.

The abyss of difference – which is really what that term “abyss” has always meant in Catholicism (and psychiatry) – is most often artificially caused by outside agents.

Companion Reading list –

In both of the above articles, one of the things that I get into are scientology’s policies of enforcing Disconnection and Fair Game, and how they are exactly patterned on Catholicism’s policies of enforcing excommunication or anathema and the ‘Sword of God’.

Most people think of these as being an “internal” or limited distribution policy rather than something enforced on a world-wide basis. This has never been the case with either the Catholic church or scientology.

To challenge scientology’s “religious doctrine” concerning these matters, is to challenge the Catholic church’s “religious doctrine”, for they are the same.

To challenge scientology’s doctrine as not religious concerning these behaviors is just plain stupid, and begs the question why some would choose that as their basis of attack since it is a strategy guaranteed to lose. Unless, that is, the strategy is to destroy all religion.

See, if scientology were to go “down” for this, then so could the Catholic Church. For one thing, they have been practicing these policies for far longer. Or any of the other front groups patterned the same way, and from the same basic tenets as Catholicism, such as Mormonism, etc., who all practice some form of the basic idea of anathema/excommunication.

Both Catholicism and Scientology cloak themselves in “religious freedom”. Some critics think that to be a religion, one must worship God or Jesus Christ – free clue, that is not what the Supreme Court has ruled.

Both Catholicism and Scientology act as if they are their own sovereign state, callous and disregarding of governmental authority.

Both Catholicism and Scientology not only have as part of their tenets, instructions that violate basic human and spiritual rights, but they also both attempt cloak themselves in benevolent activities to shield the stench of their true core from the public’s view.

Both Catholicism and Scientology have people with good intents working for and with them, in fact both need such people for the above stated reason.

No matter how many good and decent people either can lay claim to, it does not change their rotten cores.

The achilles heel of both, is that their teachings against those who challenge and attack their base behaviors (and more importantly their personnel who carry it out) are in violation of basic rights. Basic rights such as personal liberty and the pursuit of happiness, to name just two as an example.

This post serves to narrow the focus onto the main abusive policies of these two groups, and how they are exactly in parallel.

The Condemned

excommunicate_and_anathema

.

Anathema – Suppressive – Anti-social – Herem

.

To understand the word anathema (a Greek word) we need to look at the word herem (Jewish) of which it is the equivalent. Herem comes from the word haram, which means to cut off, to separate, to curse, and indicates that which is cursed and condemned to be cut off or exterminated, whether a person or a thing.

This is the sense of anathema in the following passage from Deuteronomy 7:26:

Neither shalt thou bring anything of the idol into thy house, lest thou become an anathema like it. Thou shalt detest it as dung, and shalt utterly abhor it as uncleanness and filth, because it is an anathema.

Idol here, means worshiping (or listening to) anything else or anyone else besides “God”.

This is giving you the attitudes and views that one “should” have towards people/things that are anathema.

  • Detest as dung (shit)
  • Utterly abhor
  • Unclean
  • Filthy

In modern times, you can see executives of the Church of Scientology behaving exactly this way in this video from October of 2014 –

Quotes –

…You guys are embarrassing and pathetic. Pathetic. Disgusting and it’s all over your face and you look terrible.

He’s such a loser.

…nobody gives a fuck about you.

You’re nothing.

You can see people behaving the same way towards myself, my husband, and my daughter in this internet forum, where the continued message is the same basic ideas as:

  • Detest as dung (shit)
  • Utterly abhor
  • Unclean
  • Filthy

In August of 2010, as part of a black intelligence operation in cahoots with Karen de la Carriere, a woman named Nancy Many (a self-professed former scientology intelligence operative) introduced my son to this same internet forum, where he immediately began carrying out the same basic propaganda under the guise of “his experiences growing up in scientology” – most of which never happened, by the way. The real focus was to attack me, and try to enforce public agreement with the same desired views towards me.

  • Detest as dung (shit)
  • Utterly abhor
  • Unclean
  • Filthy

This original “Help” thread, has now been hidden from public view by the board owner because it contains my husband and I posting there and raising questions as to Nancy’s motivations in doing this. Encouraging a son attacking his mother by someone (Nancy) who is supposedly against breaking up families as she supposedly is, does tend to create a perfect picture of ultimate hypocrisy – as do many other supposed “activists” for human rights present at that forum.

The timing of this is also key.

My husband Mike had just come out in public again, having formed his blog in June of 2010, where it quickly became clear we were not towing-the-party-line yet again.

In a little under a month, up pops my son out of nowhere posting on the previous meeting grounds of scientology discussions, a newsgroup called alt.religion.scientology.

He deleted his initial post just prior to Nancy bringing him on the other forum, presumably to erase the record of his having done so.

Tom_deleted_his_message_July_2010

Unfortunately for that plan, it was preserved anyway because someone replied to it and included the entire original intact.

