George, A. J. Balfour and Sir Auckland Geddes.


Balfour’s longtime associate from the days of the Coefficients Club, undercover British intelligence man H.G. Wells was also attending the conference as a “reporter” (standard intelligence “cover” back then) for an international array of press syndicates – he met with Frank Buchman as well.


But it was Senator Borah who actually called for the conference originally, it might interest you to know.

Borah – left


As a reminder this is the same man that also spearheaded killing the British/Vatican backed League of Nations completely in the Senate later on in this time period.

Borah (and Secretary of State Hughes) had originally planned the Conference to be specifically targeted at disarmament of the British and Japanese navy arms-building fest and the war-mongering that the slavemasters were leveling against humanity.

I think that Borah essentially was chessing them, calling them on their false outer image of peace this, peace that, and peace the other thing.

We’re peaceful! Dammit!


It’s all YOUR fault we had to have these wars!

hilarious portrayal of the slavemasters blaming war on the people - disarmament 1921hilarious portrayal of the slavemasters blaming war on the people – disarmament 1921


One of the promotional campaigns of the Round Table/Slavemaster League of Nations bs, was “bringing about the end of war” through “removing the causes of war”, you see, and Borah did quite an interesting press statement that kind of killed their credibility by pointing to their total hypocrisy on the subject, at the time.

One of the things the British slavemasters had been doing was that they were holding up bio-war from nameless others as a fear-mongering thing – neglecting to mention the fact that they were one of the main promoters of the creation of such weapons in the first place.

Well-captured in this political cartoon during the Conference –


SENATOR WILLIAM E. BORAH (REP. IDAHO), who originally proposed a conference with Great Britain and Japan on a reduction of navies –

“It is said that in order to have peace and disarmament we must first remove the causes of war. I agree; we must remove the causes of war in so far as we can. Let, us begin, however, with the most prolific cause of war, incitement to war, a constant invitation to war, always a temptation to war, to wit, huge navies—competition in naval armaments.

“So long as nations rise and fall, so long as peoples are imbued with a national spirit and are of different races, so long as commercial rivalry obtains, there will be differences between nations; nations will have controversies. We can never hope to settle them all and see no more arise.

But suppose that every battle ship which Japan has was at the bottom of the sea; suppose that every battle-ship—those obsolete floating palaces which we are building-was at the bottom of the sea and likewise every battle ship belonging to Great Britain was at the bottom of the sea, would the United States, Great Britain and Japan be any less fitted to sit down and discuss Yap or to discuss the liberation of China?

Would either or any of the Powers be less secure; indeed, would not reason and justice and right be more likely to prevail?

The most hoary-headed lie which ever tormented the human race is the old, worn-out lie—proved false a thousand times— that great armies and great navies are assurances of peace.”

– The Literary Digest for November 12, 1921 World Leaders on Disarmament


You can see that Borah had the true target in sight there with his plan for this Conference. But, the League of Nations men turned it into this whole distracted thing with all sorts of points and “treaties” being put as part of the agenda, and then later laying claim to the whole thing as their idea.

Yeah, right.


One of the distractions, where Britain is trying to take attention off of that they were refusing to back off the arms-building, was making a treaty with Ireland. You know, as a child I often wondered about the “lion” symbology was that was chosen in British-man C.S. Lewis Chronicles of Narnia series – I think now I know why.

1921 image – at the time of the conference.


Irish Sein Fein Party – Arthur Griffith and Éamon de Valera for Irish “independence”.

Arthur Griffith and Éamon de Valera sein fein party irish independence WIK_Eamon-de-Valera

The treaty itself was signed apparently in the same room that the British finally agreed to America having its independence – which is truly blatant PR positioning there. Wow.


Yeah, like Britain has our best interests at heart now and is really so peaceful and democratic and all. Except for the minor details of all the now well-documented covert and back-channel planning to put the entire world under slavemaster rule, that is…you know, little things like that.

come on!.

The Brits went way out of their way to completely dominate this Conference with their own agents and League of Nations Supporters.

Europeans/British arriving at the Conference – 1921

Europeans ascending the steps to the U.S. State, War and Navy building in 1921 -

With the exception of the American delegates, the leading participants in the Armament Conference are members and Officials of the League of Nations. There is no more ardent League man than Balfour. Viviani always takes a leading part in League meetings. Schanzer is one of the most active and useful of the Leaguers. Koo is president of the League’s Council. Dr. Wang is one of the judges of the League’s Permanent Court of International Justice. Karnebeek is president of the League’s Assembly. And there are about a dozen other League members…

– (page 659 google book) Literary Digest Vol. LXXI #11, December 10, 1921, What the Harding Plan Means To the League, within the article quoting the pro-League Louisville Courier-Journal


Schazner – Italy and Karnebeek – Holland

signor_schanzer_-_italy Karnebeek_-_holland

Dr. Koo and the Chinese minister Alfred Sze (North China Government – the only one recognized by League of Nations)

Dr._V.K._Wellington_Koo_-_league_of_nations  Alfred_Sze,_North_China_Government_-_only_one_recognized_by_league


Brits like to cheat – stack the deck, so to speak.

cheaters cards stack deck stack deck stacking the deckl.

Moving on…

Another thing that was done during this Conference, was to try to find a different way to covertly gain America’s agreement with the whole League of Nations crap.

President Harding, through being influenced behind-the-scenes by Round Table men, was trying to soft-sell an “Association of Nations” to covertly get the American Senate to get on board the actual plan – the League of Nations.


league of nations

Borah caught this, and in a statement issued to the Press, he said:

The proposed association of nations has not yet been reduced to form nor yet defined. But from what one can gather here and there, it is the old League of Nations under another name. It will be engaged in precisely the same kind of work and doing the same kind of things that were proposed by the League. . . .

It is claimed by the advocates of the League that the present League has been of much service to Europe. If so, there is no reason for asking Europe to scrap the old League and try a new one. If we are. going into Europe, we ought to go in. It we are not, we ought not to be handing her a new league every ninety days.

…The United States operates under a written constitution. Great Britain has no written constitution.

One of the arguments being put forth now in favor of the Association of Nations is that Mr. Wilson made a mistake in giving his plan a written constitution, that we should adopt the British idea and undertake to conduct the League or an association of nations without any written constitution or written covenant whatever; in other words, that the new association will consist of representatives of diferent Governments coming together with no limitation upon their jurisdiction or power or authority other than their own discretion.

