Repeat and repeat till they say what you
Repeat and repeat till they are helpless
before your repetitions.
Say it over and over till their brains can
hold only what you are saying.
Speak it soft, yell it and yell it, change
to a whisper, always in repeats.
Come back to it day on day, hour after hour,
till they say what you tell them to say.
To wash ABC out of a brain and replace it
With X Y Z–
this is it.
– Carl Sandburg. “Brainwashing” In: Harvest Poems, 1910-1960.
Dr. Ewen Cameron had been hoping to correct schizophrenia by erasing existing memories and “reprogramming” the psyche.
Early in his career, he started to distinguish populations between “the weak” and “the strong”.
Those with anxieties or insecurities and who had trouble with the state of the world were labeled as:
Of course, included within that category of “trouble with the state of the world”
would be anyone who opposed the British new world “order” plan.
Cameron said these “weak” could not cope with life and had to be isolated from society by “the strong”.
Cameron further argued that “the weak” must not be allowed to influence children. He promoted a philosophy where chaos could be prevented by removing the weak from society.
He began to document these “types” that should be removed, beginning with a lecture called: Recognition of harmful personalities, in 1947.
If we can succeed in inventing means of changing their attitudes and beliefs, we shall find ourselves in possession of measures which, if wisely used, may be employed in freeing ourselves from their attitudes and beliefs in other fields which have greatly contributed to the instability of our period by their propensity for holding up progress.
—Cameron on the Germans, in lecture: Life is For Living, 1948
Hubbard also proposed to “change” the aberrated behavior and beliefs of people – exactly like Cameron – one method being by removing memories called “engrams”.
He duplicated Cameron on this point a mere two years after Cameron’s lecture of 1948.
See Two Little Men Hanging By Their Heels about how Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health paralleled Cameron and Cameron’s boss, Dr. Wilder Penfield; also see my article on the The Covert Origins of Dianetics.
The year that Science of Survival came out – 1951 – Hubbard’s second book, happened to be the same year that Cameron also presented his formed bias in the area.
Cameron and Hubbard were like two peas in a pod when it came to what to do with these “weak” people that did not deserve to be a part of society.
Watch how exactly Hubbard and Cameron parallel the same ideas – the #1 Slavemaster propaganda – Tabula Rasa as being the best solution, (with them writing on the now blank tablet) and their solutions for those who do not allow this to take place.
See A Comprehensive History of Oahspe, the section on Tabula Rasa (blank slate).
On October 17, 1951, Cameron presented his ideas in a lecture entitled Dangerous Men and Women. It describes various personalities that he believed were of marked danger to all members of society.
The last type, Cameron described, is the psychopath, who he referred to as the greatest danger in times of political and societal upheaval; this he labeled “the Gestapo”.
Note: Ron Hubbard did the same – he later wrote a “scripture” for scientologists called: The Anti-Social Personality; The Anti-Scientologist – otherwise known as “The Suppressive Person”. See Scientology Harassment Policies – Documented and the 12 Characteristics of the Anti-Social Personality – this is Hubbard’s description of the “psychopath” category – just like Cameron’s.
Cameron’s finger-pointing is pretty disgusting considering the experiments that he already was engaged in with Wilder Penfield at McGill, and the far worse ones that he was about to engage in under the auspices of MKUltra projects.
He ought to take a look in the mirror. The devil he seeks is right in front of him.
Cameron also stated in his lecture:
Get it understood how dangerous these damaged, sick personalities are to ourselves – and above all, to our children, whose traits are taking form and we shall find ways to put an end to them.
He spoke about Germans, but also to the larger portion of the society that resembled or associated with such traits.
For Cameron, the traits were contagious and anyone affected by the societal, cultural or personality forms would themselves be infected. Cameron used his ideas to implement policies on who should govern and/or parent in society. The described types would have to be eliminated from society if there was to be peace and progress.
These “weak” (and “sick” – all classified as mentally ill by Cameron) were, for Cameron, the viral infection to its stability and health. These “types” of Cameron’s, were the enemies of society and life.
Per Cameron, the “Experts must develop methods of forcefully changing attitudes and beliefs.”
– some of the information above is courtesy of Father, Son and CIA by Harvey Weinstein.
Now take a look at Hubbard regarding the point of contagion – in 1950.
Disease is contagious. Germs, traveling from one individual to another, wander through an entire society, respecting none until stopped by such things as sulfa or penicillin.
Aberrations are contagious. Like germs they respect none and carry forward from individual to individual, from parents to child, respecting none until they are stopped by dianetics.
…Aberrated parents are certain to infect their children with engrams.
– Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health; CHAPTER VIII Contagion of Aberration
Take a look at Hubbard here, in the same year as Cameron’s “dangerous” people lecture (1951).
There are only two answers for the handling of people from 2.0 down on the tone scale, neither one of which has anything to do with reasoning with them or listening to their justification of their acts.