You’ll notice practically the first thing he did was name me in a derogatory light, but buried in the rest is the propaganda line I mentioned: “One of the biggest things I had to overcome was all the subtle beliefs that were instilled in me from growing up in a scientology household.”

Less than two weeks later, Nancy Many, posting as Appledore2 introduces my son to the ex-scientologist message board (the original “Help” thread I mentioned).

nancy_many_brings_tom_out_1_sept_2010

“agentice” is a pseudonym my son uses – and another poster verifies that appledore2 is Nancy Many.

appledore2_is_nancy_many_-_helps_breaking_up_families

The first thing out of Nancy’s mouth was a lie –  “new to the internet”, Tom was anything but. The far uglier thing is her portrayal of my son’s story as being “VERY worthwhile”. She knew who I was, she had been on our private list when my husband and I first left the church, she knew my son was attacking me – and that is characterized as not only a worthwhile pursuit, but a very worthwhile pursuit.

Perhaps Nancy is just stupid, ignorant of the facts? some might say. But by her own account she was a professional undercover intelligence agent working for Scientology for over a decade, so I kind of doubt either ignorance or stupidity are even in the same room, let alone on the table when it comes to her.

I would welcome Nancy’s explanation of why she took it upon herself, with such interesting timing, to help a son attack his mother in a public forum, not only in an attempt to tar-and-feather his mother publicly, but the worst thing she did is to promote and help to further divide and split him from his mother.

You see, with both scientology and catholicism operatives, when religious fanaticism gets in the mix, things become not so easy as you might think, to navigate. It is not as simple as let’s just have a discussion and things will resolve, if it was, that would be easy. Unfortunately, with people like Nancy, and now my son, that is simply not possible, because this is a campaign.

Nancy and my son’s public attacks were immediately followed that same day by the sudden reappearance of David Griffin, in that same newsgroup alt.religion.scientology, in a posting done just eight hours after Nancy, titled: The War Ain’t Over….

Even more of not-a-coincidence, David had begun emailing, or rather trolling, in private email, within hours of Tom’s trolling post on alt.religion scientology, August 20th, 2010 – one of the people he was corresponding with was Karen De La Carriere, who told him that he could: “…find true and loyal friends of LRH on Marty’s blog.”, and inviting him to join her there in posting.

Karen gave him instructions on how to present himself: “But go introduce yourself as loyal to LRH but savvy to current DM cult.” – indicating there was an approved of propaganda line in place there at Marty’s blog. She makes it clear that posts to Marty’s blog, when and on what topic, is highly controlled, and that he should not make his post until after a post by Mike Rinder (that was planned) had been made. She also professed her deep love for L. Ron Hubbard to David: “My love for LRH is deeper than most. I spent long hours, days, weeks, months, years with him.

When David asked Karen why after his comment had been made (that he was supposed to wait to do) did Marty moderate it (deleted it) and yet allow one by Chuck Beatty to go through? Her response was to try and influence David with unsolicited personal background information about Chuck as a baby, but the real kicker was when she laid off Chuck’s “bad behavior” as being because he “only had brutalization and not true bridge” – as if all poor Chuck needed was “true” scientology and as if Karen ever gave a fig about the “bridge” of scientology at all in the first place.

This type of duplicitous behavior on the part of religious intelligence operatives, is all part of their plan.

See – Scientology: The Plan That Doesn’t Exist.

You see, in the process of enforcing disconnection and fair game, or anathema and ‘sword of god’ retribution, the goal is to destroy the “false” person utterly, if they refuse to reveal their “real” self, which, of course, would be in agreement with these so-called religiously enlightened.

This is the same in both scientology and Catholicism.

You are not the real you, until you are on the “approved” path, behaving in the approved manner, and not in any disapproved ways or manners.

I’ll give you a current example of a Catholicism supporter, who has the gall to attack scientology on the grounds of its disconnection and fair game policies, if you can believe that one.

That’s the EP*, mate. Getting the individual out of the brainwashed mindfuck and back to their real selves again. – Just Sheila

*EP = scientology parlance for end phenomena, meaning this is the goal they are seeking.

.

Their real selvesthat’s the excuse for the most heinous behavior throughout history by religious fanatics such as this.

Going from scientology ‘brainwashed mindfuck” to catholicism/christianity brainwashed mindfuck – isn’t exactly an improvement.

I figure either that person who said that is either a complete brainwashed idiot themselves, thinking they actually are a soldier of Christ fighting a ‘holy war’ against the forces of darkness, or they are a hired gun. I can’t decide which is worse.

You will often see these people heavily promote psychiatry and its bastard step-child, psychology, as the means to mask the demon, so to speak, so that that same ‘real’ you can have a ‘normal’ life. – See my posting Catholicism and Psychiatry: An Unlikely Mix – Or Is It?.