A conclave of diplomats, sitting behind closed doors with nothing to direct or limit their powers save their own will and discretion, would be a rather interesting proposition.

I am inclined to think that if the American people choose a league, they will choose one which has its powers defined, or at least an attempt to define them, rather than trust their destiny to the unbridled discretion of a few men.

– (page 661 google book)



I love Borah, he’s so great at cutting right through all the crap.

Otherwise known as NO FRICKING WAY

(Note the BS sign on the left – it was the Brits ‘bridge”, not America’s)

the-gap-in-the-bridge league of nations.

Here’s some photos of the British delegation – the people that Buchman is being hauled all the way across the world to meet and plan and be put into service of the slavemasters. You can see how important Buchman was to them – certainly not just some “nut” as Copeland tries to downplay.

washington naval conference

The larger picture of the two below is marked with arrows. The blue one is pointing to who I think is Robert Cecil (Lord Salisbury), the red one is marking Arthur Balfour – the official head of the British delegation.


disarmament conference 1921 marked cecil and bafour.

There were a lot of very high-spice political cartoons at the time – one of which was this one that I found amusing.

Biggest “show” on earth, indeed.


Here’s some actual footage of the conference and the attendees – wow!


So, that’s what’s going on then, and after Frank Buchman gets schmoozed up one side and down the other, he agrees to go “pro-slavemaster” 100%. (note: you can also see part of where he got the idea for his later name of Moral Re-armament. That’s cute, eh?)

He then gets sent to Oxford – basically slavemaster central in England – – where he established a systematic organization of co-workers and followers under the title of the “First Century Christian Fellowship.”

Buchman at Oxford (far right)

buchman at oxford2

.Buchman at oxford

The system itself was not Buchman’s brain-child, it was born out of groups known as the Coefficients Club, the Roundtable, and Milner’s Kindergarten. Leading strategists controlling such groups included Lord Robert Cecil, Lord Alfred Milner, Leo Amery, Halford Mackinder, H.G. Wells, and Lord Bertrand Russell.

Lord Robert Cecil


The problem they were trying to solve was the same one Rockefeller was being given financial marching orders to help with. That problem was how to maintain the slavemaster power of a maritime-based, financier oligarchy, in a world threatened by the growing strength of it’s populations in places like the United States, China etc.

World War I was their first “project” trying to get Americans in alliance with the slavemasters against whoever was rebelling, and the salespitch this War was about, was establishing the League of Nations which Buchman, of course, supported.

Buchman at a league of nations meeting (lower right – second in)

Buchman at a league of nations meeting

As mentioned earlier, Senator Borah from Idaho killed this in the U.S., thus necessitating another war being needed to be created, this time to force in that alliance whether we Americans wanted it or not. Tasked to then be their schoolyard bully all over the world wherever rebellious hearts against the slavemasters live.

Considering how diametically opposed to our Founding Fathers vision that was –

That is really sick.

perish the thought - wry ick face.

Buchman, while there, worked out a sort of self-advertisement which you can see the whole “disarmament” influence on, in order to try and recruit people to his “cause”

Unless we deal with human nature thoroughly and drastically on a national scale, nations will follow their historic road to violence and destruction. You can plan a new world on paper, but you’ve got to build it out of people.

This is just another variation of blaming the people – when in fact it is the slavemasters that are the real war-mongers and killers.

hilarious portrayal of the slavemasters blaming war on the people - disarmament 1921

Buchman’s technique was polished up – he would put forth a public posture of moral probity and abstinence, and invite people to talk to him about their personal problems. But, he was after something in particular – he was after what he perceived as the person’s weakness.

He would probe for the specific topics or events in their lives on which they felt the most guilt, then he would persuade them that they could overcome their perceived weakness by confessing it to him.

And, of course, becoming a faithful follower.

He recruited many people using this technique, its important that you understand it because it would become the trademark of the later-named Moral Re-Armament which Ron Hubbard followedly closely on the heels of – tactic-wise. The only difference is that Buchman usually exclusively aimed at people of power and influence, whereas Hubbard usually hit “low” – referring to Miles Copeland’s degrading reference to the “common folk”.

By the time this whole system was fleshed out pretty much, Buchman’s little flock then became known as the Oxford Group, and Buchman and his traveling salvation show were soon off on mission to rebellious (or influential on rebels) places such as Australia, Holland, Scandinavia, China, and South Africa.

Very much like the Steve Martin movie – Leap of Faith and Neil Diamond’s Brother Love’s Traveling Salvation Show.

brother loves traveling salvation show.

This is a hilarious portrayal of Neil Diamond singing this song by David Spade – you gotta see this.


Here’s Steve Martin glowing with the “light of god” (and a whole lot of sleight-of-hand) in Leap of Faith


So…Bible-thumping in China, I’m sure it was all quite the show for those “sinners”.


From lowliness to holiness – you understand.

are you ready for a miracle.

On that note –

Let’s talk about what form Buchman’s evangelizing was taking.

The basic tenet was that the reformation of the world can only be achieved by creating a moral and spiritual force, by convincing all men of the necessity of absolute honesty, absolute purity, absolute unselfishness, and absolute love.

orange-Buchman-stand4Many leaders, Buchman states, are convinced that the world needs a moral and spiritual awakening, and they put their case in striking phrases. But that is only words. The problem facing men is how to do it.

ref – An Evaluation of Moral Rearmament by Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J., American Ecclesiastical Review, Vol. 135, July-December 1956, pp. 217-226

AnimatedStarNotice that this reference I listed above is dated only one year after it had been chosen to be thrust into prominance again by Miles Copeland and the CIA, and also notice that one of the chosen methods was attacking it through a Catholic Church priest (which is what that reference is about)

One of the fundamental practices that Buchman began promoting is group or “public” confession – a theme that you will see recurring in just about every spin-off since, including Moral Majority, Pat Robertson and the 700 Club, the Unification Church, and Scientology, to name just a few.

By the late 1920’s, the Buchman program was in full roar.

The Program

In 1928, Round Table propagandist H.G. Wells, issued the program in a book titled The Open Conspiracy. The plan was to create a “new world religion” that would channel the power of self-sacrifice, characteristic of religious zeal, into implementing the goals of the conspiracy. These were, as summarized by Wells:


Firstly, the entirely provisional nature of all existing governments, and the entirely provisional nature, therefore, of all loyalties associated therewith:

Secondly, the supreme importance of population control in human biology and the possibility it affords us of a release from the pressure of the struggle for existence on ourselves; and

Thirdly, the urgent necessity of protective resistance against the present traditional drift towards war.