The first is to raise them on the tone scale by unenturbulating some of their theta by any one of the three valid processes.
The other is to dispose of them quietly and without sorrow.
Adders are safe bedmates compared to people on the lower bands of the tone scale. Not all the beauty nor the handsomeness nor artificial social value nor property can atone for the vicious damage such people do to sane men and women.
The sudden and abrupt deletion of all individuals occupying the lower bands of the tone scale from the social order would result in an almost instant rise in the cultural tone and would interrupt the dwindling spiral into which any society may have entered.
It is not necessary to produce a world of clears in order to have a reasonable and worthwhile social order; it is only necessary to delete those individuals who range from 2.0 down, either by processing them enough to get their tone level above the 2.0 line — a task which, indeed, is not very great, since the amount of processing in many cases might be under fifty hours, although it might also in others be in excess of two hundred — or simply quarantining them from the society.
Note: Out of the other side of his mouth, Hubbard had just said in the Dianetics book that:
A society which practices punishment of any kind against any of its members is carrying on a contagion of aberration.
– Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health; CHAPTER VIII Contagion of Aberration, 1950
…A Venezuelan dictator once decided to stop leprosy. He saw that most lepers in his country were also beggars. By the simple expedient of collecting and destroying all the beggars in Venezuela an end was put to leprosy in that country.
– L. Ron Hubbard, from “The Science of Survival”, CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN; COLUMN Y Method Used By Subject To Handle Others
Note: Why does Hubbard compare his ideas of treatment of these “adders” to the idea of leprosy – and the solution taken of “destroying” all the beggars?
He is covertly advocating
Exactly like Cameron.
Also exactly like Cameron, he offers the same two solutions.
One: Auditing – erasing the bad “engrams” or memories – Cameron advocates the same thing. Blank slate of unacceptable memories.
Two: Deletion, Removal, Destruction of the “weak” people themselves – where Cameron also ominously states: we shall find ways to put an end to them.
Cameron is also covertly advocating
Let’s look at some of those other “ways” – for example, the quarantine or “exile” idea (where conditions are horrifying and death is pretty much assures).
That’s the other reason Hubbard brings up the Leprosy example.
Leprosy (Hansen’s disease) is uniquely stigmatized. Widespread in Europe during the Middle Ages, people diagnosed with leprosy were pronounced “civilly dead,” and were not allowed to own property or to bequeath it. The European attitude towards people who were believed (as in some were just accused of it to get rid of them) to have the disease was:
Shun them and separate them from the community –
regard them as unclean and “loathsome” both physically and spiritually.
The similarity here in Hubbard’s directives as to how persons labeled “Suppressive Person” – like this – is simply astounding.
Scientologists must disconnect from the “SP”, they can be deprived of property, and have no rights whatsoever.
They call it – The Fair Game policy. (Which they later alleged was cancelled, but that was the naming of people Fair Game. They still label people Suppressive Person, and the practice of Fair Game against such people – like myself (and my husband) – continues to this day.
[Suppressive Person] Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.
— L. Ron Hubbard, “PENALTIES FOR LOWER CONDITIONS”, HCO Policy Letter of 18 October 1967.
As you can see, Hubbard is right in line with Ewen Cameron in treating certain people as diseased or “lepers”.
Lepers were forced into incarceration in thousands of “leprosaria” that were built across the continent. These institutions segregated the population of people who had (or were suspected or accused of having) the condition. By the mid 1500’s, Leprosy was almost competely disappeared, and these same institutions were then used to incarcerate the “mentally ill” – whether they were really or not, much like the whole “he’s a leper!” stigma.
In the 1800’s the nation of Hawaii enacted a law that legally enforced exile for people in Hawaii who had leprosy, making Hawaii the first nation in the world to institute such a treatment.The village of Kalaupapa, a peninsula on the island of Moloka’i was the chosen site.
Lepers were considered criminals, and anyone who supported them was also viewed as a criminal, and was forced to “disconnect” from family members so-labelled.
Again, exactly like both Cameron and Hubbard’s stigmatic views towards people they didn’t like or approve of.
Now, you and I both know that there will be some so-called rational people out there (including scientologists) that will try to click their heels together and say:
There’s no similarity between them.
Dianetics is different.
Scientology is different.
My answer to that is –
Then there’s the so-called critical side of things – which seem never to have bothered to draw attention to the obvious parallels between Hubbard, British Intelligence, and Biological Psychiatry.
Their mantra –
Scientology (Dianetics) is opposed to Psychiatry.
Psychiatry is opposed to Scientology (Dianetics).
My answer to that is the same.
What we have here, with all that business, is a single point where they ALL align (and lie) thereby revealing an underlying co-ordination of the whole thing.
Do you see it?
– written and researched by Virginia McClaughry