The interesting thing is, you will see both of them do this towards their ‘enemies’, or ‘bad’ people, they both promote psychiatric solutions to the character traits they find so offensive to their rigid and dogmatic beliefs.

That is how they treat those whom they condemn.

The Catholic bible goes a lot further than simple condemnation, the goal is utter destruction.

Nations, individuals, animals, and inanimate objects may become anathema, i.e. cursed and marked for extermination. When a people was anathematized by the Lord (meaning the Pope) they were to be entirely exterminated.

Moses says (Deuteronomy 7:1, 2):

“When . . . the Lord thy God shall have delivered them to thee, thou shalt utterly destroy them.

Strangely similar to L. Ron Hubbard’s intents towards anti-scientologists.

If possible, of course, ruin him utterly.

– L. Ron Hubbard Ability magazine, March 1955

I have recently heard scientology referred to as a genocidal master race cult, a concept which, yet again, is in perfect parallel with the biggest genocidal master race cult of them all – Christianity. I sometimes wonder about people who try to tar scientology and leave Catholicism out of it, I can’t decide whether they are just that ignorant, or whether they are just that dedicated to controlling public perception for their hidden masters – as in The Spy and His Master, a book by Christopher Felix that formed part of the recommended reading list for all scientology intelligence operatives.

In the New Testament of the bible, anathema entails the loss of goods and/or exclusion from the “society of the faithful.”

Loss of goods means…

They take your stuff.

 

Exactly what they did in the Inquisition. Anathema was used as part of an operation to gain money and power for the Catholic Church, while at the same time ruining utterly, their enemies who would challenge their “hold” over peoples minds, lives, and activities. They took over all the “heretics” possessions on accusation – all they had to do was accuse the person. No proof, just an accusation.

The other element here regarding the anathema label, is that it also means anyone who is against Christianity is “united to the devil.”

If any man love not our Lord Jesus Christ, let him be anathema.
-1 Corinthians 16:22

It is an exclusory term, and is most especially pronounced chiefly against heretics.

hereticOne who challenges the doctrines of an established church.

– – –

The Church of Scientology hides behind synonyms of this word, in trying to justify its behavior towards its critics, as well as trying to level insult and negative stereotyping against the “sinner” who dared challenge the doctrines of scientology. These synonyms in particular, are chosen to try and lessen their obvious heritage in common with the insane measures of Christianity.

They are dissenter and their special favorite – apostate.

There is some distinction between the ideas of anathema and excommunication within the Catholic Church. The distinction between them shows up in the Decree of Gratian (c. III, q. V, c. XII):

Know that Engeltrude is not only under the ban of excommunication, which separates her from the society of the brethren, but under the anathema, which separates from the body of Christ, which is the Church.

And we have a third idea as well – this involves hurting or damaging the person, ie: punishment.

Recited in chorus:

that he may be not only excommunicated, but anathematized, and that he may be stricken by the sword of Heaven [aka marinatha]

The Catholic Church has a ceremony it still does to this day, for pronouncing Anathema. It is called Ordo excommunicandi et absolvendi.

excommunication  excommunication2

excommunicate_and_anathema

The ceremony distinguishes three sorts of excommunication:

  • minor excommunication, incurred by a person holding communication with anyone under the ban of excommunication;
  • major excommunication, pronounced by the Pope in reading a sentence;
  • anathema and maranatha – the penalty incurred by crimes of the gravest order, and solemnly promulgated by the Pope.

Marinatha  is a command for the Lord to come and “strike” the person “by the sword of heaven”. It is a special category added to anathema, for those who were guilty of the crime of high treason.

This apparently consists of:

“He who dares to despise our decision.”

 

‘Our’ meaning a real person or persons who are in charge at the time, you understand, not some invisible personages called “God” or “Jesus Christ”.

If any man love not our Lord Jesus Christ, let him be anathema, maranatha.
– end of the first Epistle to the Corinthians, xvi, 22

He who dares to despise our decision, let him be stricken with anathema maranatha, i.e. may he be damned at the coming of the Lord, may he have his place with Judas Iscariot, he and his companions. Amen.
– Benedict XIV (1740-58–De Synodo dioecesana X, i)

This is a clip of Richard Burton delivering this ceremony in the movie Beckett, although you can tell they don’t quite have all the clothing theoretically accurate, but you get the general idea.

.

After all that, a notice is sent in writing to the priests and neighbouring bishops of the name of the one who has been excommunicated and the cause of his excommunication.

This is exactly as done in Scientology – called an Ethics Order.

The Catholic Church does this step as part of enforcing the no communication rule of everyone else towards the “anathema” person.

Again, exactly as done with scientology, they insist on disconnection from the “SP” or the person risks being declared SP themselves!

Furthermore, the Pontifical (the Catholic written order) gives the form of absolving him and reconciling him with the Church.