War, of course, meaning war against the slavemasters plans.

Frank Buchman was now fully acting as a British Slavemaster intelligence agent.


In 1928 a team of seven men, six of them from Oxford, decided to carry their “new­found spiritual experience” <gack> to the principal centers of South Africa. Since they had not chosen a name for themselves this is why they were labeled the “Oxford Group Movement” by the South African Press.

Success in “conversions” occurred everywhere they went.

You can get much more detailed descriptions of the practices of the Oxford Group from these two documents. Both are free downloads.

  1. Soul Surgery, by H. A. Walter, The Oxford Group, Oxford: 1932
  2. What_Is_The_Oxford_Group, by “The Layman with a Notebook”, Oxford University Press, New York, 1933.

Understand something here – all this is exactly when L. Ron Hubbard was taken under the wing of British intelligence man Ian MacBean in China and shown the ropes, which included a tour of The Peking Union Medical College interestingly enough.

Hubbard was young and impressionable, and during this trip he was obviously clearly exposed to the actions of British intelligance assets John Mott and Frank Buchman’s activities in China – the whole religious front group thing.

Hubbard went from this –



To this –


– during that trip (and that time period) making it quite clear that he has now chosen to emulate the whole “secret agent” activist for the New World Order persona, with the attendant goals now taken to heart.

By 1929, when Hubbard was on his way back to the U.S. where he would soon begin attending college (and meet fellow NWO recruit Paul Linebarger) – there was serious “trouble” in the world, from a slavemaster perspective.

From Thy Will be Done:

In December 1929, [John D. Rockefeller, Jr.] Junior received an urgent letter from one of his most trusted envoys. John Mott had just returned from a tour of Protestant missions in Asia, and he was quite agitated.

China wasn’t going for it and was mobilizing for war against the slavemasters. Ron Hubbard was also clearly aware of this. He had made several derogatory comments in his journal about the Chinese and the rise of “nationalism” going on there.

Thus began a new phase of Buchman’s intelligence operations, the “peace” movement. It began at Oxford University, and later spread among student populations in Europe and the U.S.A. in the 1930s, in the form of a solemn, signed pledge never to participate in any war, and to refuse service if drafted.

While Hubbard is conducting various colorfully “covered” (intelligence cover) missions around the Caribbean and writing propaganda in the form of sci-fi for the slavemasters, Buchman is busy remaking himself into an “ardent” (and vocal) admirer of Hitler.

Adolf Hitler, January 1933 in his “bad guy” get-up that was chosen for him

January 30 1933 Adolf Hitler

Buchman even included Gestapo chief Himmler and Rudolf Hess in his membership lists. Of course, at the same time (never mind the total hypocrisy here) Buchman was also supported by the Archbishop of Canterbury, and counted Edward VIII, when he was Prince of Wales, as a member.

Buchman and hitler NY_World_Telegram.

Please bear in mind that this is the same time period that the Roman Catholic Pope is making deals with Hitler and Catholic leaders are even “inspecting” his SS!

Pope Paul VI, Cardinal Montini and Cardinal Pacelli (who became Pope Pius XII) signed an agreement with Hitler’s government.

Konkordatsunterzeichnung in Rom. - Am 20. Juli 1933 wurde zwischen dem Deutschen Reich und dem Heiligen Stuhl in Rom das Reichskonkordat unterzeichnet, durch das zum erstenmal in der Geschichte für das ganze deutsche Reich die Beziehungen der katholischen Kirche zum Staat geregelt werden. Die Unterzeichnung vollzog für Deutschland der Vizekanzler Franz von Papen, für den Heiligen Stuhl der Kardinal Staatssekretär Eugenio Pacelli. Von links nach rechts: Vizekanzler Franz von Papen, (2.v.l.) Kardinal Staatssekretär Eugenio Pacelli und Ministerialdirektor Dr. Buttmann während des Unterzeichnungsaktes. 25935-33Signature of the Reichskonkordat on 20 July 1933. From left to right: German Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, representing Germany, Giuseppe Pizzardo, Cardinal Pacelli, Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani, German ambassador Rudolf Buttmann. Signing the Concordat is Cardinal Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII). By 1933, he was the Vatican Secretary of State. Far Left is Prelate Ludwig Kaas, leader of the Centre (Zentrum) Party). Seated second from his left is Franz von Papen who was a German nobleman, Catholic politician, General Staff officer, and diplomat, who served as Chancellor of Germany (Reichskanzler) in 1932.. Standing at the far right can be seen the little known Vatican prelate, Montini, who became Pope Paul VI on 30 January 1933.


On the left, in priest vestments, is Archbishop and pro-Nazi Gregory Rozman reviewing a unit of the SS.

archbishop vatican pronazi Gregory rozman reviews a unit of the SS
photo credit – Eric Frattini’s site


The Vatican literally entered into a franchise deal with Nazi Germany with this notorious Kirchensteuer or “church tax” which was an income tax.

In 1943 alone, over $100 million flowed into the coffers of the Vatican from that tax.


You do understand where much of that money was coming from, right?

ADN-ZB Das faschistische Konzentrationslager Auschwitz Eine Gruppe Juden aus Ungarn nach der Ankunft in Auschwitz im Sommer 1944.


Assets stripped from people consigned to the concentration camps – most of which were murdered and then thrown into open pits like so much garbage.


Blood Money.


*See The Even Stranger Tale of Scientology, Catholicism, Drug Trafficking and “Reforming” Rebels in Colombia for much more about all that.

It might interest you to know that Frank Buchman’s pre-WWII supporters also included movie mogul Louis Mayer, Los Angeles Times publisher Harry Chandlee, the Dupont family, and David Dubinsky of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union.

Frank Buchman and his crew camping out at the DuPont family mansion in Florida, the winter of 1943.
Left to right: Ray Foote Purdy, Loring Swaim Jr., Dr. Morris Martin (standing), Frank Buchman (seated), hidden and unknown woman (seated), Signe Lund (seated), Dubois Morris and Bob Young (standing).
From Preview Of A New World; How Frank Buchman Helped his country Move from isolation To world responsibility; USA 1939-1946, Arthur Strong, page 109.


I swear, by around this time this guy Buchman (below left) is starting to like like some kind of demented rat-Dracula.

orange-Buchman-NehruFrank Buchman meets Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India.


masterman-charles-frederick-gurney - dracula .

Well into being one of the Rat Bastards, that’s for sure.


But…it wasn’t until 1938, as war clouds gathered over Europe –

part the mists of time

That Buchman proposed the name Moral Rearmament to a group of his friends at a meeting in the Black Forest in Germany no less, and thereby shifted the emphasis from individual change to social salvation.

This is almost exactly the same principles that L. Ron Hubbard will later espouse in both Dianetics (the book) and the later Church of Scientology. For example, the Aims of Scientology “A civilization without…”

Buchman dropped the old “winning people to Christ” and MRA was now held out as something acceptable to people of any race or creed. Buchman even traveled to India at one point, where he declared that MRA was quite compatible with Buddhism, Hinduism, and Islam.

Hubbard did exactly the same thing later with Scientology – declaring it compatible with a big list of other religions.

On May 29, 1938, Buchman said: “The crisis is fundamentally a moral one. The nations must re-arm morally. Morally recovery is essentially the forerunner of economic recovery.”

ref – Buchman, Frank N.D., Remaking the World (London, 1955), p. 46.

This marks the point that Buchman shifted his movement from being primarily “religious” conversion to being more of a “political action” group – exactly as Miles Copeland described, but do notice that Miles also tried to lie and give the impression that Buchman was “just a nut” – you can clearly see now just how much of a lie that really was.

So, calling Ron Hubbard the same thing (a “nut”)?

You do the math.


During the war the new Buchman MRA movement spread rapidly, especially in America.

Even though Buchman was overtly supporting Hitler who was supposedly the “enemy” throughout this time – take a look at this that shows just how closely Buchman and the MRA was supported by the slavemasters.

Lord Salisbury (Robert Cecil) in 1944, when travel bans were still in place, submitted a special request for some British Buchmanites wished to travel to Mackinac Island to attend an assembly led by Buchman intended to rile up the American people.

Foreign Office Secretary Anthony Eden didn’t like this at all, but couldn’t do anything about it as he was only a “junior” slavemaster.

1942 – Anthony Eden, second from left in plain clothes.


Eden had written across Salisbury’s letter in red ink, ‘Surely these are deplorable people? and it is staggering that Lord S should wish them well.’

– Garth Lean, On the Tail of a Comet: The Life of Frank Buchman, page 331.



Not staggering at all, he was their agent! Apparently poor lowly Mr. Eden was out-of-the-loop on that one, or wanted to look like he was.

Around this time, the Catholic Church started helping to fuel the fire – Buchman’s fire – by attacking it and hopefully distancing themselves from the direct and complicit involvement with bringing and keeping Hitler into power.

Just before Buchman renamed his Oxford Group as Moral Re-Armament, his Eminence, the late Cardinal Hinsley, Archbishop of Westminister, had this to say of the movement:

“The group movement is so tainted with indifferentism, with the error that one religion is as good as another, that no Catholic can join it to take any active part in it or co-operate with it formally.”

This did nothing but help explode the MRA even more.

In July 1939, for example, 30,000 people gathered at the Hollywood Bowl to hear Buchman proclaim the principles and merits of MRA!

Since then the major activities of MRA have been concentrated in Caux, Switzerland, where the idle Palace Hotel was purchased as a central headquarters.

MRA resort Caux switzerlandThe MRA resort hotel headquarters at Caux, Switzerland — “Mountain House” — which Frank Buchman got as a gift from wealthy supporters after World War II. At its peak, MRA occasionally held conventions and “World Assemblies” where it filled all three of the hotels in the picture.


The participants at the first MRA World Assembly at Caux, 1946


After the war, Frank Buchman and his Moral Re-Armament were not very popular, to put it mildly. Both the American and the British people had long memories, and Buchman’s admiration of Hitler, and the group’s attempts at draft-dodging, didn’t sit well.

And then there was the total failure of Buchman’s appeasement-oriented “God’s Plan” to save the world from war. Buchman had lost his credibility — how could he claim to be receiving messages and Guidance directly from God when he was so terribly wrong about so many things? And MRA had lost its biggest pre-war draw: fear of the coming war.

They needed something to replace it with, which became chosen as the twinned fears,  Fear of Russia and Fear of Nuclear War.

Miles Copeland touches upon this time period of just after WWII ended, in his book The Game Player.

Page images –

pearl harbor was intentional and choosing the new 'enemy' - Game Player by Miles Copeland-3

In those days, I was little more than a fly on the wall at Washington social occasions, opening my mouth only to ask the occasional question, but I was all ears.

At one of the Lawtons’ parties, during a heated discussion of who would get what jobs in the several embryo organizations, I asked, ‘Suppose we were to drop the whole idea of intelligence services, and struggle along with none at all, what would the country lose?

…My question was received merely politely by most of the guests, but one of them, General John Magruder, took it seriously.


It prompted him to tell of a meeting which the new intelligence chief, Admiral Sidney Souers, had just had with President Truman.

Truman and souers

When Sauers told the President that the new centralized intelligence unit he was organizing would see that there would never be another ‘Pearl Harbor’, the President replied, ‘You haven’t yet had your Top Secret briefing or you’d know that a bit of code-breaking had told us all about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance. What President Roosevelt needed was intelligence bearing on the question of what he should do about it.’

President Roosevelt got the intelligence, and he decided to let the Pearl Harbor attack happen as a way of arousing an otherwise apathetic populace.

Holy shit – did you see that? They let Pearl Harbor happen intentionally and then used it to further the stupid slavemaster WAR that they had arranged in the first place!

.Pearl Harbor Headlines - Propaganda

.pearl harbor 4

avenge-pearl-harbor-2   remember-pearl-harbor-3


I really hate these people.

perish the thought - wry ick face.

General Magruder went on to say that he’d spent the past month talking intelligence organization in high places, that he hadn’t heard a word to indicate that President Truman’s words had reached the planners.

The top people in the Departments of State, army, navy and air force were busily concocting dangers that would justify increases in their respective budgets, and they had developed a whole new glossary of cliches for the purpose, ‘preventing another Pearl Harbor’ being one of them.

‘No one,’ [Magruder] said in answer to my question, ‘is asking what, realistically, we Americans have to fear in the post-war world.’


Fear of Russia and Fear of Nuclear War – is what was chosen.