Exactly the same as Scientology – the person must renounce their former ideas and affiliations and repent, as part of the “steps” called A-E which must be completed to get back in the good graces of the Church of scientology.

What does condemned with anathema mean in modern (and medieval) practice?

If someone knowingly and publicly denies a defined (de fidei definita) doctrine of the Catholic Church – like Martin Luther did – he can be formally declared to be excommunicated or Anathema.

The justification given for this, is that it is supposedly a benevolent act done in order to “bring the one in error to his senses” – before it’s too late and he is damned to hell by virtue of his obstinacy.

This is so like the Church of Scientology’s Suppressive Person doctrines that it could have been lifted directly off the pages of the Vulgate (the first bible).

Per the Catholic encyclopedia, the whole point of the promulgation of the anathema is to strike terror to the criminal and bring him to a state of repentance, especially if the Church adds to it the ceremony of the Maranatha.

In scientology, we see the exact same tactics, and even the same threats toward the too independent-minded.

HCO PL 29 April 1965 Issue III ETHICS: REVIEW

The being who is guilty knows with certainty that he is offending against the future of all, no matter what his surface manifestations or conduct. Further, while wog law at the worst can only cause him or her some pain and a body by execution or one’s lifetime loss of liberty, we threaten his eternity.

This is in Volume I of the Scientology’s OEC (Organization Executive Course).

OEC_HCO_Volume_1

Ethics_Review_issue_-_threaten_eternity

When Scientology expels or anathematizes someone, they are consigning them to oblivion for all eternity. Just like the Catholic Church – damned.

You are threatening somebody with oblivion for eternity by expulsion from Scientology.”

expulsion_from_scientology_equals_oblivion_for_eternity

Here’s a real life example of a scientologist actually using this as an excuse to tear apart a family, children from their mother.

From Tony Ortega

…according to what [Lori] Hodgson heard through an intermediary, the man gave his kids a crushing ultimatum: if they didn’t disconnect from their own mother, he would disconnect from them.

No one’s going to take my eternity away from me,” he reportedly told his children.

– Village Voice, October 2011

.

Hubbard also writes that scientology’s ethics actions (SP declare) are: “a far worse threat than mere wog law.” and that anyone that is attacking scientology is: “..threatening all mankind.” – while gloating over having caved in a woman by telling her that.

ethics_-_review_threatening_all_mankind

Caved In =

reduced to apathy, no longer fighting back, gives up.

 

Much like you see supposed Catholic supporters trying to do in that discussion forum I mentioned earlier, as well as in other venues.

This, of course, is justified by that “real self” idea that the person needs to get back to, you see, it’s all good then, to cave in the “false” self.

It’s all very interesting, especially throwing sociopathy into the mix here, because its really just a matter of incorrect recognition from the outside – where it never belongs – of just who is the ‘real’ person.

Both Catholics (Christians) and Scientologists are so far off the mark on that, it’s literally almost inconceivable just how wrong they are.

What blows my mind even more than that, is how the same they are in how they are wrong.

Speaking of Hubbards’ gloating over having caved in that woman, he also writes that scientology discipline can drive someone crazy, which we just witnessed was his intent.

scientology_ethics_review_-_our_discipline_makes_people_crazy

Our discipline is quite capable of driving a person around the bend because of what he or she is attacking.

Note: The idiom “around the bend” means crazy.

In Hubbard’s advanced levels – the one called New Era Dianetics for Operating Thetans (NOTS) – the reader is indoctrinated with the threat that attackers and unbelievers of Scientology will end up as Dormant Body Thetans – disembodied spirits lost in hell, so to speak, doomed for all eternity.

In NED for OTs you are actually handling, in the main, dormant BTs and clusters. These are not really alive enough to run Incident IIs and Incident Is on. They have different considerations, these dormant BTs and clusters, but they add up to being dead or below being dead. They’re in the state that FBI agents and government officials eventually wind up in when they aren’t already simply an animated dormant cluster. If people who are busy trying to smash up Scientology realized what they themselves were heading for, they would have a couple of other thinks…

– L. Ron Hubbard, HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978, ISSUE I, NED for OTs Series 1, NED FOR OTs RD THEORY OF, p3,4 section Dormant BTs and Clusters
The NED for OTs Issues are available as part of the Operating Thetan Level Six course here and at Wikileaks. A complete file of all the different OT levels is also at Wikileaks.

That’s a threat, it’s saying that:

If you are a “smasher” of Scientology you will end up as a Body Thetan on someone else’s body.

You will be…

Not really alive.

Below being dead.

Damned.

 

That’s a hell of a thing to say to someone as part of a supposedly enlightened and advanced spiritual level.

I highly recommend you read the entire sections of my article A Comprehensive History of the Oahspe, where I am analyzing these “advanced” materials, they are just loaded with catholic iconography and sick ideas.