This is where Scientology came in.

Hubbard’s first book Dianetics goes into the “threat” of nuclear war and why it’s so “urgent” that man be made to fix his nasty ‘reactive mind’.

CHAPTER I The Scope of Dianetics – Dianetics, 1950

A science of mind is a goal which has engrossed thousands of generations of Man.

Armies, dynasties and whole civilizations have perished for the lack of it. Rome went to dust for the want of it. China swims in blood for the need of it; and down in the arsenal is an atom bomb, its hopeful nose full-armed in ignorance of it.

CHAPTER X Dianetics — Past and Future; DIANETICS AND WAR

Man is now faced, by these pyramiding hatreds, with weapons so powerful that Man himself may vanish from the earth. There is no problem in the control of these weapons. They explode when and where Man tells them to explode. The problem is in the control of Man.

…Dianetics addresses war because there is in fact a race between the science of mind and the atom bomb. There may be no future generation to know which won.


The problem is in the control of Man…?

No, it isn’t.

The Problem is in control of the slavemasters.


They are who create wars simply to get what they want and damn the rest of us.

Moral+Re-Armament poster

The slavemasters were still visibly supporting Buchman and his group in 1946, as this rather bitchy article shows, but you can see the “embarassment” that’s going on about those hard-to-explain connections to Nazi-Germany.

BUCHMAN’S GROUP SCORED IN COMMONS, The New York Times, July 6, 1946, page 8.

LONDON, July 5 — Asking why facilities had been granted for entry to Britain of 100 members of the Oxford Group led by Dr. Frank Buchman from the United States, Tom Driberg, Labor member, said in the House of Commons today that the movement had a great deal in common with the Nazis.

Mr. Driberg asserted that Dr. Buchman had praised Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler and that leaders of his Moral Rearmament had been enthusiastic Hitlerites.

The group’s standards, Mr. Driberg stated, were “marked by remarkable duplicity,” by “intrigue, backstairs methods and wirepulling.”


Something had to be done.

The powers-that-be decided to make Buchman’s Moral Re-Armament into a major cold war vehicle.

In 1949, his conference in Switzerland was attended by European parliamentarians and a bipartisan delegation of the U.S. Congress, flown in by military aircraft.

This is also the time that Buchman’s people recruited a young Korean named Yong Myung Mun.

reverend moon 1940s

Moon’s Korean ministry got plugged into Moral Re-Armament around the same time that OSS/CIA man Paul Linebarger was there to come up with some sort of propaganda campaign to “stop communism” – you know what that really means.

In fact, during the very time period that Linebarger was there the second time (1950 to 1952) Buchman and the MRA established an “democratic town” – on an island near the mouth of the Nakdong River with Korean orphans and others that the Army had put there in 1951 under MRA supervision.

The orphans governed themselves, and in the Nov. 3, 1952 issue of MRA Information Service there was an article about the island, nicknamed Jinoo Do. It noted that the influence of the MRA could be found everywhere – the 4-point slogan of “Absolute Honesty,” “Absolute Purity,” “Absolute Unselfishness,” and “Absolute Love.”  (Moon copied those into the Unification Church, as well). There were also some obviously culturized variations of these noted in the Korean Straits, such as: “No Hatred—No Fear—No Greed,” or “New Men—New Nations—New World,” or “Jinoo Do—Principle of citizen Life.”

The same “democratic orphan town” idea was picked up and tried by another Buchman follower from Oxford (Mr. Abel) was done in Papua.

* * *


After the war, the tiny little Moon operation was picked up and made mainstream by military intelligence circles connected with the notorious MK-ultra program for psychedelic drug experimentation, and Tavistock-originated group dynamics programs for social manipulation.

His people first started being brought in and set up in the United States, under highest level intelligence cover in the early to middle 1960s.

Wayne Madsen, in an article that originally appeared in Inside Magazine, noted:

Buchman, clearly wishing to obfuscate about his pro-Nazi ties before the war, turned his attention towards Asia, particularly Korea.

One Korean Presbyterian preacher, who took an interest in Buchman’s Moral Rearmament principles of a universal religion and total personal submission, was Yong Myung Mun of North Korea. He later changed his name to Sun Myung Moon and, after being expelled from the Presbyterian Church for preaching heresy, he established a right-wing, nominally Christian sect called the Unification Church.

Like Vereide and Buchman, Moon began to spread his influence globally…

As did Scientology.


The British Buchmanite R. C. Mowat, formerly of Hertford College, Oxford, wrote in 1951 that:

People everywhere will turn to spiritual reality on a mass scale as it is correctly presented to them through Moral Re-Armament. But it is a race against time, because the forces of destruction are also moving ahead swiftly.

“Good and Evil are pitted against each other in the history of man. It takes more than diplomacy to cure evil. It takes more than lip-service to fight for God. … An extreme of evil must be met by an extreme of good; a fanatical following of evil by a passionate pursuit of good…. Only a passion can cure a passion. And only a superior world-arching ideology can cure a world divided by warring ideologies.”

This message must be brought to the millions before it is too late. History is moving at tremendous speed to a high point of colossal catastrophe or a high point of colossal change. We can either be the last survivors of a declining age, or the pioneers of an entirely new order of society, which will bring a flowering of the human spirit such as the world has never seen.

This is the promise of Moral Re-Armament. It is making possible the dawn of a new age. Through it “we are reaching the end of the era of crisis and pioneering the era of the cure.

The Message of Frank Buchman, R. C. Mowat, pages 51-52. (The contained quotes were from Frank Buchman.

You can clearly see the exact same evangelizing going on there that Ron Hubbard did in his Dianetics book (that I quoted earlier).

Complete with a traveling road-show, no less.

orange-Good_Road-8 buchman“The Good Road” as opposed to the “low” road, one of the many melodramatic Moral Re-Armament theatrical productions.


Sometimes, one of the easiest way to see what the purpose of a front group is, is to watch what the attacks on it are and from whom.

In this case, the Catholic church was probably its biggest attacker, going all the way to actually banning the group and with the threat of excommunication of any catholic who in any way supported it.

This is called being declared Anathema, by the way, and it is exactly what Hubbard patterned scientology’s disconnection policies on – down to circulating a “declare” amongst the parishioners, no less.

*See my post The Worst Policies of Catholicism and Scientology – The Punishment of Those Who Disagree for side-by-side comparisons of actual materials.

But hey now, that’s a pretty strong attack on the MRA, wouldn’t you say? And…one that’s just about guaranteed to drive interest to it from those who hated the Catholic Church and Christianity (as they should).

See the thought process there? They want them in one of their groups one way or another.

It was a way to get people that they had “lost” (or couldn’t get otherwise) into striving for something that they could never achieve within a slavemaster front group.

But, some of the attacks on behalf of the Catholic Church are incredibly revealing as to the insanity that exists within it.

It is, after all, the biggest cult on earth.


One of the criteria that someone made up for a cult, is that the follower must follow the dictates (to the exclusion of logic and sanity) of the “leader”.

Well, in the Catholic Church, that would be the high-level priests and the Pope, and they most definitely act as this “go-between” that the follower must adhere to. If not, they risk damnation, excommunication, and “the sword of god” (harassment and black ops on them).

Considering the Vatican role in both WWI and WWII, and the desire to put down anyone anywhere on the globe who would oppose their rule – you can see the extreme moral ambiguity here, not to mention total hypocrisy.

So, let’s have a look. This was done in 1956 right after it had been chosen as one of two groups the CIA wanted to use making it even clearer why all these public attacks. Driving attention.

Cute, eh?


But when a spiritual revivalism like Moral Rearmament is addressed to people of all faiths, and members of the Catholic Church, including lay leaders and theologians, co-operate in the movement—it is not only news but a matter for study and critical reflection.

The problem is more acute in Europe, since the international headquarters of MRA are in Switzerland, and the movement has found a wider response there than in the United States. But American Catholics cannot afford to ignore it. Its founder is an American, and for several years MRA has been holding its world congress at Mackinac Island, Michigan, with active centers throughout the United States.

An Evaluation of Moral Rearmament by Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J., American Ecclesiastical Review, Vol. 135, July-December 1956, pp. 217-226


Father Hardon – who was a Jesuit Priest.

Father hardon.

It is a matter of faith that Christian revelation was closed with the death of the last Apostle. Any other revelation since then, unless confirmed by divine approval, is to be considered spurious and in opposition to Catholic Christianity.

ref – An Evaluation of Moral Rearmament by Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J., American Ecclesiastical Review, Vol. 135, July-December 1956, pp. 217-226



“confirmed by divine approval”?

Well, since God didn’t come over to the Vatican to chair a meeting, three guesses who this “divine approval” actually is claimed by – and the first two don’t count!

Since MRA clearly professes to have a revelation, it is, therefore, a religion.

An Evaluation of Moral Rearmament by Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J., American Ecclesiastical Review, Vol. 135, July-December 1956, pp. 217-226

Now there’s an interesting and conveniently improbable and unproveable definition of a religion – don’t you think?

Moral Rearmament is anti-intellectual in its facile solution of the social problems that have vexed humanity since the dawn of history. Its obtuseness to these problems as nothing more than faulty, selfish personal attitudes to be solved by evangelical revivalism, is at least naïve.

An Evaluation of Moral Rearmament by Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J., American Ecclesiastical Review, Vol. 135, July-December 1956, pp. 217-226

These “problems” that have vexed humanity is a veiled reference to the Fairy Tale of the garden of eden.

But what you probably don’t know, is that the entire foundation of the Catholic Church rests on the concept that there MUST be suffering and problems, and that earth is a place of punishment and must remain so.

From my post Catholicism is Anti-American; Anti-Democracy; Anti-Free Speech; Anti-Free Will – See For Yourself  –

…the grand Christian dogma on which religion rests as on its foundation – that, when we have given up this present life, then shall we really begin to live. God has not created us for the perishable and transitory things of earth, but for things heavenly and everlasting; He has given us this world as a place of exile

the other pains and hardships of life will have no end or cessation on earth; for the consequences of sin are bitter and hard to bear, and they must accompany man so long as life lasts.

To suffer and to endure, therefore, is the lot of humanity; let them strive as they may, no strength and no artifice will ever succeed in banishing from human life the ills and troubles which beset it.

If any there are who pretend differently – who hold out to a hard-pressed people the boon of freedom from pain and trouble, an undisturbed repose, and constant enjoyment – they delude the people.

– Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum (of revolutionary change) May 15, 1891


“….who hold out to a hard-pressed people the boon of freedom from pain and trouble, an undisturbed repose, and constant enjoyment…”

Yea, anything but that!


Let them remember that the world will never be able to rid itself of misery, sorrow and tribulation…

– Pope Pius XI DIVINI REDEMPTORIS (On Atheistic Communism) 19 March 1937


Not only all that, it is good to suffer!

Jesus Christ, when He redeemed us with plentiful redemption, took not away the pains and sorrows which in such large proportion are woven together in the web of our mortal life.

He transformed them into motives of virtue and occasions of merit; and no man can hope for eternal reward unless he follow in the blood-stained footprints of his Saviour.

“If we suffer with Him, we shall also reign with Him.”

– Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum (of revolutionary change) May 15, 1891


Let’s look at this again –

Moral Rearmament is anti-intellectual in its facile solution of the social problems that have vexed humanity since the dawn of history. Its obtuseness to these problems as nothing more than faulty, selfish personal attitudes to be solved by evangelical revivalism, is at least naïve.

An Evaluation of Moral Rearmament by Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J., American Ecclesiastical Review, Vol. 135, July-December 1956, pp. 217-226


The insult of “its obtuseness” is again a reference to that these problems are not to be solved – get it?

The ‘dawn of history’ bit is a very loaded word usage. What that really is referring to is the beginning of “history” according to the Catholic Church. And that history only was written less than 500 years ago, to boot.

So…dawn of history is in actuality, simply a reference to their control of things, Ie: when they consider that started.

MRA is also anti-intellectual in its appeal to the masses as a world force and world view to which, step by step, a person is brought “to commit himself irrevocably,” and then have every thought and action of his life determined accordingly. The absoluteness of this dedication cannot be questioned:

What would it mean for America to rearm morally? It would mean the uniting of our nation in every part of its life on a constructive plan. We need to find once again the power of a united mind. We must leave our causes, many of them excellent causes, and find this common cause. We shall find the force that will forge amiable individuals into a united nation.

ref – An Evaluation of Moral Rearmament by Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J., American Ecclesiastical Review, Vol. 135, July-December 1956, pp. 217-226, excerpted quotes are from Buchman, Frank N.D., Remaking the World (London, 1955)


What is really interesting about the above attack is that’s literally a mirroring activity.