Both scientology and catholicism believe that there are demons that cause one’s bad behavior.

So we have in Catholicism:

  • Excommunication – separates and kicks out the person from “the society of the brethren”
  • Anathema – a major excommunication, it separates from the body of Christ – which is the Church itself. Anathema means that the person is barred from “going to heaven” because the Pope has the “keys”.
  • Stricken by the sword of Heaven (Marinatha) – black intelligence operations against the person to “destroy him utterly”. These include financial, familial, physical, and mental attacks on the person so designated as “deserving” of such treatment.

Scientology employs all three towards those who dare to challenge its doctrines and “superiority” in spiritual matters – as dictated by L. Ron Hubbard in 1965 and 1966.

  • Declare as Suppressive Person written order – bars the person from auditing and especially UPPER level services (the equivalent of “getting to heaven”) = Anathema
  • it’s Disconnection policies = Excommunication
  • it’s Fair Game policies and Guardian’s Office/Office of Special Affairs intelligence operations = “stricken by the sword of Heaven” = Maranatha

“We judge him damned and with the Devil…”

excommunication_-_we_judge_him_damned_and_with_the_devil– from the movie Beckett

.

Here is a side-by-side comparison of Catholic doctrine and scientology doctrine on this matter.

Starting with this:

“For I could wish that I myself were accursed and separated [anathema] from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my kin, according to the flesh” (Rom 9:3).

This is the equivalent of the Disconnection practice of scientology, practiced towards a person that has been declared “Suppressive Person”.

Friends, business relations, children, family, in fact anyone that is still a scientologist and connected with you, must disconnect as a so-called “choice” – or else face being declared a suppressive person themselves and be subjected to the same treatment.

.

This is exactly the same as the Catholic Church.

.

The Church of Scientology has both “tech” and policy that REQUIRES someone to disconnect from anyone declared by HCO as a Suppressive Person.

HCOB 10 September 1983 PTSness and Disconnection states the following:

To fail or refuse to disconnect from a suppressive person not only denies the PTS (person connected to a Suppressive Person) case gain, it is also supportive of the suppressive – in itself a Suppressive Act. And it must be so labeled.

Here’s the documentation – taken from scientology’s Technical Volume XII.

Tech_volume_12_-_ptsness_and_disconnection

ptsness_and_disconnection_-_disconnection_is_a_freedom

You will note that it starts out trying to PR position disconnection as a “freedom”.

Here is the part of this issue where it specifically discusses how to disconnect and that to fail to do so from a Suppressive Person is itself a Suppressive Act.

suppressive_act_to_not_disconnect

“Suppressive Acts” are a scientology ethics offense. This means that if the person does not disconnect from a declared SP – they will be declared.

These particular ones concerning failing to disconnect are specifically stated in scientology management Policy. The particular issue is contained in the Organization Executive Course; HCO Division, Volume 1.

This is my copy –

OEC_HCO_Volume_1

The policy itself is titled: Suppressive Acts, Suppression of Scientology and Scientologists, dated 23 December 1965 and revised twice – the most recent revision being 8 January 1991.

suppressive_acts_full_page

Under the heading of Suppressive Acts, we see the following contained in that list as two separate suppressive acts:

  • Continued adherence to a person or group pronounced a suppressive person or group by HCO.
  • Failure to handle or disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of suppressive acts.

Listing_of_Suppressive_Acts_-_High_Crimes_-_failure_to_disconnect_from_a_suppressive

Mike Rinder, former head of the Office of Special Affairs – in charge of tracking and targeting Suppressive Persons and their families, friends, employers etc. –  tells us that:

3.      An individual labeled a Suppressive, even if only due to continued association with someone ELSE who has been labeled a Suppressive, faces the reality of immediate family members (spouses, children, parents), friends, business associates and even employers who are Scientologists disconnected from them. Lost jobs, divorce, kicked out of school, refused service by doctors and many other ramifications from life altering to merely annoying.

4.      It is church policy that anyone who is declared has forfeited their right to participate in the activities of the church and is no longer eligible for auditing or training. This is the Scientology equivalent of being condemned to hell. It is a powerful motivating force.

blog post, May 30, 2013 – Mike Rinder

This is as close to an admission of complicity in enforcing this as can be found currently regarding people like myself and my husband.

Note: To this day, despite our asking, neither Mike Rinder nor Mark Rathbun have revealed the specifics on what they know concerning actions like this towards my husband and I.

 

Now that we have proven that Scientology’s scriptures in this area really do advocate such behavior, I’ll give you a very real example. My father.

For speaking out about alterations to Hubbard’s scriptures committed by persons supposedly entrusted to protect them, my husband and I were declared Suppressive Persons in 2000. These “Declares” are archived in the Just Dox – Scientology section of our Reading Library.