From my mirroring article

…a person will use mirroring against you with other people.

They want to create in front of the other person – that complete opposite of what you have said about them, towards you, so that hopefully the other person watching will doubt YOU, and then…the propaganda, the opinion the mirroring abuser wants others to have about you, has a chance of working.

Incredibly complex, but simple at the same time. You say, and you are telling actual truth here, that the person did x. They, in front of you, or behind your back, same thing, tell another person that you did x to them.

So..they are supposed to doubt you now – get it?


So, what this guy is accusing the MRA of is exactly what goes on (and has gone on for centuries) in the Catholic Church.

This is also – this whole MRA thing – is just a classic example of controlled opposition.

See, what scares the slavemasters (Catholic Church, British nobility etc) is exactly this:

  • “…find once again the power of a united mind.”
  • We must leave our causes…. and find this common cause

It is the casting aside

and Defiance



of false causes that they have created and provided and taking on a true one – one that doesn’t include daily suffering for humanity endlessly, their entire reason for any support whatsoever – now that scares them right down to their toes.

But see, that is not to be found in the MRA, since it is simply yet another false cause trying to pretend like its the real good guys – which it definitely is not.

By the time this was written, the Catholic Church had actually already “banned” participation or support by Catholics of the MRA.

A decree of the Holy Office of August 8, 1951, makes the following provisions:

  1. It is not fitting for either diocesan or religious priests, and much less for nuns, to participate in meetings of Moral Rearmament.
  2. If exceptional circumstances should make such participation opportune, the permission of the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office must be requested beforehand. This permission will be granted only to learned and experienced priests.
  3. Finally, it is not fitting that the faithful should accept posts of responsibility in Moral Rearmament, and especially not fitting that they join the so-called “policy team.”


One of the most profoundly anti-intellectual and anti-reason statements I have ever seen, is quoted by Father Hardon –

“The Catholic Church owes it to herself,” says Bishop Suenens, Auxiliary Bishop of Malines, Belgium, “to ask to see the credentials of any prophet who comes forward, in whatever manner, claiming to be sent by the Holy Spirit…The moment they speak a religious language, Buchman and his disciples must answer this same question: ‘Where is the guarantee of your authenticity’.”

Guarantee of authenticity?

Where is theirs?

From some Pope-on-a-throne?

From some declamatio books?

From….nothing, that’s what.

They have nothing whatsoever confirming their “authenticity” from anyone but themselves.


MORAL REARMAMENT Archbishop of Milan Warns It Is ‘Morality Without Dogma’

MILAN, Italy, June 17 (AP) — Ildefonso Cardinal Schuster, Archbishop of Milan, said today that the Moral Rearmament Movement endangered both Catholics and non-Catholics.He described the movement as heterodoxal — at variance with the teachings of the Catholic church — in a warning note to the clergy and Catholic faithful of his Archdiocese.

Cardinal Schuster attacked Moral Rearmament as a movement “of Protestant origin and system, outside the guidance and control of the Catholic church.”He called the movement dangerous for non-Catholics because it presents a “form of religion cut in half and suggestive, morality without dogma, without the principle of authority, without a supremely revealed faith — in a word, an arbitrary religion, and therefore, one full of errors.”- The New York Times, June 18, 1952, page 8.

Then, in 1955 and 1957, the Vatican re-affirmed it’s “ban” against the MRA – drawing even more attention to it.

Note: Again, this is done exactly when its just been chosen (Miles Copeland) for “political action” around the world to help stop “communism” – don’t forget.

Implies Sympathy With Aims
but Cautions All Catholics
Against Serving It


Special to The New York Times.ROME, Dec 9. — The Roman Catholic Church indicated today that it was in sympathy with the aims and purposes of the Moral Re-Armament movement but that Catholics should beware of collaborating with it.

The Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano recalled that secular and regular clergy were forbidden to attend any meeting of Moral Re-Armament and that lay Catholics were forbidden to serve it in any responsible capacity.

These prohibitions were issued in 1955 by the Vatican’s Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, which is in charge of all matters pertaining to faith and morals. L’Osservatore reminded Catholics that both prohibitions were still in force.

The Catholic Church’s main objection to Moral Re-Armament, L’Osservatore Romano indicated, is that it presents itself as “a movement with a true religious ideology of its own of a nature different from Catholic ideology.”

MACKINAC ISLAND, Dec. 9 (AP) — Ray Purdy, a spokesman for M. R. A., said, “It’s all news to me.”He said many Catholics had worked in the movement in the past and many were working in it now. He declined to comment further.

No Comment Here

A spokesman at the New York office of the Moral Re-Armament movement said yesterday that there would be no comment on the article. He reported that Dr. Buchman was not in the city.– The New York Times, December 10, 1957, page 21.

Catholics mixing it up with the MRA?

Why are we not surprised….


Meanwhile, Buchman was mixing it up with some interesting people.


Frank Buchman, Ray Foote Purdy, and Admiral Richard E. Byrd

Frank Buchman, Ray Foote Purdy, and Admiral Richard E. Byrd.

Looking even more like a rat-man.

You know what else that he reminds me of even more perfectly?

Danny Devito’s portrayal of the Penguin in Batman.

penguin danny devito batman.




The influence of the movement declined after the deaths of Buchman (1961) and his later successor Peter Howard (dies in 1965). During this period is when the MRA starts being replaced with the Unification Church of Moon and his “missionaries”, while the Church of Scientology drastically re-arranged it’s whole set-up to prepare for the next generation of rebels to recruit. Within scientology, this period of time was called creating the Grade Chart or the “Bridge” of Scientology.


Boy, do those words mean something different now, eh?


Note: To illustrate some more of the parallels between the Unification Church and the MRA, in 1937, Buchman’s Oxford Group began a publication called The Rising Tide, which is the same name of the paper of the Freedom Leadership Foundation, the later Sun Myung Moon front group set up in 1969 as the U.S. branch of the Moon’s International Federation for Victory over Communism.

Buchman also had a magazine called New World News which Moon named his magazine the same name too. And…Moral Re-Armament had a singing group known as the Angels, which again, was the model for Moon’s Little Angels children’s ballet.


It was in 1972, that Moon made his first journey to the United States. His number one priority was supposedly to take over control of the U.S. government by getting his followers elected to office. However, considering his actual role in the slavemaster community one has to take that with a large grain of salt.

Moon traveled the country in what he called his International One World Crusade – and that’s much more obviously in line with the slavemaster goal.


As with Buchman, Moon kept his initial meetings small – house parties were used to entice converts – and like Vereide and Coe, groups were organized into small “cells.” And as with Vereide’s prayer breakfasts and Buchman’s “crusades,” hundreds of politicians around the country were duped into extending official welcomes to the enigmatic Korean.”

This description from visup website is hilarious while also being very accurate – a masterpiece of correctly targeted ridicule.

As was noted before here, the Unification Church has also displayed indoctrination techniques that eerily resemble behavioral modification methods being researched by the CIA and Pentagon under the banner of such projects as Artichoke and MK-ULTRA, been linked to numerous terrorist organizations (thanks in no small part to its vigorous support of the World Anti Communist League, an organization that brought together various third world dictators and death squads into contact with a cabal of “former” Nazis, religious extremists, US military and intelligence officer and international drug lords in what was officially described as a front against the spread of communism) and drug trafficking. But moving along.

– Friday, January 30, 2015, The Family Part IV, Visup


Reverend Sun Myung Moon in the U.S.


yikes_-_vincent_001 wiley-double yikes


As one author once said – “It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize that many groups use charitable giving/participation, patriotic associations and demonstrations of community or national good will to obfuscate their true objectives and agenda, or to conceal and deflect attention from their wrong-doing. “

The scary thing is, that is going on right now both in the scientology church itself and in its so-called “critic” community. Not all, but enough that it’s obvious there is more going on in this media circus of the last five years than just trying to “reveal the abuses” of scientology.

If anything, it is both a: attracting more attention and b: deflecting attention off what they really don’t want known.

What scientology is, was, and will always be.


Scientology-Volunteer-Ministers-pass-out-food-water in Nepal.

David_Miscavige_happily_presiding_over_Mike_Edwards_award  lieutenant ron hubbard WWII


A chosen vehicle to prepare humanity

– and especially Americans, who they have a special grudge against –

for slavemaster 2-class system rule.


So, now, when you look at what Miles Copeland said again –

But the arrangement we made with Moral Rearmament gave us useful secret channels right into the minds of leaders not only in Africa and Asia but also in Europe.

When Bob made similar arrangements with Scientology, the brainchild of another nut, this one a science-fiction writer named Ron Hubbard, we were on our way to having a political action capability which would make the highly expensive, largely ineffective and largely overt ‘covert action’ of Bill Casey’s CIA seem trivial by comparison.

‘MRA will hit ’em high, and the Church of Scientology will hit ’em low!’ Bob liked to boast, and he was right.

If you cynics who read this think I’m kidding, put the thought out of your mind. Back in the fifties, at least some of us understood that most moves on the international gameboard, as well as most moves in the various domestic games that were behind them, were based less on Machiavellian common sense than on old-fashioned superstition.


You’ll now see just how significant that actually was.

* * *


(advance to mid-song)


So go ahead now –



Free yourself from these monsters.



You can do it.

V-for-Vendetta - free

.page divider 2014.

Thank you for reading.


Virginia McClaughry


Join the conversation! 10 Comments

  1. Excellent work, thank you!

  2. Great work !

    Did you know Ari Emanuel’s mother in law is Ada Fogran daughter of Russ ?

    Sarah Addington mother is Ada Fogran

    • No, actually, I didn’t. Thanks so much for pointing that out. Since Ada’s father was James Russell Forgan senior I’ll probably add all the information I just gathered (thanks to your tip) about the Ada/Sarah branch of my family tree to either James’s page or to my family tree separate blog. Or maybe both. I’ll also correct James Jr’s page about that, because Ada was his sister. Thanks again. – Virginia

  3. As an ex-moonie, I can say that I find your work extremely valuable. Having attended a public meeting involving West coast moonies and members of Narcanon early in my moonie membership, I can attest to the collusion of these two cults. I am also aware of the intersection of Moon’s activities and that of intelligence in Iran/Contra and elsewhere. We (ex-moonie community), are embarking on an extensive investigation of Moon’s early years and his ties to intelligence. Of particular interest is the activities of Young Oon Kim who was one of Moon’s earliest converts. She was fluent in English with graduate degrees in Theology and was tasked by Moon to translate his main text the Divine Principle. She was also largely responsible for pioneering Moon’s presence in the United States and Western Europe. We know that she was able to escape from Moon’s Eh wha University scandal unscathed and land a job with the American Eighth Army Chaplin’s office. We believe that she was under the tutelage of Helen Kim who was certainly connected with the C.I.A. There is significant public data suggesting that MRA had operatives in South Korea all the way down to the Hamlet level influencing social policy. Young Oon Kim traveled extensively in the west after she received a scholarship at a Japanese Methodist theological seminary. This seminary was connected to a Canadian Theological seminary in Toronto that was associated with MRA activists. We also know that as a missionary in California during the early 1960’s she associated with elements of the new age who also had ties to intelligence. We would appreciate any information that you could share privately or on your blogs that could assist in our efforts to expose the shady beginning of the Unification church. Thanks again Frank F frankfrivilous@gmail.com

    • Hi Frank, thanks so much your kind and thought-filled comment. I do plan to swing back around on my research into the Unification Church, Synanon, etc., when I finish some other supporting areas that I wanted to do first. Some of which you might find interesting as to roots of all of these. Anyway, I can put a new comment here though when I do something related to the Uni/MRA scientology connection. (hopefully I’ll remember lol) or you can check with us via at vmcc (put the at sign) at icehouse (put the dot) net.


  4. Hello Wade. What happened with the extensive investigation you spoke of? I have perused the ex-Moonie community blog and I don’t see anything about it. I see some pretty extensive investigation here at the McClaughrys blog though – wow. Have you read up on what Virginia and Mike have been uncovering about the Unification Church’s true intelligence connections? Robert.

    • Of course Robert. I have acknowledged my appreciation here too. I’m sure that ex-scientologists understand how difficult it is to recover from cult abuse. Those who question why, just have to search for answers from available resources. Much of what you and I provide is only valuable to point the direction. The groundswell will happen in time, usually when the victims finally wake up having being robbed of everything. There are many ex-moonie blogs and Facebook discussion groups that provide varying levels of discovery but the participants have to be interested in connecting the dots. Thanks again.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


All that Spy Stuff, Historical Research


, , , , , , , , , , , ,