In 2010 my husband created a blog and we both began publicly writing along the lines of our actual interests. My father was a member “in good standing” of the Church, as it is called, but was not active at this time.

In 2012 approximately, our writings began being heavily documented concerning scientology’s true origins.

With no notification and with no public actions whatsoever on his part, that same year apparently, my father was secretly declared an SP for refusing to disconnect from me.

He was never even told about it.

Dead file list – Dad on it, captured video

dad sp declare

You can see the SP list yourself, as well as links to the captured videos and the forums where a complete list was compiled, in the Just Dox – Scientology section of our Reading Library.

Mike’s in there four times, and I’m listed as well.

We, my husband and I, and now my father, have all been (and are still) subjected to Fair Game practices against us.

Our families SP declares comprise both ends of the SP spectrum. My husband and I declared for speaking out against the Church and my father declared for refusing to disconnect.

Put together with over 15 years of Fair Game against us – our family story now comprises a picture-perfect microcosm of scientology’s extreme (and very Catholic-based) practices in action.

The Church considers SPs Fair Game, and the policy of the Church (and it’s true masters) is to destroy the person utterly. That is exactly what they tried to do to my father – just because he wouldn’t disconnect from me and was supportive of me!

If any man love not our Lord Jesus Christ, let him be anathema, maranatha.
– end of the first Epistle to the Corinthians, xvi, 22

He who dares to despise our decision, let him be stricken with anathema maranatha, i.e. may he be damned at the coming of the Lord, may he have his place with Judas Iscariot, he and his companions. Amen.
– Benedict XIV (1740-58–De Synodo dioecesana X, i)

You can see from our earlier reference studies, that “crimes of the gravest order” include publicly speaking out against Catholic Christianity and challenging the veracity of their doctrines. You can also see that a person can be excommunicated for just talking to anyone already excommunicated, let alone supporting them as much as my father was doing.

Again, this is exactly the same in scientology – all of the above actions are labelled “Suppressive Acts”, and the sword of God will be employed globally, in all aspects of the condemned person’s life to punish him in order to force him back in the fold.

They don’t care where, or what you choose, they only care that you stop doing what you are doing.

Hubbard actually formed a whole organization specifically for dealing with “enemies” of the Church – people labeled SP, like me, my husband, and my father.

To get things started, Ron Hubbard wrote a policy 1 March 1966 The Guardian. It established the Guardian Office, some of its bureaus were Intelligence, Public Relations and Legal. The GO dealt with critics of Scientology and its bureaus leveled a combined assault on targeted critics.

The Guardian Office was the vehicle for applying the Fair Game Policy previously mentioned. Especially the Intelligence unit, which ran black intelligence operations against critics to cost the person his job, to get him jailed, and any other way possible to ruin the critic’s life completely.

The Church’s Intelligence unit has staff in Churches all around the world.

The Guardian Office and it’s 1981 replacement created by Mark Rathbun, the Office of Special Affairs, have four bureaus that work together to deal with people labeled as Fair Game by the Church. The 4 bureaus are Intelligence, Public Relations, Legal, and Finance.

Intelligence runs black intelligence operations on the person, as a way to stop the attack. This is called Fair Game.
Public Relations tries to PR their way out of the “attack”.
Legal tries to sue their way out of the “attack”.
Finance buys their way out of the “attack”.

When the first three bureaus fail to stop the “attack”, Finance bureau then pays to stop it.

This, in a nutshell, is what the Guardian’s Office was, and what the current Office of Special Affairs is.

Further reading material –

Nancy Many, who fronted my son’s obviously orchestrated attack on myself and my husband, worked for both of these Fair-Gaming organizations.

Nancy was raised Catholic, and it is my opinion that this is part of how she justifies such attacks on persons deemed anathema or “suppressive”.

I don’t care how many books she writes, or soap-opera tv shows she ‘speaks out’ on, to try and build her image as a ‘former cult member’ or whatever the frack she thinks she’s doing. The simple fact remains that you can use us as an excellent yardstick to gauge her real motivations and intentions.

She was happy to bring a son out publicly against his mother, a mother who just happens to have been declared SP by the very intelligence people that she supposedly “used to” work for.

You do the math.

.

Next, here’s another exactly parallel doctrine of Scientology and Catholicism – a concept called ‘squirreling’.

“If anyone preaches to you a gospel other than the one that you received, let that one be accursed [anathema]!” (Gal 1:9, see also 1 Cor 16:22).

In scientology, a “gospel other than the one you received” is called squirreling. Only the approved scriptures of L. Ron Hubbard can be practiced. Altering and adding to Hubbard’s materials is strictly verboten, and is labeled a Suppressive Act which can lead to declaring the person formally a Suppressive Person.

This is the equivalent of “accursed” and publicly named Anathema.

In the same issue that lists the Suppressive Acts (that we already covered) you see that one listed there as well – twice even.

squirrelling_is_suppressive_act

Considering that’s exactly what we caught them (Church officials) doing, our being declared “Suppressive” for revealing this has a certain amount of strong irony to it.

Much the same though, it’s interesting that the charge we levied against the Church – squirreling their materials – was much the same as another charge that Martin Luther levied against the Catholic Church. He charged that essentially they (the priests/pope) were not teaching the true nature of spirituality and that they were altering/creating materials purely to suit their desires for power and money – and in fact were keeping people down spiritually.

– – –

The Reason

 

To review –

So we have in Catholicism:

  • Excommunication – separates and kicks out the person from “the society of the brethren”
  • Anathema – a major excommunication, it separates from the body of Christ – which is the Church itself. Anathema means that the person is barred from “going to heaven” because the Pope has the “keys”.
    • minor excommunication, incurred by a person holding communication with anyone under the ban of excommunication;
    • major excommunication, pronounced by the Pope in reading a sentence;
    • anathema and maranatha – the penalty incurred by crimes of the gravest order, and solemnly promulgated by the Pope.Subcategories:
    • The Pontifical (the Catholic written order) gives the form of absolving him and reconciling him with the Church.
    • demons cause bad and behavior and disagreement with “the path”  = Anathema
  • If someone knowingly and publicly denies a defined (de fidei definita) doctrine of the Catholic Church – like Martin Luther did – he can be formally declared to be excommunicated or Anathema.
  • Marinatha  is a command for the Lord to come and “strike” the person “by the sword of heaven”. It is a special category added to anathema, for those who were guilty of the crime of high treason.
    The justification given for this, is that it is supposedly a benevolent act done in order to “bring the one in error to his senses” – before it’s too late and he is damned to hell by virtue of his obstinacy.
  • Notice is sent in writing to the priests and neighbouring bishops of the name of the one who has been excommunicated and the cause of his excommunication.as part of enforcing the no communication rule of everyone else towards the “anathema” person.
  • Stricken by the sword of Heaven (Marinatha) – black intelligence operations against the person to “destroy him utterly”. These include financial, familial, physical, and mental attacks on the person so designated as “deserving” of such treatment.

Scientology employs all of the above towards those who dare to challenge its doctrines and “superiority” in spiritual matters – as dictated by L. Ron Hubbard in 1965 and 1966.

  • Declare as Suppressive Person written order – bars the person from auditing and especially UPPER level services (the equivalent of “getting to heaven”) = Anathema
  • Labelled as ‘squirreling’ any questioning or disagreeing with their practices = Anathema
  • it’s Disconnection policies = Excommunication
  • Person gets Declared as Suppressive and excommunicated for talking to or failing to disconnect from one named Anathema = Excommunication
  • it’s Fair Game policies and Guardian’s Office/Office of Special Affairs intelligence operations = “stricken by the sword of Heaven” = Maranatha
  • demons cause bad and “reactive” behavior = Anathema

They both want the person viewed as –

.

“We judge him damned and with the Devil…”

excommunication_-_we_judge_him_damned_and_with_the_devil– from the movie Beckett

.

Finally, let’s expand further on the justification, the “why this is ok” reason given for the darkly satanic practices of Anathema. Catholic scriptures discuss that excommunication/anathema is supposedly a benevolent act done in order to “bring the one in error to his senses” before it’s too late and the person is damned to hell simply by virtue of his obstinacy.

Again, we have the exact same thing in Scientology scriptures.

{re: Sp’s} …they cannot be granted the rights ordinarily accorded rational beings. If a person or a group that has committed a suppressive act comes to his, her or their senses and recants

sps_have_no_rights_-_have_to_come_to_their_senses

So, see, there’s that one – the bring to their senses bit.

Now for the other two parts – the kindness, the benevolence of labelling someone Anathema, so that you can get them back.

Again, we have the exact same thing in Scientology scriptures.

This is from the same volume, but a different issue. This one is titled: Writing of an Ethics Order and is dated 2 June 1965.

Note: SP “declares” are also referred to as Ethics Orders.

writing_of_an_ethics_order

On the second page of the issue (p. 968) regarding “labeling” somebody an SP –

labeling_SP_is_a_kind_action_and_you_get_them_back_someday

If you label them, you get them back in some day. If you don’t label them, they are far more likely to vanish forever.

Labeling them is a kind action.

Vanish forever, being the equivalent of comdemned to hell.

And there you have it – there are those same Catholic points in scientology, as plain as the nose on your face.

On the subject of Anathema persons (SPs) having no rights – Hubbard actually didn’t just make that policy; he made it part of the sacrosanct “tech” of scientology the following year – 1966.

The name of the relevant technical bulletin (HCOB) by Hubbard is THE ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY, THE ANTI-SCIENTOLOGIST, published 27 September 1966.

In this bulletin, Hubbard makes the point of that these people (the anti-social, the Suppressive Person/Anti-Scientologist) should be isolated as if they are diseased. He writes:

Similarly, if society were to recognize this personality type as a sick being as they now isolate people with small pox, both social and economic recoveries could occur.

isolate_the_anti-social_or_SP

A little later on he attempts to mitigate the obvious shades of Spanish Inquisition he’s got going here, labelling these “heretics” as “bad” people who should be deprived of all rights and freedom, and engages in a little hair-splitting on a minor point to try and distract the reader from the heinous ideas he is actually advocating.

He writes:

{regarding testing for “anti-social” characteristics}…Anyone who took it could be found guilty. While this mechanism might have suited the times of the Inquisition, it would not suit modern needs.

As the society runs, prospers and lives solely through the efforts of social personalities, one must know them as they, not the antisocial, are the worthwhile people. These are the people who must have rights and freedom. Attention is given to the antisocial solely to protect and assist the social personalities in the society.

And ergo the antisocial – as determined by religious nutcases like the Catholic Church, Scientology, Mormon, Muslim, etc. – is not a worthwhile person.

only_social_persons_have_rights_and_freedom

.

Nancy Many’s introduction of my son’s story – versus mine, of course – as being very ‘worthwhile’ takes on an even more sinister intent.

And let’s not forget her “handler” – Karen de la Carriere’s role in all this.

jessie_nancy_tory_jackson_karen_graham_agp2.

* * *

.

So, we have Psychiatry, Psychology, Christianity, Scientology, and Mormonism all united in the extermination of traits, thoughts, actions and people themselves, that they do not like.

With the same solutions brought all the way forward into modern times and simply re-worded.

Exactly like monstrous CIA MKultra psychiatrist Dr. Ewen Cameron, L. Ron Hubbard offers the same two solutions.

  • One: Auditing – erasing the bad “engrams” or memories , the demons, causing unacceptable or aberrated behavior – Cameron advocates the same thing. Blank slate of unacceptable memories and personality traits.
  • Two: Deletion, Removal, Destruction of the “weak” people themselves – where Cameron also ominously states: we shall find ways to put an end to them.

Cameron is also covertly advocating Genocide.

The similarity here in Hubbard’s directives as to how persons labeled “Suppressive Person” – like this – should be treated is simply astounding.

Scientologists must disconnect from the “SP”, they can be deprived of property, and have no rights whatsoever.

They call it – The Fair Game policy. (Which they later alleged was cancelled, but that was the naming of people Fair Game. They still label people Suppressive Person, and the practice of Fair Game against such people – like myself (and my husband) – continues to this day.

Google News

mike_-_2000_article

[Suppressive Person] Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.

— L. Ron Hubbard, “PENALTIES FOR LOWER CONDITIONS”, HCO Policy Letter of 18 October 1967.

As I said once before, it does give one pause to hazard the idea that perhaps all these “versions” of religion and new age front groups are really just perverse methods of pro and against propagation of Catholic ideas, ie: controlled opposition, and people like Nancy Many’s role in it.

Creating, facilitating, and enjoying a false abyss of difference where there should not be one, is just plain evil.

By

Virginia McClaughry

Join the conversation! 2 Comments

  1. Scientology(SC) and Catholicism have absolutely nothing in common and trying to compare SC and the C of $ with any mainstream religion is absolutely ridiculous.

    SC is a dangerous cult which abuses its followers and those working for it . It is a money generating machine whose principal and overwhelming rationale for existence is to coerce large amounts of cash from both its followers and its staff for the grandiose empire building of its sociopathic leaders and for their own personal enjoyment and luxury life styles.. It is run at the top by mentally disturbed criminals who think nothing of using blackmail, threats, defamation, physical violence, mental and physical harassment on anyone that disagrees with them, and on their own staff and followers who either fall out of favour with them or decide to leave their dangerous cult.

    They run an institution(not a Church) based on a set of phoney beliefs invented by a scifi writer to con and defraud gullible and vulnerable people in society, and anyone else they can attract, out of very large sums of money. They enslave, abuse and persecute their staff, as well as the young children of staff, paying them miniscule wages and entrapping them in the cult. They rip apart families all based on their phoney, warped and anti-social invented beliefs.

    There is absolutely nothing these people or the C of $ itself have in common with any mainstream respectable Church of God. They most certainly have nothing in common with the Catholic Church other than the fact that they are laughably allowed to get away with calling themselves a “church” because no Government has yet had the fortitude to take on this phoney criminal organization in any comprehensive fashion. If you think not then join up the catholic church, go to a few masses and see how they operate and deal with their people because it bears absolutely no resemblance to what you have seen in the C of $.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Category

All that Spy Stuff, Historical Research, what is valid data

Tags

, , , , , , , ,